Well I hope all the dumb sh##s that voted for this piece of crap are happy now.
If you merely replaced the word “religious” in that provision with “sexual orientation” then Obama would be demanding its inclusion.
>> By limiting the discretion of commanders to address [religious] speech and actions within their units, this provision would have a significant adverse effect on good order, discipline, morale, and mission accomplishment.
And yet, the morale and discipline affront of faggotry in the military is to be not only allowed but embraced — if you merely remain silent about the sexual preferences of sodomites, you are guilty of a “hate crime” and will be disciplined.
May GOD have mercy on this nation. It’s shameful how far we have fallen.
I must be naïve because I thought that the 1st Amendment of the Constitution already guarantees this.
No praying in foxholes.
Of course the White House strongly objects to Christian liberty. He has nothing to lose at this point but he is more than willing to cause others to lose more and more of what they hold near and dear.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
But Obama doesn’t like the Constitution. Why would he like any amendment?
Watch out for the unintended consequences of Islamics recruiting more head choppers from the ranks of our military.
Even though Islam is not a religion, but a socio-political system masquerading as one.
And the Black “church” is silent because it worships Ob@ma.
I hear you, but, what if the book displayed were a Koran? Or, Anton Sandor LaVey’s “Satanic Bible”? As a CO I would be inclined to tell the user of such books to put them away if I were to think their open display affect morale and discipline.
Why would I want that power to be taken away?
We have to think this through carefully.
+JMJ,
~Theo
Ridiculous comment by the President. The military has already been accommodating since 1776 WITHOUT an adverse effect.
This protection is being promoted because those basic rights, which up to now have been accepted, are being discriminated against.
I cannot more strongly object to the president's false portrayal of the situation.
For centuries, the US military has understood the intent of the 1st amendment right to free exercise -- that it's far better to let people speak their minds on these subjects than it is to get the government involved in deciding what is proper religious expression and what isn't. In fact, government accepted prayer would be government ESTABLISHING a government approved religion.
And Islam?