Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

What this victory in New York symbolizes is hope.

Hope that tolerance is coming and hope that one day people will understand.

Why can't we folks just unnerstand these gays who want us to accept their sinnin'? We are such bad people for pointing out that they sin.

1 posted on 06/30/2011 7:27:59 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl; metmom; Mad Dawg; reaganaut; Elsie

Ah, as we see the entire lib brigade is all out to condemn us for not just letting the gays have their “right to marriage”...


2 posted on 06/30/2011 7:29:06 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos
Why can't we folks just understand these gays who want us to accept their sinning'? We are such bad people for pointing out that they sin.(spelling added).

Something about that pesky phrase "THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY"

4 posted on 06/30/2011 7:37:00 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

Marriage is no right!.... It is a religious institution established by God.

From a societal perspective, IT IS A DUTY.

Why is it a duty??? because traditional marriage produces FUTURE TAX PAYERS!!!

Let a homo couple make babies without outside help before they start talking about “rights”!


5 posted on 06/30/2011 7:38:45 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

The reality of “homosexual marriage” and monogamy is that it is contradictory to what homosexuality practices.

And homosexuals can’t procreate which is the primary reason for marriage.


6 posted on 06/30/2011 7:40:50 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GizmosAndGadgets; NonValueAdded; del4hope; MamaB; LowOiL; Jemian; LBKQ; lysie; EmilyGeiger; ...

Ping to the Auburn list. The source seems to be our paper, The Plainsman. Not good at all. This doesn’t reflect the feeling of the majority of people here.


7 posted on 06/30/2011 7:41:38 AM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

homosexuals just can’t accept that a sexual fetish does not contribute to the continuance of society.

homosexual conduct is only about recreational sex, nothing more.

there is no love test in marriage. There is no orgasm test.

just a society rewards the institution for continuing society test.


8 posted on 06/30/2011 7:47:47 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

If these people only want a right to a union.... why couldn’t we have a defined legal “union” called homosexual union or some such wording.They could hold ceremonies and all that, what ever the heck they want. Then they could have their “union”. It is not right to call it “marriage” as that already has a definition that same sex couples cannot meet.

But that is not what they are after. They want acceptance for their actions. They want validation that what they are doing is normal. They want the world to redefine God instituted holy sacraments to fit their perversions. May God have mercy on us all.


9 posted on 06/30/2011 7:49:08 AM PDT by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie mmm mmm mmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; BabaOreally; Berlin_Freeper; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

10 posted on 06/30/2011 7:50:13 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos; Alamo-Girl; metmom; Mad Dawg
There has NEVER BEEN A LAW that prohibits homosexuals from getting married.

Homosexuals have ALWAYS HAD EXACTLY THE SAME rights as everyone else when it comes to marriage.

12 posted on 06/30/2011 7:52:06 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos
SICK
14 posted on 06/30/2011 7:53:43 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

Couldn’t see that one coming, could we?

That didn’t take long.


18 posted on 06/30/2011 8:11:02 AM PDT by metmom (Be the kind of woman that when you wake in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

If marriage is a “right” then by their normal thinking, can I get the gov’t to provide a spouse to me? (Not that I would like their quality...)


25 posted on 06/30/2011 9:07:52 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos
While many of us may not exactly condone that lifestyle, to deny a same-sex couple the same rights as a heterosexual couple is wrong.

This is absolutely TRUE!

However; MARRIAGE is between a MAN and a WOMAN.

Calling PRIVILEDGES granted to QUEERS a 'marriage' and a 'right' is nothing more than a lie.

31 posted on 06/30/2011 9:45:37 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos
Marriage should be a right for all

It already is. There is no sexual orientation prerequisite for getting married. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as a straight man has. Conversely, a gay man has the same prohibition against marrying a man as a straight man does.

35 posted on 06/30/2011 10:12:37 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

OK. huh!


39 posted on 06/30/2011 6:11:19 PM PDT by Cunning8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos
While many of us may not exactly condone that lifestyle, to deny a same-sex couple the same rights as a heterosexual couple is wrong.

Silly leftist, government does not grant rights, rights were endowed man by the Creator. Government is supposed to uphold rights. Last I checked there was no right to be rewarded for choosing to engage in self destructive and disordered sexual activity, EVEN if you get a certificate!

40 posted on 06/30/2011 6:21:57 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

I heard that Obama also approved the queer marriage act in new york, he said that they had done the right thing.

But on the other hand he said that personally he was not ready to support it.

Sounds like more double talk to me, if he thinks its the right thing then why can,t he support it? if he is not prepared to support it then he must think it is wrong.


41 posted on 07/02/2011 8:54:44 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson