Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
"...ludicrous and potentially libelous."

Are you threatening me with a law suit? Well, counselor, I would be willing to go to court with the facts as presented, would you? (note: FR frowns on threats of law suits)

You really ought to be more careful with what you cut and paste and when you screw up a 1500 word post (that no one, including me will read) blaming everyone else doesn't exonerate you. The fact is that I am not accusing you of plagiarizing Bellarmine, the plagiarized text was copied directly from "Plain reasons against joining the church of Rome" by Richard Frederick Littledale. (That source is very telling of the "objectivity" of your research).

Now run along and annoy someone else.

295 posted on 05/30/2011 11:14:05 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: Natural Law; daniel1212

If you didn’t read it, how do you know it’s plagiarized?


297 posted on 05/30/2011 11:52:34 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

To: Natural Law; boatbums; metmom; Quix; RnMomof7; smvoice; 1000 silverlings; blue-duncan

Than you for the clarification, and I do see now that i should have provided the researcher, rather than just the original source, which might infer i had found it myself, and i am sorry for not doing so.

Nor does my use of such impugn my objectivity, as i quoted more RC sources, including in this matter, while the main thing is that the reference was genuine, which i have found no indication otherwise of, and could have simply cited what the Society of Saint Pius said Bellarmine taught, though it provided no reference.

As for copyright violation, both sources are public domain (the work by Littledale was printed in 1810) so there was no violation of copyright as you charge. Nor was in anyway threatening a lawsuit.

Yet despite your protest about accreditation, the point remains that while you attack our lack of certainty in some things, you have no infallible understanding of infallible declarations, or how many there are in total, or how many verses they have defined, etc., while you must allow varying interpretations by Catholics, and are contradicted by your own in at least 2 key assertions.

But the most important thing is that souls believe and the church preaches the wholly inspired Scriptures, and the words that expound it.

“But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. “ (John 20:31)


304 posted on 05/30/2011 4:16:46 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( "Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out," Acts 3:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

To: Natural Law

I can understand why YOU wouldn't read it: you don't need to, with the MINDREADING abilities you have exhibited here; but why won't anyone ELSE read it?

307 posted on 05/30/2011 6:22:52 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson