Of course the Washington Post would give soundinding-board for the Jesuit homo-enabler to whine about how he's "Catholic" and in "good-standing".
1 posted on
09/21/2017 11:56:22 AM PDT by
ebb tide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: ebb tide
2 posted on
09/21/2017 11:57:47 AM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
Washington comPost AND James Martin? Doesn’t that sort of call for a double bharf alert?
To: ebb tide
Loving gays does not mean condoning their sins.
To: ebb tide
You can judge these unofficial inquisitions by their fruits. Kind of funny seeing that fruitcake talk about "fruits".
To: ebb tide
And in each of the cities in which the talk was scheduled, the local bishop (in each case a cardinal) had no qualms about the upcoming lecture.Goes to show how corrupt Francis' college of cardinals is.
6 posted on
09/21/2017 12:00:57 PM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
> Pope Francis himself, for example, is a frequent target. In this way, such supposedly traditional Catholic websites are subverting tradition.
This Pope is a Marxist anti-Christ.
7 posted on
09/21/2017 12:01:43 PM PDT by
JohnyBoy
(We should forgive communists, but not before they are hanged.)
To: ebb tide
I called for Christians to love gay people. Now the Catholic alt-right is taking revenge. Well, no -- you didn't call for Christians to love gay people. You called for Christians to pretend that gay people are normal, and that homosexuality is not an abomination in the eyes of God.
Begone, you freak.
8 posted on
09/21/2017 12:04:30 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
To: ebb tide
Father Martin is not being quite honest here. He actually called on Christians to condone gay behavior and gay marriage. That’s what prompted the response, not some call to love gay people. Given this, I don’t think it’s wise to add lying to his list of sins.
To: ebb tide
I can love the sinner and hate the sin. But I can’t love anything this perv priest says
11 posted on
09/21/2017 12:08:35 PM PDT by
Veto!
(Political Correctness Offends Me)
To: ebb tide
We do call for love of all.
We also call for repentance by all.
15 posted on
09/21/2017 12:30:44 PM PDT by
ctdonath2
(It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
To: ebb tide
We love the sinners, but the unrepenting sinner who cannot see and love better than himself in an unindulging ungay person is evil and dead in the soul still
16 posted on
09/21/2017 12:36:16 PM PDT by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: ebb tide
We should love gay people, but which is more loving:
- telling people tempted in that direction to ignore the disease rates among those who engage in gay sex, telling them to ignore scripture, and telling them there is nothing wrong with engaging in those actions even though those who do have extraordinarily high rates of depression and suicide, or
- showing them the joy of following God’s word, leading by example as we turn difficult decisions over to the All-knowing, and embracing those who accept God’s sovereignty over our lives with the pure love of Christian brotherhood?
19 posted on
09/21/2017 12:52:25 PM PDT by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: ebb tide
It is Godly to love the sinner while hating the sin. It is not Godly to ignore, enable or encourage the sin.
20 posted on
09/21/2017 12:58:42 PM PDT by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: ebb tide
No, Father. Confirming people in a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance isn’t love. And the most loving thing someone can do for you is defrock & excommunicate you.
21 posted on
09/21/2017 1:06:30 PM PDT by
surroundedbyblue
(Proud to be an Infidel & a deplorable.)
To: ebb tide
Martin is who he is and I don't believe he's the real problem here. I believe the
real problem is Martin's Jesuit superiors who have given his book the "thumbs up" and who continue to insist that he is doing a fine job, as well as certain cardinals who have read the book and publicly come out in support of it. IOW, I believe Martin is simply the voice of an organized group of sodomites further up the hierarchy who are using him as a spokesman.
In a sane world, Martin would be silenced and laicized for his antics but he knows that won't happen because the lavender mafia has his back. He's utterly without fear and in our faces every day which means that this goes right up the chain of command.
To: ebb tide
Fr. Martin’s ideas are all about enabling sinful behavior and playing the victim when the devout resist his sophistry. Love has nothing to do with it.
23 posted on
09/21/2017 1:28:55 PM PDT by
Antoninus
("In Washington, swamp drain you.")
To: ebb tide
zero legitimacy in the Church
so who gets to determine 'legitimacy in the church' these days?
27 posted on
09/21/2017 2:42:41 PM PDT by
wafflehouse
(RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
To: ebb tide
The failure of the Vatican to purge these pervert priests shows they are in approval of their message.
28 posted on
09/21/2017 2:56:32 PM PDT by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23)
To: ebb tide
“Catholic Alt-Right” - the demonization of the good is accelerating.
Thanks all for the terrific dead-on responses on this thread. If that Straw-Man Martin ever calls out FR as part of the “Catholic Alt-Right”, apparently I’m all in.
To: ebb tide
The well-known sodomite needs to crawl back under his rock.
30 posted on
09/21/2017 3:14:12 PM PDT by
NKP_Vet
("Man without God descends into madness")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson