Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Members are future of Church PR
BYU Daily Universe ^ | Nov. 15, 2010 | Brooke Self

Posted on 12/30/2010 6:26:18 PM PST by Colofornian

Latter-day Saints themselves are the new face of public relations for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, several presenters said during last week’s Mormon Media Studies Symposium on BYU’s campus.

“The most authentic and transparent ways to dispel myths about the Church is through the lives of our members,” said Joel Campbell, associate professor of communications at BYU.

SNIP

The two-day conference was the first of its kind and brought together scholars and practitioners to discuss a variety of topics relating to Mormonism and media.

SNIP

Scott Swofford, who previously coordinated media for the Church and is now director of content at BYU Broadcasting, said the missionary department has done research for years on the most effective way to share the gospel message. A catalyst to the new campaign was a Pew study that said 51 percent of Americans know little or nothing about Mormons.

“We did the research and the most authentic and transparent way to do that [introduce the church] is through the lives of our members,” Swofford said. “The way to connect with people most likely to respond to our message is personally, not institutionally.”

SNIP

Otterson said in a recent interview on the Mormon Channel that public perceptions are influenced just as much — if not more so — by interactions with individual Church members.

SNIP

“I think there has been a nervousness about sharing the things that we believe are true and that are fundamental parts of our faith, and when we represent ourselves we leave that part out of the conversations,” Cardon said. “Those are the things that convert us.”

(Excerpt) Read more at universe.byu.edu ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion; Other Christian; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: inman; lds; mormon; publicrelations; realities
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
This article shows Lds know they have a public perception issue.

One of the top Lds thread replies of the year (1,361 replies) was to this Mormon wonderment as to why there's lack of PR popularity by the Lds church: Why do they hate us? The responses

That thread came on the back of its "sister" thread: McKay Coppins: Why do they hate us? Try Asking [Coppins, BTW, is now @ Newsweek]

See also:
* Myths and Reality - The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints [Posted by Mormon poster...over 400 replies...see especially posts 29, 37, 41, 47, 86 -- and #76 by Elsie]
* LDS don’t get theological respect because they seek and shun mainstream acceptance, prof says [see especially posts 1, 2, 6, 8]

For examples of misleading Mormon PRism, see Elsie's post #428:

1 posted on 12/30/2010 6:26:23 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

IBPD spam


2 posted on 12/30/2010 6:29:01 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR to pimp your blog!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender
From the article: ““We did the research and the most authentic and transparent way to do that [introduce the church] is through the lives of our members,” Swofford said. “The way to connect with people most likely to respond to our message is personally, not institutionally.”..."I think there has been a nervousness about sharing the things that we believe are true and that are fundamental parts of our faith, and when we represent ourselves we leave that part out of the conversations,” Cardon said. “Those are the things that convert us.”

PD, when I read this, it provoked a few honest questions that I had as I reflected upon your posting style.

First of all, do these comments at all engender a desire to reconsider that style?

IOW, if the "most authentic and transparent way" to relate to others personally and not institutionally -- doesn't spam linkages present more of a tilted "institutional" front vs. personally transparent?

And perhaps you could address this question: If Lds leaders are saying that "I think there has been a nervousness about sharing the things that we believe are true and that are fundamental parts of our faith... -- then why do I perceive a reluctance on the part of some Mormons to directly share these things? (vs. "go here" only approach)

Have a very blessed New Year!

3 posted on 12/30/2010 6:31:57 PM PST by Colofornian (Final filtered authority figures of Lds: PR spokesmen & Unofficial Mormon links Some Lds use)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

(Ping to mention in post #1)


4 posted on 12/30/2010 6:35:16 PM PST by Colofornian (Final filtered authority figures of Lds: PR spokesmen & Unofficial Mormon links Some Lds use)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

IBPD2!


5 posted on 12/30/2010 6:37:27 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; All

PD, when I read this, it provoked a few honest questions that I had as I reflected upon your posting style.

First of all, do these comments at all engender a desire to reconsider that style?

IOW, if the “most authentic and transparent way” to relate to others personally and not institutionally — doesn’t spam linkages present more of a tilted “institutional” front vs. personally transparent?

And perhaps you could address this question: If Lds leaders are saying that “I think there has been a nervousness about sharing the things that we believe are true and that are fundamental parts of our faith... — then why do I perceive a reluctance on the part of some Mormons to directly share these things? (vs. “go here” only approach)


When I converse with people in person I share plenty.

When I deal with a bunch of anonymous persons, of which a large part are anti-Mormon activists, you will get my links to the truth.

So twist this all you want, I STILL will not play your game.

Nice try!!


6 posted on 12/30/2010 6:51:52 PM PST by Paragon Defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Oh btw thanks for this post it is very interesting. I am sure the thread will head downhill from here.

Have a good night!


7 posted on 12/30/2010 6:53:16 PM PST by Paragon Defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Questions for Mormons

1. If Gods are individuals who have passed through mortality and have progressed to Godhood, how has one person of the Trinity (the Holy Spirit) attained Godhood without getting a body? (See Acts 5:3,4)

2. If Gods are individuals who have passed through an earth life to attain Godhood, how is it that one person of the Trinity (Jesus Christ) was God before He received a body or passed through earth life? (Matt. 1:23 and Hebrews 10:5)

3. If the Book of Mormon really contains the fullness of the Gospel, why does it not teach the doctrine of “eternal progression”? (See D&C 20:8,9)

4. God said, “Is there a God beside me? Yea, there is no God; I know not any”. How can there be Gods who are Elohim’s ancestors? Surely an all-knowing God would know this and wouldn’t speak falsehoods. (See Isa. 44:8 and Journal of Discourses Vol. 1, pg. 123)

5. How can any men ever become Gods when the Bible says, “Before me there was no god formed, neither shall there be after me”? (Isaiah 43:10)

6. If Adam is the “only God with whom we have to do”, did Adam create himself? (Journal of Discourses Vol. 1, pg. 50, 51)

7. Joseph Smith stated that without the ordinances and authority of the priesthood no man can see the face of God and live (D & C 84:21, 22). He also said that he saw God in 1820 (Joseph Smith 2:17). Joseph Smith, however, never received any priesthood until 1829 (D&C 13). How did he see God and survive? In which was he in error: his revelation in D & C 84:21, 22 or his experience in the grove?

8. If a spirit is a being without a body (See Luke 24:39), why do Mormons teach that God the Father has a body of flesh and bones? (See John 4:24)

9. If the Father is Elohim and Jesus is Jehovah (as the Mormons teach), how does a Mormon explain Deuteronomy 6:4, which in the Hebrew says, “Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our Elohim is one Jehovah”?

10. If the Book of Mormon contains the fullness of the Gospel, why doesn’t it teach that God was once a man?

8 posted on 12/30/2010 7:13:19 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

CB
If you are a worthy mormon, you could try writing a letter
about your questions to the “authorities”...

... but they really don’t want members pestering them by
asking anything embarrassing!

Things that show a lack of logic in LDS doctrine
Things that point out the lack of objective facts
Things that point out a lack of logic
Things that point out a lack of evidence

In short, stick with your feelings, mormon! It’s all we got!

...................>

or, mormons could flee from the cult and turn to Christ.


9 posted on 12/30/2010 7:18:39 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

INB4PD3!


10 posted on 12/30/2010 7:59:29 PM PST by Imnidiot (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imnidiot

IB4PD4!!!!!!!!


11 posted on 12/30/2010 8:02:37 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla

IB4PD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!


12 posted on 12/30/2010 8:03:37 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Imnidiot

DOH! I was mistaken...I didn’t see the cut & paste stuff so I assumed he hadn’t shown up. My bad.


13 posted on 12/30/2010 8:05:58 PM PST by Imnidiot (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

BTTT


14 posted on 12/30/2010 8:13:06 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
This article shows Lds know they have a public perception issue.

I think Sisterwives and Big Love might have helped.

15 posted on 12/30/2010 10:30:08 PM PST by dragonblustar ("... and if you disagree with me, then you sir, are worse than Hitler!" - Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: dragonblustar

mind reading


17 posted on 12/31/2010 12:16:46 AM PST by BlueMoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender; Colofornian
I love this one: How heavy were those gold plates --> that ties in to the facts that there were no Semites in the AMerica sbefore Columbus (no Nephites or Lamanites -- they are fictional), and that the Book of Abraham is really just the book of the Dead with J Smith pretending to translate it (he didn't reckon that a few years later they'd find the Rosetta stone and be able to translate Egyptian hieroglyphics and prove that it was just the book of the Dead with dedications to Anubus, god of the dead, not Abraham)
18 posted on 12/31/2010 1:06:52 AM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender; Colofornian
<1>you will get my links to the truth.

Well, let us know when you decide to post some.

While we are waiting, here are some links to the truth about Mormonism, from those who have been there

www.mormonoutreach.org

www.utlm.org

www.irr.org./mit

www.exmormon.org

19 posted on 12/31/2010 7:09:44 AM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar
The reason why he won’t respond to your question is because he can’t. If he has to think about his religion in any depth, he might start to question it.

BINGO! That is exactly it and why the LDS leadership, several years ago taught in their conference that members should be aware of what is posted online about 'the church'. Truth of the matter is, if the LDS really research their religion in order to respond to the 'antis' they will leave. I did and so did many others I know.

20 posted on 12/31/2010 7:14:53 AM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson