Posted on 06/29/2017 7:47:51 AM PDT by Salvation
Almost two decades ago, as a younger priest, I remember trying to save a marriage. Sadly, by the second counseling session I concluded that the couple really had no intention of trying to save the marriage. Rather, they were looking to me to assuage their guilt and to console them by telling them they were really “doing the right thing,” that God wanted them to be happy and would not mind if they divorced. I could do no such thing.
At a critical moment the couple said, in effect, “We are really doing this for the sake of the children. We don’t want them to suffer with all of our bickering.” To which I replied, “Then stop the bickering!” As they looked at me incredulously, I went on to urge them to get whatever help they needed to work through their differences. I insisted that God hates divorce and that divorce is not good for children; reconciliation is what they want and need.
Realizing that they were not going to get the approval and consolation they sought, the couple ended the session and did not return. They finalized their divorce. Their three children went on to be subject to things far worse than bickering: being carted around to different households on weekends, meeting Dad’s new girlfriend, accepting a stepdad, always secretly wishing that Mom and Dad would love each other again.
I thought of that story (and others like it) as I was reading this book, published in May: Primal Loss: The Now Adult Children of Divorce Speak, by Leila Miller. It should be required reading for anyone who thinks that divorce is “good thing” for their children—or even for them.
Consider the following passage from the book, in which a woman writes of suffering through her parent’s divorce during her youth:
My grandparents’ generation had to deal with a lot — war, undiagnosed PTSD, and alcoholism—but they had a noble idea: That you sacrificed your own happiness for your children’s well-being. You took on all the heartache so they didn’t have to. …
My parent’s generation inverted that. They decided it was better a child should have her world torn apart than that an adult should bear any suffering. Of course, they didn’t frame it that way. They wanted to believe that the child would suffer less, because children were just extensions of the mother, and the mother would theoretically be happier [p. 131].
It is shocking logic, but widespread in our culture. Indeed, the whole conversation about marriage today is about adults and what makes them happy; children are something of an afterthought. Marriage is said to be about romance, being happy, and “finding a soulmate.” But if one asks a couple about having children, a common response is, “Oh sure, that too. We’ll probably have a kid or two … when we’re ready.” Children are seen more as a way of accessorizing the marriage, as an “add-on” rather than the essential work of a marriage.
Yet the biblical and traditional understanding of marriage has its entire structure made sensible by its central work: procreation and the subsequent raising of the children. That a man and a woman should enter a stable, lifelong union makes sense because that is what is necessary and best for children. Marriage is about children and has its very structure directed toward what is best for them. Physically, emotionally, psychologically, and spiritually, a child is best raised by a father and a mother who are stably present and who manifest the masculine and feminine genius of being human. To intentionally subject children to anything less or anything different does them an injustice.
The divorce culture casts this aside and insists that marriage is about adults and what makes them happy. If there are children in the picture, don’t worry, they’ll adjust; kids are resilient. Or so the thinking goes.
Leila Miller has done a wonderful service in showing that children are not so resilient after all. In fact, even long after attaining adulthood, these victims of their parents’ divorces still suffer painful and lasting effects. Ms. Miller interviewed 70 adult children of divorce and let them speak for themselves.
Many were surprised that anyone was interested or even cared about what they thought or had experienced. One of the more common experiences shared was a “we’re not going to talk about the divorce” mentality. Never mind the awkwardness of Mom and Dad marrying others. We’re supposed to go along with the drastic changes and be delighted, happily accept new siblings, and call some man “Dad” (or some woman “Mom”) who really isn’t. We want to make sure that no one’s feelings get hurt, so we’re all going to be nice and pleasant. The unspoken message in this is that the feelings of the children matter less and must be sacrificed so that others—mainly adults—can be happy and “get on with their lives.”
Some who have read this book say, “Finally, someone understands.” Or “Wow, that’s just how I feel!” The powerful, articulate testimonies in it will help those who had to live through divorce to name and understand their own hurts and feelings, not merely so as to brood or to reopen old wounds, but to the bring them to the light and seek deeper healing.
I cannot recommend this book enough. It is a healing for those who have suffered and, I pray, a strong medicine to prevent divorce. As Christians, let’s remember that God designed marriage to be what is best for children. The truest happiness any father or mother can find will be the knowledge that they made the sacrifices necessary to be sure that their children were raised well and prepared for life here, and even more, for eternal life.
Disclaimer: Not everyone who is divorced came to be so in the same way. Some tried hard to save their marriage but their spouse was unwilling. Others came to conversion later in life. Still others were physically endangered during the marriage. This essay is not to be construed as a general condemnation of all who are divorced. Rather, it is a heartfelt plea that amidst today’s divorce culture we count the full cost of divorce and that we remember that marriage is first and foremost about what is best for children.
70th decade?! You’re 700?!
Oh. Wow.
Ok, Let me go back a step. Give me a chance to process this.
Thessalonians came to mind, but not Matthew.
Does that “never get[ting] married” include not having children? I ask because I can’t imagine children of a couple who live together outside of marriage with an easy legal out aren’t in such a great situation, either.
It really helps to read the whole article:
“Disclaimer: Not everyone who is divorced came to be so in the same way. ..... Still others were physically endangered during the marriage. This essay is not to be construed as a general condemnation of all who are divorced. Rather, it is a heartfelt plea that amidst today’s divorce culture we count the full cost of divorce and that we remember that marriage is first and foremost about what is best for children.”
Oh grow up.
The caveat was included but you want even more?
Methinks someone doth protest too much.
When we were at our lowest I used CS Lewis “We have no right to happiness” from “God in the Dock” as a springboard for talking about what was REALLY going on.
Our thirtieth anniversary is next month.
Wonderful, prayers for him.
You are welcome! Enjoy~
Congratulations!
Not necessarily. "Constructive Abandonment" that is, the abandonment, actively or passive aggressively ;^) of the marriage bed also counts.
Some spouses are perfectly willing to live with you as long as it's on their terms.
You know, it’s funny. When I was growing up, it never occurred to me that my parents were doing anything out of line. But as I got older I started to review some of the things they had done and the effect those things had on me.
While I’m bound to honor my parents, if they weren’t my parents, I wouldn’t give them the time of day.
And I always tell people with children who are thinking of divorce “Be VERY careful with how you treat your children, one day you will answer to an adult for it.”
“Does that “never get[ting] married” include not having children?”
I think I did a poor job saying what I was trying to say. I value marriage and family very, very much, which is why I made the comment about divorce. If two people truly loved one another, and especially if they’ve had children together, divorce will surely leave emotional scars. Sometimes those scars are so deep that life is never the same. On the other hand, sometimes people scar each other in marriage. It’s sad either way.
Why is divorce so high in the bible belt?
But most divorces are not about that.
Mostly they are about people not wanting to put in the effort to stay married. There might be some work involved or they might have to (gasp!) actually change a habit or two.
Marriage is about putting someone else's needs above your own wants. It is not for the weak or faint of heart.
Then there is the other side of it. They actually get married.
The divorce rate is zero if you never get married in the first place.
A reasonable point when divorce is inevitable — and not involving children in their vulnerable years.
Welcome to FR.
>> Many [children of divorce] were surprised that anyone was interested or even cared about what they thought or had experienced.
The reason is obvious, and the impact heartbreaking.
Looks to be a good read regardless of circumstances.
Any thoughts on related passages from the NT?
My mantra for everything from marriage to motherhood to Cub Scout camp is, "Tough enough." My mother was, my grandmother was, and I am. And it looks like my daughters are, too. (Not sure about the 5-year-old ;-).
Congratulations on your endurance. My 30th anniversary will be in 2019.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.