To: GonzoII
No.
It is a smoke screen.
Like I said above,
THE SEXUAL ORIENTAION OF THE PRIEST DOES NOT MATTER!
CHILDREN OF BOTH SEXES WERE MOLESTED BY ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS AND ROME DID NOTHING EXCEPT MOVE THE CHILD MOLESTING PRIESTS TO ANOTHER DIOCESE!!
16 posted on
05/01/2010 5:55:41 AM PDT by
Gamecock
(If you want Your Best Life Now, follow Osteen. If you want your best life forever, don't. JM)
To: Gamecock
What’s with the “look-at-me” font?
26 posted on
05/01/2010 6:22:00 AM PDT by
Lorica
To: Gamecock
You screamed: “THE SEXUAL ORIENTAION OF THE PRIEST DOES NOT MATTER!”
Clearly it does when the overwhelming number of abusers were homosexual men abusing adolescent boys and young men. That’s called ephobophilia. And yes, it matters.
30 posted on
05/01/2010 7:42:55 AM PDT by
vladimir998
(Part of the Vast Catholic Conspiracy (hat tip to Kells))
To: Gamecock
if a man or a priest touches a boy is a homosexuals and therefore this is also a homosexuals problem.
Mostly it was boys who were touched and molested and it’s high time for some of these people to stop pushing this perverted sickness
71 posted on
05/01/2010 12:27:40 PM PDT by
manc
(WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
To: Gamecock
their sexual orientation does not matter
course it does matter, many were boys, they were touched by men and therefore they are homosexuals
72 posted on
05/01/2010 12:30:27 PM PDT by
manc
(WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
To: Gamecock
It is a smoke screen. How exactly is this a smokescreen. Are you suggesting that the fact that a majority were homosexual molesters suddenly takes away the responsibility of the Church for thier part?
80 posted on
05/01/2010 4:43:32 PM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson