Skip to comments.
A Different God? Mitt Romney, the Religious Right, and the Mormon Question
BYU Studies ^
| Reviewer Roger Terry of author Craig Foster's book
Posted on 06/12/2011 5:01:54 PM PDT by Colofornian
As can be expected from a book published by Greg Kofford, Craig L. Fosters A Different God? is well researched and engaging. This book begins by examining the rise of the religious right and the power it exerts on the current political landscape. Foster presents a good deal of information that most Latter-day Saints will not be well acquainted with, such as the difference between evangelical and fundamentalist Christians, the emergence of the charismatic movement, the rise and fall of the Moral Majority, and the subsequent establishment of the Christian Coalition. This background is particularly pertinent to the majority of Mormons in the western United States who align themselves with the Republican Party.
Foster also gives a concise but surprisingly comprehensive summary of the political history of the Latter-day Saints. Because official Church curriculum does not address in detail the period from about 1850 until World War II or even later, most Mormons are rather uneducated regarding their political past, particularly the theocratic era that prevailed until the EdmundsTucker Act precipitated several changes, including the Manifesto in 1890 and the disbanding of the Peoples Party in 1891. The fact that most Mormons at the time gravitated toward the Democratic Party might surprise some of their modern descendents.
While Foster, an ardent Romney supporter, is admirably objective about the many weaknesses that undermined Mitt Romneys run for the Republican presidential nomination, his thesis in this book is that these flaws could have been overcome if not for a larger issue that eventually doomed the Romney campaign: the Mormon Question. This book apparently went to press after John McCain had secured his partys nomination but before he had selected his running mate, but it still has validity far beyond the 2008 presidential primaries. His thorough examination of the strong anti-Mormon sentiment that still seethes in America, especially among the religious right, will be relevant if Romney runs again in 2012 or if any other Latter-day Saint takes aim at the presidency in a future election.
Even though Foster doesnt quite arrive at this particular destination, the sobering conclusion that his presentation inevitably yields is that if a Mormon is to be elected United States president in the foreseeable future, he or she may have to run as a moderate Republican or, perhaps even more realistically, as a moderate Democrat.
TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Other Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: antimormonfatwa; antimormonjihad; antimormontant; bigot; bitterantimormon; bitterformermormon; evangelical; formermormon; hatespeech; lds; mormoaner; mormon; mormonbashing; mormophobic; pharisees; religiousbigot; religiousextremist; religiousintolerance; religiouszealot; romney; romney2012; throwthefirststone; usedtobeamormon; whiningmormons; zealot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: Sherman Logan
Im not Mormon or particularly fond of the faith, but...But you manage to show up a lot and try to defend them from their own history that gets posted.
41
posted on
06/12/2011 6:54:01 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: Elsie
Oh, there’s many of us here who will defend them against the crap that gets tossed around here. At least one of us will always show up on these threads just so no one will think we all remained silent.
42
posted on
06/12/2011 6:55:32 PM PDT
by
sand lake bar
(This bag may be used as a toy)
To: Sherman Logan
There aren't enough Mormons to swing an electoral vote in any states except Utah and possibly Idaho.Nice qualifier you've slipped in here.
If, by some means they can get him to be THE Republican (I didn't say CONSERVATIVE on purpose) candidate, then the sheer volume of dislike for OBAMA would put him in the WH.
Thanks, but no thanks. We'll be sure he gets the same results in THIS primary as he did in the LAST one: he's a LOSER.
43
posted on
06/12/2011 6:59:11 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: sand lake bar
Would you explain what “crap”? Which statements that are made here against mormonISM are in fact crap? You made the claim, state what you are talking about.
44
posted on
06/12/2011 6:59:40 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Non forgiveness is like holding a hot coal thinking the other person will be blistered)
To: sand lake bar
When you say crap are you talking about the mormon jesus that is created and not eternal?
When you say crap are you saying the god that was once a man just like us and not the eternal God?
When you say crap are you talking about the celestial marriage?
When you say crap are you talking about becoming gods of your own planet?
When you say crap what are you talking about?
45
posted on
06/12/2011 7:02:23 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Non forgiveness is like holding a hot coal thinking the other person will be blistered)
To: Colofornian
A Different God?
_________________________________
Different godsssssssssssss
To: ari-freedom
You mean like they did with Obama?Sorry. You gave a false parallel. (Obama's never claimed to be Catholic; nor did he use ND as a platform to make such a claim...try again)
47
posted on
06/12/2011 7:06:44 PM PDT
by
Colofornian
(I already have a God as my leader. Why do I need ANOTHER one as POTUS?)
To: svcw
Romney is a temple worthy mormon, which means he has been deemed by the lds authorities as a mormon in good standing. Temple Worthy MORMONS must answer THIS question (found in the TEMPLE RECOMMEND quiz) in the affirmative every year to REMAIN 'worthy:
11 Do your keep the Word of Wisdom?
Now the Word of Wisdom (WoW) is a bunch of do's and don't regarding what GOD has told MORMONs to eat, drink and bathe.
Here it is:
THE
DOCTRINE AND COVENANTS
OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
SECTION 89
Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Kirtland, Ohio, February 27, 1833. HC 1: 327329. As a consequence of the early brethren using tobacco in their meetings, the Prophet was led to ponder upon the matter; consequently he inquired of the Lord concerning it. This revelation, known as the Word of Wisdom, was the result. The first three verses were originally written as an inspired introduction and description by the Prophet.
19, Use of wine, strong drinks, tobacco, and hot drinks proscribed; 1017, Herbs, fruits, flesh, and grain are ordained for the use of man and of animals; 1821, Obedience to gospel law, including the Word of Wisdom, brings temporal and spiritual blessings.
1
A aWord OF Wisdom, for the benefit of the council of high priests, assembled in Kirtland, and the church, and also the saints in Zion
2 To be sent greeting; not by commandment or constraint, but by revelation and the
aword of wisdom, showing forth the order and
bwill of God in the temporal salvation of all saints in the last days
3 Given for a principle with
apromise, adapted to the capacity of the
bweak and the weakest of all
csaints, who are or can be called saints.
4 Behold, verily, thus saith the Lord unto you: In consequence of
aevils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of
bconspiring men in the last days, I have
cwarned you, and forewarn you, by giving unto you this
word of wisdom by revelation
5 That inasmuch as
any man adrinketh bwine or strong drink among you, behold it is not good, neither meet in the sight of your Father, only in assembling yourselves together to offer up your sacraments before him.
6 And, behold, this should be wine, yea,
apure wine of the grape of the vine, of your own make.
7 And, again,
astrong drinks are not for the belly,
but for the washing of your bodies.
8 And again, tobacco is not for the
abody, neither for the belly, and is not good for man, but is an herb for bruises and all sick cattle, to be used with judgment and skill.
9 And again, hot drinks are not for the body or belly.
10 And again, verily I say unto you, all wholesome
aherbs God hath ordained for the constitution, nature, and use of man
11 Every herb in the season thereof, and every fruit in the season thereof; all these to be used with
aprudence and
bthanksgiving.
12 Yea,
aflesh also of
bbeasts and of the fowls of the air, I, the Lord, have ordained for the use of man with thanksgiving; nevertheless they are to be used
csparingly;
13 And it is pleasing unto me that they should not be
aused, only in times of winter, or of cold, or
bfamine.
14 All
agrain is ordained for the use of man and of beasts, to be the staff of life, not only for man but for the beasts of the field, and the fowls of heaven, and all wild animals that run or creep on the earth;
15 And
athese hath God made for the use of man only in times of famine and excess of hunger.
16 All grain is good for the
afood of man; as also the
bfruit of the vine; that which yieldeth fruit, whether in the ground or above the ground
17 Nevertheless, wheat for man, and corn for the ox, and oats for the horse, and rye for the fowls and for swine, and for all beasts of the field, and barley for all useful animals, and for mild drinks, as also other grain.
18 And all saints who remember to keep and do these sayings, walking in obedience to the commandments,
ashall receive
bhealth in their navel and marrow to their bones;
20 And shall
arun and not be
bweary, and shall walk and not faint.
21 And I, the Lord, give unto them a promise, that the
adestroying angel shall
bpass by them, as the children of Israel, and not slay them. Amen.
Didja read the part where MORMONs are NOT supposed to eat MEAT except during cold weather of famine?
Do you wanna know how many FR MORMONs will answer the question whether THEY are following WOW?
Do you think MITT would?
48
posted on
06/12/2011 7:08:02 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: Colofornian
If it wasn’t for the Mormons, Prop 8 wouldn’t have passed in California. They were the ones that pushed the issue. They were the ones who the gays protested and ridiculed.
49
posted on
06/12/2011 7:10:19 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(All we are saying....is give the military a chance)
To: sand lake bar
Oh, theres many of us here who will defend them against the crap that gets tossed around here.Yup...
But in a courtroom setting, most DEFENSE attournies would actually have some kind of EVIDENCE for the jury to mull over.
Accusing the witnesses of LYING all the time gets mighty old when nothing is produced to back up the claim.
50
posted on
06/12/2011 7:13:05 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: svcw
You made the claim, state what you are talking about.Your Honor, SVCW is badgering the attorney for the defense.
Make him STOP IT!
--MormonDude(Please?)
51
posted on
06/12/2011 7:14:49 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: svcw
Your Honor, SVCW is asking questions of the Defense Attorney!
SURELY Your Eminence KNOWS what MORMONs are taught!
If the facts have slipped your mind; I shall now refresh them for you...
Timeline... Subject...
0:59 "Anti-Mormons..."
1:16 "ATTACK the faith you have..."
2:02 "We really aren't obligated to answer everyone's questions..."
3:57 "You already know MORE about God and Christ and the plan of salvation than any who would ATTACK you."
52
posted on
06/12/2011 7:19:10 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: ari-freedom
This is simply not true as stated. What the mormons did do was use their PR machine for self promotion. There were hundreds of churches and thousands of people who worked on this issue without self promotion. It is because of the lds self promotion that they were targeted as the group responsible for the passage.
53
posted on
06/12/2011 7:19:20 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Non forgiveness is like holding a hot coal thinking the other person will be blistered)
To: ari-freedom
If it wasnt for the Mormons, Prop 8 wouldnt have passed in California.I guess you didn't get the memo.
The actual data will be posted later.
54
posted on
06/12/2011 7:21:17 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: Colofornian
Even though Foster doesnt quite arrive at this particular destination, the sobering conclusion that his presentation inevitably yields is that if a Mormon is to be elected United States president in the foreseeable future, he or she may have to run as a moderate Republican or, perhaps even more realistically, as a moderate Democrat. The one that's running is doing exactly this.
55
posted on
06/12/2011 7:21:47 PM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
("Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama are not rivals, they're running mates." - Rep. Thaddeus McCotter)
To: Elsie
I don’t think you’re lying. You actually believe all this stuff and you believe it’s necessary to keep attacking a group of people who are generally good, honest, etc.
56
posted on
06/12/2011 7:25:01 PM PDT
by
sand lake bar
(This bag may be used as a toy)
To: svcw
It is because of the lds self promotion that they were targeted as the group responsible for the passage. Oh the MORMONs LOVE being on the receiving end of stuff.
I'm surprised that flagellation is not part of 'official' MORMON doctrine!
57
posted on
06/12/2011 7:27:33 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: Elsie
Or sooner, as the case may be!
58
posted on
06/12/2011 7:28:17 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: sand lake bar
I dont think youre lying. You actually believe all this stuff and you believe its necessary to keep attacking a group of people who are generally good, honest, and believe a HERESY!Sorry about the colateral damage to the PEOPLE that you've implied get attacked, but they are standing really close to the target: false 'christianity': mormonISM.
Acts 17:18-19
18. A group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to dispute with him. Some of them asked, "What is this babbler trying to say?" Others remarked, "He seems to be advocating foreign gods." They said this because Paul was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.
19. Then they took him and brought him to a meeting of the Areopagus, where they said to him, "May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting?
Acts 18:11
So Paul stayed for a year and a half, teaching them the word of God.
Romans 15:4
For everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through endurance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.
Romans 16:17
I urge you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them.
1 Corinthians 4:17
For this reason I am sending to you Timothy, my son whom I love, who is faithful in the Lord. He will remind you of my way of life in Christ Jesus, which agrees with what I teach everywhere in every church.
1 Corinthians 11:2
2. I praise you for remembering me in everything and for holding to the teachings, just as I passed them on to you.
Ephesians 4:14-15
14. Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.
15. Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ.
2 Thessalonians 2:15
So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter.
2 Thessalonians 3:6
In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we command you, brothers, to keep away from every brother who is idle and does not live according to the teaching you received from us.
1 Timothy 1:3-4
3. As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain men not to teach false doctrines any longer
4. nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. These promote controversies rather than God's work--which is by faith.
1 Timothy 1:7
They want to be teachers of the law, but they do not know what they are talking about or what they so confidently affirm.
1 Timothy 2:7
And for this purpose I was appointed a herald and an apostle--I am telling the truth, I am not lying--and a teacher of the true faith to the Gentiles.
1 Timothy 4:1-2
1. The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.
2. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.
1 Timothy 4:6
If you point these things out to the brothers, you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, brought up in the truths of the faith and of the good teaching that you have followed.
1 Timothy 4:11
Command and teach these things.
1 Timothy 6:3-5
3. If anyone teaches false doctrines and does not agree to the sound instruction of our Lord Jesus Christ and to godly teaching,
4. he is conceited and understands nothing. He has an unhealthy interest in controversies and quarrels about words that result in envy, strife, malicious talk, evil suspicions
5. and constant friction between men of corrupt mind, who have been robbed of the truth and who think that godliness is a means to financial gain.
2 Timothy 1:13
What you heard from me, keep as the pattern of sound teaching, with faith and love in Christ Jesus.
2 Timothy 2:15-17
15. Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
16. Avoid godless chatter, because those who indulge in it will become more and more ungodly.
17. Their teaching will spread like gangrene.
2 Timothy 3:16-17
16. All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,
17. so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
2 Timothy 4:3-4
3. For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.
4. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.
Titus 1:11
They must be silenced, because they are ruining whole households by teaching things they ought not to teach--and that for the sake of dishonest gain.
Titus 2:1
You must teach what is in accord with sound doctrine.
Titus 2:15
These, then, are the things you should teach. Encourage and rebuke with all authority. Do not let anyone despise you.
Hebrews 13:9
Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings.
2 Peter 2:1-3
1. But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them--bringing swift destruction on themselves.
2. Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute.
3. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.
2 John 1:10
If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take him into your house or welcome him.
59
posted on
06/12/2011 7:32:55 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: ari-freedom
If it wasnt for the Mormons, Prop 8 wouldnt have passed in California.
I could say the same thing about Evangelicals and Catholics. If it wasn't for them, Prop 8 wouldn't have passed.
I could say the same thing about minority voters, who carried Prop 8 -- vs. white voters who were more likely to vote against it. If it wasn't for minority voters, Prop 8 wouldn't have passed.
Why are you singling out one group? Just because the liberals have?
They were the ones that pushed the issue. They were the ones who the gays protested and ridiculed.
The liberals knew they could tackle the Mormon church because of its widespread unpopularity. What? Did you really think the liberals would take on the minority voters of CA? Really?
60
posted on
06/12/2011 7:34:23 PM PDT
by
Colofornian
(I already have a God as my leader. Why do I need ANOTHER one as POTUS?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson