Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joseph Smith Married Other Men's Wives: Would you share your spouse with the Prophet?
Rethinking Mormonism ^

Posted on 11/28/2010 11:46:07 AM PST by delacoert

Joseph Smith's Failed Proposals to Married Women

John Taylor's Wife, Leonora
"The Prophet went to the home of President Taylor, and said to him, 'Brother John, I WANT LEONORA.'" Taylor was stunned, but after walking the floor all night, the obedient elder said to Smith, "If GOD wants Leonora He can have her." Woodruff concluded: "That was all the prophet was after, to see where President Taylor stood in the matter, and said to him, Brother Taylor, I dont want your wife, I just wanted to know just where you stood."
- Prophet Wilford Woodruff, John Mills Whitaker Journal, Nov. 1 1890; emphasis in original

Heber C. Kimball's Wife, Vilate
“During the summer of 1841, shortly after Heber's return from England, he was introduced to the doctrine of plural marriage directly through a startling test-a sacrifice which shook his very being and challenged his faith to the ultimate. He had already sacrificed homes, possessions, friends, relatives, all worldly rewards, peace, and tranquility for the Restoration. Nothing was left to place on the altar save his life, his children, and his wife. Joseph demanded for himself what to Heber was the unthinkable, his Vilate. Totally crushed spiritually and emotionally, Heber touched neither food nor water for three days and three nights and continually sought confirmation and comfort from God." Finally, after "some kind of assurance," Heber took Vilate to the upper room of Joseph's store on Water Street. The Prophet wept at this act of faith, devotion, and obedience. Joseph had never intended to take Vilate. It was all a test."
- Biography of Heber C. Kimball, "Heber C. Kimball, Mormon Patriarch and Pioneer." By Stanley B. Kimball, page 93.

Orson Pratt's Wife, Sarah
"Sometime in late 1840 or early 1841, Joseph Smith confided to his friend that he was smitten by the "amiable and accomplished" Sarah Pratt and wanted her for "one of hisspiritual wives, for the Lord had given her to him as a special favor for his faithfulness" (emphasis in original). Shortly afterward, the two men took some of Bennett's sewing to Sarah's house. During the visit, as Bennett describes it, Joseph said, "Sister Pratt, the Lord has given you to me as one of my spiritual wives. I have the blessings of Jacob granted me, as God granted holy men of old, and as I have long looked upon you with favor, and an earnest desire of connubial bliss, I hope you will not repulse or deny me." "And is that the great secret that I am not to utter," Sarah replied. "Am I called upon to break the marriage covenant, and prove recreant to my lawful husband! I never will." She added, "I care not for the blessings of Jacob. I have one good husband, and that is enough for me." But according to Bennett, the Prophet was persistent. Finally Sarah angrily told him on a subsequent visit, "Joseph, if you ever attempt any thing of the kind with me again, I will make a full disclosure to Mr. Pratt on his return home. Depend upon it, I will certainly do it." "Sister Pratt," the Prophet responded, "I hope you will not expose me, for if I suffer, all must suffer; so do not expose me. Will you promise me that you will not do it?" "If you will never insult me again," Sarah replied, "I will not expose you unless strong circumstances should require it." "If you should tell," the Prophet added, "I will ruin your reputation, remember that."
(Article "Sarah M. Pratt" by Richard A. Van Wagoner, Dialogue, Vol.19, No.2, p.72. Also see: http://www.xmission.com/~country/reason/spratt.htm)

William Law's Wife, Jane
"William Law, a former counselor in the First Presidency, wrote in his 13 May 1844 diary: "[Joseph] ha[s] lately endeavored to seduce my wife, and ha[s] found her a virtuous woman" The Laws elaborated on this in a public meeting shortly thereafter. "The Prophet had made dishonorable proposals to [my] wife . . . under cover of his asserted 'Revelation,' " Law stated. He further explained that Joseph came to the Law home in the middle of the night when William was absent and told Jane that "the Lord had commanded that he should take spiritual wives, to add to his glory." Law then called on his wife to corroborate what he had said. She did so and further explained that Joseph had "asked her to give him half her love; she was at liberty to keep the other half for her husband" Jane refused the Prophet, and according to William Law's 20 January 1887 letter to the Salt Lake Tribune, Smith then considered the couple apostates. "Jane had been speaking evil of him for a long time . . . slandered him, and lied about him without cause," Law reported Smith as saying. "My wife would not speak evil of . . . anyone . . . without cause," Law asserted. "Joseph is the liar and not she. That Smith admired and lusted after many men's wives and daughters, is a fact, but they could not help that. They or most of them considered his admiration an insult, and treated him with scorn. In return for this scorn, he generally managed to blacken their reputations--see the case of . . . Mrs. Pratt, a good, virtuous woman."
("Mormon Polygamy" by Richard S. Van Wagoner, page 44)

Hiram Kimball's wife, Sarah
Sarah M. Kimball, a prominent Nauvoo and Salt Lake City Relief Society leader was also approached by the Prophet in early 1842 despite her solid 1840 marriage to Hiram Kimball. Sarah later recalled that

Sarah Kimball, like Sarah Pratt, was committed to her husband, and refused the Prophet's invitation, asking that he "teach it to someone else." Although she kept the matter quiet, her husband and Smith evidently had difficulties over Smith's proposal. On 19 May 1842, at a Nauvoo City Council meeting, Smith jotted down and then "threw across the room" a revelation to Kimball which declared that "Hiram Kimball has been insinuating evil, and formulating evil opinions" against the Prophet, which if he does not desist from, he "shall be accursed." Sarah remained a lifetime member of the Church and a lifelong wife to Hiram Kimball. 
- "LDS Biographical Encyclopedia" By Elder Andrew Jensen, 6:232, 1887, Official History of the Church 5: 12-13,

Note: Although Joseph Smith did not take Hiram Kimball's wife as a plural wife, Smith later secretly married Hiram's fourteen-year-old daughter, Helen Mar Kimball. Read her story here: http://www.wivesofjosephsmith.org/26-HelenMarKimball.htm

Sidney Rigdon's daughter, Nancy
Read her story and Joseph Smith's explanation here

Joseph Smith's Successful Proposals to Married Women

Adam Lightner's wife, Mary
Mary Elizabeth Rollins, already married to non-Mormon Adam Lightner since 11 August 1835, was one of the first women to accept a polyandrous proposal from Joseph Smith. "He was commanded to take me for a wife," she wrote in a 21 November 1880 letter to Emmeline B. Wells. "I was his, before I came here," she added in an 8 February 1902 statement. Brigham Young secretly sealed the two in February 1842 when Mary was eight months pregnant with her son George Algernon Lightner. She lived with her real husband Adam Lightner until his death in Utah many years later. In her 1880 letter to Emmeline B. Wells, Mary explained: "I could tell you why I stayed with Mr. Lightner. Things the leaders of the Church do not know anything about. I did just as Joseph told me to do, as he knew what troubles I would have to contend with." She added on 23 January 1892 in a letter to John R. Young: "I could explain some things in regard to my living with Mr. L[ightner] after becoming the Wife of Another (Joseph Smith), which would throw light, on what now seems mysterious--and you would be perfectly satisfied with me. I write this; because I have heard that it had been commented on to my injury"
(Lightner, Mary E. Statement. 8 Feb. 1902; Lightner to Emmeline B. Wells, 21 Nov. 1880; Lightner to John R. Young, 25 Jan. 1892. George A. Smith Papers. Special Collections. University of Utah)

Orson Hyde's Wife, Marinda
Marinda Nancy Johnson, sister of Apostles Luke and Lyman Johnson, married Orson Hyde in 1834. A year before Hyde returned from Jerusalem in 1843, Marinda was sealed to Joseph Smith in April of 1842, though she lived with Orson until their divorce in 1870. Many suspect Joseph Smith was the actual father of Marinda's son Frank Henry who was born on 23 Jan 1845, for two reasons. First, because Marinda had been the polygamous wife of Smith since Apr 1842. Second, because Smith had sent her first husband, Orson Hyde, on a mission to Washington on April 4, 1844 "immediately" after a meeting with Joseph Smith (History of the Church, pg. 286). The gestation period for a human is on average 266 days (not 9 months), which would date the conception to early May 1844. Of course, 266 is an average date and the figures vary. To give you an idea of the range, only four percent of pregnancies are actually carried two weeks or more beyond the average time (Guttmacher, 1983). Frank Henry was born on January 23, 1845. Orson Hyde left for Washington April 4, 1844. The difference in these two dates is 294 days! That is almost a month longer than expected and is basically physiologically impossible, especially considering that Orson Hyde had not returned to Nauvoo until August 6, 1844.
(Andrew Jenson, Church Chronology, August 6, 1844) Marinda later divorced Orson Hyde and voiced her disgust of polygamy.

Windsor Lyon's Wife, Sylvia
Sylvia P. Sessions, married to Windsor P. Lyon, gave birth to a daughter on 8 February 1844, less than five months before Joseph Smith's martyrdom. That daughter, Josephine, related in a 24 February 1915 statement that prior to her mother's death in 1882 "she called me to her bedside and told me that her days on earth were about numbered and before she passed away from mortality she desired to tell me something which she had kept as an entire secret from me and all others but which she now desired to communicate to me." Josephine's mother told her she was "the daughter of the Prophet Joseph Smith, she having been sealed to the Prophet at the time that her husband Mr. Lyon was out of fellowship with the Church."
(Affidavit to Church Historian Andrew Jenson, 24 Feb. 1915)

Norman Buell's Wife, Prescindia
Prescindia D. Huntington, a faithful Mormon and married woman in Nauvoo, was also a polyandrous wife of Joseph Smith. Prescindia had married Norman Buell in 1827 and had two sons by him before joining Mormonism in 1836. She was secretly sealed to Joseph Smith by her brother Dimick on 11 December 1841, though she continued to live with her husband Buell until 1846, when she left him to marry Heber C. Kimball. In a "letter to my eldest grand-daughter living in 1880," she explained that Norman Buell had left the Church in 1839, but that "the Lord gave me strength to Stand alone & keep the faith amid heavy persecution." (Mormon Polygamy: A History" by Richard S. Van Wagoner, page 44)

Prescindia, who was Normal Buell's wife and simultaneously a "plural wife" of the Prophet Joseph Smith, said that she did not know whether her husband Norman "or the Prophet was the father of her son, Oliver." And a glance at a photo of Oliver shows a strong resemblance to Emma Smith's boys.
(Mary Ettie V. Smith, "Fifteen Years Among the Mormons", page 34; Fawn Brodie "No Man Knows My History" pages 301-302, 437-39)

Lucinda Morgan Harris, wife of Far West high councilor George Harris, admitted in 1842 that she had been Smith's "mistress since four years," and it is known that she visited Smith while he was incarcerated in Liberty Jail in 1838.

Henry Jacob's Wife, Zina
Prescindia's twenty-year-old sister Zina was living in the Joseph Smith home when Elder Henry B. Jacobs married her in March 1841. According to family records, when Zina and Henry asked Joseph Smith why he had not honored them by performing their marriage, Smith replied that "the Lord had made it known to him that [Zina] was to be his Celestial wife." Believing that "whatever the Prophet did was right, without making the wisdom of God's authorities bend to the reasoning of any man," the devout Elder Jacobs consented for six-months-pregnant Zina to be sealed to Joseph Smith 27 October 1841. Some have suggested that the Jacobs's marriage was "unhappy" and that the couple had separated before her sealing to Joseph Smith. But, though sealed to Joseph Smith for eternity, Zina continued her connubial relationship with her husband Henry Jacobs. On 2 February 1846, pregnant with Henry's second son, Zina was re-sealed by proxy to the murdered Joseph Smith and in that same session was “sealed for time" to Brigham Young. Faithful Henry B. Jacobs stood by as an official witness to both ceremonies.
("History of Henry Bailey Jacobs." By Ora J. Cannon, page 5-7. also see "Recollections of Zina D. Young" by Mary Brown Firmage)

Zina and Henry lived together as husband and wife until the Mormon pioneers reached Mt. Pisgah, Iowa. At this temporary stop on the pioneer trail, Brigham Young announced that "it was time for men who were walking in other men's shoes to step out of them. Brother Jacobs, the woman you claim for a wife does not belong to you. She is the spiritual wife of brother Joseph, sealed up to him. I am his proxy, and she, in this behalf, with her children, are my property. You can go where you please, and get another, but be sure to get one of your own kindred spirit" (Hall 1853, 43-44). President Young then called Jacobs on a mission to England. Witnesses to his departure commented that he was so emotionally ill they had to "put him on a blanket and carry him to the boat to get him on his way".
("Short Sketch of the Life of Henry B. Jacobs" By Ora J. Cannon)

Henry returned from his mission and settled in California. But he was still in love with his wife Zina, now a plural wife of Brigham Young. Henry's letters to his wife Zina were heartrending. On 2 September 1852 he wrote: "O how happy I should be if I only could see you and the little children, bone of my bone, flesh of my flesh." "I am unhappy," Henry lamented, "there is no peace for poor me, my pleasure is you, my comfort has vanished.... O Zina, can I ever, will I ever get you again, answer the question please." In an undated Valentine he added:

It was the rule rather than the exception for Smith to encourage a polyandrous wife to remain with her legal husband.
Faithful Mormon Joseph Kingsbury even wrote that he served as a surrogate husband for Joseph Smith:
 

Read Mormon apologist explanations for why Joseph Smith married other men's wives:
http://www.fairlds.org/pubs/polyandry.pdf

Did Joseph Smith have sex with his wives?
http://www.i4m.com/think/history/joseph_smith_sex.htm

Did Joseph Smith emotionally blackmail these women into marriage?
http://www.i4m.com/think/history/angel_sword.htm

Read the detailed history of each of Joseph Smith's 33 plural wives in Todd Compton's excellent book In Sacred Loneliness.

For some details on the other married women Joseph married and impregnated, see: 
http://www.wivesofjosephsmith.org 
http://www.xmission.com/~country/reason/polyg.htm
http://www.lds-mormon.com/isl.shtml
http://www.mormonismi.info/jamesdavid/menwives.htm

For more discussion on Mormon sexuality, see this on-line article:
Sexuality Within The Contemporary Mormon Experience


TOPICS: Other non-Christian
KEYWORDS: inman; lds; mormon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 561-571 next last
To: Saundra Duffy
Yes, we Mormons are a bunch of ignorant gullible stupid robots walking around like little zombies.

The pervasiveness of masturbatory activities has been resigned to the shadow lands of Mormonism.
 
Some research has suggested that virtually 100 % of males and 85% of females will masturbate.[19] If this topic is dealt with at all in any church or family settings, it is probably almost always surrounded by deep shame. The evasive or non-existent treatment of masturbation in a church or ecclesiastical context, in view of the pervasiveness of the behavior, probably also contributes to the residue of shame that eventuates from the behavior. The inherent shaming quality of the behavior, in part due to the very private practice of it, is intensified by the God-infused feelings of guilt that are applied. Again, if anything, this probably promotes or feeds the repetitiveness of the behavior. One young woman in discussion with me concerning a repetitive masturbation issue was told by a previous bishop that she was mocking God through her repeated "offenses." This had a short term cessation influence, and a longer term intensification effect for her. She eventually returned to the behavior to medicate herself, in part due to the shame she felt. This demonstrates the addictive and self-feeding nature of the behavior.

I received a call from a bishop who was referring a young man to my singles ward. I was shocked by this bishop's intention to have the young man brought up before the high council for a disciplinary hearing due to the fact that he masturbated. Out of dismay I had to ask him to repeat to me that the young man's "offense" was masturbation! I informed the bishop that I would handle the situation. Months of de-shaming this young man ensued.

 
 
Fropm -->  http://www.postmormon.org/exp_e/index.php/magazine/pmm_article_full_text/215

61 posted on 11/28/2010 1:51:43 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
It’s an industry whose existence and success depends on spreading rumors, half-truths, and outright lies about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP SANDY!

That is the only industry I am interested in, the ending of the unsubstantiated allegations and hyperbole from Mormon Apologist against those representing the truth.

Fortunately it is becoming a booming “business”...

62 posted on 11/28/2010 1:53:49 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Certainly Mormonism can’t be compared to Islam which is behind the most recent clash between civilization and the barbarian hordes. But theologically there are some striking similarities:

Similarities between Joseph Smith and Muhammad:

The followers of Muhammad and Joseph Smith both killed innocent “infidel” on the same date of 9/11. On September 11, 1857, Mormon militia massacred about 140 men, women and children under the authority of Brigham Young. However 17 very young children were spared and adopted into Mormon families. They were in fact sold to the highest Mormon family bidder and resold and traded many times afterwords. This event is called “The Mountain Meadows” massacre. Mormon leaders engaged in a deliberate rewriting of history to deny they were behind the murders. On September 11, 2001 Muhammad’s followers, using the Koran as a guide, sent two airplanes into the World Trade Center killing 3000 innocent men, women and children. Muslims today have a PhD in rewriting history and preach in the mosques that Jews were actually driving the planes, not Muslim terrorists.
Both were visited by an angel. Joseph Smith was visited by the angel “Moroni” and Muhammad by Gabriel. Galatians 1:6-9 says, “I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; 7 which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you, and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to that which you received, let him be accursed.”
Both were given visions.
Both were told that no true religion existed on the earth. In the published account of his life, Joseph Smith related that he became very disturbed when he was a youth because of the “strife among the different denominations,” and this “cry and tumult” led him to ask God “which of all the sects were right — and which I should join.” He was told that he must “join none of them, for they were all wrong... that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt...” (Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith 2:8-19) N. J. Dawood says that Mohammed was also concerned with the fact that the Jews and Christians had “divided themselves into schismatic sects.” In the scriptures given by Mohammed, we read: “Yet the Sects are divided concerning Jesus.... Truly, the unbelievers are in the grossest error.” (The Koran, translated by N. J. Dawood, Surah 19, p. 34) In Surah 30, page 190, this warning appears: “Do not split up your religion into sects, each exulting in its own beliefs.” In Surah 3, page 398, we read: “The only true faith in Allah’s sight is Islam. Those to whom the Scriptures [i.e., Jews and Christians] were given disagreed among themselves through jealousy only after knowledge had been given them.”
Both were to restore the long lost faith as the one true religion. Islam makes claim that Adam and Abraham were Muslims, a claim that is as ridiculous as it is undocumented from either history or archaeology. Mormons make the unsubstantiated claim that the church in the first century were Mormon.
Both wrote a book inspired by God.
Both claimed to be illiterate or uneducated and used this as proof the book was inspired. “How could an illiterate man write the Koran or the Book of Mormon?” Joseph Smith is claimed to have only grade three education.
Both claimed the Bible was lost, altered, corrupted and unreliable.
Both claimed their holy book was the most correct and perfect book on earth.
Both claimed that their new “Bible” was based upon a record stored in heaven. With Islam, it is the “mother book” that resides in heaven with God. With Mormonism, it is the golden Nephi plates that the angel Moroni took back to heaven.
Both claim that the version we have in our hands today are identical to what the prophet revealed and that parts are not lost, altered and corrupted. Of course the proof that these claims are invalid is found in two books. The Mormon claim is proven false by a book called “3913 Changes to Book of Mormon” by Sandra Tanner. The Islamic claim is proven false by a book (In Arabic language) called, “Making Easy the Readings of What Has Been Sent Down” by Muhammad Fahd Khaaruun. Both books show that the copy of the book of Mormon and the Koran used today is different from what was originally used when each religion was started.
Both claimed to be a final prophet of God.
Both claimed they were persecuted because of their pure faith.
Both were polygamists who had many wives.
Both borrowed from paganism/polytheism. Muhammad incorporated that polytheistic moon god called “Allah” and “Allah’s three daughters” into Islam. Basically Muhammad chose Allah from within 350 known gods that were worshipped in Arabia and proclaimed the moon god to be the greatest and only God. Smith borrowed from a doctrine called “pyramidology” and the Masons and other magic systems.
Both received “after the fact corrective revelations” from God. Muhammad retracted the Satanic verses and Mormons retracted Smith’s divine order mandating polygamy. But for Mormons it there is even a closer parallel. Sounds exactly like Muhammad and his satanic verses.
“As many false reports have been circulated respecting the following work, and also many unlawful measures taken by evil designing persons to destroy me, and also the work, I would inform you that I translated by the gift and power of God, and caused to be written, one hundred and sixteen pages, the which I took from the Book of Lehi... which said account, some person or persons have stolen and kept from me, notwithstanding my utmost exertions to recover it again — and being commanded of the Lord that I should not translate the same over again, for Satan had put it into their hearts to tempt the Lord their God, by altering the words, that they did read contrary from that which I translated and caused to be written; and if I should bring forth the same words again, or, in other words, if I should translate the same over, they would publish that which they had stolen, and Satan would stir up the hearts of this generation, that they might not receive this work: but behold, the Lord said unto me, I will not suffer that Satan shall accomplish his evil design in this thing: therefore thou shalt translate from the plates of Nephi, until ye come to that which ye have translated... I will shew unto them that my wisdom is greater than the cunning of the Devil.” (Book of Mormon, 1830 edition, Preface)
Immediately after the death of Muhammad and Smith, a fight broke out from among the “faithful converts” as to who would succeed Muhammad and Smith. Both groups were plunged into irreparable division that has endured ever since. Islam and Mormonism both have squabbles among themselves as to who is the one true splinter group of their prophet!
Mormons, contrary to the Bible, “baptize the dead” by gathering genealogies of all men who lived on earth. This contradicts the Bible: “But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes about the Law, for they are unprofitable and worthless.” Tit 3:9 While the Bible says avoid focusing in Genealogies, the Mormon church makes it their central focus of mission. Mormons have even been criticized for baptizing, by proxy, the Jews had died in Nazi Holocaust camps. When lists of genealogies are collected, living Mormons are baptized, on behalf of, those on the lists, who have already died. In this way, Mormons view every man who lived, as being Mormons. In the same way Muslims claim that all men are born Muslims and when they learn the truth of Christianity, they are apostatizing from their first faith. Muslims re-write history by proclaiming Jesus and the Apostles were Muslims in a similar way Mormons baptize Jews (for example) with the expectation they will be Mormons in the next life. Yet gathering of large genealogical lists no more makes dead people Mormons in the next life, than re-writing history makes Jesus into a Muslim.
Both the Islam and Mormon religions have those who follow the “original doctrine” of the founding leaders and like these founding leaders, are violent, polygamists, and have revelations justifying their evil actions.
Both Muslims and Mormons (and Jehovah’s Witnesses) have progressive revelation. Jw’s call it “new light”. Muslims call it “Nasikh”. Jehovah’s Witnesses were once instructed to celebrated Christmas, birthdays and salute the flag, but “new light” changed all that. Mormons like all Muslims, were originally polygamists until “The Manifesto” against polygamy came as a revelation to John Taylor, over 40 years after Smith’s death, on the eve of the US government outlawing the practice of polygamy. New revelation always replaces older revelation that became inconvenient to the prophet.

From: http://www.bible.ca/islam/islamic-mormonism-similarities.htm


63 posted on 11/28/2010 2:04:00 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Standing by the walls of Minas Tirith as Sauron's forces pound the gates...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

14 was Smith’s youngest, so Mohammed does have him on that.


64 posted on 11/28/2010 2:06:05 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kingpins10

Any man who thinks it is ok to have multiple wives, is in sin. David, Solomon, etc., were in sin as well.

- - - - —
Exactly. When the LDS defend polygamy they usually turn to the OT to ‘prove’ it is ok with God. But it wasn’t ok then either.


65 posted on 11/28/2010 2:07:45 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; colorcountry; Colofornian; Elsie; svcw; Zakeet; Tennessee Nana; FastCoyote; ...

Some people get unending glee in making up facts to cut down others.

- - - - - -

Yes they do, like Smith and Young made about Christians? A lot of glee there I imagine. Whereas what we inmans post is documented well. No need to make up facts when Mormonism is it’s own worst enemy.


66 posted on 11/28/2010 2:19:24 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
That is interesting isn't it.

In the heat of the Missouri “Mormon War” of 1838, Joseph Smith made the following claim,


67 posted on 11/28/2010 2:21:01 PM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

>>> We’re providing referenced quotes of LDS Leaders published in LDS Books available directly from the BYU Library Website.....And Sandra is a Lawyer.

Hmmm... did I come off as a mormon apologist???

My point was that I found apologist Sam to be the strongest evidence that adultery in God’s name DID in fact occur.


68 posted on 11/28/2010 2:26:14 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Todd Compton and other Mormon apologists also admit to these marriages and their consummation.


69 posted on 11/28/2010 2:27:14 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

No, sorry if you felt my statement was directed at you. I was just answering your question about why she spins everything (lies).


70 posted on 11/28/2010 2:29:05 PM PST by SENTINEL (Mormonism...from Ezra Taft Benson to Harry Reid in only one generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL; Saundra Duffy

Placemarker...

waiting for Sandy to tell us which of the items I posted earlier is truth, half truth, lies, etc.


71 posted on 11/28/2010 2:32:40 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll; Saundra Duffy

Very well said. The problem is, Mormon doctrine teaches that angels are just resurrected human beings, not different creatures; so they are just like us in many ways.

Therefore, Lucifer’s ‘sin’ was not that he wanted to become God (or have God’s power) because he could have earned that by becoming mortal and living the LDS gospel, but to the Mormons, Lucifer’s sin was that when Lucifer and Jesus both presented theirs ‘gospels’ to God the father and He had to decide which one was going to be the Savior (Jesus or Lucifer), Jesus wanted to give us ‘free agency’ but Lucifer’s ‘gospel’ wanted to force everyone to live it.

And no I’m not kidding (see tagline).


72 posted on 11/28/2010 2:36:13 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
That is true he wrote himself into the JST Bible, almost by name.

Mormons, however, do not use the JST Bible because Brigham Young said it was "spurious", or a fraud.

The RLDS stayed true to the words of Joseph Smith, and use the JST in full.

In fact it is a true statement that the current LDS Church is the "breakaway" church, and the RLDS is the original.

I would encourage the LDS to bring forth a SINGLE witnessed and documented miracle that has occurred during the nearly 180 years of it's existence.....You know like the kind that prophets of old performed. THAT IS THE BURDEN OF CLAIMING THE SAME POWER.

They always bring up the "wicked and adulterous generation that wants a sign" scripture, but you know we've been though nearly 5 generations now since the 1830's, and besides, even the Pharaoh of Egypt saw Moses part the Red Sea.

73 posted on 11/28/2010 2:39:48 PM PST by SENTINEL (Mormonism...from Ezra Taft Benson to Harry Reid in only one generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion; SENTINEL; Saundra Duffy
waiting for Sandy to tell us which of the items I posted earlier is truth, half truth, lies, etc.

Ya had to go and do it ampu -


74 posted on 11/28/2010 2:40:38 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla; aMorePerfectUnion; SENTINEL; Saundra Duffy
Cricket Sound
75 posted on 11/28/2010 2:47:05 PM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
What did you expect from a lawyer ?

I'll bet she's working hard in the background right now on those of us she has located. I get private emails and contacts from people like her on my freepmail here, my youtube account and my yahoo account, asking me how my family is, naming my kids by name, etc in an obvious attempt to silence me. They even told me my name had been turned over to the FBI as a church arson suspect, even though I live 3,000 miles from California and haven't been there for years.

One of her cohorts here on FR wound up banned for trying to set me up with JimRob....Said I was stalking and swearing at him in freepmails, all a lie. I guess I should be happy that Brigham Young isn't still the false prophet or my head would have been on a pike long ago for exposing the dark secrets of mormonism and leaving the "faith".

I think the most important question to ask when considering joing a church is what will happen if I try to leave ? For Islam, the jehovah's witnesses, and Scientology the answers are all very similar.

76 posted on 11/28/2010 3:05:00 PM PST by SENTINEL (Mormonism...from Ezra Taft Benson to Harry Reid in only one generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

You’ll have to excuse me, I mixed up the LDS with the Jehova’s witnesses with mormons in my previous post, a VERY easy thing to do.


77 posted on 11/28/2010 3:07:01 PM PST by SENTINEL (Mormonism...from Ezra Taft Benson to Harry Reid in only one generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL
I'll bet she's working hard in the background right now on those of us she has located. I get private emails and contacts from people like her on my freepmail here, my youtube account and my yahoo account, asking me how my family is, naming my kids by name, etc in an obvious attempt to silence me. They even told me my name had been turned over to the FBI as a church arson suspect, even though I live 3,000 miles from California and haven't been there for years.

That is flat out cowardly Sentinel. Then they turn around and have the audacity to claim we are persecuting THEM.

78 posted on 11/28/2010 3:15:15 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

they have a constitutional freedom to join the LDS, I agree. However that doesn’t make Mormonism ‘the only true church’ as they claim nor does it make it not a cult.

The same constitutional freedom for them to worship also allows us the same freedom to speak out openly and publicaly against their heresies.


79 posted on 11/28/2010 3:23:46 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
One needs not look any further than Harry Reid or Mitt Romney to judge the honesty of a mormon. I mean how can they really be in communication with God and allow these two to keep their temple recommends ?

Like JimRob has said, though, if they start posting their Romney crap again this season they'll be invited to leave and form their own "RINOS for Romney" website.

80 posted on 11/28/2010 3:31:19 PM PST by SENTINEL (Mormonism...from Ezra Taft Benson to Reid and Romney in only one generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 561-571 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson