Posted on 11/27/2016 6:37:35 PM PST by DWW1990
Efforts to redefine marriage will ultimately, and always, fail, and as in the case of Elton John and David Furnish, will be revealed as folly. As Gamaliel warned the Sanhedrin concerning the Apostles of Jesus, “[I]f their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God. (Acts 5:38b-39)” As liberals work to hold onto their perverse legal redefinition of marriage, they are not merely battling conservatism, but God Himself, and that is always a losing proposition.
(Excerpt) Read more at trevorgrantthomas.com ...
The way things are shifting, I think this might be back in play. Absurd, foolish, unthinkable. There is only the X and the Y Chromosone, and it takes a man and a woman to bring family to Earth. Real simple logic.
How is it, “doomed?”
Trump is pro gay rights and has no interest in stopping gay marriage
Real and simple, unless you’re corrupted by liberalism.
I do not expect Trump to focus on any aspect of this. Although I oppose the concept, and I do want someone to focus on it, Trump clearly has other things to think about: the economy, illegal immigrants, Muslim “refugees”.
I think we will see polygamy (I don’t think you can stop it) before people rise up and demand a Constitutional Amendment (which is the only way this thing dies).
Because, as the excerpt implies, it contradicts the truth.
The only thing that makes me smile briefly as a result of homosexual marriage is how they HAVE to get married now to get health benefits. No more donestic partner benefits. I wonder how happy they really are with that consequence.
Sorry, no one wants the truth today.
Trump wants to pick pro-life SC justices. There aren’t that many on the pro-life, non traditional marriage side
“homosexual marriage” No, anything but “marriage.” Do not continue promulgating the fraud and lies.
Not true! And, it’s eternally present whether anyone “wants it” or not.
This issue will not come back to the SC
“Trump wants to pick pro-life SC justices. There aren’t that many on the pro-life, non traditional marriage side.”.
There is a big legal difference between the two.
Roe v. Wade could be overturned and handed back to the states.
However, if Obergefell were to be overturned, it would be difficult if not impossible to invalidate the same sex marriages that existed on the day Obergefell were overturned.
At that point, you run into some serious EPC questions having to do with classes of people, those who are already married and those who cannot get married.
Why should a putrid extreme Court decision be regarded as law anyway?
How is is it doomed?
“...as in the case of Elton John and David Furnish.” The more people hear about Elton John, the more people see through the boring deception. My great grandparents celebrated their 50th wedding anniversary in Kansas and of my great grandfather’s ten brothers and sisters, four celebrated Golden anniversaries. That’s a delightful induction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.