Posted on 02/07/2011 8:45:48 AM PST by verdugo
We all hate it when someone makes a promise and doesnt keep it. But you promised! we will say, and, depending on the level of blame and sensitivity of conscience on the part of the offending party, the reaction can be one of great shame. If this is true of promises one is simply unable to keep because circumstances forbade it, it is more so in the case of false promises: that is, those made with no intention of keeping them, or those one had absolutely no authority to make. To promise salvation to a non-Catholic, either directly or indirectly, falls in the latter category as being particularly shameful. It is shameful because it is sinful. It is sinful because it offends not only against faith, but against the greatest Christian virtue: charity.
That the Church has defined there is no salvation outside her means that this proposition is true, and we know it is so with a divinely guaranteed certitude. Genuine charity is rooted in truth. A lie is an affront to truth and therefore an offense against charity. The ontological and psychological connection between truth and charity is a basic Christian concept, whose origin is in the Trinity Itself. Pope Benedict XVI recently highlighted this truth-charity nexus:
To defend the truth, to articulate it with humility and conviction, and to bear witness to it in life are therefore exacting and indispensable forms of charity. Charity, in fact, rejoices in the truth (1 Cor 13:6). Only in truth does charity shine forth, only in truth can charity be authentically lived. (Caritas in Veritate, No. 1, 3, emphasis in original.)
There are various theories regarding how non-Catholics get to heaven as non-Catholics. Many of these have been advanced by churchmen of high rank. Rather than attempt to disprove these opinions in polemical fashion, I would prefer to show the truth of their contrary, and the consequent duty we have in charity not to waver from it. Out of love for God and for our non-Catholic neighbor, we must not give false or even uncertain assurances concerning how salvation is to be attained, and, consequently, how damnation is to be avoided. That would not be doing the truth in charity (Eph. 4:15), as St. Paul enjoins upon Christians.
Lets consider an oft-cited infallible definition:
The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church. (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.)
We often hear the objection that someone does not need to be a formal member of the Church in order to be saved. The implication is that the spiritual trumps the juridical, and that God is not a stickler for names on baptismal registers and the like. But the implication often reaches further than such trivialities, to include what the Church has defined is necessary for salvation. The objection frames the issue of being Catholic in a far-too-juridical way. What makes us inside the Church? Three things: Divine and Catholic Faith (explicit in the principal mysteries the Trinity and the Incarnation and at least implicit in all other articles), sacramental baptism, and subjection to the Holy Father. These defining elements of Church membership expounded by St. Robert Bellarmine were authoritatively postulated by Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis:
Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. For in one spirit says the Apostle, were we all baptized into one Body, whether Jews or Gentiles, whether bond or free. [I Cor., XII, 13] As therefore in the true Christian community there is only one Body, one Spirit, one Lord, and one Baptism, so there can be only one faith. [Cf. Eph., IV, 5] And therefore, if a man refuse to hear the Church, let him be considered so the Lord commands as a heathen and a publican. [Cf. Matth., XVIII, 17] It follows that those who are divided in faith or government cannot be living in the unity of such a Body, nor can they be living the life of its one Divine Spirit. (No. 22)
There are many people who would not be considered formal members of the Church who are, in fact, Catholics in the dogmatic sense. Consider a case Im personally familiar with: a teenager baptized in a (schismatic) Orthodox church in Russia. Adopted by a Catholic couple when she was about eleven years old, she continued to communicate and confess in the Catholic Church as she had in the Orthodox parish in Russia. The Catholic priest in this country said that as long as she believed in the pope which she did she was free to receive the sacraments. Yet I have been assured that, juridically, she is still considered Orthodox. I am fairly certain that her name appears on no Catholic parish register. For all that, she meets the three of the requisites above. This young lady could not be more Catholic. What is important are not the juridical issues, but the ecclesiological, sacramental, and creedal elements that truly make one a Catholic. Perhaps we can put it in terms that might make a canonist cringe: de facto Catholicism is what matters, not de jure Catholicism.
The overly legalistic analysis strikes me as somewhat disingenuous, too, inasmuch as those who advance it generally accuse us (Feeneyites) of being hung up on some sort of formalism. Assuredly we are not; but we are hung up on Catholicism.
Note in the definition of the Council of Florence that pagans, Jews and heretics and schismatics are all categorically described as existing outside the Catholic Church and, consequently, they cannot have a share in life eternal. With only two exceptions, those outside the Church according to Florence correspond exactly to those not included as members by Pius XII. Those exceptions are 1) unbaptized believers (e.g., catechumens), whom Florence does not mention in Cantate Domino, but whom Pius XII clearly states are not members; and 2) excommunicates, whom Florence does not mention.
The unbaptized catechumen and analogous individuals bear a certain close relationship to the Church, as they have her faith, assent to her government, and seek her sacraments. I dont see the need to be preoccupied with this question, as some are. God will provide for His own, and these people are His by those ties Ive just mentioned. God will not cast off anyone who perseveres in His grace.1 Regarding excommunicates, we know from the grave nature of excommunication that those who die in that terrible state if they really are excommunicated in foro interno are lost. What concerns me most are the pagans, Jews and heretics and schismatics that do not have the Churchs faith, do not assent to her government, and may or may not have a sacrament or two, or even seven. The Church infallibly assures us that those who fit these descriptions are not in the way of salvation and that that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her. Jesus commands us in the Holy Gospels to preach the unvarnished Catholic Gospel to these. If we let human respect get in the way of the great mandate, we damn ourselves.
These categories are not beyond comprehension. Pagans (or the synonymous infidels) would include not only unbelievers like atheists and agnostics, idolators like Hindus, or pantheists like Buddhists, but also Muslims, whom the Catholic world lumped into the category pagan in the fifteenth century when the Florentine Fathers met. Jews are hardly in need of explanation. They identify themselves as such. The words heretic and schismatic are rarely used in common parlance today, even in ecclesiastical circles, for they are considered divisive and even rude. Yet, the Church not only officially uses the words, but also clearly defines them in the current (1983) Code of Canon Law:
Can. 751 Heresy is the obstinate denial or doubt, after baptism, of a truth which must be believed by divine and catholic faith. Apostasy is the total repudiation of the christian faith. Schism is the withdrawal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or from communion with the members of the Church subject to him.
Elsewhere in the Code (1364 §1), we are informed that members of all three categories here mentioned automatically excommunicate themselves from the Church: An apostate from the faith, a heretic or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication .
I am very well aware that theologians distinguish between formal and material heresy as well as between formal and material schism. These are perfectly legitimate distinctions. Someone baptized and brought up in an alien sect will inevitably be, for a time anyway, merely in material heresy or schism. Before the age of reason, its not even a question: the child is a Catholic plain and simple. There are no infant Lutherans, Syrian Jacobites, or Serbian Orthodox only pagan ones and Catholic ones. At what point one brought up in such a sect formally adheres to heresy or schism is Gods business and Ill not lose the least amount of sleep over the question. What is the duty of the Church, however, and what ought to make us lose a few winks, is the duty we have to witness to the truth of where salvation is to be found. To keep people somnolent in their errors is just plain damnable. Let us suppose for a moment that one of the infants weve just considered lives to his teens in a blissful merely material heresy. Supposing he commits a mortal sin? Where does he seek forgiveness? Lets say that his particular denomination believes that sin cannot separate us from Gods love as so many believe? What then? Will the same priest who puts the fear of God into a Catholic boy struggling against vice do a volte-face and assure the non-Catholic suffering the same moral afflictions a place in Paradise should he die even though he will not seek the sacrament of Gods mercy because his parents taught him its a popish abomination?
Indifferentism breeds strange contradictions.
While these distinctions are real, and have a valuable place in Catholic theology, they are not intended to contradict the plain meaning of dogma. Theology is meant to serve the revealed word, not to annul it.
The explanation that I recently read on the blog of a particularly intelligent priest, to the effect that God can save someone outside the Church very much misses the point. To argue from Gods sheer power while prescinding from His revelation is a dangerous thing. God could, by His naked omnipotence, use me who am not a priest to confect the Eucharist, couldnt He? By His omnipotence, God could arrange for a child of our own times to be immaculately conceived. Neither of these things entails an inherent contradiction like squaring a circle, but both contradict defined dogma. It would be wiser to believe that Gods grace and providence will make things happen in conformity to His revelation despite the apparent unlikeliness of it.
If we trust Gods grace, justice, and mercy to conform perfectly to the dogmatic teaching of His Church, we will never regret it. And that, I can promise.
She prays for us.
Official Catholic teaching is that Catholics do indeed pray TO saints (for intercession, of course).
As a non-Catholic (former Catholic), I've defended Catholics on this point as to the reasonableness of the position. (I assume saints are indeed living and can hear us).
Where I differ with my Catholic friends is with respect to the efficacy of asking Mary or another saint multiple times to "pray for us." When I ask a friend to pray for me, he hears it the first time. I don't have to call him 100 times within the hour and keep asking him again. :-)
I realize your list is written in a sarcastic and/or humorous way, but here is a response nevertheless. Most of the laws you quote were civil laws expressly written for and observed by the children of Israel and worked well for maintaining civil order. Some of these laws concerning hygiene were amazing considering they knew nothing about germs at that time. Some sound strange to us because they are taken out of cultural context, such as “if a man sells his daughter as a slave...” Others of these are external forms of laws that were later “written on our hearts and minds” under the new covenant of Jesus Christ. Now our body is the temple and the sacrifice is complete in the cross.
Thankfully, there’s at least one person who disagrees:
“The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.”
2 Peter 3:9
Doesn’t say a word about Catholicism, but rather about saving faith in Jesus Christ.
I’ve read the entire Bible.
It’s all about the HEART. It’s NOT about praying TO Mary or other dead sinners. What is in your heart comes out through your actions. Elevating Mary to the level of Christ is WRONG on so many levels. Traditions and rituals won’t get you there either. Saying 52,000 Hail Mary’s and 700 Out Fathers won’t matter either.
Try reading this passage and applying it:
Matt.6:7
[7] But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
Vatican II is a punishment from God. It is a snare, a siren song to RUN AWAY FROM!
What you don’t understand is that the Jews in the OLD Testament were making Judiasm a LEGALISTIC ritual and the Priests were HYPOCRITES. Maybe that could help clear your head.
The problem is that you WANT to believe what you do. You do NOT want serious discussion. You simply want to mock Christians and Jews.
There is something else you should note. The Bible RECORDS what people did. It doesn’t necessarily CONDONE what people did. For example, no where does it work out well for men to have MUTLIPLE WIVES. Yet it happens all the time. The intermarrying for political reasons was routinely done and that didn’t work out well either. Why? Because from the beginning it was to be ONE man for ONE woman. Finally Christ calrified that as well as the deciples because the people were not being obedient and obeying the prophets.
I assume saints are indeed living and can hear us
I don’t believe that is a defensible assumption. I believe the dead leave this space time continuum.
Wow! As a Buddhist I must really be in deep do-do. Where do I sign up for this Catholic thingy?
And yet, it’s not as simple as I first thought: Moslems torture and kill me in this life if I don’t convert, and then Allah sends me to hell. Catholics at least won’t torture and kill me in this life (at this point in history, anyway . . . probably) - yet they still expect the Catholic God to send me to hell after I die - a kinder and gentler, more “charitable” posture, I suppose.
So, who has jurisdiction? Do I end up in the Moslem hell or the Catholic one? Or both? Do the eternal sentences run consecutively? Do I get any say in this, any appeal? And how does this fit in with the whole endowed by my Creator with certain inalienable rights thing? Inquiring Buddhists want to know.
My purpose is to save souls from damnation, nothing new for Catholics, the popes have been proclaiming it forever :
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino, 1441, ex cathedra:
The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives; that the unity of this ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only those who abide in it do the Churchs sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the Christian militia productive of eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.
Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.
Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra: With Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim to every human creature that they by absolute necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.
Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, Decree # 30, 1311-1312, ex cathedra: Since however there is for both regulars and seculars, for superiors and subjects, for exempt and non-exempt, one universal Church, outside of which there is no salvation, for all of whom there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra: Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.
Pope Leo X, Fifth Lateran Council, Session 11, Dec. 19, 1516, ex cathedra: For, regulars and seculars, prelates and subjects, exempt and non-exempt, belong to the one universal Church, outside of which [b]no one at all is saved, and they all have one Lord and one faith.
Pope Pius IV, Council of Trent, Iniunctum nobis, Nov. 13, 1565, ex cathedra: This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one can be saved I now profess and truly hold
Pope Benedict XIV, Nuper ad nos, March 16, 1743, Profession of Faith: This faith of the Catholic Church, without which no one can be saved, and which of my own accord I now profess and truly hold
Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, Session 2, Profession of Faith, 1870, ex cathedra: This true Catholic faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold
Proclamations of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium
In addition to the ex cathedra (from the Chair of Peter) proclamations of the popes, a Catholic must also believe what is taught by the Catholic Church as divinely revealed in her Ordinary and Universal Magisterium (Magisterium = the teaching authority of the Church): Pope Pius IX, Vatican I, Sess. III, Chap. 3, ex cathedra: Further, by divine and Catholic faith, all those things must be believed which are contained in the written word of God and in tradition, and those which are proposed by the Church, either in a solemn pronouncement or in her ordinary and universal teaching power, to be believed as divinely revealed.
the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium does not actually have to be considered at all in regard to Outside the Church There is No Salvation, because this dogma has been defined from the Chair of Peter and nothing in the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium can possibly contradict the Chair of Peter. Pope St. Gregory the Great, quoted in Summo Iugiter Studio, 590‐604: The holy universal Church teaches that it is not possible to worship God truly except in her and asserts that all who are outside of her will not be saved. Pope Innocent III, Eius exemplo, Dec. 18, 1208:
By the heart we believe and by the mouth we confess the one Church, not of heretics, but the Holy Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church outside of which we believe that no one is saved.
Pope Clement VI, Super quibusdam, Sept. 20, 1351: In the second place, we ask whether you and the Armenians obedient to you believe that no man of the wayfarers outside the faith of this Church, and outside the obedience to the Pope of Rome, can finally be saved.
Pope St. Pius V, Bull excommunicating the heretic Queen Elizabeth of England, Feb. 25, 1570: The sovereign jurisdiction of the one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation, has been given by Him [Jesus Christ], unto Whom all power in Heaven and on Earth is given, the King who reigns on high, but to one person on the face of the Earth, to Peter, prince of the Apostles... If any shall contravene this Our decree, we bind them with the same bond of anathema.
Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (# 14), May 5, 1824: It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.
Pope Leo XII, Quod hoc ineunte (# 8), May 24, 1824: We address all of you who are still removed from the true Church and the road to salvation. In this universal rejoicing, one thing is lacking: that having been called by the inspiration of the Heavenly Spirit and having broken every decisive snare, you might sincerely agree with the mother Church, outside of whose teachings there is no salvation.
Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (# 13), Aug. 15, 1832: With the admonition of the apostle, that there is one God, one faith, one baptism (Eph. 4:5), may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever. They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that those who are not with Christ are against Him, (Lk. 11:23) and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore, without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate (Athanasian Creed).
Pope Gregory XVI, Summo Iugiter Studio (# 2), May 27, 1832: Finally some of these misguided people attempt to persuade themselves and others that men are not saved only in the Catholic religion, but that even heretics may attain eternal life. Pope Pius IX, Ubi primum (# 10), June 17, 1847: For there is one universal Church outside of which no one at all is saved; it contains regular and secular prelates along with those under their jurisdiction, who all profess one Lord, one faith and one baptism.
Pope Pius IX, Nostis et Nobiscum (# 10), Dec. 8, 1849: In particular, ensure that the faithful are deeply and thoroughly convinced of the truth of the doctrine that the Catholic faith is necessary for attaining salvation. (This doctrine, received from Christ and emphasized by the Fathers and Councils, is also contained in the formulae of the profession of faith used by Latin, Greek and Oriental Catholics).
Pope Pius IX, Syllabus of Modern Errors, Dec. 8, 1864 ‐ Proposition 16: Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation. Condemned
Pope Leo XIII, Tametsi futura prospicientibus (# 7), Nov. 1, 1900: Christ is mans Way; the Church also is his Way Hence all who would find salvation apart from the Church, are led astray and strive in vain.
Pope St. Pius X, Iucunda sane (# 9), March 12, 1904: Yet at the same time We cannot but remind all, great and small, as Pope St. Gregory did, of the absolute necessity of having recourse to this Church in order to have eternal salvation
Pope St. Pius X, Editae saepe (# 29), May 26, 1910: The Church alone possesses together with her magisterium the power of governing and sanctifying human society. Through her ministers and servants (each in his own station ad office), she confers on mankind suitable and necessary means of salvation.
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 11), Jan. 6, 1928: The Catholic Church is alone in keeping the true worship. This is the fount of truth, this is the house of faith, this is the temple of God: if any man enter not here, or if any man go forth from it, he is a stranger to the hope of life and salvation.
Of course you have every right to proselytize, until the person tells you to stop. The catholic church has every right to teach that everyone outside the church has a soul that is in mortal danger. To paraphrase Thomas Jefferson it neither breaks my bones or pricks my flesh.
Considering we have a constitution that allows us to violate 7 of the ten commandments I find it funny when people want them posted all over the place.
That would include Pope Bendict XVI.
No thanks,........"Ubi Petrus, Ibi Ecclesia"...... works just fine for me.
Disavow vatican II? Where does the pope stand on vatican II?
Vatican II was not a dogmatic council. It did not declare any new doctrines. If anyone sincerely reads any part of Vatican II that people use today to change Catholic dogma (an impossibility), you will find that it does not clearly state what they say.
One can ignore Vatican II altogether, since VatII does not contain any new dogmas, and all the defined dogmas are contained in councils and decrees prior to Vatican II.
Hey, its OK. We were taught the same thing about you.
Best belly laugh Ive had this week.
Who precisely is “we”?
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.”
Now I am a deist not a christian so I don't have a dog in this fight but it appears to me that the christian re-constructionist movement is more correct on this one.
Scripture is even more strict if you look at Moses in the desert for 40 years and all his purgings, and additionally:
15 He that striketh his father or mother, shall be put to death. 17 He that curseth his father, or mother, shall die the death. (Exodus 21)
18 If a man have a stubborn and unruly son, who will not hear the commandments of his father or mother, and being corrected, slighteth obedience: 19 They shall take him and bring him to the ancients of his city, and to the gate of judgment, 20 And shall say to them: This our son is rebellious and stubborn, he slighteth hearing our admonitions, he giveth himself to revelling, and to debauchery and banquetings: 21 The people of the city shall stone him: and he shall die, that you may take away the evil out of the midst of you, and all Israel hearing it may be afraid. (Deut 21)
No. Neither do all Catholics. In fact, most likely, most Catholics from today will not be saved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.