Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The King James Version: The Bible Translation that Changed the World
National Review ^ | 07/08/2011 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 07/08/2011 8:20:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/08/2011 8:21:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Cool post, but the Geneva Bible changed the world. That was the one William Bradford was strangled and burned by the Catholic Church for translating. It was also the one that the Pilgrims brought to the New World. King James saw the writing on the wall so to speak. The Gospel could no longer be hid.


2 posted on 07/08/2011 8:24:36 AM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: normy

Haha Bradford! Tyndale! Although Bradford had one!


3 posted on 07/08/2011 8:26:03 AM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
As an American English speaker, and raised during the 50's and 60's, the King James Version has always been, and will always remain, "The Bible" to me and my family.

I recognize that there is a place for the newer translations. But the phrases that have become part of the American culture and lexicon are from the KJV.

I do not believe that a modern American can consider themselves literate unless they have read the KJV, regardless of their religion or lack thereof.

4 posted on 07/08/2011 8:35:00 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Commisioned Translators eh? Don’t you mean imprisoned Jews? Because that is what happened. Strange how history rewrites itself.


5 posted on 07/08/2011 8:38:08 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

RE: Don’t you mean imprisoned Jews?

What did the translators have to do with imprisoned Jews again?


6 posted on 07/08/2011 8:40:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: normy
Your mindless hatred is clouding your brain.

(1) The translators of the Geneva Bible were William Tyndale and Myles Coverdale.

(2) William Bradford probably owned several, but that's about as much as he had to do with the translation.He also died of natural causes.

(3) Myles Coverdale also died of natural causes. William Tyndale was executed, not by the Catholic Church, but by the city fathers of Antwerp at the behest of the Protestant King of England, Henry VIII.

Tyndale was living in Belgium in the first place to avoid him.

7 posted on 07/08/2011 8:41:11 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dayglored; SeekAndFind
> I do not believe that a modern American can consider themselves literate unless they have read the KJV, regardless of their religion or lack thereof.

Okay, one modification to that statement:

At a bare minimum, they have to have read the Pentateuch, Psalms, the Gospels, and Revelations. Hundreds of common phrases and words are found there, and without at least that much background, I don't think a person can call themselves literate.

Yeah, they can skim the "begats". :)

8 posted on 07/08/2011 8:41:11 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
"As an American English speaker, and raised during the 50's and 60's, the King James Version has always been, and will always remain, "The Bible" to me and my family."

I feel just as you do. There may be some slight difficulty in understanding the language of King James, but it is very slight. Unless one is pitifully uneducated, there should never be any difficulty in understanding the beautiful language of that day. If any scripture is read at my passing, my only wish is that it be presented in the language of King James.

9 posted on 07/08/2011 8:49:37 AM PDT by davisfh (Islam is a mental illness with global social consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I believe he said Bradford was executed by the Catholic church and not Tyndale.


10 posted on 07/08/2011 8:56:08 AM PDT by sigzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sigzero

He changed his mind in his subsequent post and said he meant Tyndale.


11 posted on 07/08/2011 9:00:03 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I like the KJV. I find its archaic English more dignified, somehow. Even though it was supposed to be for the ‘vulgar’ in its time.


12 posted on 07/08/2011 9:11:16 AM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

the only problem is that Early Modern English like Shakespeare or the KJV is increasingly different from the English spoken today — and exceptionally different from modern American.


13 posted on 07/08/2011 9:11:26 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
Hundreds of common phrases and words are found there

Actually, they are found in other translations as well

14 posted on 07/08/2011 9:12:59 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The AV certainly was a monumental work and over the years as the translators said it has been revisited and many errors corrected, hence later additions and new translations.
The message from the translators in the front of many editions makes interesting reading.


15 posted on 07/08/2011 9:23:38 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Peace on Earth, Good will to men” has now been so obliterated in the new translations that it is unmemorable. I prefer King James still.


16 posted on 07/08/2011 9:24:07 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; normy

“William Tyndale was executed, not by the Catholic Church, but by the city fathers of Antwerp at the behest of the Protestant King of England, Henry VIII.”

False. Tyndale was found guilty of heresy by the Catholic Church, which was convenient because the penalty for heresy was death. The civil authorities killed Tyndale by strangling, then burning, by the decision of the Catholic Church.

Tyndale fled England because it was more dangerous to translate there than in Europe, since in 1408, the Catholic Archbishop of Canterbury had made it illegal to translate into the vernacular without permission. And until Thomas More fell from favor, it was deadly to be a Protestant in England - “Saint” Thomas More pursued ‘heretics’ and had them tortured and killed at an unprecedented rate.

However, with his fall from favor, King Henry VIII was not inclined to kill Tyndale. In fact, in August of 1535, Cromwell was given permission to write letters asking for clemency for Tyndale by the King’s authority. The appeal was turned down.

Sorry, but the responsibility for Tyndale’s death lies as the feet of the Catholic Church.


17 posted on 07/08/2011 9:30:58 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: davisfh; dayglored

“As an American English speaker, and raised during the 50’s and 60’s, the King James Version has always been, and will always remain, “The Bible” to me and my family.”

Zondervan has published a 400th aniversary edition of the ORIGINAL KJV complete with OLD ENGLISH lettering, a beautiful bible. No wonder the Geneva Bible remained popular for quite a few years.

You can get one at Walmart for $5.00.


18 posted on 07/08/2011 9:33:01 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
> Actually, they are found in other translations as well

Well, generally, the modern-English translations have been scrubbed of the archaic usage ("thee", "Thou", "shalt"), older vocabulary, and often the phrase structure is rearranged. While this enhances the "readability" by most people, it not only removes the poetic sound and feel of the KJV, but it no longer reflects the idiomatic or cultural reference use, so a lot of common references go whizzing over the heads of the modern folks because they don't recognize them. I think that is a profound loss to the language and culture.

19 posted on 07/08/2011 9:39:55 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel; SeekAndFind

***Commisioned Translators eh? Don’t you mean imprisoned Jews? ***

Please feel free to point out those imprisoned Jews!

THE KING JAMES VERSION TRANSLATORS

I. The First Westminister Company—translated the historical books, beginning with Genesis and ending with the Second Book of Kings.

Dr. Lancelot Andrews
Dr. John Overall
Dr. Hadrian Saravia
Dr. Richard Clarke, Dr. John Laifield, Dr. Robert Tighe, Francis Burleigh, Geoffry King, Richard Thompson
Dr. William Bedwell

II. The Cambridge Company—translated Chronicles to the end of the Song of Songs.

Edward Lively, Dr. John Richardson, Dr. Lawrence Chaderton
Francis Dillingham, Dr. Roger Andrews, Thomas Harrison, Dr. Robert Spaulding, Dr. Andrew Bing

III. The Oxford Company—translated beginning of Isaiah to the end of the Old Testament.

Dr. John Harding, Dr. John Reynolds
Dr. Thomas Holland, Dr. Richard Kilby
Dr. Miles Smith, Dr. Richard Brett, Daniel Fairclough

IV. The Second Oxford Company—translated the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, and the Revelation of St. John the Divine.

Dr. Thomas Ravis, Dr. George Abbot
Dr. Richard Eedes, Dr. Giles Tomson, Sir Henry Savile
Dr. John Peryn, Dr. Ralph Ravens, Dr. John Harmar

V. The Fifth Company of Translators at Westminster—translated all of the Epistles of the New Testament

The fifth company of translators at Westminster are all found at this link
Dr. William Barlow
Dr. John Spencer
Dr. Roger Fenton
Dr. Ralph Hutchinson
William Dakins
Michael Rabbet
[Thomas(?)] Sanderson

VI. The Sixth Company of Translators at Cambridge translated the apocryphal books. The King James translators did not consider the Apocrypha to be scripture and neither did King James—see, Alexander McClure on the Apocryphal committee and Why the Apocrypha is not is the Bible.

Dr. John Duport, Dr. William Brainthwaite, Dr. Jeremiah Radcliffe
Dr. Samuel Ward
Dr. Andrew Downes, John Bois
Dr. John Ward, Dr. John Aglionby, Dr. Leonard Hutten
Dr. Thomas Bilson, Dr. Richard Bancroft


20 posted on 07/08/2011 9:42:04 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson