Posted on 05/14/2010 11:55:28 AM PDT by GonzoII
America’s prelates have finally rallied to confront a pressing moral issue. No, not to oppose the billions in federal funding for Planned Parenthood, nor the additional billions for foreign- aid population programs targeting Catholic Third World countries. No, our prelates have united to condemn those “ mean- spirited” Americans, millions of them practicing Catholics, who support Arizona’s decision to enforce longstanding federal immigration statutes. The bishops’ spokesman on the issue, Roger Cardinal Mahony, charitably accuses the law’s supporters of favoring “ German Nazi and Russian Communist techniques.”
This is nothing new. For years — decades, really — most of our bishops have calibrated Catholic social teaching to conform to the increasingly liberal Democrat agenda. For instance, embattled Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid has often branded opponents of amnesty as “ anti- immigrant.” In less- than- perfect charity, the USCCB has obediently perpetuated that canard. But again, he who pays the piper calls the tune.
And the piper’s tune was called with truly brazen audacity on May 6 by America’s leading pro- abortion Catholic Democrat, who made it perfectly clear just who’s boss when it comes to the Church’s politics.
From Foxnews. com: “ House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday urged Catholic leaders to ‘ instruct’ their parishioners to support immigration reforms, saying clerics should ‘ play a very major role’ in supporting Democratic policies.
“‘ The cardinals, the archbishops, the bishops that come to me and say, “ We want you to pass immigration reform,” and I said, “ I want you to speak about it from the pulpit…. The people, some ( of whom) oppose immigration reform, are sitting in those pews, and you have to tell them that this is a manifestation of our living the gospels”,’ she said.”
Now this triumphal diktat represents a verifiably “ German Nazi and Russian Communist technique,” aimed directly at the heart of the Church on the part of the omnipotent state. Has even one prelate had the temerity to condemn it publicly? Or did Pelosi’s cardinals, archbishops, and bishops show up with their birettas in hand, instead of Canon 915? ( Canon 915 states in part: “ Those who have been . . . obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.”)
Conflict Or Capitulation?
“ In my judgment a conflict between the state claiming unlimited powers and the Catholic Church is inevitable” — Hilaire Belloc, Essays of a Catholic ( 1931).
Pelosi’s brazen outburst represents a primal scream from a depraved powermonger railing at the successors of the apostles: “ Get in line!” But the bishops quietly comply. How did it come to this?
A longtime conservative activist recently gave me a clue. He was explaining why government spending kept growing under George W. Bush, even though most Republicans opposed it. “ The way politicians see it,” he explained, “ interest groups have very specific priorities. When they get their first priority, they are happy. Under George W. Bush, pro- lifers got their judges, the neocons got their war, and evangelicals got their ‘ Faith- Based Initiatives.’ Now, while many groups might want less spending, no powerful interest group came to Bush with ‘ less spending’ as its first priority. So spending just kept going up.”
So the politician’s task is to deliver a group’s first priority. He doesn’t ask, “ What else do you want,” he turns to the next interest group and addresses their highest priority. No matter how much members of an interest group might talk about “ too much spending,” the politician knows that, if they get their first priority, the rest is just background noise.
Let’s analyze the USCCB from this perspective. What does the hard- nosed Capitol Hill pol see as the Catholic Church’s “first priority”? Remember, even though the bishops are undoubtedly a powerful interest group, their first priority is all they will get. Their lower priorities will stay on the shelf — that is the way the game is played.
For almost 100 years — especially since Archbishop Joseph Bernardin planted the USCC’s flag firmly on the left 40 years ago — our bishops have advocated a wide range of liberal social welfare initiatives. They have also strongly opposed abortion. So what’s the score in 2010? Abortion is still legal, but the liberal social welfare agenda has prospered — and so has the USCCB. Catholic “ social justice” bureaucracies flourish, from the Catholic Campaign for Human Development to the huge USCCB headquarters in Washington. The bishops’ anointed experts have developed strong ties with the Washington left, on and off Capitol Hill, and those ties have paid off.
Today the Church receives two billion dollars a year from the government for Catholic Charities, tens of millions more for Catholic universities and hospitals, and tens of millions a year more for the USCCB itself.
With that scorecard, would the average Washington politician draw the conclusion that the life issues — especially abortion — are the bishops’ first priority?
Politicians might not be saints, but they’re not dumb. Politicians also understand the law. So they notice when bishops refuse to implement Canon Law (and Canon 915 is mandatory, not optional) in the case of even the most flagrant Catholic pro-abortion scandalmongers. Politicians draw the logical conclusion. And politicians are also well aware that, as Cardinal McCarrick judiciously put it a few years back, Catholic bishops do not want to “alienate” important pro-abortion Catholics on Capitol Hill because “[taxpayer] money is needed for Catholic hospitals, charities, and education.”
The bottom line: To the crass politician — the vast majority — the bishops’ actions have made it clear that their first priority is money.
Winners And Losers
Does that mean our bishops don’t really oppose abortion? Of course not. But listen to them with a politician’s ear. Left- wing politicians will always invoke the usual nostrums condemning “ waste, fraud, and abuse.” Of course, they do not mean it. Those categories finance the power of the left, and they are not about to eliminate them. To repeat: When leftist politicians rant and rave against “ waste, fraud, and abuse,” they are lying. Now, when bishops condemn abortion, they are telling the truth. But politicians wonder, do they really mean it? If they do, why has it never been the bishops’ first priority?
When bishops condemn abortion, as Theodore Cardinal McCarrick carefully observed, they must always keep in view their first priority — the money. If our bishops were seriously to make the life issues their first priority, they would invite a long and bruising battle. Eventually they might win on abortion ( I think they would, in fact, and pretty quickly), but they would definitely lose the money. Nothing personal, that’s just the way the system works. And that’s not all. The left is spiteful. After the enraged pols shut the water off, they might decide to go after the Church’s tax exemptions.
And there’s more: Imagine pro- abortion Sen. Patrick Leahy’s outrage if he were excommunicated. He might not be able to receive the Eucharist, but as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, he could still issue subpoenas.
In recent years, the bishops have received tens of billions of taxpayer dollars. The way the politicians see it, that money has bought the bishops’ tacit agreement never to go to the mat about abortion. Sure enough, the bishops never have. Instead, while formally opposing abortion, their “ experts” have for 40 years emitted a steady ooze of “ social justice” drivel, imparting the imprimatur of the Catholic Church to virtually every line- item in the left- wing policy agenda of the proabortion Democratic Party. In return, the bishops have gotten — the money.
To put it plainly, since 1968, in the hearts and minds of American bishops and in the halls of the U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, there has been a struggle between Humanae Vitae — which is the infallible teaching of the Magisterium — and government- funded “ social justice,” the left- wing Marxist agenda upon which the bishops have bestowed a Catholic imprimatur.
It’s clear today that Humanae Vitae has lost.
+ + + Editor’s Note: We strongly suggest that every reader circulate copies of Christopher Manion’s powerful and informative essay among Catholic laity, priests, and bishops. You can also access this article on The Wanderer’s web site at www. the wandererpress. com.
Nice set of statistics.
Thanks for the ping....very interesting!
Stunning - thanks Mrs. Don-o
1. Most members of minority groups think immigration is too high.
Is immigration……… too high... too low.... just right
Hispanic-Americans 56 7 14
Asian-Americans: 57 5 18
African-Americans: 68 4 14
2. Most members of minority groups think that illegal immigration is not caused by limits on legal immigration, but by a lack of enforcement.
Illegal immigration caused by… legal option too limited … lack of enforcement…
Hispanic-Americans 20 61
Asian-Americans: 19 69
African-Americans: 16 70
3. Most minorities feel that there are plenty of Americans available to fill unskilled jobs.
Unskilled jobs:… More immigrants needed… Americans can do it
Hispanic-Americans 15 65
Asian-Americans: 19 65
African-Americans: 6 81
Ofcourse you know my thoughts on this issue.
I find it interesting that the WIVES of the men here illegally want them home.
The men should be home helping raise their children.
“Wetback wives” — Sounds like a theme for a whole nother kind of (international) country song. I hope the mods consider the whole context of your post (these are MEXICAN women who are being quoted talking this way) and don’t just zot it because of the often racially incendiary term.
Is it true that a number of these men start "second families" here in the U.S., of which the Mexican wife knows nothing?
Re: post 27, EXCELLENT.
As an aside, Hispanics usually vote for the Party of Death. Also, sometimes ILLEGAL immigrants vote.
Look. They are avoiding their vocation as fathers. Some may say they’re coming to support their families, I say justice is to make sure your country does what is right for families through jobs, a decent place to live, stopping corruption, killing the drug trade. The bishops should concentrate on that.
When they go to confession after being here twenty years, with no purpose of amendment of doing the right thing (my parish has an immigration center and all kinds of help, they don’t do it), does the priest say ‘everybody does it’, ‘it’s okay to take from those who work hard and are legal/citizens’, ‘to take housing, medical, schooling, social services, jobs from those here who need them and those who pay taxes for them’?
Bottom line, it’s not right, it’s not ‘just’.
I would think the lesson would be learned from the socialist, left leaning groups who pushed for Somalis into this country... only for some of them to go to training camps to attack this country.
I suggest they remind our next door neighbors of certain wars and treaties signed. I also suggest they’re told neighbors who see their next door attacked by terrorists would understand why (instead, they put out a comic book showing how to cross). Look at their laws re: immigration, look at the jihadis and OTMs brought by coyotes into this country (hey, if you can get 25G to smuggle two guys instead of three truckloads, of course they do it). How about the beheadings 30 miles from McHenry county in Texas and the highest kidnapping rate in this country? How about the ID theft, gangs, murders, rapes and releases?
I suggest, as I did before, the next million march take place in Mexico.
When you pass amnesty and grandfather relatives in, you’re also letting in jihadi families... but they don’t care.
Don’t they get there will be no America to run to if ICE is busy looking for next door illegals and extra law enforcement for gangs/crime instead of concentrating on terror-linked individuals, some who get school visas, attend one day, drop out, go on to plan or are taking off no-fly lists, etc. They can’t focus on the number one issue with this crap going on.
We have high unemployment, citizens need the jobs.
It’s been a nice few decades, we can’t do anymore for you.
Be thankful for what you have accomplished, we’ll thank you for the part you’ve played in this country. It has to stop.
If that has to be explained by a country that has given this opportunity, you never gave a damn about this country anyway... except as a teat to suck off of.
First Catholic area of business, get rid of the socialists that infiltrated the church decades ago. Stop them from spinning our Lord’s words into Marx.
Two of my kids are married to people who did it the right way, paid lots of money, waited, jumped through hoops. It’s not fair to them either.
Meanwhile kids are getting indoctrinated in schools, they teach we do nothing for no one, are greedy and exploitive.
They’ll never know how much we’ve done for people all around the world. They don’t teach history, the constitution, the law, just feelings. No concept of right and wrong, it’s all ‘relative’, no god, no critical thinking.
There’s a lot of praying to do... and a lot of calling and writing.
Where are you in CA?
Wow! Great work!
Thanks for the ping!
Thanks for giving this guy holy hell so that he if nothing else his conscience is pricked.
Agenda-driven leftists should be confronted with reality - their bubbles should be busted, and that is what you are doing. How else can they be stopped?
If we love them, we will do what you are doing.
Keep it up and thanks for sharing.
In my years here, I know that anything from Mrs. Don-o is always a good read.
Bookmark
Thanks for sharing your letter. There is good information there and I will steal it. :)
Something else that I haven’t actually thought through. Are we supposed to rebuild the Tower of Babel?
‘Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; and nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down, and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.’
How can a border be wrong when God created it?
You are right when you say a nation has a right to a border, because the rule of law must prevail, as imperfect as it is. Nations properly possess sovereignty, and sovereignty means borders.
On the other hand, if the ancient divisions (parceled out, as it were, by God) prevailed, there would be no people of European ancestry in the Western Hemisphere. We'd have to back to Europe. And then the people of Indian ancestry would have to leave too, because 10,000 years ago they fame over from Asia. And then.... I suppose all the way back to everybody crowding into the Garden of Eden?
This isn't true. It was arrived at like all human activity happens. That's not tawdry, it's just normal. AND, it's the natural result of peoples speaking different languages.
On the other hand, if the ancient divisions (parceled out, as it were, by God) prevailed, there would be no people of European ancestry in the Western Hemisphere.
I don't mean actual borders, more the idea that God wanted separate peoples. That God didn't want a one-world-population all speaking the same language - which will be the result of an open-borders/migration policy.
Thus, it's not a sin against migrants for America to enforce border laws. In fact, it serves God's intent.
I certainly agree with you that every nation has a right to legally-recognized, secure borders, and that it’s wrong to cross those borders unlawfully.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.