Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Because of the Protestant Reformers Beliefs On Mary
Why I Am a Catholic ^ | 12/16/10 | Frank Weathers

Posted on 12/17/2010 7:31:07 AM PST by marshmallow

Back when I first joined YIMCatholic, I was going to write posts about my conversion. I hammered out seven posts in pretty rapid succession and then, I stopped writing them until recently.

Many of my posts now are simply my observations of the world which are colored through the lens of a convert to Catholicism. It would be difficult for them not to be. Other posts I've written are of the "look what I just found!" variety, and the "I want to share this with you" type. Call them the discovery posts if you will.

Recently I gave a talk on the Communion of Saints for my parishes RCIA group. Consequently, I've been answering questions of potential converts that have prompted me to explain my conversion to others.

Basically, this has resulted in my having become a neophyte evangelist of sorts for the Church. And though this blog space isn't the forum for heavy-duty apologetics, because others do that better elsewhere, I have always seen my role here at YIMC as one of evangelizing.

Back to my conversion story, when I was first confronting the idea of becoming a Catholic, I had to look hard at the question "Why am I Protestant?" Having just moved cross-country following my retirement from the Marines, I found out that my mother no longer went to church where we had gone when I was growing up. Instead of the non-denominational church I grew up in (and which we were a founding family of), I learned that she now went to a Presbyterian church instead. Hmmm.

Rather than start visiting all kinds of churches, which appealed to me about as much as shopping for a new car, my family and I kept going to the local Catholic parish in our new town while I did research and home improvement projects. One of the first things I looked into was the problem of Catholics and their obviously misguided devotion to the Virgin Mary.

The funny thing is, I had sat in the pews in the Catholic Church with my wife for close to 18 years and I had never really noticed any wacky or overly zealous devotion to Mary. Not at Mass, anyway, and as we didn't stick around much after the conclusion of Mass, I didn't see anything that made me uncomfortable. Truthfully, I was surprised about this and it's probably a big reason why I continued to sit in the pews with my patient Catholic wife for that long a time.

This didn't stop me from believing that weird Marian devotions were happening though, and I assumed talk of her perpetual virginity was just "crazy talk." Like most, I had no idea what the Immaculate Conception was either and I just thought people were referring to Our Lord's conception. I was ignorant, plain and simple. But I had in mind a mission to correct the wrong religious track that my family was on so I started planning the military campaign to retake the spiritual territory I had ceded to the Church. My first target was what I thought would be the easiest: Mary.

Before I went on my "destroy Marian Devotion" offensive, though, I knew I would have to do a little homework. Planning ahead, you see, I figured the best place to start was with the guys who picked up the Protestant Reformation football and ran with it for touchdowns. Follow the winners Frank, and victory will be yours!

But get this. Much to my surprise, nay, shock(!) I had to throw a penalty flag on myself and look for a different angle of attack. Because what I found out was that the Big Three "Reformers" all agreed with the Catholic Church's teachings on the Mother of God!

Here is what I found, courtesy of the site catholicapologetics.info,

Martin Luther:

Mary the Mother of God

Throughout his life Luther maintained without change the historic Christian affirmation that Mary was the Mother of God:

"She is rightly called not only the mother of the man, but also the Mother of God ... It is certain that Mary is the Mother of the real and true God."

Perpetual Virginity

Again throughout his life Luther held that Mary's perpetual virginity was an article of faith for all Christians - and interpreted Galatians 4:4 to mean that Christ was "born of a woman" alone.

"It is an article of faith that Mary is Mother of the Lord and still a Virgin."

The Immaculate Conception

Yet again the Immaculate Conception was a doctrine Luther defended to his death (as confirmed by Lutheran scholars like Arthur Piepkorn). Like Augustine, Luther saw an unbreakable link between Mary's divine maternity, perpetual virginity and Immaculate Conception. Although his formulation of the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception was not clear-cut, he held that her soul was devoid of sin from the beginning:

"But the other conception, namely the infusion of the soul, it is piously and suitably believed, was without any sin, so that while the soul was being infused, she would at the same time be cleansed from original sin and adorned with the gifts of God to receive the holy soul thus infused. And thus, in the very moment in which she began to live, she was without all sin..."

Assumption

Although he did not make it an article of faith, Luther said of the doctrine of the Assumption:

"There can be no doubt that the Virgin Mary is in heaven. How it happened we do not know."

Honor to Mary

Despite his unremitting criticism of the traditional doctrines of Marian mediation and intercession, to the end Luther continued to proclaim that Mary should be honored. He made it a point to preach on her feast days.

"The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of the human heart."

"Is Christ only to be adored? Or is the holy Mother of God rather not to be honoured? This is the woman who crushed the Serpent's head. Hear us. For your Son denies you nothing." Luther made this statement in his last sermon at Wittenberg in January 1546.

John Calvin:

It has been said that John Calvin belonged to the second generation of the Reformers and certainly his theology of double predestination governed his views on Marian and all other Christian doctrine . Although Calvin was not as profuse in his praise of Mary as Martin Luther he did not deny her perpetual virginity. The term he used most commonly in referring to Mary was "Holy Virgin".

"Elizabeth called Mary Mother of the Lord, because the unity of the person in the two natures of Christ was such that she could have said that the mortal man engendered in the womb of Mary was at the same time the eternal God."

"Helvidius has shown himself too ignorant, in saying that Mary had several sons, because mention is made in some passages of the brothers of Christ." Calvin translated "brothers" in this context to mean cousins or relatives.

"It cannot be denied that God in choosing and destining Mary to be the Mother of his Son, granted her the highest honor."

"To this day we cannot enjoy the blessing brought to us in Christ without thinking at the same time of that which God gave as adornment and honour to Mary, in willing her to be the mother of his only-begotten Son."

Ulrich Zwingli:

"It was given to her what belongs to no creature, that in the flesh she should bring forth the Son of God."

"I firmly believe that Mary, according to the words of the gospel as a pure Virgin brought forth for us the Son of God and in childbirth and after childbirth forever remained a pure, intact Virgin." Zwingli used Exodus 4:22 to defend the doctrine of Mary's perpetual virginity.

"I esteem immensely the Mother of God, the ever chaste, immaculate Virgin Mary."

"Christ ... was born of a most undefiled Virgin."

"It was fitting that such a holy Son should have a holy Mother."

"The more the honor and love of Christ increases among men, so much the esteem and honor given to Mary should grow."

I remember being blown away by these revelations. I had gone to Christian churches my whole life and I had been told what I was supposed to believe, and I had never been told these things about Mary. I felt a little bit like the fellow wearing tan below, even though I was really acting like the guy wearing black.

And then I thought, "methinks they dost protest too much." And like young Skywalker above, I too leaped with faith and lived to tell the tale. I didn't land on my feet though. Instead, I landed in the lap of Blaise Pascal.

And so began the process of my going back to the Scriptures and to the Church Fathers and back through the history of the Catholic Church, and finally back into the arms of Christ's Church Herself.

Perhaps this post is a prequel in the 2BFrank saga. Sheeeesh!

To read more about the Protestant Reformers views on the Blessed Virgin Mary, and to track down the footnotes too, head on over to catholicapologetics.info. Head over to Scripture Catholic too, and bring your Bibles. Then head over to the Vatican and look at the Catechism of the Catholic Church as well.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: freformed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,441-1,4601,461-1,4801,481-1,500 ... 1,541-1,558 next last
To: Dr. Eckleburg; metmom; Quix; presently no screen name; 1000 silverlings; blue-duncan; ...
By using the term" "Mother of God" for Mary, a created being, the RCC gives the false impression that Mary preceded Christ which is insanity because the Triune God has no beginning and no ending.

This "giving of a false impression" is a product of your mind and your lack of familiarity with Catholic doctrine exacerbated by a certain philosophical obtuseness. Anyone with just the slightest bit of operational reason would know that someone who is the mother of God in time cannot be the origin of God's being before time or the world existed. Elizabeth called Mary the mother of her Lord--as a Jewish woman, the wife of a Jewish priest, both of whom were righteous in God's sight and who observed all the Lord's commands and decrees blamelessly, her Lord was the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the creator of heaven and earth. She had no problem with her cousin Mary being the mother of her Lord. That's good enough for me.

I don't think Mary is a mediator. Jesus is the only mediator between God and man and the Holy Spirit in the believer's heart is the one who intercedes for him according to God's will. I don't think Mary is a co-redeemer. It's what Jesus did alone that is the basis for human redemption. I think both of those concepts, as I have heard them described, are just nuts.
1,461 posted on 12/21/2010 11:00:05 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1457 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; Dr. Eckleburg

Catholic theology proclaims her “the firstborn of every creature”(Col 1:15) which once again is the title that belongs to Christ alone, not Mary.


1,462 posted on 12/21/2010 11:07:43 AM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1461 | View Replies]

Comment #1,463 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Natural Law; narses
By using the term" "Mother of God" for Mary, a created being, the RCC gives the false impression that Mary preceded Christ which is insanity because the Triune God has no beginning and no ending.

That is a total misinterpretation of what the Church actually teaches. The "false impression" is entirely yours. I've never met a Catholic who holds this false impression, not a single one, nor heard of any Catholic priest or theologian who holds to this egregious error, that Mary pre-existed the Trinity.

The actual teaching about Mary, the Incarnation, Christ's Person, His two natures, and how these all relate together has been posted here literally thousands of times, in hundreds of posts over the last ten years or so, and yet we still hear these ridiculous assertions. The actual teaching has been posted scores of times over the past couple of day, ON THIS THREAD, yet we still have the over-the-top accusations coming out of thin air.

These kind of posts are either made out of ignorance, or designed simply to instigate more "fights", imo.
1,464 posted on 12/21/2010 11:09:36 AM PST by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1457 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

Wrong.
Colossians 1:15 refers to Christ, not Mary. The Church does not teach that it refers to Mary.


1,465 posted on 12/21/2010 11:15:33 AM PST by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1462 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
"and I showed you where two popes "had declared.""

No, you showed me where two popes, out of 265, had expressed a personal belief that you then proceeded to misrepresent. It is a pathetic expression of hatred that denies Christ and rejects His sacrifice.

1,466 posted on 12/21/2010 11:15:39 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1459 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente; Quix

That’s what I said, *Christ alone* is the firstborn, not Mary. Quix has a long list that Catholics claim is Mary’s role and this is one of them


1,467 posted on 12/21/2010 11:23:33 AM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1465 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; Dr. Eckleburg
Elizabeth called Mary the mother of her Lord--as a Jewish woman, the wife of a Jewish priest, both of whom were righteous in God's sight and who observed all the Lord's commands and decrees blamelessly, her Lord was the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the creator of heaven and earth.

Elizabeth KNEW the prophecy of a future Messiah coming. Wouldn't He have to be born first? Are you saying God needs to grow in wisdom? Jesus did because He was acting in another form - a flesh form, a human form.

She had no problem with her cousin Mary being the mother of her Lord. That's good enough for me.

And who Jesus said who His mother is - ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU? You take one Scripture and make a doctrine out of it.

I have said it over and over - JESUS isn't enough for the RCC, they want more. Just like the 'works' mentality for salvation - the Blood of JESUS isn't enough. WHO would want Jesus not to be enough? Who tempted Him, Who was after The Word from the beginning? That's where this deception comes from. And why? to ROB Jesus of those He died for. Satan comes to kill/rob/destroy. And The RCC is his pawn.

IMO, being anyway involved in deceptive teachings must do something to the ability to think for themselves in that area where they were deceived. Like a link to reasoning has dissolved. Deception is destructive as the Word states - perhaps, more than some realize - but they don't take The Word seriously enough to 'get it'. And I SPEAK from experience. Until one washes themselves in Truth and renew their 'deceptive' mind/teaching can that deception be erased. Thank YOU, Jesus!
1,468 posted on 12/21/2010 11:39:58 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1461 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente
That is a total misinterpretation of what the Church actually teaches

Are you saying the RCC doesn't assign the divinity to Mary? What's ALL the 'co''s about?

In 2nd grade a nun corrected me when I said the mother of Jesus by saying she is the mother of God. I already knew God already existed - so how could he born? They consistently said mother of God for a reason. Because she didn't 'just' give birth to the man, JESUS. The man JESUS, Who died for our sins, WASN'T ENOUGH! And still isn't to the RCC with the 'works' mentality, or praying to Mary as 'co mediator'.

They don't teach about pre existing God but that is what they are implying without saying it - yet say it with their 'co's. She is the mother of the man, JESUS. It ends there! But that isn't good enough, is it?
1,469 posted on 12/21/2010 11:59:24 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1464 | View Replies]

To: maryz; Dr. Eckleburg

See Dr. E’s post at 1457; that is what I’ve been trying to explain, although with a great lack of eloquence.

“Mother of God” implies some foundation for “Queen of Heaven” — which she is NOT — all in all, as Dr. E states, this elevates the created to an equality with the Creator. Bad no matter how you cut it.

Thanks Dr. E; again, you nail it.


1,470 posted on 12/21/2010 12:00:34 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1441 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

That’s a good question. We are given a resurrection body that does not decay. It does not suffer or feel pain.


1,471 posted on 12/21/2010 12:05:40 PM PST by BenKenobi (Rush speaks! I hear, I obey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1447 | View Replies]

To: HossB86; Dr. Eckleburg
Dr. E's 1457 "nails it" only to those who do not believe that Christ is really, actually, genuinely God Incarnate, the Word become flesh at His conception; Jews and Muslims would have a problem with "Triune," but would otherwise have no problem with the sentiment.
1,472 posted on 12/21/2010 12:06:37 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1470 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Captain Beyond; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; ...
This "giving of a false impression" is a product of your mind and your lack of familiarity with Catholic doctrine exacerbated by a certain philosophical obtuseness.

!NOPE!
IT'S A FUNCTION OF
BASIC WORD MEANINGS
IN THE LANGUAGE
AND
IN THE
NON-VATICAN-ALICE-IN-WONDERLAND-SCHOOL-OF-THEOLOGH-AND-REALITY-MANGLING
CULTURE OF THE REAL WORLD

WHERE
THERE'S
NO
VATICAN DAFFYNITIONARY,
WHERE THERE'S
A GREAT LACK OF
INGROWN, MYOPIC, WILLFUL BLINDNESS, IN-BRED, TUNNEL-VISIONED, MENTALLY WALLED-OFF, INSTITUTIONAL CLUELESSNESS, GROUP THINK, RIGID IN-GROUP HOSTILITY TO TRUTH,
. . .
CONSUMED SHEEPLE.


WHERE SANE, FAIR-MINDED INDIVIDUALS REALLY CAN READ SCRIPTURE AND HEAR HOLY SPIRIT LEADING THEM INTO THE TRUTHS OF SCRIPTURE WITHOUT SUFFERING VULCAN MIND MELDED IDIOCIES, BLASPHEMIES, IDOLATRIES, HERESIES FROM THE BUREAUCRATIC POLITICAL POWER MONGERING PSEUDO-THEOLOGICAL ELITES OF THE VATICAN MAGICSTERICALS.

1,473 posted on 12/21/2010 12:46:35 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1461 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings; Deo volente
INDEED. IN THE WORDS OF A LONG LIST OF RC'S OVER MANY CENTURIES:

THESE ARE NOT isolated idle musings of some few RC's. These are cherished, believed, practiced convictions of a huge percentage of Roman Catholics around the world and over several hundred years--greatly approved, encouraged, aided and abetted by the hierarchy, more or less from the top down, low such many years.

Below are a list of brazen examples
from a very popular devotional
VERY SANCTIONED, APPROVED AND ENCOURAGED
by the Vatican system & hierarchy.
.
.
.

Some have said that the language below
is 'merely' hyperbolic adoration.
I don't think that's what
GOD ALMIGHTY WOULD LABEL IT.
I'm convinced that
GOD ALMIGHTY
CALLS IT
BRAZEN DEMONICALLY
FACILITATED, ENCOURAGED & LED
IDOLATRY AND BLASPHEMY.
He doesn't usually mince words.
.
.
.
WERE MARY HERSELF POSTING ON FR
I BELIEVE HER DENOUNCIATIONS OF SUCH
WOULD BE MUCH MORE FIERCE THAN MINE!
.
.
.
I was involved in a house church
famous all over Southern California
for its deliverance ministry and follow-up.
Mental hospitals and pastors sent their worst cases
to us--the ones they gave up on.
By God's grace, Christ's Blood and Holy Spirit
operating in servant-hearted love through
a lot of dedicated people who opened their homes
to such folks,
many were set free--lastingly free.
.
.
.
I learned a lot in that church.
One of the things that I OBSERVED,
I see a LOT hereon.
there's a characteristic
TYPE OF RESPONSE
WHEN A PERSON AWASH
IN DEMONIC INFLUENCES
(I don't think it matters
whether they are resident
or hovering around)
GETS CHALLENGED, EXHORTED,
HAS THEIR PRIDE PRICKED.
I see a LOT of that TYPE of response, hereon.
.
.
.

Below are the examples
of exalting other deities.
They are real.
They are serious.
They are owned,
operated in,
manifested in,
heart-felt wallowed in
by millions of Roman Catholics around the world.
Pretending otherwise does not change the facts.
White washing it with magicsterical diplospeak
doesn't change the facts.
Rationalizing it with 101 weasel words
doesn't change the facts.
.
.
.

the FACTS are easy enough to see below
for anyone with
more discernment than a gnat's.
.
.
.

Those reading this with any consciousness above comotose
no longer have any excuse.
.
.
.
Holy Spirit will be nudging, urging, forsaking of all such
--ALL HINT OF SUCH--
IGNORING HIS LEADING, NUDGING, URGING
in such matters can be spiritually deadly.
Very spiritually deadly.
.
.
.

ONCE AGAIN,
just a small part of
THE EVIDENCE: .
.
.

Here's the title:

http://www.amazon.com/Ten-Meditations-Mysteries-Rosary-Ferraro/dp/0819801577/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1272938246&sr=1-2

And it carries the official sanctions of:

ni•hil ob•stat
n.
1. Roman Catholic Church An attestation by a church censor that a book contains nothing damaging to faith or morals.
2. Official approval, especially of an artistic work.

WITH RICHARD CARDINAL CUSHING’S IMPRIMATUR

Let me track down the brief portion of quotes upthread . . .

Here they are:

However, as we've seen through a variety of sources--a pile of them in Ferraro's manual about the Rosary--the Roman Catholic et al/Vatican Edifice disagrees with a lot of the claims of RC's hereon to the contrary.

p.32
.
[Quixicated emphases below]
Mary is crowned Queen of heaven and earth, dispenser of all graces . . .

p32
4 - She became Queen of Purgatory, where she exercises her power as mediatrix in behalf of these suffering souls.

5 - She became Queen of us sinners, to assist us through the dangers of this life and to help us in difficulties.

6 - She became the ruler of hell, that trembles at her slightest gaze and is defeated by her power.

"Just as a rock extracted from earth will precipitate into the abyss, so will man, left without Mary's help, quickly slide toward hell." --Richard of St Victor

p37
Sacred Heart of Jesus, Thy kingdom come; Thy kingdom come through Mary! --Partial Indulgence

p41
"Mary is the tree of life to those who grasp her, and he is happy who hold her fast." --Prov. 3:18

p43
1 - "Hail Mary, beloved daughter of the Father, Mother of the Divine Son, Spouse of the Holy Spirit, complement of the most august Trinity!"

p45
6 - To her was granted grace greater than that conferred upon all others, 'that she might vanquish sin in every respect.'
.
[Qx: I guess Christ's vanquishing sin was unnecessary--or ineffectual without Mary's assistance?]

p46
7 - "Mary is the dawn of God because, just as the dawn marks the end of darkness and the beginning of day, so Mary indicates the end of vices and the beginning of virtue."
.
[Qx: I guess Christ's conquering on The Cross and HIS conquering trip to hell were unncessary?]

9 - God loved Mary so much that He gave her the keys to His heart. 'No one can go to God without Mary drawing him.'
.
[Qx: I guess Holy Spirit has been relegated to a 'Walter Mitty' role as spouse of Mary? That's SOME POWER to cancel & take over HOLY SPIRIT'S role to draw men to God!]

p47
4 - "Mary, trusting in the word of the angel, destroyed the sin Eve committed by trusting in the serpent.'
.
[Qx: Evidently, she beat Christ to the job of vanquishing sin!]

5 - "She desired the safety of everyone, went in search of it, and obtained it; it was also through her that this salvation was wrought."
.
[QX: What an unnecessary waste of precious Blood and suffering on THE CROSS!!!/sar]

p47
10 - "As Noah's Ark saved all the animals that entered it, so Mary saves all the souls that entrust themselves to her care."

p50
8 - "If she were not so holy as she is, how could God appoint her to be the ladder of Paradise, the advocate of the world, meatrix between HIm and us?"

p50
4 - "By becoming Mother of God, Mary belongs to the order of hypostatic union; hence she participates IN the infinite sanctity of God."

1,474 posted on 12/21/2010 12:50:41 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1467 | View Replies]

To: maryz; Dr. Eckleburg

Funny; I believe that Jesus is the Son of God, God Incarnate, The Word become flesh — the second person of the Godhead — I believe in the Triune God.

I also believe what the Bible (God’s Word) says about Jesus (The Word) being present with God in the beginning — John 1:1. Jesus, The Word made flesh, was born of Mary — she is his mother as she bore him in the flesh. But God the Son was, is, and will ever be, eternal; without beginning or end.

I don’t believe in a bunch of Roman Catholic Church hogwash.

So, Dr. E. nailed it for me despite what you may think (or not think) that I believe.

Hoss


1,475 posted on 12/21/2010 12:53:46 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1472 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
She is the mother of the man, JESUS. It ends there! But that isn't good enough, is it?

No, it's not good enough. The "man", Jesus, is also God. Mary is the mother of the PERSON, Jesus. He is a Divine Person, with two natures, human and Divine. These two natures are united in His Person, not separated. Mary became His mother at the moment of His conception in her womb, by the power of the Holy Spirit. She was not His mother before this point.
She is the mother of the Person, not merely of His human nature. Your assertion to the contrary is the essence of the old Nestorian heresy, which no mainline Christian church holds to anymore.

There have been literally thousands of posts here on this forum over the past ten years explaining this teaching to death. I'm not going to start all over again from the beginning. You've been here constantly through these years, you can look at the posts/links, etc. explaining the Catholic teaching about Mary.
1,476 posted on 12/21/2010 1:00:15 PM PST by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1469 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

I can’t subscribe to Nestorianism — I hope you’re very happy with it!


1,477 posted on 12/21/2010 1:00:16 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1475 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Great googly-moogly!

Now. To all those who have been claiming otherwise, explain THOSE statements!!!!

Thanks for the “Quixification”

Hoss


1,478 posted on 12/21/2010 1:00:23 PM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1474 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

Sure.

LOL.


1,479 posted on 12/21/2010 1:02:12 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1478 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
"What's ALL the 'co''s about?"

As described ad nauseum (literally until we are sick of it) co, in this case does not mean equal. From the Latin "cum" it means with.

1,480 posted on 12/21/2010 1:09:25 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1469 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,441-1,4601,461-1,4801,481-1,500 ... 1,541-1,558 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson