Posted on 10/29/2018 6:16:28 PM PDT by marshmallow
An Islamic school which taught that only Muslims and animals were saved on Noahs ark has become the first to be successfully prosecuted for operating illegally.
The Al-Istiqamah Learning Centre in west London marketed itself as a study centre where home-educated children had part-time tuition, but Ofsted inspectors found that almost 60 children of compulsory school age were regularly attending the centre during school hours.
The case was referred to the Crown Prosecution Service after the centre failed to respond to Ofsteds warning notice in November 2017.
Director Nacerdine Talbi and Headteacher Beatrix Kinga Bernhardt have now become the first people convicted of running an unregistered independent school and were each given a three-month curfew and ordered to pay a total of £970 towards costs. The school has also been fined £100.
HM Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman welcomed the verdict and said that it sent an important message to other unregistered schools, some of which she said deny children a proper education and leave them at risk of harm and, in some instances, radicalisation.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
“only Muslims and animals were saved on Noahs ark”
so Noah saved one species then?
Anybody saved on the ark would be long dead by now, Muslim or not.
Hope they were penned with the swine.
**pay a total of £970 towards costs. The school has also been fined £100. **
In U. S. dollars?
Riight ... so if you’re not mooslim, you must be an an animal.
“...Muslims and animals...”
Isn’t that redundant?
Muslims didn’t even exist until 600 AD or so.
“Hope they were penned with the swine.”
That’s why the story is ridiculous. Then again, these pukes also rape animals in real life..
Why did the muslims even bring a pair of pigs onto their ark?
What a garbage bag of a fake religion.
I hope their “school” of blatant lies closes. Burns down. Is deconstructed. Closes.
Not sure what you are asking there.
2. A Spelling Mistake
gopher {go'-fer} unknown (Ref 3)
kopher {ko'-fer} pitch Did kopher become gopher? One would expect a scribe to make an error the other way round - a foreign word turning into a familiar word (gopher becomes kopher). Considering that this is the sole appearance of the word in the whole bible, this is a big claim - and untestable. There would need to be some collaborative evidence to label this a text error. Simply claiming the word looks like something else is insufficient evidence. Did the scribes have a lot of trouble mixing up g & k? Surely the next scribe would spot the imaginary word gopher and go back to kopher. Besides, if kopher was the original, the verse would have been "Make yourself an ark of pitched wood; make rooms in the ark, and cover it inside and outside with pitch." Seems to be bordering on tautology.
WWF: GOPHER WOOD or GO FOR WOOD? © Tim Lovett June 2004, Sept 04
You mean there’s no such thing as a gopher tree?
:^) Correct. And the modern imitation Arks were built using modern power tools and such, and have over 300 man-years of labor in them.
I wonder where they find the reference to any religion way back in Genesis....
Anybody else want to make that stupid claim now???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.