Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormon Doctrine (1958–2010), RIP.
Religion Dispatches.org ^ | May 24, 2010 | Joanna Brooks

Posted on 05/24/2010 7:40:38 PM PDT by Colofornian

I’m holding in my hand my black hardcover copy of Mormon Doctrine by Bruce R. McConkie, one of Mormonism’s most influential books, an all-time Mormon bestseller, which went out of print this week.

A book written, I’m sure, with the best of intentions by a revered Mormon leader. And, still, a book that continued to circulate even after other high-ranking Mormon leaders recommended more than one thousand corrections to its content.

A book that called Roman Catholicism the “Church of the Devil.” And a book that elevated to doctrinal status non-doctrinal folklore about the origins of the LDS Church’s ban on conveying priesthood authority to members of African descent, claiming that blacks were the descendents of the accursed Cain.

A book that due to its authoritative presentation and doctrinal fundamentalism gave many Mormons reasons for grief.

Mormon Doctrine (1958 – 2010), RIP.


TOPICS: History; Other Christian; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: beck; glennbeck; inman; lds; mcconkie; mormon; mormondoctrine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,161-1,166 next last
To: Ripliancum
From the looks of it, doing a simple search of your postings, this is the 3rd thread you've started on the same subject in the last 4 days. Just curious as to why this is such a fascinating subject to you?

The first thread was a bare-bones TV news version of the article. No details. Kind of like how you'll hear a "breaking news" bare-bones story -- and just to get it into circulation, you'll post it.

I knew then some other news source would come out with a more fuller explanation of it. Peggy Fletcher Stack did with the Salt Lake Trib. A credible journalist; a credible newspaper; and so I posted it because as Stack said:

"Mormon Doctrine served two generations of the Mormon rank and file as the main authoritative source of LDS teachings," said LDS sociologist Armand Mauss. "With its authoritative tone and constant promotion from high places, it came to be regularly cited in the church curriculum, especially in [Church Educational System] materials, and soon took on almost a scriptural stature."..."The book became one of the all-time best-sellers in Mormondom," they wrote, "achieving the near-canonical status..."

So, Rip, exactly how many books can you say have achieved the recognition level of "almost...scriptural stature...near canonical status" in Mormondom?

I mean the only other book I can think of is the 1833 Book of Commandments, which was then withdrawn as Mormon "scripture."

Of all the articles, this one had by far the best cultural assessment headline (coupled with the last two lines) of what this represents -- what is happening within the Mormon movement: Last two lines -- A book that due to its authoritative presentation and doctrinal fundamentalism gave many Mormons reasons for grief. Mormon Doctrine (1958 – 2010), RIP

You see, Mormon leaders aren't simply taking a book out of circulation. There's more to this than a mere inventory decision. It really is a death knell to the more fundamentalist wing of the Mormon church -- the hardline camp that was stridently and virulently anti-Christian.

I compare it to some of the softening in anti-Christian theology within the old RLDS sect. Through the years, they've made an attempt to try, in some ways, to become more biblical. But since they still embrace Smith, there's only so far that they can move.

McConkie gave a disclaimer at the front of the book, stating that he alone was responsible for the doctrinal and spiritual interpretations.

You're funny. Harold B. Lee assigned Spencer W. Kimball to closely review McConkie's revision process of the 1966 revision. If Kimball had not checked off on it, then Lee would have reverted to McKay's position.

As Stack wrote in the Tribune: McKay feared that if the corrections were made, it would seriously affect McConkie's credibility, so he preferred not to see the book republished at all.

So let me give you a parallel illustration:
Let's say one of the top 15 leaders in the Vatican writes a book in 1958 called "Roman Catholic Doctrine."
Let's say that because the author called the Protestants "the whore of Babylon," along with more than 1,000 other changes it needed, the Pope ordered that it be taken off the shelves.

But then the next Pope assigned his second-in-charge to review a revision. It was "signed off" on -- and revised -- and republished...with everyone knowing it came direct from the Vatican. Then, in the ensuing years, whenever the Vatican came out with church resources/curricula, this book was cited. Eventually, even though the book was published by a publisher not directly connected with the Vatican, its final round of publishing for 18 straight years was under the direct oversight of the Vatican.

And now you want to tell me that...
...the Vatican had nothing to do with previewing the book;
...or "OKing" the book for republishing;
...or that the Pope had no authority to pull it off the shelves again if it really misrepresented Catholic doctrine;
...or that it's somehow sheer happenstance that the Vatican quoted this book over & over & over & over again in its church resources, magazines, curricula, etc;
...or that it's somehow irrelevant that the Vatican owns the book publishing company of where the book has been published and promoted for the past 18 years...
...and that the Vatican really wasn't responsible for previewing, reviewing, revising, re-publishing, publishing, promoting, or sanctioning the book...
...it was all part of a lone-nut "no conspiracy" author theory...

...Other than those "small details"...hmm...let me ponder your tidbit offering as a possibility...for about 3 seconds...

Uhhh...Nope! (Doesn't "compute")

21 posted on 05/24/2010 11:13:22 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum; Colofornian
From the looks of it, doing a simple search of your postings, this is the 3rd thread you've started on the same subject in the last 4 days. Just curious as to why this is such a fascinating subject to you?

Like any malicious-minded bully, she gets her strength from hiding behind a mask, and refuses to disclose what specific church she belongs to. She will tell you "Christian", but won't prove it. Just one small example of why the government will soon take over the internet to prevent anyone being anonymous anymore, because miscreants use that anonymity for negative purposes.

22 posted on 05/24/2010 11:40:27 PM PDT by 999replies (Thune/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

If you did not have cut-and-paste capability, you wouldn’t know what to think or say. lol


23 posted on 05/24/2010 11:41:55 PM PDT by 999replies (Thune/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac; Ripliancum

“I hate it when others put down my religion. I can say LSD, uh, I mean LDS is just another form of Islam, and I am being nice here.”

Mormonism is like Islam in that it incorporates some elements of Christianity and Judaism. It also is like Islam in that it isn’t a Christian faith and is based largely on the teachings of a false prophet. Mormons are good people by and large and share many conservative values but so long as they follow the teachings of Joseph Smith they are not Christians.

****

I am so thankful to the Lord to grant me wisdom to see wonderful qualities in the Catholic faith even if some members choose to trash my faith saying I am not Christian because I witness the Godhead (Father, Son and Holy Ghost) differently.

I am glad that not all Catholic do not share that attitude and welcome the opportunity to work togather.

Yep it seems you have that nicely figured out because of one man bias which we all have in some form or another for we all come with some kind of baggage.

Alexander Hislop a Presbyterian Minister who wrote “The Two Babylons” an anti Catholic book should we condem the Presbyterian church or protestants because a church leader wrote about his bias opinions?

Does the LDS as a whole feel that way for what a few might say NO

...do not each of us feel sometimes that those who make careless statements that others wish they be still and seat down.

If we watch in the scheme of things we realize it take some a long time to grow to see the errors of their ways.

and if we are fair are there not things we might have thought and said and as we mature wish we never went there!


24 posted on 05/25/2010 12:05:57 AM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Are you a she all these years I thought you were a man now it makes sense all the wacko things said came from a women.


25 posted on 05/25/2010 12:09:44 AM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; reaganaut; Tennessee Nana

All these harsh standards you set for others will be there on judgment day

Matt. 7:

1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

Day after day time is spent fault finding to you there is nothng good about the Church or its leaders or the LDS as a whole.

When ever a positive word is mention it needs to be tarish many of you can not let that stand.


26 posted on 05/25/2010 12:28:26 AM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: restornu; Colofornian; reaganaut; Tennessee Nana

Resty,

This may come as a shocker, but we are called to judge false religions.


27 posted on 05/25/2010 2:18:02 AM PDT by Gamecock (If you want Your Best Life Now, follow Osteen. If you want your best life forever, don't. JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mandingo Conservative
 
I hate it when others put down my religion.
 
Never fear: THIS one is STILL in print and they GIVE it away!!
 

 

 
 

THE FIRST BOOK OF NEPHI
HIS REIGN AND MINISTRY
CHAPTER 14
 
An angel tells Nephi of the blessings and cursings to fall upon the Gentiles—There are only two churches: the Church of the Lamb of God and the church of the devil—The saints of God in all nations are persecuted by the great and abominable church—The apostle John shall write concerning the end of the world. Between 600 and 592 B.C. 
 
   1 And it shall come to pass, that if the Gentiles shall hearken unto the Lamb of God in that day that he shall manifest himself unto them in word, and also in power, in very deed, unto the taking away of their stumbling blocks—
  2 And harden not their hearts against the Lamb of God, they shall be numbered among the seed of thy father; yea, they shall be numbered among the house of Israel; and they shall be a blessed people upon the promised land forever; they shall be no more brought down into captivity; and the house of Israel shall no more be confounded.
  3 And that great pit, which hath been digged for them by that great and abominable church, which was founded by the devil and his children, that he might lead away the souls of men down to hell—yea, that great pit which hath been digged for the destruction of men shall be filled by those who digged it, unto their utter destruction, saith the Lamb of God; not the destruction of the soul, save it be the casting of it into that hell which hath no end.
  4 For behold, this is according to the captivity of the devil, and also according to the justice of God, upon all those who will work wickedness and abomination before him.
  5 And it came to pass that the angel spake unto me, Nephi, saying: Thou hast beheld that if the Gentiles repent it shall be well with them; and thou also knowest concerning the covenants of the Lord unto the house of Israel; and thou also hast heard that whoso repented not must perish.
  6 Therefore, woe be unto the Gentiles if it so be that they harden their hearts against the Lamb of God.
  7 For the time cometh, saith the Lamb of God, that I will work a great and a marvelous work among the children of men; a work which shall be everlasting, either on the one hand or on the other—either to the convincing of them unto peace and life eternal, or unto the deliverance of them to the hardness of their hearts and the blindness of their minds unto their being brought down into captivity, and also into destruction, both temporally and spiritually, according to the captivity of the devil, of which I have spoken.
  8 And it came to pass that when the angel had spoken these words, he said unto me: Rememberest thou the covenants of the Father unto the house of Israel? I said unto him, Yea.
  9 And it came to pass that he said unto me: Look, and behold that great and abominable church, which is the mother of abominations, whose founder is the devil.
  10 And he said unto me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and the other is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church, which is the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the earth.
  11 And it came to pass that I looked and beheld the whore of all the earth, and she sat upon many waters; and she had dominion over ball the earth, among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people.
  12 And it came to pass that I beheld the church of the Lamb of God, and its numbers were few, because of the wickedness and abominations of the whore who sat upon many waters; nevertheless, I beheld that the church of the Lamb, who were the saints of God, were also upon ball the face of the earth; and their dominions upon the face of the earth were small, because of the wickedness of the great whore whom I saw.
  13 And it came to pass that I beheld that the great mother of abominations did gather together multitudes upon the face of all the earth, among all the nations of the Gentiles, to fight against the Lamb of God.
  14 And it came to pass that I, Nephi, beheld the power of the Lamb of God, that it descended upon the saints of the church of the Lamb, and upon the covenant people of the Lord, who were scattered upon all the face of the earth; and they were armed with righteousness and with the power of God in great glory.
  15 And it came to pass that I beheld that the wrath of God was poured out upon that great and abominable church, insomuch that there were wars and rumors of wars among all the nations and kindreds of the earth.
  16 And as there began to be wars and rumors of wars among all the nations which belonged to the mother of abominations, the angel spake unto me, saying: Behold, the wrath of God is upon the mother of harlots; and behold, thou seest all these things—
  17 And when the day cometh that the wrath of God is poured out upon the mother of harlots, which is the great and abominable church of all the earth, whose founder is the devil, then, at that day, the work of the Father shall commence, in preparing the way for the fulfilling of his covenants, which he hath made to his people who are of the house of Israel.
  18 And it came to pass that the angel spake unto me, saying: Look!
  19 And I looked and beheld a man, and he was dressed in a white robe.
  20 And the angel said unto me: Behold one of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
  21 Behold, he shall see and write the remainder of these things; yea, and also many things which have been.
  22 And he shall also write concerning the end of the world.
  23 Wherefore, the things which he shall write are just and true; and behold they are written in the book which thou beheld proceeding out of the mouth of the Jew; and at the time they proceeded out of the mouth of the Jew, or, at the time the book proceeded out of the mouth of the Jew, the things which were written were plain and pure, and most precious and easy to the understanding of all men.
  24 And behold, the things which this apostle of the Lamb shall write are many things which thou hast seen; and behold, the remainder shalt thou see.
  25 But the things which thou shalt see hereafter thou shalt not write; for the Lord God hath ordained the apostle of the Lamb of God that he should write them.
  26 And also others who have been, to them hath he shown all things, and they have written them; and they are sealed up to come forth in their purity, according to the truth which is in the Lamb, in the own due time of the Lord, unto the house of Israel.
  27 And I, Nephi, heard and bear record, that the name of the apostle of the Lamb was john, according to the word of the angel.
  28 And behold, I, Nephi, am forbidden that I should write the remainder of the things which I saw and heard; wherefore the things which I have written sufficeth me; and I have written but a small part of the things which I saw.
  29 And I bear record that I saw the things which my father saw, and the angel of the Lord did make them known unto me.
  30 And now I make an end of speaking concerning the things which I saw while I was carried away in the spirit; and if all the things which I saw are not written, the things which I have written are true. And thus it is. Amen.

28 posted on 05/25/2010 3:23:27 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Great info, thanks.

Sadly, fact don't work on minds corrupted by deception. Look at Obama's misguided followers.


We should continue to pray for Mormons who cannot discern their own spiritual darkness, collectively, but more importantly, to pray for individuals we know who may be freed from their chains.

James 1 gives good advice on this

Ultimately, it is the Holy Spirit that gives us discernement and light:

___________________________________________________

http://www.spirithome.com/discrnmt.html

When the Spirit is on the move, it's characterized by:

- Christ-centered spirituality in every aspect of life;

- Rejection of all prejudice, class/ethnic/educational barriers, exclusiveness, and denominational warfare. When it follows the Spirit, the Body of Believers knowingly chooses to counter-model prejudices by living without regard to them.

- bringing attention and worship to Jesus Christ, and awareness of God's/Jesus'/Spirit's work.

- an unusual level of passion, energy, or impact.

These are the main things to look for in discerning about something:

- it is governed by love, for if it is not, it's worthless ( 1 Corinthians 13:1-3);

- it centers us onto Jesus the Christ and Lord ( 1 Cor 12:3), and His good news;

- it directs us to Scripture, not away from it ( Isaiah 8:19, 20);

- it builds up the church and its members ( Ephesians 4:11-12), giving it power, wisdom, character, boldness, and unity.

- it helps create in us a love of righteousness, a heightened sense of sin, and a turning away from known evil.

29 posted on 05/25/2010 3:25:23 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mandingo Conservative
 
I hate it when others put down my religion.
 
Then you MUST someday travel to SLC and visit Temple Square, where what they think of your 'religion' is chisled in STONE!
 

 
(Well; it's REALLY on a metal plaque on that stone.   Makes it easier to CHANGE it some day...)
 



  17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other—This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!
  18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)—and which I should join.
  19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.”
  20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, “Never mind, all is well—I am well enough off.” I then said to my mother,
“I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true.”
 
 
And, continuing thru the years, the high ranking leaders of that Organization have done the same!
 
Joseph Smith continues: "for the teachers of religion of the different sects understood the same passages of scripture so differently as to destroy all confidence in settling the question by an appeal to the Bible" (from Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith-History 1:12). "What is it that inspires professors of Christianity generally with a hope of salvation? It is that smooth, sophisticated influence of the devil, by which he deceives the whole world" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.270).
 
Questions put to Joseph Smith: "'Do you believe the Bible?' [Smith:]'If we do, we are the only people under heaven that does, for there are none of the religious sects of the day that do'. When asked 'Will everybody be damned, but Mormons'? [Smith replied] 'Yes, and a great portion of them, unless they repent, and work righteousness." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 119).
 
Brigham Young stated this repeatedly: "When the light came to me I saw that all the so-called Christian world was grovelling in darkness" (Journal of Discourses 5:73); "The Christian world, so-called, are heathens as to the knowledge of the salvation of God" (Journal of Discourses 8:171); "With a regard to true theology, a more ignorant people never lived than the present so-called Christian world" (Journal of Discourses 8:199); "And who is there that acknowledges [God's] hand? ...You may wander east, west, north, and south, and you cannot find it in any church or government on the earth, except the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" (Journal of Discourses, vol. 6, p.24); "Should you ask why we differ from other Christians, as they are called, it is simply because they are not Christians as the New Testament defines Christianity" (Journal of Discourses 10:230).
 
Orson Pratt proclaimed: "Both Catholics and Protestants are nothing less than the 'whore of Babylon' whom the Lord denounces by the mouth of John the Revelator as having corrupted all the earth by their fornications and wickedness. Any person who shall be so corrupt as to receive a holy ordinance of the Gospel from the ministers of any of these apostate churches will be sent down to hell with them, unless they repent" (The Seer, p. 255).
 
Pratt also said: "This great apostasy commenced about the close of the first century of the Christian era, and it has been waxing worse and worse from then until now" (Journal of Discourses, vol.18, p.44) and: "But as there has been no Christian Church on the earth for a great many centuries past, until the present century, the people have lost sight of the pattern that God has given according to which the Christian Church should be established, and they have denominated a great variety of people Christian Churches, because they profess to be ...But there has been a long apostasy, during which the nations have been cursed with apostate churches in great abundance" (Journal of Discourses, 18:172).
 
President John Taylor stated: "Christianity...is a perfect pack of nonsense...the devil could not invent a better engine to spread his work than the Christianity of the nineteenth century." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 6, p.167); "Where shall we look for the true order or authority of God? It cannot be found in any nation of Christendom." (Journal of Discourses, 10:127).
James Talmage said: "A self-suggesting interpretation of history indicates that there has been a great departure from the way of salvation as laid down by the Savior, a universal apostasy from the Church of Christ". (A Study of the Articles of Faith, p.182).
 
President Joseph Fielding Smith said: "Doctrines were corrupted, authority lost, and a false order of religion took the place of the gospel of Jesus Christ, just as it had been the case in former dispensations, and the people were left in spiritual darkness." (Doctrines of Salvation, p.266). "For hundreds of years the world was wrapped in a veil of spiritual darkness, until there was not one fundamental truth belonging to the place of salvation ...Joseph Smith declared that in the year 1820 the Lord revealed to him that all the 'Christian' churches were in error, teaching for commandments the doctrines of men" (Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 3, p.282).
 
More recent statements by apostle Bruce McConkie are also very clear: "Apostasy was universal...And this darkness still prevails except among those who have come to a knowledge of the restored gospel" (Doctrines of Salvation, vol 3, p.265); "Thus the signs of the times include the prevailing apostate darkness in the sects of Christendom and in the religious world in general" (The Millennial Messiah, p.403); "a perverted Christianity holds sway among the so-called Christians of apostate Christendom" (Mormon Doctrine, p.132); "virtually all the millions of apostate Christendom have abased themselves before the mythical throne of a mythical Christ whom they vainly suppose to be a spirit essence who is incorporeal uncreated, immaterial and three-in-one with the Father and Holy Spirit" (Mormon Doctrine, p.269); "Gnosticism is one of the great pagan philosophies which antedated Christ and the Christian Era and which was later commingled with pure Christianity to form the apostate religion that has prevailed in the world since the early days of that era." (Mormon Doctrine, p.316).
 
President George Q. Cannon said: "After the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was organized, there were only two churches upon the earth. They were known respectively as the Church of the Lamb of God and Babylon. The various organizations which are called churches throughout Christendom, though differing in their creeds and organizations, have one common origin. They all belong to Babylon" (Gospel Truth, p.324).
 
President Wilford Woodruff stated: "the Gospel of modern Christendom shuts up the Lord, and stops all communication with Him. I want nothing to do with such a Gospel, I would rather prefer the Gospel of the dark ages, so called" (Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p.196).
 

 

 

30 posted on 05/25/2010 3:31:13 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum
From the looks of it, doing a simple search of your postings, this is the 3rd thread you've started on the same subject in the last 4 days.
 
 
I wonder just how many DOORS these fresh faced young folks will pound on in 4 days?
 
                                                       
 
How many will the OTHER 60,000   53,000    uh... 52,000 'volunteers for the LDS church' knock on as well?

31 posted on 05/25/2010 3:36:21 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum
Just curious as to why this is such a fascinating subject to you? Especially since McConkie gave a disclaimer at the front of the book, stating that he alone was responsible for the doctrinal and spiritual interpretations.

Don't you READ the fine print?

32 posted on 05/25/2010 3:38:06 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac
 

Mormonism is like Islam in that it incorporates some elements of Christianity and Judaism.

It also is like Islam in that it isn’t a Christian faith and is based largely on the teachings of a false prophet.



 

 

“I Will Be a Second Mohammed”

In the heat of the Missouri “Mormon War” of 1838, Joseph Smith made the following claim, “I will be to this generation a second Mohammed, whose motto in treating for peace was ‘the Alcoran [Koran] or the Sword.’ So shall it eventually be with us—‘Joseph Smith or the Sword!’ ”[1] 

It is most interesting that a self-proclaimed Christian prophet would liken himself to Mohammed, the founder of Islam. His own comparison invites us to take a closer look as well. And when we do, we find some striking—and troubling—parallels. Consider the following.

  • Mohammed and Joseph Smith both had humble beginnings. Neither had formal religious connections or upbringing, and both were relatively uneducated. Both founded new religions by creating their own scriptures. In fact, followers of both prophets claim these scriptures are miracles since their authors were the most simple and uneducated of men.[2]

  • Both prophets claim of having angel visitations, and of receiving divine revelation to restore pure religion to the earth again. Mohammed was told that both Jews and Christians had long since corrupted their scriptures and religion. In like manner, Joseph Smith was told that all of Christianity had become corrupt, and that consequently the Bible itself was no longer reliable. In both cases, this corruption required a complete restoration of both scripture and religion. Nothing which preceded either prophet could be relied upon any longer. Both prophets claim they were used of God to restore eternal truths which once existed on earth, but had been lost due to human corruption.

  • Both prophets created new scripture which borrowed heavily from the Bible, but with a substantially new “spin.” In his Koran, Mohammed appropriates a number of Biblical themes and characters—but he changes the complete sense of many passages, claiming to “correct” the Bible. In so doing he changes many doctrines, introducing his own in their place. In like manner, Joseph Smith created the Book of Mormon, much of which is plagiarized directly from the King James Bible. Interestingly, the Book of Mormon claims that this same Bible has been substantially corrupted and is therefore unreliable. In addition, Joseph Smith went so far as to actually create his own version of the Bible itself, the “Inspired Version,” in which he both adds and deletes significant portions of text, claiming he is “correcting” it. In so doing he also changes many doctrines, introducing his own in their place.

  • As a part of their new scriptural “spin,” both prophets saw themselves as prophesied in scripture, and both saw themselves as a continuation of a long line of Biblical prophets. Mohammed saw himself as a continuation of the ministry of Moses and Jesus. Joseph Smith saw himself as a successor to Enoch, Melchizedek, Joseph and Moses. Joseph Smith actually wrote himself into his own version of the Bible—by name.

  • Both prophets held up their own scripture as superior to the Bible. Mohammed claimed that the Koran was a perfect copy of the original which was in heaven. The Koran is therefore held to be absolutely perfect, far superior to the Bible and superceding it. In like manner, Joseph Smith also made the following claim. “I told the Brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding its precepts, than by any other book.”[3]

  • Despite their claim that the Bible was corrupt, both prophets admonished their followers to adhere to its teachings. An obvious contradiction, this led to selective acceptance of some portions and wholesale rejection of others. As a result, the Bible is accepted by both groups of followers only to the extent that it agrees with their prophet’s own superior revelation.

  • Both Mohammed and Joseph Smith taught that true salvation was to be found only in their respective religions. Those who would not accept their message were considered “infidels,” pagans or Gentiles. In so doing, both prophets became the enemy of genuine Christianity, and have led many people away from the Christ of the Bible.

  • Both prophets encountered fierce opposition to their new religions and had to flee from town to town because of threats on their lives. Both retaliated to this opposition by forming their own militias. Both ultimately set up their own towns as model societies.

  • Both Mohammed and Joseph Smith left unclear instructions about their successors. The majority of Mohammed’s followers, Sunni Muslims, believe they were to elect their new leader, whereas the minority, Shiite Muslims, believe Mohammed’s son was to be their next leader. Similarly, the majority of Joseph Smith’s followers, Mormons, believed their next prophet should have been the existing leader of their quorum of twelve apostles, whereas the minority, RLDS, believed Joseph Smith’s own son should have been their next prophet. Differences on this issue, and many others, have created substantial tension between these rival groups of each prophet.

  • Mohammed taught that Jesus was just another of a long line of human prophets, of which he was the last. He taught that he was superior to Christ and superceded Him. In comparison, Joseph Smith also made the following claim.

“I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. A large majority of the whole have stood by me. Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I. The followers of Jesus ran away from Him, but the Latter-day Saints never ran away from me yet.”[4] In light of these parallels, perhaps Joseph Smith’s claim to be a second Mohammed unwittingly became his most genuine prophecy of all.


[1] Joseph Smith made this statement at the conclusion of a speech in the public square at Far West, Missouri on October 14, 1838. This particular quote is documented in Fawn M. Brodie, No Man Knows My History, second edition, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971), p. 230–231. Fawn Brodie’s footnote regarding this speech contains valuable information, and follows. “Except where noted, all the details of this chapter [16] are taken from the History of the [Mormon] Church. This speech, however, was not recorded there, and the report given here is based upon the accounts of seven men. See the affidavits of T.B. Marsh, Orson Hyde, George M. Hinkle, John Corrill, W.W. Phelps, Samson Avard, and Reed Peck in Correspondence, Orders, etc., pp. 57–9, 97–129. The Marsh and Hyde account, which was made on October 24, is particularly important. Part of it was reproduced in History of the [Mormon] Church, Vol. III, p. 167. See also the Peck manuscript, p. 80. Joseph himself barely mentioned the speech in his history; see Vol. III, p. 162.”

[2] John Ankerberg & John Weldon, The Facts on Islam, (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 1998), pp.8–9. Eric Johnson, Joseph Smith  & Muhammed, (El Cajon, CA: Mormonism Research Ministry, 1998), pp. 6–7.

[3] Documentary History of the [Mormon] Church, vol.4, pp.461.

[4] Documentary History of the [Mormon] Church, vol.6, pp.408–409.


33 posted on 05/25/2010 3:39:25 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
It was the standard reference.

(I would have LOVED to have been a fly on the wall at the 'meeting' that the decision to quit making it so easily available in print was formulated.

Haven't these folks heard of the INTERNET yet?)

34 posted on 05/25/2010 3:42:48 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Belteshazzar
I remember surmising something to that effect in south-semitic (i.e., Arabic) resources library at the University of Minnesota many moons ago when I was young and foolish. Someone whispered to me to shut up, or there would be trouble. Little did I know how right he was.

There were Mormon agents up there?
35 posted on 05/25/2010 3:53:56 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Belteshazzar

Apostle Parley P. Pratt beat you to this observation ... before he was told to shut up.

 

Well!

Isn't THIS interesting...



Parley Parker Pratt (12 April 1807 – 13 May 1857)[1] was a leader in the Latter Day Saint movement and an original member of Quorum of the Twelve Apostles from 1835 until his murder in 1857. He served in the Quorum with his younger brother, Orson Pratt. He was a missionary, poet, religious writer and longtime editor of the religious publication The Latter-day Saints' Millennial Star. Having explored, surveyed, built and maintained the first road for public transportation there, scenic Parley's Canyon in Salt Lake City, was named in his honor.

Pratt practiced plural marriage and had twelve wives. One of Pratt's great-great-grandsons is Mitt Romney, former Massachusetts governor and candidate for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.[2]


From WIKI....

36 posted on 05/25/2010 4:00:34 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
 
...both have special instructions for the nether regions..
 
I do not know about ISLAM, but MORMONism says...

What is your church doing to help the male to stay true?
 




prophet kimball"All of this should be conveyed without having priesthood leaders focus upon intimate matters which are a part of husband and wife relationships. Skillful interviewing and counseling can occur without discussion of clinical details by placing firm responsibility on individual members of the Church to put their lives in order before exercising the privilege of entering a house of the Lord. The First Presidency has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnatural, impure, or unholy practice. If a person is engaged in a practice which troubles him enough to ask about it, he should discontinue it."
- Official Declaration of the First Presidency of the Church, January 5th, 1982


spencer kimball"Prophets anciently and today condemn masturbation. It induces feelings of guilt and shame. It is detrimental to spirituality. It indicates slavery to the flesh, not that mastery of it and the growth toward godhood which is the object of our mortal life. Our modern prophet has indicated that no young man should be called on a mission who is not free from this practice. What is more, it too often leads to grievous sin, even to that sin against nature, homosexuality. For, done in private, it evolves often into mutual masturbation-practiced with another person of the same sex and thence into total homosexuality...."
- Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, Pages 77-79, 81-82

"Among the most common sexual sins our young people commit are necking and petting. Not only do these improper relations often lead to fornication, [unwed] pregnancy, and abortions - all ugly sins - but in and of themselves they are pernicious evils, and it is often difficult for youth to distinguish where one ends and another begins. They awaken lust and stir evil thoughts and sex desires. They are but parts of the whole family of related sins and indiscretions. Almost like twins, 'petting' and fornication are alike."
- Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, page 65


spencer kimball"Also far-reaching is the effect of the loss of chastity. Once given or taken or stolen it can never be regained. Even in a forced contact such as rape or incest, the injured one is greatly outraged. If she has not cooperated and contributed to the foul deed, she is of course in a more favorable position. There is no condemnation where there is no voluntary participation. It is better to die in defending one's virtue than to live having lost it without a struggle."
-
Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, page 196


"And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear. Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth." (Genesis 4:9-14.) That was true of murder. It is also true of illicit sex, which, of course, includes all petting, fornication, adultery, homosexual acts, and all other perversions. The Lord may say to offenders, as He did to Cain, "What hast thou done?" The children thus conceived make damning charges against you; the companions who have been frustrated and violated condemn you; the body that has been defiled cries out against you; the spirit which has been dwarfed convicts you. You will have difficulty throughout the ages in totally forgiving yourself."
-Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, "Love Versus Lust", BYU Speech January 5, 1965. Often-used quote still used today in LDS seminary classes.


kimball"I do not find in the Bible the modern terms "petting" nor "homosexuality," yet I found numerous scriptures which forbade such acts under by whatever names they might be called. I could not find the term "homosexuality," but I did find numerous places where the Lord condemned such a practice with such vigor that even the death penalty was assessed."
- Apostle Spencer W. Kimball, "Love Versus Lust", BYU Speech January 5, 1965


"If adultery or fornication justified the death penalty in the old days, and still in Christ's day, is the sin any less today because the laws of the land do not assess the death penalty for it? Is the act less grievous? There must be a washing, a purging, a changing of attitudes, a correcting of appraisals, a strengthening toward self-mastery. There must be many prayers, and volumes of tears. There must be an inner conviction giving to the sin its full diabolical weight. There must be increased devotion and much thought and study. And this takes energy and time and often is accompanied with sore embarrassment, heavy deprivations and deep trials, even if indeed one is not excommunicated from the Church, losing all spiritual blessings."
-Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, Page 155


"How like the mistletoe is immorality. The killer plant starts with a sticky sweet berry. Little indiscretions are the berries -- indiscretions like sex thoughts sex discussions, passionate kissing, pornography. The leaves and little twigs are masturbation and necking and such, growing with every exercise. The full-grown plant is petting and sex looseness. It confounds, frustrates, and destroys like the parasite if it is not cut out and destroyed, for, in time it robs the tree, bleeds its life, and leaves it barren and dry; and, strangely enough, the parasite dies with its host."
- Apostle Spencer W. Kimball, General Conference Address, April 1, 1967.








37 posted on 05/25/2010 4:02:50 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar; restornu
 
Even the Prophets teach all of the LDS to pray and get a confirmation for ourselves when a revelation is given.
 
And I submit to you that they better NOT; but follow along with WHATEVER has come from the mouth of the 'latest' Living Prophet®!

In conclusion let us summarize this grand key, these “Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet”, for our salvation depends on them.


1. The prophet is the only man who speaks for the Lord in everything.
2. The living prophet is more vital to us than the standard works.
3. The living prophet is more important to us than a dead prophet.
4. The prophet will never lead the church astray.
5. The prophet is not required to have any particular earthly training or credentials to speak on any subject or act on any matter at any time.
6. The prophet does not have to say “Thus Saith the Lord,” to give us scripture.
7. The prophet tells us what we need to know, not always what we want to know.
8. The prophet is not limited by men’s reasoning.
9. The prophet can receive revelation on any matter, temporal or spiritual.
10. The prophet may advise on civic matters.
11. The two groups who have the greatest difficulty in following the prophet are the proud who are learned and the proud who are rich.
12. The prophet will not necessarily be popular with the world or the worldly.
13. The prophet and his counselors make up the First Presidency—the highest quorum in the Church.
14. The prophet and the presidency—the living prophet and the First Presidency—follow them and be blessed—reject them and suffer.

I testify that these fourteen fundamentals in following the living prophet are true. If we want to know how well we stand with the Lord then let us ask ourselves how well we stand with His mortal captain—how close do our lives harmonize with the Lord’s anointed—the living Prophet—President of the Church, and with the Quorum of the First Presidency.

Ezra Taft Benson

(Address given Tuesday, February 26, 1980 at Brigham Young University)

 


 


38 posted on 05/25/2010 4:06:00 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
 
             

Fascinating!


39 posted on 05/25/2010 4:11:58 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 999replies
Like any malicious-minded bully, she gets her strength from hiding behind a mask, and refuses to disclose what specific church she belongs to.

Why do you BASH the messenger and avoid commenting on the INFORMATION?

I find that FASCINATING!

40 posted on 05/25/2010 4:13:14 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,161-1,166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson