Than you for the clarification, and I do see now that i should have provided the researcher, rather than just the original source, which might infer i had found it myself, and i am sorry for not doing so.
Nor does my use of such impugn my objectivity, as i quoted more RC sources, including in this matter, while the main thing is that the reference was genuine, which i have found no indication otherwise of, and could have simply cited what the Society of Saint Pius said Bellarmine taught, though it provided no reference.
As for copyright violation, both sources are public domain (the work by Littledale was printed in 1810) so there was no violation of copyright as you charge. Nor was in anyway threatening a lawsuit.
Yet despite your protest about accreditation, the point remains that while you attack our lack of certainty in some things, you have no infallible understanding of infallible declarations, or how many there are in total, or how many verses they have defined, etc., while you must allow varying interpretations by Catholics, and are contradicted by your own in at least 2 key assertions.
But the most important thing is that souls believe and the church preaches the wholly inspired Scriptures, and the words that expound it.
“But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. “ (John 20:31)
WRITTEN...