Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it "Catholic" or "Roman Catholic?" <Vanity><Ecumenical>

Posted on 02/26/2010 1:08:31 AM PST by Gamecock

So I have a question about terminology.

Some of our Catholic FRiends get upset when we Prods use the term Roman Catholic, insisting that the term is derogatory, insulting, etc.

What I would like to discuss is why do Catholics complain about the term Roman Catholic, when the term is in such wide use inside of the Catholic church?

Thoughts?


TOPICS: Catholic; Ecumenism; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: catholic; ignorance; romancatholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-455 next last
To: Lorica

I’m sorry you consider the question hostile. It’s not meant to be.

Asking if a person has children is not generally thought of as antagonism.

If you’d prefer not to answer, then just say that. Instead you come back with slurs against me for having the temerity to ask the question.


401 posted on 03/04/2010 8:36:39 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
If you’d prefer not to answer, then just say that. Instead you come back with slurs against me for having the temerity to ask the question.

You have to be kidding...

402 posted on 03/04/2010 8:44:44 AM PST by Trailerpark Badass (One good thing about music, when it hits you feel no pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Lorica; Dr. Eckleburg
It is not antagonistic to ask me if my eyes are blue, if I have children, whether I am Catholic, etc.

I may answer yes, no, maybe, "it's none of your business" and so on.

However, if the person asking such a question keeps on asking me long after it is obvious I choose to not answer - then that behavior is antagonistic.

Dr. Eckleburg, quit asking.

Lorica, quit complaining.

403 posted on 03/04/2010 8:52:34 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Thanks for your guidance. No more questions.


404 posted on 03/04/2010 8:59:59 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

Nope.


405 posted on 03/04/2010 9:00:40 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

It never ceases to amaze me either. It’s like talking to Martians.


406 posted on 03/04/2010 9:05:26 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

lol. Are your eyes blue?


407 posted on 03/04/2010 9:30:49 AM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

ha! I was wondering the same thing...


408 posted on 03/04/2010 9:41:03 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
It’s like talking to Martians.

With Martians you could probably chalk it up to simple miscommunication, in good faith.

409 posted on 03/04/2010 9:44:13 AM PST by Trailerpark Badass (One good thing about music, when it hits you feel no pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator; theanonymouslurker; Lorica; Dr. Eckleburg

Dr. Eckleburg was asking everyone who disagreed with her if they had children. Me, theanonymouslurker, and Lorica. All of us made it clear that we would not answer it, yet she continued. Thank you for telling her to stop. It was clearly antagonistic, yet it took YOUR intervention. Why?

It is a common tactic of Dr. E. to make things personal. We should not have to hit the abuse button, or call you in, for Dr. Eckleburg to behave properly on the threads, yet consistently that is the case where she is concerned. Other posters do not do that.

Thank you for intervening, but why should you have to bother with this 7th grade antagonistic behavior?


410 posted on 03/04/2010 9:47:11 AM PST by Judith Anne (2012 Sarah Palin/Duncan Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

.


411 posted on 03/04/2010 9:54:15 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I’m sorry you consider the question hostile. It’s not meant to be.

Asking if a person has children is not generally thought of as antagonism.

If you’d prefer not to answer, then just say that. Instead you come back with slurs against me for having the temerity to ask the question.

I'm all about keeping the record straight. The first time you asked me if I had children, I replied:

That’s not relative to the fact that your information was incorrect.

You continued to ask me, at least twice more. Had you respected my first answer, you wouldn't have anything to complain about.

412 posted on 03/04/2010 3:26:27 PM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
However, if the person asking such a question keeps on asking me long after it is obvious I choose to not answer - then that behavior is antagonistic.

Dr. Eckleburg, quit asking.

Thank you.

Lorica, quit complaining.

Please advise what I should do differently next time I ping you and don't receive a response?

413 posted on 03/04/2010 3:31:43 PM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

My son was molested for four years by a Catholic boy near us and we never knew about it. Whether that boy was molested himself, I don’t know, but he caused my then 8-year-old son untold pain all his life.


414 posted on 03/04/2010 4:43:34 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

oh, boo hoo.


415 posted on 03/04/2010 4:45:00 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Roman Catholicism teaches that men can store up their own reserve of righteousness through good works.

It does not. Nothing in the Catechism says that.

Roman Catholicism also teaches that this righteousness, if it exceeds that which is necessary to save someone, can be given as credit to another person.

Neither is this taught in the Catechism.

Rome is a banking system, not a faith which correctly counts Christ's righteousness alone as being capable of saving sinners.

Negative. Do you have any evidence of your claims?

416 posted on 03/04/2010 4:55:45 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Negative. Do you have any evidence of your claims?

Of course not. That was just another baiting comment, meant to rile up the "papists" and mislead the lurkers.

417 posted on 03/04/2010 5:38:53 PM PST by Judith Anne (2012 Sarah Palin/Duncan Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
The question then is why would any parent entrust the lives and safety of their children to any priest, a man who abstains from a normal, functional life to live sequestered with other men, many of whom are pedophiles?

First of all, most priests, the priests who would have access to teens and children, are hardly "sequestered." They live extremely public lives, probably much more so than most of us. In the same vein they are not "confined" to the company of other priests, exclusively, nor are they somehow socially isolated, as your words imply. On the other hand, those priests who do live a cloistered life obviously lack the access to teens and children.

The idea that "many" priests are "pedophiles" is an outrageous slur that cannot be born out by any evidence.

Thank god my experience growing up and being educated in the Catholic church, as well as the experience of the many others who shared that experience with me, bears so little resemblance to the outrageous image you have.

418 posted on 03/04/2010 6:37:17 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (One good thing about music, when it hits you feel no pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Of course not. That was just another baiting comment, meant to rile up the "papists" and mislead the lurkers.

Good luck to them, I say.


419 posted on 03/04/2010 6:37:39 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
My son was molested for four years by a Catholic boy near us and we never knew about it.

What was the resolution?

Certainly you had the boy arrested?

420 posted on 03/04/2010 6:41:43 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (One good thing about music, when it hits you feel no pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson