Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Faith: Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), from Catholic to Muslim
CNN ^ | 9/1/11 | Chris Welch

Posted on 09/02/2011 9:07:47 AM PDT by marshmallow

Minneapolis, Minnesota (CNN) –Prior to 2006, few people even knew that then-Minnesota state legislator Keith Ellison was a Muslim. Because of his English name, he said, no one thought to ask.

But five years ago, when he ran for a seat in the United States House of Representatives - a race he would go on to win - word of his religious affiliation began to spread.

“When I started running for Congress it actually took me by surprise that so many people were fascinated with me being the first Muslim in Congress,” said Ellison, a Democrat now serving his third term in the House.

“But someone said to me, ‘Look Keith, think of a person of Japanese origin running for Congress six years after Pearl Harbor–this might be a news story.’”

Though Ellison's status as the first Muslim elected to Congress is widely known, fewer are aware that he was born into a Catholic family in Detroit and was brought up attending Catholic schools.

But he said he was never comfortable with that faith.

“I just felt it was ritual and dogma,” Ellison said. “Of course, that’s not the reality of Catholicism, but it’s the reality I lived. So I just kind of lost interest and stopped going to Mass unless I was required to.”

It wasn’t until he was a student at Wayne State University in Detroit when Ellison began, “looking for other things.”

(Excerpt) Read more at religion.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Islam; Theology
KEYWORDS: blackmuslims; islam; keithellison; muslim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 4,661-4,676 next last
To: bkaycee

What’s sinful about it?


1,161 posted on 09/06/2011 11:24:29 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1157 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Are you seriously looking for a verse that says, "Mary finished her role in the Gospel"?

You don't think a total lack of mention of her from the book of ACTS onward is a good clue?

1,162 posted on 09/06/2011 11:26:00 AM PDT by bkaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1154 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Yea, their Nicene Creed sounds all flowery and pious...

Flowery? Really? Not to me. It's as technical as a theology manual.

1,163 posted on 09/06/2011 11:27:10 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1155 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Rarely have I felt so deceived. We are not told that the Eucharist is the Spriritual Body of Christ that we believers belong to. We are told that it is the ACTUAL BODY AND BLOOD OF CHRIST. You wouldn’t be playing some semantics games now would you? And yes, Mary’s immaculate conception would require her to be present in the Eucharist. If He was part of her body, He contained part of her DNA, and that DNA is part of His Body. So when His body is turned from wafers and wine into THE ACTUAL BODY AND BLOOD of Christ, as your Mass teaches and believes, then Mary’s part of that ACTUAL BODY AND BLOOD OF CHRIST would HAVE TO BE PRESENT. Otherwise, He is not COMPLETELY there.


1,164 posted on 09/06/2011 11:27:42 AM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1146 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee

So, you don’t have one. Got it.


1,165 posted on 09/06/2011 11:28:47 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Are you free from sin, due to Christ’s sacrifice? If you are, she is.
Christians are free from the penalty of sin, but still sin.

Are you saying Mary was sinless, but still sinned?

1,166 posted on 09/06/2011 11:29:18 AM PDT by bkaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee
You don't think a total lack of mention of her from the book of ACTS onward is a good clue?

We're dealing in clues?

1,167 posted on 09/06/2011 11:29:46 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Some might consider a false accusation to the Savior a no no.


1,168 posted on 09/06/2011 11:33:34 AM PDT by bkaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1161 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Yea, their Nicene Creed sounds all flowery and pious...Trouble is, the entire thing is not only non biblical, it is anti biblical...

I've got a question here. How is the Nicene Creed Anti-Biblical? What did I miss here, because I've read it and it's as Biblical as you can get.

1,169 posted on 09/06/2011 11:34:28 AM PDT by Avalon Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1155 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
We're dealing in clues?
No, just double standards, apparently.
1,170 posted on 09/06/2011 11:35:16 AM PDT by bkaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1167 | View Replies]

To: Jvette; smvoice; Avalon Hussar; Judith Anne
"then she becomes responsible for the HUMAN Jesus and not the GOD Jesus Christ.”

There goes Ephesus and Chalcedon. We have two persons here. But there is one Christ, not two.

My mother did not provide the y chromosome, but she is the mother of all of me. Mary did not provide the Divine nature, but she is the mother of all of Jesus who IS Jesus Christ,who IS God the Son of God. There is no part of God the Son of God which is not Jesus and no part of Jesus which is not God the Son of God. He is one person.

Or so we hold. Remember, the Marian stuff all arose out of a Christological controversy.

1,171 posted on 09/06/2011 11:35:25 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1143 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee

What do you care? Are you putting me under your scriptural microscope for fun? I’m not having fun, and I quit. You said Mary’s role was finished when she gave birth to Christ. I asked for scriptural proof. You furnished none, and changed the question.

Are you free from sin? Or not? Are you “in Christ” as Paul says, or not? What does that mean to you? Are you washed whiter than snow? And what do you care what I say about Mary? You have mede it clear you believe none of it, so, forget it. Go find some other Catholic to play your proddy games.


1,172 posted on 09/06/2011 11:37:22 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Two Christs? Hardly. He was/is 100% man. He was/is 100% God.


1,173 posted on 09/06/2011 11:37:40 AM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee

So, we ask for chapter and verse of those who demand chapter and verse from us and that’s a double standard?


1,174 posted on 09/06/2011 11:38:26 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1170 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee

What did Mary say that was false?


1,175 posted on 09/06/2011 11:38:40 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1168 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; boatbums
The 'praise' consists of the acknowledgement that they have a distant and imperfect glimpse of the True God, but that they are totally wrong in how they worship Him.

Imperfect??? You mean like they got a little bit right so they are ok??? Your muzlim apologetics is disgusting...

1Jn 5:11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
1Jn 5:12 He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

Simple as that...Your muzlim brethren are not just a little bit Christian...

And it is not my Church. God has me; I do not have him. Remember?

Only if you've ever called on Jesus to save you...Where's your testimony of your conversion to Jesus???

Joh 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
Joh 5:40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.

So saying Islam is simply a "false worship" or incomplete worship of the true God shows incredible ignorance of their faith. There is just no excuse for your church leaders to state such falsehoods just so that they can appear "ecumenical".

Nope, they simply understand how things are. This is the wisdom of the Magisterium, not the god that so many Protestants see starting back at them when they look in the mirror.

Your magisterium has man's wisdom, not the wisdom from God...

1,176 posted on 09/06/2011 11:38:59 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies]

To: caww
So if an individual is unfamilar with the truths of Gods word he will indeed fall....just a matter of time...especially with the degree of deception there is today...and it's fast on the move across our nation and this world.

And for anyone who doubts it, Adam and Eve had Scripture that was just one verse long and they STILL blew it.

1,177 posted on 09/06/2011 11:39:13 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Avalon Hussar; Quix; Religion Moderator
And you, Avalon said he thinks "aliens" are actually fallen angels masquerading as aliens, --> "he thinks"? mind reading is not allowed according to RF rules...

Actually, if you've ever bothered to really read what quix wrote, that's exactly what he SAID and it's not mind reading to say that that is what quix thinks when he's said as much.

It's disingenuous to accuse someone of mind reading when it's simply a matter of having good reading comprehension skills.

1,178 posted on 09/06/2011 11:42:37 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1063 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Two Christs? Hardly. He was/is 100% man. He was/is 100% God.

It was you who said:
"then she becomes responsible for the HUMAN Jesus and not the GOD Jesus Christ.”

nI'mnot sure what you mean by "responsible" but IF he is ONE, then she is the Mother of God. That just follows. IF she's the mother of the man but not the God, then he is not one.

1,179 posted on 09/06/2011 11:43:09 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
There goes Ephesus and Chalcedon. We have two persons here. But there is one Christ, not two.

Just for the record here, I understand the concept here of the Hypostatic Union of Christ's divinity and humanity but I don't understand the actual mechanics involved beyond understanding that just as there are "Three Hypostases in one Ousia" there is likewise a Hypostasis of divinity and humanity in Christ's being.

That being said, carry on!

1,180 posted on 09/06/2011 11:44:00 AM PDT by Avalon Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 4,661-4,676 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson