Posted on 03/08/2010 6:27:24 PM PST by TaraP
Job 40:15-24 Behemoth
15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. 16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. 17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. 18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. 19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him. 20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play. 21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens. 22 The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about. 23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth. 24 He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares. http://www.answersincreation.org/job4041a.htm There is one certainty about Job 40-41 they are not dinosaurs that lived 6,000 years ago. With the possibilities presented, I leave it up to the reader to decide for themselves what the correct answer is. We probably wont know for certain until we get to heaven.
What do I believe? I lean toward the dinosaur theory. You may say, How can Bible writers, such as David in Psalm 74, write about a dinosaur if it lived 65 million years ago? This is simple. There were certainly dinosaur fossils available in Bible times.
They are in the rocks now, so they must have been in the rocks then. David, and others, probably saw these fossils, and wrote about them (see Paleontology Pioneers and Aboriginal Dinosaurs?
Do you agree with this theory?
Yes.
If you really want a mysterious creature check out the Leviathan of Job 41.
I do think there is something to the Gap Theory. That explains the presence of t-rex and the other mega-sauruses before man came along. There is also the “Apparent Age” theory that postulates the earth only appears to be billions of years old but was actually created looking that way. What does a brand-new baby rock look like? Also, Adam was created as a grown man already, not a baby.
An elephant or hippo fit well with the imagery of the books. What makes you think an elephant or hippo do not work?
Here’s a theory: Dinosaurs were part of the “backstory” God created for the Earth so that he could call one up here. Why make a coherent backstory? So choosing God would be an act of faith, without which there would not be free will. Why does free will matter? Because without free will, there cannot be true love or even companionship, and the universe would be a sterile empty place (possibly even for God).
There are many legends of the behemoth, beyond what a hippo could be.
Tail like a cedar. Neither hippos or elephants have large tails.
“Tail” as in singular. Cthuthu has more than that (:
—
Please post the verse first, then you should see your error...;)
What do you mean a Coherent back story?
17 He moveth his tail like a cedar:
Bah, Cthulhu has one tail, just a mass of tentacles around his head! I’m still gonna stick with the real evil old one, Cthulhu!
No you are right...However the angels were pro-creating with human beings before Noah’s flood and creating giants
Does this have to do with Dinos? Did GOD create Dinos? OR
did something/ someone pro-create with a species of animal and create the Dinos?
Great! Now what is being compared to the cedar tree? The tail, or how the tail moves? If it was the tail that was being compared, the verse would state:
His tail is like a cedar:
But no, we see the that the tail MOVES like a cedar. It's the motion of the tail that is compared, not the tail itself.
It speaks about one particular fierce dinosaur.
Angelic Human crossbreed experiments of the time of Noah where Angels took women and bread Human Giants as described in Genesis 6 of the Bible.
Other related Bible stories were included after Genesis 6 as it occurred on a smaller scale, and the story of David and Goliath holds some clues.
It is said that not only humans were corrupted but also animals and if that included Animal Giants too then maybe that means the Dinosaurs in terms of fitting the picture into the Bible chronology.
Since they were of a giant size anyway, who says that maybe they were not a result of experiments and by doing so God decided to save the pure animals that we have today of their kind and then along with humans while sending a flood to bury the Giants, be it Human hybrids or dinosaurs.
“When the children of men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born to them, and the angels of God saw them on a certain year of this jubilee, that they were beautiful, and they took themselves wives of all, whom they chose, and they gave birth to their sons and they were giants.
“Because of them lawlessness increased on the earth and all flesh corrupted its way. Men and cattle and beasts and birds and everything that walked on the earth were all corrupted in their ways and their orders, and they began to devour each other. Lawlessness increased on the earth and the imagination and thoughts of all men were continually, totally evil” (Jubilees 5:1, 2).
Dunno for sure. It could be an explanation about the gap between Genesis 1:1 and verse 2. Satan and his horde started messing up things so bad on earth, God wiped the slate clean and started over with creation. Possible.
Some perhaps, but it's not possible that they all did; there are just too many written and pictorial records of them that are post-flood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.