Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 02/07/2013 8:58:03 AM PST by Religion Moderator, reason:

Childish behavior



Skip to comments.

Pope: Everyone, Even Atheists, Want to See the Face of God
Asia News ^ | 1/16/13

Posted on 01/16/2013 8:57:49 AM PST by marshmallow

General audience, Benedict XVI defines the Incarnation as "something unimaginable, the face of God can be seen, the process that began with Abraham is fulfilled." The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, he asks "for the great gift" to "proclaim together that Jesus is the Savior of the world."

Vatican City (AsiaNews) - "The desire to know the face of God is in every man, even the atheists," but this desire is only realized by following Christ, in whom, in the Incarnation, "something unimaginable took place, the journey that began with Abraham is fulfilled. He is the Son, the fullness of all Revelation; the mediator who shows us the face of God. "

And "to proclaim together that Jesus is the Saviour of the world" Benedict XVI asked for incessant prayers for "the great gift" of Christian unity in the forthcoming week, which begins on the 18th of this month.

Previously, in his catechesis, he again reflected on the meaning of Christmas, in a commentary on John's Gospel in which the apostle Philip asks Jesus to show them the Father. The answer of Jesus, "introduces us to the heart of the Church's Christological faith; For the Lord says: "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father" (Jn 14:9).This expression summarizes the novelty of the New Testament, the novelty that appeared in the cave of Bethlehem: God can be seen, he showed his face is visible in Jesus Christ".

The theme of "seeking the face of God" is present throughout the Old Testament, so much so that the Hebrew term "face", occurs no less than 400 times, 100 of which refer to God." The of Jewish religion which the religion forbids all images, "for God can not be depicted," and "can not be reduced to an object," tells us that "God...

(Excerpt) Read more at asianews.it ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Ecumenism; Ministry/Outreach; Skeptics/Seekers
KEYWORDS: spiritualjourney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,221-1,225 next last
To: HarleyD; P-Marlowe; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; marron; stfassisi; CynicalBear; xzins
And that, my friend, is PRECISELY why I'm constantly complaining about "free" will. Just look at how this one belief is so readily defended although it is used no where in scripture. Makes you wonder doesn't it? Trace any heresy no matter what it is and it comes back to the "I have a free will" thing.

Your tactics in this line of accusations remind me way too much of a certain Catholic FReeper who accuses others of holding heretical positions and asking them why they believe it and to defend their beliefs.

Nobody is defending the unrealistic definition of *free will* that you keep posting. Find me ONE person who says that they believe in your dictionary definition of free will that we all know cannot exist, and defends it, which you keep stating that they believe in and defend . Provide the links or links.

Heresy against whom or what? You keep throwing that out as well. It's a nice vague accusation made to discredit someone but I haven't seen anywhere where it's been stated what the heresy is against.

621 posted on 02/01/2013 7:29:38 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
They post on the forum about how important their own Free Will was in their decision to choose Christ. The refuse to acknowledge that their salvation was entirely a work of God. They want to think that it was their own free will decision which brought them to the foot of the cross and that somehow they were smart enough or good enough in their own nature to gain salvation by their own volitional action.

Who and where? Links to posts please.

622 posted on 02/01/2013 7:31:17 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Some, of course, believe that God did not have to predestine to hell if He only predestined the elect to heaven. That would make logical sense. If you don’t specifically appoint someone to heaven, then they are logically going to hell, but not because they were specifically appointed to it.

That's kind of a given, and does not mean that God decided to send them to hell as in picking and choosing before time who He made for the purpose of destruction, never giving them a chance to repent as He has commanded all men to do.

623 posted on 02/01/2013 7:34:55 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Do you believe people free choose to go to hell? For all those who don't believe that is what you're saying. They can either choose Christ or not. So, according to what you're stating, people choose to go to hell.

I've seen you post that people can choose as well. So why when I say it, does it by default mean that I believe in the unrealistic definition of *free will* that you gleaned from a secular dictionary, but when you say it, it doesn't?

I don't believe that most people knowingly choose hell. What they choose is to reject God, which results in going to hell. I've said it before, they got what they wanted, an existence without God, but I'm sure it's not what they expected.

624 posted on 02/01/2013 7:40:20 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; HarleyD; betty boop; metmom; Alamo-Girl; marron; stfassisi; xzins
>> I find it somewhat ironic that the people who walk down the aisles singing “I surrender all” are so unwilling to surrender their free will.<<

Whoever said they are unwilling to surrender their free will? Understanding that people have to take some responsibility is not claiming that one is unwilling to give up their free will. It’s simply acknowledging that there is some personal responsibility.

>> The semi-Pelagian clings to their free will as if their salvation is dependent on it;<<

Now why you would you inject something like that? No one here has stated any such thing that I have seen. In every post that I have seen there is the underlying premise that but for the grace of God and His calling none would be saved. If the position of those who think “we are just along for the ride” is so weak that those types of statements have to be made rather than backing up their beliefs with scripture it gets rather obvious that their beliefs are not sound.

625 posted on 02/01/2013 7:40:48 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

I didn’t know, so thanks.


626 posted on 02/01/2013 7:44:16 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; xzins; CynicalBear; P-Marlowe; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
But branding every Reformer as believing in double predestination is wrong. Most great Reformers such as John McArthur, John Piper or even old time preachers and teachers such as Charles Spurgeon or Matthew Henry clearly don't.

Branding any believer as an anything is wrong. Labeling people sets the stage for making people respecters of persons, differentiating between the have's and the have nots, between the *You've arrived* or *You haven't arrived, you need to get to the level of spiritual maturity I'm at*.

I've had my fill of that out of the Pentecostal movement with their speaking in tongues/slain in the Spirit stuff. And with the Catholics with the *I'm doing better works than you are* mentality.

It sets the trap for spiritual pride and many fall into it.

627 posted on 02/01/2013 7:49:05 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: metmom; CynicalBear; HarleyD; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; marron; stfassisi; xzins
Who and where? Links to posts please.

Let me ask you something metmom. Would it upset you if God chose you from the foundation of the Earth based solely upon his counsel and that your free will had nothing whatsoever to do with it; in fact, because he loved YOU before you were ever formed he chose you and changed your will to His in order that you would then willingly come to Christ?

Would it upset you if you realized that YOU did not make the decision to follow Christ, but that God alone made that decision and that he changed your heart and your will to conform to his before you ever asked?

If you answer yes to either of those questions, then I would have to put you in the category of those who are unwilling to surrender their free will.

The fact of the matter is that until God changes our hearts our "free will" we will always choose the path that leads away from God because our unregenerate hearts cannot turn to God.

628 posted on 02/01/2013 7:53:20 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; HarleyD; betty boop; metmom; Alamo-Girl; marron; stfassisi; xzins
It’s simply acknowledging that there is some personal responsibility.

We are responsible for our sins. We are not responsible for our salvation.

If we were responsible for our salvation, then the blood of Christ is only partially sufficient. If we are responsible for our salvation, then we become our own Saviors. We become co-redemptors in our eternal destiny.

629 posted on 02/01/2013 7:57:16 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: metmom; P-Marlowe; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; marron; stfassisi; CynicalBear; xzins
Nobody is defending the unrealistic definition of *free will* that you keep posting.

Well, post your definition from a reliable source.

Provide the links or links.

Oy vey!

Heresy against whom or what? You keep throwing that out as well.

If you're not going to read my scriptures, would you at least read the dictionary? Now if you disagree with my verbage, then please feel free to post your own references from reliable sources. You'll find that I'm very flexible.
630 posted on 02/01/2013 8:00:40 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

There is NO SUCH THING AS FREE WILL AS HAS BEEN DEFINED ON THIS THREAD.

It is pointless to use it as it CANNOT exist.

Don’t put me in a category of what you think I believe and then demand that I defend it. I’ve dealt enough with that from certain Catholic FReepers and have put them on my *Do not respond* list, and I will do the same with anyone who tries to pigeon hole me and demand that I defend something I never claimed to believe but that I am accused of believing.


631 posted on 02/01/2013 8:02:17 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; CynicalBear; HarleyD; betty boop; metmom; Alamo-Girl; marron; stfassisi; xzins
Deuteronomy 30:15-20 15 “See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil. 16 If you obey the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you today, by loving the Lord your God, by walking in his ways, and by keeping his commandments and his statutes and his rules, then you shall live and multiply, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to take possession of it.

17 But if your heart turns away, and you will not hear, but are drawn away to worship other gods and serve them, 18 I declare to you today, that you shall surely perish. You shall not live long in the land that you are going over the Jordan to enter and possess. 19 I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live, 20 loving the Lord your God, obeying his voice and holding fast to him, for he is your life and length of days, that you may dwell in the land that the Lord swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.”

632 posted on 02/01/2013 8:06:06 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Good grief. Read the post. I wasn't asking for links to the definitions but rather FReepers who held to that belief.

Here's my comment.....

Nobody is defending the unrealistic definition of *free will* that you keep posting. Find me ONE person who says that they believe in your dictionary definition of free will that we all know cannot exist, and defends it, which you keep stating that they believe in and defend . Provide the links or links.

633 posted on 02/01/2013 8:08:53 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; stfassisi; betty boop; metmom; boatbums; P-Marlowe
>>I believe somewhere back PM stated that he didn't believe any Reformers on this board believed in double predestination. I agree.<<

Here is a statement from your home page.

>>”God elects, chooses, before the foundation of the world whom he will save and whom he will pass by and leave to unbelief and sin and rebellion. He does this unconditionally, not on the basis of foreseen faith that humans produce by a supposed power of ultimate self-determination.”<<

That by definition is double predestination. It’s even stated in the Westminster Confession of Faith that you wanted me to read.

>>”By the decree of God, for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and others foreordained to everlasting death.”<<

Now there are some fudge word’s Calvinists like to use to hide their true beliefs like the Catholics do in trying to defend their beliefs to hopefully somehow align with what scripture says but like the Catholics they fall far short.

Foreordained or predestined, it’s all the same. The belief of Calvinists leaves no wiggle room really. As was stated earlier in this thread. Calvinists believe that we are “just along for the ride”. So deny all you want but it’s right there on your home page for all to see.

634 posted on 02/01/2013 8:09:21 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Thanks, CB. It is pretty clear.


635 posted on 02/01/2013 8:15:46 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: metmom; All
Find me ONE person who says that they believe in your dictionary definition of free will

OK, just a minute.

This may take some time.
636 posted on 02/01/2013 8:17:35 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Don’t put me in a category of what you think I believe and then demand that I defend it.

Does that mean you are not going to answer those two questions?

They were simple yes/no questions.

637 posted on 02/01/2013 8:30:26 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: metmom; CynicalBear; HarleyD; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; marron; stfassisi; xzins
Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live

You WILL choose life IF God changes your WILL.

If God does not change your will then you will choose death. It is the nature of unregenerate man to reject God. It is like the story of the scorpion and the turtle.

The scorpion needs to cross the river and so he asks the turtle for a ride. The turtle says, "Do you think I am crazy? If I let you get on my back, you'll sting me."

"Don't worry," said the scorpion. "If I do that, we would both drown in the river."

So the turtle gives him a ride. Halfway across the river, the scorpion stings the turtle. And as the poison starts to work and the turtle and scorpion start to sink into the river together, the turtle says, "Why did you do it? Now we're both going to die."

The scorpion, in his last few breaths, says, "I couldn't help it. It's my nature."

638 posted on 02/01/2013 8:37:08 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; HarleyD

You don’t understand “pass by” and “leave”. In fact, you’re relying on a stereotypical view of Calvinism rather than on what they themselves say. There’s no reason you should know that much about Calvinism; there was a time that I, too, thought they all believed as the Primitive Baptists do.

Boy was I wrong.


639 posted on 02/01/2013 8:49:38 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; stfassisi; betty boop; metmom; boatbums; P-Marlowe
That by definition is double predestination.

From my page...

Nowhere in my statement does it state that God foreordained who would be damned as indicated by the definition. It merely states who God would pass by. (See below)

Foreordained or predestined, it’s all the same.

No, it's not the same and wording is important. Otherwise God (via Paul) would have been redundant when He said, "Those who He foreknew he also predestined...". There are distinct differences between "foreknew" and "predestined". And the order of those words are important. However I hate to post any more from the dictionary since it seems to be such a heretical document. I'm running to the dictionary so much my "D" key is sticking.

Now you never answered my question. Do men purposely choose to go to hell? I'll answer it for both you and metmom who don't seem to want to address this. Of course they do not choose to go to hell. And that is what the confession tells us. As metmom rightfully stated in one of her post, men are deceived into going to hell. So how can you say there is a "free" choice if they're deceived?

640 posted on 02/01/2013 8:50:49 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,221-1,225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson