Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genetic Adam and Eve Could Have Been Contemporaries, Scientists Say
The Christian Science Monitier ^ | 8/2/13 | Elizabeth Barber

Posted on 08/05/2013 8:55:32 AM PDT by marshmallow

New research published in Science shows that our most recent common female and male ancestors could have been alive at the same time.

Thousands of years ago, somewhere in Africa, lived a man who – probably – had no idea that he, among all the other men in his group, would go on to become humankind’s most recent common male ancestor. Scientists would call him “Adam.”

Now, a new paper published in the journal Science significantly narrows the time during which Adam could have lived – about 120,000 to 156,000 years ago – putting him in about the same time period as humankind’s most recent common female ancestor, often dubbed “Eve." The research revises previous findings that dated Adam within a much longer period.

And the findings also ease recent doubts that the Y chromosome can reliably trace ancient lineage, renewing confidence that tracing and dating lineage using mutations in the Y chromosome could be critical in answering some of the vexing questions about how and where the first humans originated.

“We’ve shown that we can do this kind of dating, and that the Y chromosome is a really powerful tool,” says Brenna Henn, a genetics researcher at SUNY Stony Brook. “Now that we can use the Y chromosome in this manner, we can go back and look into other big questions, like exactly where in Africa did humans originate?”

“The ultimate goal is to understand when and where there was a modern human population,” she says.

Dr. Henn and colleagues analyzed the Y chromosome from 69 men from nine globally divergent regions, including Namibia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Algeria, Pakistan, Cambodia, Siberia, and Mexico. The Y chromosome, which in human males is one chromosome of the 23 pairs that form the genome, is a useful means through which.......

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion; History; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: adamandeve; ancestors; ancestry; creation; crevo; crevolist; davidthaler; eden; familytree; gardenofeden; genealogy; genesis; genetics; helixmakemineadouble; markstoeckle; mitochondrialeve; mtdna; origins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 08/05/2013 8:55:32 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Thousands of years ago, somewhere in Africa, lived a man who – probably – had no idea that he, among all the other men in his group, would go on to become humankind’s most recent common male ancestor. Scientists would call him “Adam.”

So multiple men evolved from apes at the same time? Which came first the chicken or the egg has finally been solved. Multiple eggs just appeared from multiple lizards and they all grew chickens what laid the same kind of eggs.

2 posted on 08/05/2013 9:01:18 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Why do all pictures of Adam and Eve show them with bellybuttons?


3 posted on 08/05/2013 9:02:46 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Now, a new paper published in the journal Science significantly narrows the time during which Adam could have lived – about 120,000 to 156,000 years ago – putting him in about the same time period as humankind’s most recent common female ancestor, often dubbed “Eve." The research revises previous findings that dated Adam within a much longer period.

< Snort>

Related threads:
The Catholic Priest Praised by Einstein for Explaining the Universe
Catholicism and evolution: Are they contradictory?
Pope: Humanity isn't random product of evolution
God was behind Big Bang, universe no accident: Pope
Pope praises science, but insists God created world
The Problem of Polygenism in Accepting the Theory of Evolution [Catholic Msgr. Charles Pope]
Radio Replies Second Volume - Creation and Evolution
A meeting of religion and science: Sister Frances Zajac sees no conflict in her callings
Atheist says that Church accepts darwinism [Catholic Caucus]
Let Science Be Science and Faith Be Faith
Creationists, Intelligent Design Advocates Blast Vatican for Not Inviting Them to Evo Conference
Catholics on Evolution (Ecumenical)
Vatican evolution congress to exclude creationism, intelligent design
Catholic universities plan scientific examination of evolutionary theory
God made pre-humans into people, Vatican newspaper says [Open]
How a Catholic priest gave us the Big Bang Theory
Evangelicals should follow Catholic example on evolution
Austrian cardinal says Darwinism should be studied as science
The Sense that it is True that Six-Day Creationism is Paganism
Creationist Defends Bible-Based Science Against Vatican Astronomer's Criticism
Vatican Paper Hits 'Intelligent Design'

4 posted on 08/05/2013 9:03:34 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Thus, my opponent's argument falls.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Personally, I would be much more interested and intrigued in the detailed, rational and supported persuasive thesis and argument that the original Adam and the original Eve did NOT exist at the same time and place.

I got lots of popcorn...

5 posted on 08/05/2013 9:06:15 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice
Body mods man. You know, like giant earlobes. They probably had some dude cut a hole in their belly because it was rad and because like this guy below, body mods increases your chances of being hired as a political advisor for the Democrat party.


6 posted on 08/05/2013 9:08:36 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

My gawd, man, have you no decency?

It’ll take me years to get the photo of that awful human-like thing out of my mind.


7 posted on 08/05/2013 9:10:13 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Genetic Adam and Eve Could Have Been Contemporaries

Isn't that sort of assumed, if they started the human race?


8 posted on 08/05/2013 9:10:39 AM PDT by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“Dubbed” Adam and Eve. I didn’t know God went around “dubbing” people.


9 posted on 08/05/2013 9:10:51 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
“We’ve shown that we can do this kind of dating...,” says Brenna Henn.

Yeah, amazing new discovery: successful dating -- and mating --- requires Y-Chromosome Adam and Mitochondrial Eve being in the same 10,000 year time slot.

"Pretty sure we can get together, Adam. Let me take a quick look at my calendar..."

10 posted on 08/05/2013 9:12:07 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarification, I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Self-abuse. It’s not just for “private” anymore.


11 posted on 08/05/2013 9:19:28 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

LOL...lets just hope she was ovulating at the time!

EVE: “Dang! We missed because YOU were out fishing instead of eating the apples God gave us, you worm...let’s see...next time is...”

ADAM: “Er...what was that you said about an apple?”


12 posted on 08/05/2013 9:21:17 AM PDT by rlmorel (Silence: The New Hate Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Our common biblical ancestor is not Adam, it’s Noah; everyone but him died in the flood. Likewise, if you accept evolutionary theory, there would have been multiple near-extinctions where the genetic tree was pruned to only a few branches. Both Noah or his evolutionary equivalent would have had other men around.


13 posted on 08/05/2013 9:23:55 AM PDT by Driabrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Job 38

4 Were you there when I made the world? If you know so much, tell me about it. 5 Who decided how large it would be? Who stretched the measuring line over it? Do you know all the answers?


14 posted on 08/05/2013 9:24:43 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice
Why do all pictures of Adam and Eve show them with bellybuttons?

Because the umbilical cords ripped off when they fell out of the pods?


15 posted on 08/05/2013 9:24:56 AM PDT by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Man-made dimples.


16 posted on 08/05/2013 9:25:26 AM PDT by Slyfox (Without the Right to Life, all other rights are meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

What was going throught this guy’s head when he got himself mutilated like that??!! ‘Because I am not ugly enough...?’


17 posted on 08/05/2013 9:28:19 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Don’t want to be around that dude if he gets a cold.


18 posted on 08/05/2013 9:29:25 AM PDT by Starstruck (With Government nothing ever changes............for the better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice
Why do all pictures of Adam and Eve show them with bellybuttons?

More importantly, who took the picture?

19 posted on 08/05/2013 9:32:04 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Genetic Adam and Eve were the first male and female humans whose genetic lines did not die off. They were not necessarily the first humans. From a scientific point of view, there could have been populations of humans living for an indeterminate amount of time prior to the birth of the genetic Adam or the genetic Eve, and it’s not necessarily true that they mated with each other, only that the maternal line can be traced to Eve and the paternal line to Adam.

In Biblical terms, the genetic “Adam” is actually Noah as someone upthread has already pointed out. All males trace their y chromosomes back to Noah. His wife would then be the genetic Eve.


20 posted on 08/05/2013 9:34:04 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson