Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did You Choose “Catholic? (Why do adults become Catholics?)
CE.com ^ | January 27th, 2012 | George Weigel

Posted on 01/27/2012 9:11:21 PM PST by Salvation

Why Did You Choose “Catholic?”

January 27th, 2012 by George Weigel

Why do adults become Catholics?

There are as many reasons for “converting” as there are converts. Evelyn Waugh became a Catholic with, by his own admission, “little emotion but clear conviction”: this was the truth; one ought to adhere to it. Cardinal Avery Dulles wrote that his journey into the Catholic Church began when, as an unbelieving Harvard undergraduate detached from his family’s staunch Presbyterianism, he noticed a leaf shimmering with raindrops while taking a walk along the Charles River in Cambridge, Mass.; such beauty could not be accidental, he thought—there must be a Creator. Thomas Merton found Catholicism aesthetically, as well as intellectually, attractive: once the former Columbia free-thinker and dabbler in communism and Hinduism found his way into a Trappist monastery and became a priest, he explained the Mass to his unconverted friend, poet Robert Lax, by analogy to a ballet. Until his death in 2007, Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger insisted that his conversion to Catholicism was not a rejection of, but a fulfillment of, the Judaism into which he was born; the cardinal could often be found at Holocaust memorial services reciting the names of the martyrs, including “Gisèle Lustiger, ma maman” (“my mother”).

Two of the great nineteenth-century converts were geniuses of the English language: theologian John Henry Newman and poet Gerard Manley Hopkins. This tradition of literary converts continued in the twentieth century, and included Waugh, Graham Greene, Edith Sitwell, Ronald Knox, and Walker Percy. Their heritage lives today at Our Savior’s Church on Park Avenue in New York, where convert author, wit, raconteur and amateur pugilist George William Rutler presides as pastor.

In early American Catholicism, the fifth archbishop of Baltimore (and de facto primate of the United States), Samuel Eccleston, was a convert from Anglicanism, as was the first native-born American saint and the precursor of the Catholic school system, Elizabeth Ann Seton. Mother Seton’s portrait in the offices of the archbishop of New York is somewhat incongruous, as the young widow Seton, with her children, was run out of New York by her unforgiving Anglican in-laws when she became a Catholic. On his deathbed, another great nineteenth-century convert, Henry Edward Manning of England, who might have become the Anglican archbishop of Canterbury but became the Catholic archbishop of Westminster instead, took his long-deceased wife’s prayer book from beneath his pillow and gave it to a friend, saying that it had been his spiritual inspiration throughout his life.

If there is a thread running through these diverse personalities, it may be this: that men and women of intellect, culture and accomplishment have found in Catholicism what Blessed John Paul II called the “symphony of truth.” That rich and complex symphony, and the harmonies it offers, is an attractive, compelling and persuasive alternative to the fragmentation of modern and post-modern intellectual and cultural life, where little fits together and much is cacophony. Catholicism, however, is not an accidental assembly of random truth-claims; the creed is not an arbitrary catalogue of propositions and neither is the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It all fits together, and in proposing that symphonic harmony, Catholicism helps fit all the aspects of our lives together, as it orders our loves and loyalties in the right direction.

You don’t have to be an intellectual to appreciate this “symphony of truth,” however. For Catholicism is, first of all, an encounter with a person, Jesus Christ, who is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). And to meet that person is to meet the truth that makes all the other truths of our lives make sense. Indeed, the embrace of Catholic truth in full, as lives like Blessed John Henry Newman’s demonstrate, opens one up to the broadest possible range of intellectual encounters.

Viewed from outside, Catholicism can seem closed and unwelcoming. As Evelyn Waugh noted, though, it all seems so much more spacious and open from the inside. The Gothic, with its soaring vaults and buttresses and its luminous stained glass, is not a classic Catholic architectural form by accident. The full beauty of the light, however, washes over you when you come in.

 
George Weigel is author of the bestselling books The Courage to Be Catholic: Crisis, Reform, and the Future of the Church and Letters to a Young Catholic.

This column has been made available to Catholic Exchange courtesy of the
Denver Catholic Register.

 



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; converts; saints
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461 next last
To: mdmathis6
Vladdy baby is just baiting the Sola scripturists....

Ah, well it was a flop because the bait was not tempting.

61 posted on 01/28/2012 7:08:56 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
I neither brought up any Psalm nor is any Psalm actually connected in any way to what I said or asked.

Why not? Is Psalms NOT 'sola scripture'? The question was from whence is Matthew a credible Gosple? Right? I mean really now Christ was to come out of the seed line of David and who better to prophecy what would take place at the Crucifixion?

62 posted on 01/28/2012 7:12:22 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

You wrote:

“Why not?”

Because there’s no relationship between the two in regard to what was asked for.

“Is Psalms NOT ‘sola scripture’?”

No. Psalms is Psalms. No book in the Bible is ‘sola scripture’.

“The question was from whence is Matthew a credible Gosple? Right?”

No.

“I mean really now Christ was to come out of the seed line of David and who better to prophecy what would take place at the Crucifixion?”

None of which has anything to do with what was asked for. Please throw in the kitchen sink to complete your own obfuscation.


63 posted on 01/28/2012 7:24:04 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

It’s the old...”tradition holds that such and such wrote such a book and if a sola scripturist will admit the possibility that such a tradition may have validity, then his belief in Sola Scriptura can be shown to have no foundation...thus the poor shaken “Solaist”(who very much was trying to be just like the Bereans) can be challenged and his faith in “scripture alone” destroyed with the question of whether or not other more questionable “traditions of the Catholic Church” might have merit, despite having no validity to be found in settled canon” ....gambit!
(run on sentence deliberatley employed for sarcastic stream of consciousness effect!)

Yawwwnn, like we couldn’t have seen thru that ploy!


64 posted on 01/28/2012 7:24:12 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Christ came not to make man into God but to restore fellowship of the Godhead with man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

“Since Protestants say they believe in sola scriptura”

I am a Protestant. I’ve never said that. I have said “In Christ alone...” however. Is it wrong that I believe that my salvation is found in Jesus Christ, alone?


65 posted on 01/28/2012 7:25:01 AM PST by Grunthor (I don't vote for Democrats, this includes Mitt Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
None of which has anything to do with what was asked for. Please throw in the kitchen sink to complete your own obfuscation.

I am not obfuscating. I do NOT understand what answer you are demanding. I can find NO authority given any flesh man to 'create' filtration systems and then claim ownership. Christ does just fine in His own WORDS, He never handed off to flesh beings authority to make up hoops to jump through to hear His voice. And claiming Peter got the keys won't fly. WHY? Because Peter put his 'keys' in writing, he did not open up a locksmith business for each ensuing man to cut new keys.

Now IF Psalms 22 penned by King David is not sufficient for you to accept as giving all the credibility/certification that Matthew Gosple provides then so be it.

66 posted on 01/28/2012 7:34:13 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
None of which has anything to do with what was asked for. Please throw in the kitchen sink to complete your own obfuscation.

I am not obfuscating. I do NOT understand what answer you are demanding. I can find NO authority given any flesh man to 'create' filtration systems and then claim ownership. Christ does just fine in His own WORDS, He never handed off to flesh beings authority to make up hoops to jump through to hear His voice. And claiming Peter got the keys won't fly. WHY? Because Peter put his 'keys' in writing, he did not open up a locksmith business for each ensuing man to cut new keys.

Now IF Psalms 22 penned by King David is not sufficient for you to accept as giving all the credibility/certification that Matthew Gospel provides then so be it.

67 posted on 01/28/2012 7:34:21 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

You wrote:

“I am a Protestant.”

What denomination?

“I’ve never said that.”

Irrelevant. Sola scriptura is part and parcel of Protestantism. If a particular Protestant denies what his sect believes in, and in fact what is automatically part of the proper understanding of Protestantism, then all that tells us is that Protestants can be heterodox according to even their own loose standards.

“I have said “In Christ alone...” however. Is it wrong that I believe that my salvation is found in Jesus Christ, alone?”

No, it just has nothing to do with what was asked for. Thanks for proving my point: Protestants are unable to provide the answers.


68 posted on 01/28/2012 7:36:22 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
It’s the old...”tradition holds that such and such wrote such a book and if a sola scripturist will admit the possibility that such a tradition may have validity, then his belief in Sola Scriptura can be shown to have no foundation...thus the poor shaken “Solaist”(who very much was trying to be just like the Bereans) can be challenged and his faith in “scripture alone” destroyed with the question of whether or not other more questionable “traditions of the Catholic Church” might have merit, despite having no validity to be found in settled canon” ....gambit! (run on sentence deliberatley employed for sarcastic stream of consciousness effect!) Yawwwnn, like we couldn’t have seen thru that ploy!

I can understand what you wrote. Thank you for the explanation. I forgot that some are taught they hold the 'copyright' for the WORD of God, and it is in the state of evolution.

69 posted on 01/28/2012 7:40:59 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

“What denomination?”

Church of the Nazarene.

“No, it just has nothing to do with what was asked for.”

I don’t care what was asked for, I AM however confused by the term “Sola Scriptura.” What do you mean by this?

“Thanks for proving my point: Protestants are unable to provide the answers.”

Maybe you are not asking the right questions or are asking in such a manner as to feel like “gotcha” questions.


70 posted on 01/28/2012 7:42:31 AM PST by Grunthor (I don't vote for Democrats, this includes Mitt Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

You wrote:

“I am not obfuscating.”

Perhaps you believe that.

“I do NOT understand what answer you are demanding.”

Then this is too much for you. It is best you move on then and allow those with more skill and understanding to participate.

“I can find NO authority given any flesh man to ‘create’ filtration systems and then claim ownership.”

That has nothing to do with what I asked for.

“Christ does just fine in His own WORDS, He never handed off to flesh beings authority to make up hoops to jump through to hear His voice.”

That too is not what I asked about.

“And claiming Peter got the keys won’t fly. WHY? Because Peter put his ‘keys’ in writing, he did not open up a locksmith business for each ensuing man to cut new keys.”

That too is not what I asked about.

“Now IF Psalms 22 penned by King David is not sufficient for you to accept as giving all the credibility/certification that Matthew Gosple provides then so be it.”

Nothing in Psalms 22 actually in any way, shape or form addresses anything that was asked for. If you actually provide what I asked for, great. It doesn’t seem that you are able to, however.


71 posted on 01/28/2012 7:42:47 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Then put up and show your ‘wise’ counsel!


72 posted on 01/28/2012 7:47:52 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Although I have been Catholic since being in the cradle, I am a Catholic because of the greatness and fullness of the belief, confidence, and love that comes from God and is most shown in a visable way.


73 posted on 01/28/2012 7:55:09 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

My experience is that two people get engaged. One was raised a Catholic, the other one doesn’t belong to a religion. The other one has to become a Catholic if he/she wants to marry the Catholic. Then they have kids who immediately become Catholics when they are baptized as infants. That’s what happened with my parents and the resulting kids. However I saw the light at around 20 years old and am no longer a Catholic.


74 posted on 01/28/2012 7:56:06 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Plus have a stable spiritual foundation in life.


75 posted on 01/28/2012 8:00:46 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Anyone who seriously studies the Bible and still doesn’t find the answer for which he/she is searching will continue to search and eventually convert to Catholcism because it has the fullness of faith and is the Body of Christ here on earth.

In other words, you feel God's grace is not sufficient and Christ's death on the cross for your salvation is not sufficient so you run to ritualism thinking that surely there's something else YOU must do to save yourself. It seems there is a lack of faith there.
76 posted on 01/28/2012 8:01:22 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Church of the Nazarene.

Hey I'm a Nazarene PK! Of course I'm Catholic now... so that happened... anyhoo...

We never used the term sola scriptura when I was growing up because frankly I don't think we gave the authority of Scripture much thought, it was just a given.

Nazarenes by reason of their Wesleyan heritage are closer to Catholics in general theology than almost any of the original reformation sectarians. At least that's what my cousin says everytime I give her the "why don't you just get it over with and convert already" look.

77 posted on 01/28/2012 8:10:46 AM PST by Legatus (Keep calm and carry on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Legatus

Yes, I know that Nazarenes and Catholics are close in theology, we have several former Catholics in our congregation.

One of them that I know well says that is why he is comfortable with us.....not a lot of “crazy junk.” (his words)


78 posted on 01/28/2012 8:29:22 AM PST by Grunthor (I don't vote for Democrats, this includes Mitt Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

By allowing you to show you can’t answer the simple questions I already have. That was the point. Thanks for helping.


79 posted on 01/28/2012 8:35:24 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Please,

As a non-Catholic Christian I would be interested in your reasoning. As a Christian, I would behave as a Berean and test your reasoning against scripture.

I just don’t understand this heat on both sides, and it seems the overriding objective is to score points over another person.


80 posted on 01/28/2012 8:47:49 AM PST by kingcanuteus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson