Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mormon View of Salvation: A Gospel That Is Truly Impossible
Equip.prg ^ | January 8, 2015 | Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson

Posted on 01/08/2015 5:33:17 AM PST by Gamecock

A doorstep encounter with missionaries from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) may allow only a brief moment to make a hopefully lasting impression, so we must weigh our words carefully. Too many Christians make the mistake of introducing peripheral topics that can sometimes move the discussion toward an agonizing dead end.

Many times Mormons are not familiar with their history or doctrines, allowing them sometimes to assume the Christian is either making something up or taking something out of context. But ask a Mormon, “If you were to die right now, do you have the assurance that all of your sins are forgiven?” The typical response is, inevitably, “I hope so,” “I think so,” or just plain, “No.” Why is this?

In Mormonism, salvation is defined in two unique ways. Tenth LDS President Joseph Fielding Smith explained, “Salvation is twofold: General—that which comes to all men irrespective of a belief (in this life) in Christ—and, Individual—that which man merits through his own acts through life and by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the gospel.”1 General salvation, or resurrection from the dead, is known as salvation by grace and is provided to all people. It is synonymous with immortality since the resurrected person lives forever.

The goal of a faithful Latter-day Saint is to achieve individual salvation or “exaltation,” which does not come easily. Thomas S. Monson, Mormonism’s current prophet, taught, “It is the celestial glory which we seek. It is in the presence of God we desire to dwell. It is a forever family in which we want membership. Such blessings must be earned.”2 With this as a background, we can then proceed to remind them regarding what those requirements really entail.

The Impossible Gospel. Using just six verses from two of the Standard Works3 and by asking a few questions, it’s possible to show how futile Mormonism’s plan of salvation really is. Bear in mind that these questions are asked within a context that a Mormon will understand.

1 Nephi 3:7: “For I know that the Lord giveth no commandments unto the children of men, save he shall prepare a way for them that they may accomplish the thing which he commandeth them.”

Ask: Does this passage say that it’s possible to keep all of God’s commandments? How are you doing at this?

Alma 11:37: “And I say unto you again that he [God] cannot save them in their sins; for I cannot deny his word, and he hath said that no unclean thing can inherit the kingdom of heaven; therefore, how can ye be saved, except ye inherit the kingdom of heaven? Therefore, ye cannot be saved in your sins.”

Ask: Do you struggle with sin? If so, doesn’t this tend to prove that you, as a Mormon, are still “in your sins” and are “unclean”? If you are, doesn’t this mean you are not saved?

Moroni 10:32: “Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you.”

Ask: Have you denied yourself of all ungodliness? If not, doesn’t this verse tend to prove that you have yet to receive the grace that will cleanse you of your sins? If you have not denied yourself of all ungodliness, when do you think you will do so?

D and C 25:15: “Keep my commandments continually, and a crown of righteousness thou shalt receive. And except thou do this, where I am you cannot come.”

Ask: How many commandments must you keep continually? Some? Most? All?4 If all, how are you doing at this?

D and C 58:43: “By this ye may know if a man repenteth of his sins—behold, he will confess them and forsake them.”

Ask: How many sins must you forsake?5 Have you forsaken all of your sins? If not, doesn’t that mean you have not truly repented?

D and C 1:31: “For I the Lord cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance.”

Ask: In light of the answers you’ve given to the above questions, do you think God will overlook your sins?

Common Excuses. We like to utilize a book written by twelfth LDS President Spencer W. Kimball (1895–1985) called The Miracle of Forgiveness. This popular work, which has been in continuous print since 1969, has even been recommended for use by two general authorities speaking at General Conferences.6

Kimball insisted that “one of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation.”7 Stating that “forgiveness (is) cancelled on reversion to sin,” he wrote, “Those who feel that they can sin and be forgiven and then return to sin and be forgiven again and again must straighten out their thinking. Each previously forgiven sin is added to the new one and the whole gets to be a heavy load.”8 Kimball said that “God would never require anything from his children which was not for their benefit and which was not attainable. Perfection therefore is an achievable goal.”9

With these quotes in mind, consider several common excuses used by many Latter-day Saints and the response to such objections from this Mormon president.

“This is why we have repentance.” Spencer Kimball utilized D and C 58:43 when he wrote, “There is one crucial test of repentance. This is abandonment of sin. Providing that a person discontinues his sin with the right motives—because of a growing consciousness of the gravity of the sin and a willingness to comply with the laws of the Lord—he is genuinely repenting….In other words, it is not real repentance until one has abandoned the error of his way and started on a new path.”10 He later added, “The Lord cannot save men in their sins but only from their sins, and that only when they have shown true repentance.”11 The problem, of course, is that most Mormons realize they have not met such a demanding requirement; hence, they have not “truly repented” in the first place.

“But I’m trying” and “I’m doing the best I can.” Many Mormons like to believe that their honest efforts to do the right thing are enough to achieve forgiveness. Kimball did not think so. He wrote, “Nor is repentance complete when one merely tries to abandon sin. To try with a weakness of attitude and effort is to assure failure in the sense of Satan’s strong counteracting efforts. What is needed is resolute action.”12 He then related a story about a military officer who ordered a soldier to deliver a message. This officer became irritated when the soldier said he would try to carry out the order, even if it meant death. To this the officer replied, “I don’t want you to die, and I don’t want you merely to do the best you can, and I don’t want you to try. Now, the request is a reasonable one….Now get out of here and accomplish your mission.”13 Kimball concluded, “To ‘try’ is weak. To ‘do the best I can’ is not strong. We must always do better than we can.”14 Remind the Mormon that whenever a person uses the word “try,” it is almost always within the context of failure. For example, a person who climbs a hill will say he climbed the hill. He doesn’t say he “tried” to climb the hill.

The Freedom Found in Christ. The Bible contradicts the notion that we can earn God’s forgiveness. Grace by definition is unmerited and mercy by definition is undeserved. For example, Romans 3:28 says a person “is justified by faith without the deeds of the law,” while Galatians 2:16 adds that “by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.”

It is important to stress that we are not minimizing the role of good works. While justification comes by grace through faith and not by works, Ephesians 2:10 clearly states that believers were created for good works. Our works are the evidence of our faith. When we realize that salvation comes through what Christ did on the cross, it no longer is about what we do but rather what He did. Unfortunately, Mormonism places an oppressive burden squarely on the backs of the LDS people.

Forgiveness of sins provides the Christian peace that passes all understanding. By using the approach we’ve presented here, you will be challenging the Mormon to explain why Christians should surrender their assurance of forgiveness for something that the Mormons only wish they had. —Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson

Bill McKeever is the founder of Mormonism Research Ministry (www.mrm.org), which he founded in 1979.

Eric Johnson is an MRM research associate. Together they coauthored Mormonism 101 (Baker, 2000).

NOTES 1.Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation 1:134 (Salt Lake City: Publishers Press, 1956). Emphasis in original.

2.“An Invitation to Exaltation,” Ensign, May 1988, 56.

3.The King James Version of the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Pearl of Great Price, and the Doctrine and Covenants comprise written scripture to Mormons.

4.According to the 1997 church manual Teachings of Presidents of The Church: Brigham Young, “Joseph also told us that the Savior requires strict obedience to all the commandments, ordinances and laws pertaining to his kingdom, and that if we would do this we should be made partakers of all the blessings promised in his Gospel,” 37–38.

5.Former president Harold B. Lee wrote, “In one sentence, repentance means turning from that which we have done wrong in the sight of the Lord and never repeating that mistake again. Then we can have the miracle of forgiveness.” Harold B. Lee, Ye Are the Light of the World: Selected Sermons and Writings of Harold B. Lee (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1974), 321.

6.General Conferences are official gatherings held in Salt Lake City in the spring and fall each year. See Seventy Richard L. Evans, Conference Report, April 1970, 16; Apostle Richard G. Scott, Ensign, November 2004, 16.

7.Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1969), 206–7.

8.Ibid., 169, 170.

9.Ibid., 209.

10.Ibid., 163.

11.Ibid., 166, emphasis in original.

12.Ibid., 164, emphasis in original.

13.Ibid.

14.Ibid., 165.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: antichristian; inman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last
To: metmom
A few years ago I had an encounter with God that could best be described as being filled with the Holy Spirit. It made as profound change in me as being saved did. I was IMMEDIATELY delivered from a whole bunch of things that I had been struggling with for years. Suddenly, they were no longer an issue. Literally overnight.

John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, would probably call that Sanctification.
101 posted on 01/08/2015 1:18:58 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Churches would be a lot better place if every Christian came to gripes with the fact that their own individual sin is no better than the person sitting next to them.

Amen, amen, AMEN!!!

102 posted on 01/08/2015 1:19:05 PM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; metmom
MY religion tells me I can do it all (except one) and still be saved.

Yes, but if saved, Christ gives the power to stop sinning, or victory over your sinning.

Are we still on the same page Elsie?
103 posted on 01/08/2015 1:20:38 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Heavenly Rates

A man dies and goes to heaven. Of course, St. Peter meets him at the pearly gates. St. Peter says, “Here’s how it works. You need 100 points to make it into heaven. You tell me all the good things you’ve done, and I give you a certain number of points for each item, depending on how good it was. When you reach 100 points, you get in.”

“Okay,” the man says, “I was married to the same woman for 50 years and never cheated on her, even in my heart.”

“That’s wonderful,” says St. Peter, “that’s worth three points!”

“Three points?” he says. “Well, I attended church all my life and supported its ministry with my tithe and service.”

“Terrific!” says St. Peter, “that’s certainly worth a point.”

“One point? Golly. How about this: I started a soup kitchen in my city and worked in a shelter for homeless veterans.”

“Fantastic, that’s good for two more points,” he says.

“TWO POINTS!!” the man cries, “At this rate the only way I get into heaven is by the grace of God!”

“Come on in!”


104 posted on 01/08/2015 1:28:21 PM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Gamecock
Paul was describing the actions and condition of a man convinced of his utter and complete sinfulness. He was not describing the state of a born-again Christian.

He certainly is speaking of a born-again Christian:

"O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." (Rom 7:24-25)

Nowhere does he say anything about a hypothetical unregenerate, but says over and over again "I" "I am" "I myself", all in the present tense. It is also consistent with the Apostle John's testimony:

1Jn 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

But Paul is not stating that a Christian lives a vicious life of sin like we used to, back when we were "by nature the children of wrath, walking in the vanity of our mind." The difference between the regenerate and the unregenerate is that the former are at war with their flesh, and in the Spirit they worship God (for God has given us a new heart and a new mind, and works in us both to will and to do of His good pleasure). The latter are yet in darkness.

105 posted on 01/08/2015 1:28:35 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans; Gamecock
Please read carefully Chapter 7 and Chapter 8.

Chapter 7
23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Chapter 8:1-4:
There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I realize that many have been falsely told and taught that Paul is actually referring to himself and is declaring that Christians cannot escape Sinning.

However, just by reading those two snippets of scripture above, you should be able to recognize that the Apostle Paul is actually talking about one man outside the Grace of God, and the other (Chapter 8) living in the Grace of God, or as Paul puts it "to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit."
106 posted on 01/08/2015 1:34:11 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Gamecock
I realize that many have been falsely told and taught that Paul is actually referring to himself and is declaring that Christians cannot escape Sinning.

Then Paul is the one who "falsely told and taught" this, as did John, as he refers to himself over and over again, even repeating it, "I myself," "I am," "I," etc etc. I'll make one final point:

Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

It is not possible that an unregenerate serves the law of God with his mind.

As for the verses, they are all consistent with the teaching I already explained.

107 posted on 01/08/2015 1:42:13 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Greetings_Puny_Humans; Gamecock
Please read carefully Chapter 7 and Chapter 8.

...I realize that many have been falsely told and taught that Paul is actually referring to himself and is declaring that Christians cannot escape Sinning.

I read ALL of Chapter 7 and 8. Did you?

I don't know who is teaching you, but you are the one being taught error. Paul is giving his own testimony, and refers only to himself.

Romans 7: 14 We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin. 15 I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. 16 And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. 17 As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. 18 For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature.[c] For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19 For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. 20 Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.

21 So I find this law at work: Although I want to do good, evil is right there with me. 22 For in my inner being I delight in God’s law; 23 but I see another law at work in me, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within me. 24 What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body that is subject to death? 25 Thanks be to God, who delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord!

So then, I myself in my mind am a slave to God’s law, but in my sinful nature[d] a slave to the law of sin.

108 posted on 01/08/2015 1:43:58 PM PST by WVKayaker (Impeachment is the Constitution's answer for a derelict, incompetent president! -Sarah Palin 7/26/14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Greetings_Puny_Humans; Gamecock
Greetings_Puny_Humans; Gamecock

It's irrelevant if a person can stop sinning.

Because all it takes is ONE sin to condemn us and need a Savior, so even if we sinned only once and lived an otherwise perfect life, we STILL couldn't get in.

Not only that, God is not going to love us any more if we sinned only once or were on death row.

Jesus died for us while we were yet sinners.

And while theoretically, perhaps it is possible to never sin again, but I doubt even that. We are all weak, especially when sick, tired, or hungry. We're all caught off guard when something unexpected happens. We all get ground down by the pressures of daily living and become irritable and cranky.

I for one, sin far more than I care to and care to admit. It's a hazard of living in this body.

109 posted on 01/08/2015 1:44:03 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Ha ha!


110 posted on 01/08/2015 1:44:52 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: metmom; SoConPubbie; Gamecock
It's irrelevant if a person can stop sinning. Because all it takes is ONE sin to condemn us and need a Savior, so even if we sinned only once and lived an otherwise perfect life, we STILL couldn't get in.

This is quite true, but the heresy of perfectionism-- this Pelagian idea that we might become sinless-- is also quite heinous. It tells a person that if they cannot become sinless, that they must not really be converts, but damned individuals fooling themselves. This brings torment for born again believers, and false pride for infidels who preach it. It is another way to get back to that old sinful assertion: "that I am getting to heaven based on my own merits, for I myself am not "evil," but innately good."

111 posted on 01/08/2015 1:50:05 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

He is talking about himself, and then branching out. He is also in writing in present tense.


112 posted on 01/08/2015 1:55:51 PM PST by Gamecock (Joel Osteen is a preacher of the Gospel like Colonel Sanders is an Army officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: metmom

You are being so profound today!


113 posted on 01/08/2015 1:57:30 PM PST by Gamecock (Joel Osteen is a preacher of the Gospel like Colonel Sanders is an Army officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

It ain’t me.


114 posted on 01/08/2015 2:16:23 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
If you can resist sin you don’t need Jesus.

I'm given to believe murder is a sin.

I'm often tempted to murder.

Thus far I've managed to resist the temptation.

Are you telling me I don't need Jesus?

115 posted on 01/08/2015 2:36:40 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
I'm given to believe murder is a sin. I'm often tempted to murder.

Presumably you have hated people. According to Christ, that is having committed murder in the heart. In the same way lusting after a woman is adultery in the heart. To Christ, it is not just about actions in the world, but the acts of the heart itself even in secret.

116 posted on 01/08/2015 2:40:19 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: trebb
I consider all religion sinful and agents of discord.

I suggest you visit North Korea if you think all religion is sinful and agents of discord.

117 posted on 01/08/2015 2:44:35 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

It’s got nothing to do with hatred; it’s a simple acknowledgement that certain individuals should be destroyed before they have an opportunity to destroy other innocents.


118 posted on 01/08/2015 2:53:02 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
It’s got nothing to do with hatred; it’s a simple acknowledgement that certain individuals should be destroyed before they have an opportunity to destroy other innocents.

We aren't talking about your stoic determination to see terrorists dead. We're talking about the people you've hated in your life.

119 posted on 01/08/2015 2:55:55 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Because all it takes is ONE sin to condemn us and need a Savior, so even if we sinned only once and lived an otherwise perfect life, we STILL couldn't get in.

we are all born with sin. Even Mary was.
120 posted on 01/08/2015 3:25:21 PM PST by Old Yeller (Civil rights are for civilized people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson