Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Traveling the Path to Catholicism
Catholic Exchange.com ^ | March 12, 22015 | Fr. William Saunders

Posted on 04/18/2015 6:56:57 PM PDT by Salvation

Traveling the Path to Catholicism

shutterstock_194966885 

Q: Recently I saw a picture showing the Rite of Election at the cathedral. Would you please explain more about the Rite of Election and RCIA? When I was growing up, we did not have such a program.

The Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults (RCIA) is a formal program of catechetical instruction, ascetical practice (prayer and spirituality), and liturgies whereby adults — called catechumens — are formally admitted into the Church and receive the sacraments of initiation — baptism, confirmation, and holy Eucharist. (The sacrament of penance is received later since baptism washes away all sin — original sin and actual sin.)

The Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council decreed, “The catechumenate for adults, comprising several distinct steps, is to be restored and brought into use at the discretion of the local ordinary. By this means the time of the catechumenate, which is intended as a period of suitable instruction, may be sanctified by sacred rites to be celebrated at successive intervals of time” (No. 64).

This mandate first calls to mind a “restoration” of something that one time existed in the Church. St. Paul in his Letter to the Galatians mentioned that “the man instructed in the Word [i.e. a catechumen] should share all he has with his instructor” (6:6), indicating a formal preparation for entrance into the Church. St. Justin Martyr (d. c. 165) in his first Apology described the catechumenate: “Those who are persuaded and believe in the truth of our teachings and sayings undertake to live them accordingly; they are taught to ask, with fasting, for the remission of their sins, we also praying and fasting with them. Then they are led by us to a place where there is water, and they are regenerated in the same way as we have been regenerated.” Tertulian (d. c. 220) coined the title “catechumen” and reproached the pagans for not making a distinction between them and the “faithful.” Remember that during this time, the Church was under persecution by the Roman Empire and was confronted with various heresies; therefore, the Church wanted a very formal, careful period of instruction to prevent the infiltration of both persecutors and heretics.

The catechumens themselves were distinguished between inquirers (audientes), those initially interested in the faith, and actual catechumens who had made an initial commitment to pursue the faith. The catechumenate involved several stages, each with a catechetical, ascetical and liturgical facet, and usually lasted three years. During this time, they could attend Mass through the Liturgy of the Word, but could not participate in the Liturgy of the Eucharist. At the end of this period, the catechumens were examined, not so much for their knowledge, but to determine whether they lived the faith devoutly and had a sincere conviction of faith. If the examination was favorable, the catechumen became a candidate for baptism, received further instruction and was baptized at the Easter Vigil Mass.

After the legalization of Christianity in 313, the catechumenate began to fall into disuse for various reasons. The fear of persecution was greatly lessened. Baptism of infants became the norm with adult baptism waning. Conversion of the barbarian invaders precluded any prolonged period of instruction (actually, Pope Gregory the Great [d. 604] mandated only a 40-day preparation period for these people). By the Middle Ages, the catechumenate had disappeared, with only traces remaining in the rites of baptism and formal reception into the Church.

Given this brief history, the Second Vatican Council saw the need to restore the formal catechumenate for adults. In 1972, the Congregation for Divine Worship issued a new rite, approved by Pope Paul VI. As in the early Church, RCIA is a gradual process that involves the whole community of the faithful. Not only does RCIA prepare individuals for entrance into the Church, it allows the members of the Church to renew their faith.

During the course of the RCIA program, the individual follows a spiritual journey of “steps” accomplished through defined periods punctuated with formal rites. The first period is the precatechumenate, when candidates inquire about the faith and receive evangelization. Hopefully, the person comes to that initial conversion and step of faith, aided by the grace of God. This period ends with the Rite of Acceptance into the Order of Catechumens when the candidates publicly declare their intention to enter the Church.

This Rite of Acceptance then begins the Period of the Catechumenate, during which the catechumens receive catechetical, ascetical and liturgical training. Catechetical instruction is of the utmost importance: “This catechesis leads the catechumens not only to an appropriate acquaintance with dogmas and precepts but also to a profound sense of the mystery of salvation in which they desire to participate” (RCIA, No. 75). During this time, the catechumens should undergo a conversion of mind and action, becoming acquainted with the teachings of the faith and acquiring a spirit of charity. The sponsors and parish community assist the catechumens by their example and support. At Sunday Mass, the catechumens receive special exorcisms, blessings and anointings following the homily; however, after the Liturgy of the Word, they leave the Church. The Catechumenate may extend over a prolonged period of time, even years if necessary.

The Rite of Election closes the Period of Catechumenate. This rite normally coincides with the first Sunday of Lent. At this rite, upon the testimony of sponsors and catechists and the catechumens’ affirmation of their intention to join the Church, the Church makes its “election” of these catechumens to receive the sacraments of initiation. In the presence of the bishop (or his delegate), they inscribe their names in the Book of the Elect at the cathedral as a pledge of fidelity. Now the catechumens are called “the elect” or “the illuminandi” (“those who will be enlightened”). They now begin a Period of Purification and Enlightenment — the final, intense preparation for the reception of the sacraments of initiation. On the next five Sundays of Lent, three scrutinies (rites for self-searching and repentance) and the presentations of the Creed and Lord’s Prayer take place. This period concludes with the celebration of the sacraments of initiation at the Easter Vigil.

After the Easter Vigil, the newly baptized and confirmed members of the Church (technically called neophytes) enter the Period of Postbaptismal Catechesis or Mystagogy. The neophytes grow in their understanding of the mysteries of the faith and strengthen their bonding with the rest of the faithful. They should enter more fully into the life and unity of the Church. This period normally ends around Pentecost.

The RCIA is a spiritually moving process beneficial to the whole parish community. As we draw closer to the celebration of Easter, let us pray in particular for those elect who will be entering our holy Catholic Church this Easter.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; converts; rcia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: LurkingSince'98

41 posted on 04/19/2015 10:14:55 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Thanks. Appreciate your posts.


42 posted on 04/19/2015 10:26:03 AM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

This forum is for discussion. Your purpose is to be decisive by asking questions, purposefully misinterpreting them, and cherry picking quotes (Biblical and otherwise) in an effort to justify your own beliefs.


43 posted on 04/19/2015 11:00:03 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

Y’all do that. Don’t you believe the Bible? I do.


44 posted on 04/19/2015 11:03:21 AM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MamaB

Devolving to I’m rubber and you’re glue, Barack? Once again you only intend to be divisive.


45 posted on 04/19/2015 11:07:35 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

LOL.


46 posted on 04/19/2015 11:18:30 AM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
in the right-hand photo the religious leader on the left has changed out his eyeglasses for a different pair.

And changed his tie, too.

Hold on...you were talking about the guys on the right-hand side as depicted in each photo? Ok now I've got it.

In the right-hand pic that leader of a (large) religious sect has a much smaller (even tiny?) representation of the torture device used by Roman Empire to finalize murder of a World Famous religious dissident.

when in Israel do as the Romans do ---uuhg! dang it all that ain't it either i'll get it right eventually just you wait and see

But what's with the open-mouthed bear on the lower left?

is the soul who assembled the imagery hoping to channel Elisha and bring on da' bears?

notice to kittens: do not tempt the bears

47 posted on 04/19/2015 11:21:37 AM PDT by BlueDragon (a ship in the harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are for...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
This forum is for discussion. If that is all it is for RCs, versus promotion of Rome, then they should not post such articles as Traveling the Path to Catholicism . What would a title such as Traveling the Path to Mormonism invite?

Your purpose is to be decisive

I think you mean divisive , and which this article and any stand for a truth claim is, since a Path to Catholicism is a path away from something else. While liberals claim Christians are divisive, as we must be if preaching union with Christ who came to bring division, they themselves are divisive.

by asking questions, purposefully misinterpreting them, and cherry picking quotes (Biblical and otherwise) in an effort to justify your own beliefs.

Now you are resorting to a argument by mere assertion, which i challenge you to substantiate and debate, since you have taken it upon yourself to respond to a request for two answers by impugning the character and content of the poster. Which is how you example engaging in discussion.

48 posted on 04/19/2015 11:43:06 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Thank you for proving my point with your post. You did exactly as I wrote you would.

I just popped in to get the kids a snack and water. I’m going to grab my husband and I each a cold one and take them back outside to enjoy the beautiful day that the Lord has made. Peace be with you.


49 posted on 04/19/2015 11:49:28 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Torahman
What utter nonsense. You have very little understanding of scripture. The Teacher from Nazareth was and is a Torah Observant Jew. Always will be, forever. He walked and talked the Torah that HaShem gave to Moshe (Moses) on Sinai. He said that it was eternal and that whoever kept the mitzvot (commandments) and taught others to do so would be great in the Kingdom of Heaven. Yeshua knew of no “church”. He created a movement across biblical Israel that brought the light of Torah to the nations. What is called the “Church” is a European/.Roman/ Greek collection of revived cultural icons with another name. It is idolatry.

Precisely right. Thank you.

50 posted on 04/19/2015 11:50:12 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Impossible, as the church of Rome is largely invisible in the NT. For the NT church manifestly did not teach perpetual ensured magisterial infallibility, which is unseen and unnecessary in the life of the church, as is her separate class of believers distinctively titled "priests ," offering up "real" human flesh and blood as a sacrifice for sin, and literally consuming this to obtain spiritual life, around which act all else revolves, and looking to Peter as the first of a line of exalted infallible popes reigning over the church from Rome (which even Catholic scholarship provides testimony against), and a separate class of believers distinctively titled "saints," and praying to created beings in Heaven, and being formally justified by ones own sanctification/holiness, and thus enduring postmortem purifying torments in order to become good enough to enter Heaven, and saying rote prayers to obtain early release from it, and requiring clerical celibacy as the norm, among other things.

I think that is the longest sentence that I have ever seen!!!

51 posted on 04/19/2015 12:54:15 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

He did a good job though. : )


52 posted on 04/19/2015 1:20:09 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun; daniel1212

As for "decisive", yes, he is often enough that.

For the rest of the characterizations of what dan most often does here on, you just further established that it is himself whom is more correct in the overall course of this last exchange, though I'll grant that ultimately --- you were correct enough in saying I don't answer to you, for no one present here is that One ultimate judge.

Yet meanwhile, back at the ranch, as you said

is the very thing dan has long worked at engaging in here, though few are willing to take him up on it...oftentimes making it all personal against himself (if not entirely ignoring him) -- which then helps to lead to himself asking personal questions which are not attacks, yet are effort to require a person to think and consider what the ramifications are for whatever else they had just been speaking towards or else supporting.

Genesis 1:4

Matthew 10:34

1 Corinthians 11:19 [check the commentaries]

And what has there been for many centuries (since the 16th at least) but there having been one particular ecclesiastical community holding forth that itself alone could unilaterally dismiss all others, along with any and all arguments raised -- not necessarily against God, or the Gospel of Christ, but complaints raised primarily against itself instead which are neither (God, or the Gospel).

At the same time that "it" would (and still attempts to) point towards how in centuries yet even more distant past, disputes were settled in Church Council even though those Councils of earliest times this one ecclesia whom presumes to have settled all disputes already, did not order to be commenced, nor did they preside over those Councils, and more often than not ---- it would not be one from among their own ecclesia making and presenting the arguments which won the day, in the first places(s).

Yet this one ecclesia presents itself as the only ecclesiastical community (there were 7 Churches in Asia addressed in book of Revelation, there were multiple churches in widely scattered locales, and although then altogether considering themselves One Church --- yet one in which no "pope" in or from 'Rome' OR FROM ANY OF THE OTHER churches presided over all the rest in ultimate earthly authority, as head, etc., showing Rome to have become in it's own ways something of a heretic and schismatic, whom none can seem to approach unless in complete surrender to that one's principles of sola ecclesia, as defined unilaterally by themselves (alone).

And so discussion must still proceed.

Here on FR we discuss these things among ourselves.

For folks around here who can't hack discussing concepts such as these, there are waa-bulances standing by...

no worries as for that one though... cute as she was and as acute the intended treatment, Bill called and canceled.

53 posted on 04/19/2015 3:58:22 PM PDT by BlueDragon (...slicing through the bologna like Belushi at a Samurai Delicatessen...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

Potato/poe-tah-toe, divisive/discussion. Hey, whatever makes you sleep better at night. You know what’s going to make me sleep better? The last six hours of playing outside with my babies, along with the few beers my husband and I are about to enjoy in peace. Peace be with you.


54 posted on 04/19/2015 5:17:13 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
Your knowledge of Catholicism is seriously deficient. You can rectify that with some simple reading.

The reality is that Catholicism is the one Christian practice which is NOT a cult. All the other evangelical and protestant branch practices are exactly that - cults.
55 posted on 04/19/2015 5:59:53 PM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Montana_Sam
The reality is that Catholicism is the one Christian practice which is NOT a cult. All the other evangelical and protestant branch practices are exactly that - cults.

I am sure you think that, but Scripture points the other direction...

Mary is dead, not the "Queen of Heaven". Saints are everyone of us believers, not some dead guy decorated in gold and jewels. There is only one High Priest in the New Testament, and there are only married in the leadership of the early church in Scripture. Paul cites it as a requirement.

You have been indoctrinated into believing all of that "mumbo jumbo" Latin stuff, and refused to study the Greek and Hebrew which the OT and NT writes used. Sorry if you are offended by the truth, but just because your CULT calls itself something does NOT make it so!!!

I'll stick with the Holy Spirit as my guide! Jesus made promises and I believe Him, not some guy in a fancy gown.

I would quote the Scriptures referencing all of the above, but that are already posted over and over, and the Romanists cling bitterly to the lies!

56 posted on 04/19/2015 6:14:36 PM PDT by WVKayaker (Impeachment is the Constitution's answer for a derelict, incompetent president! -Sarah Palin 7/26/14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MamaB

**Y’all do that**

All Catholics do what?

How can you put all Catholics in one bucket/category? It just doesn’t work like that.


57 posted on 04/19/2015 6:19:06 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

At St. Paul’s in Cambridge, MA, my future daughter-in-law was received into the Church this Saturday Vigil. My son was her sponsor.


58 posted on 04/19/2015 6:25:20 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
You did exactly as I wrote you would.

Since that is another accusation that you fail to show, then grabbing a "cold one" is not surprising. Altered senses go together with converting to Rome, which i am sorry to see you choose.

59 posted on 04/19/2015 6:40:09 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
I think that is the longest sentence that I have ever seen!!!

Yes, it is long, but only one, and not complex, which could easily be split up (next time maybe). And as you might know, i usually write with many short paragraphs.

But as a RC you should be used to long sentences. Just one of the many examples of the plethora of papal prolixity, is an encyclical (QUADRAGESIMO ANNO, POPE PIUS Xl ,MAY 15, 1931) of over 20,000 words, with more than one paragraph of over 400 words, and at least one sentence of over 90 words!

Still, WP says, "Jonathan Coe's The Rotters' Club appears to hold the record at 13,955 words."

60 posted on 04/19/2015 7:00:24 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson