Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuts and Bolts - By Tim Staples: Mary Worshippers Need Not Apply
Envoy ^ | Tim Staples

Posted on 02/15/2010 9:07:17 AM PST by GonzoII

The Scenario:

Ever have one of those days when you’re feeling full of energy and vigor? I mean, you’re feeling just obnoxiously happy? Well, this is one of those days.

Driving home from work, you switch on the radio to see what’s happening, and you tune in to a local Protestant radio station just in time to hear a preacher speaking against various Catholic doctrines concerning Mary. The show is called Pastor Bob’s Bible Hour. Pastor Bob proclaims: “Jesus knew Catholics would come along and begin to worship His mother and call her perpetual virgin and absurd things like that. But the Bible says: ‘Is not this the carpenter’s son? Is not His mother called Mary? And are not His brethren James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? And are not all of His sisters with us?’ (Matt. 13:55-56a). And isn’t it sad, my brothers and sisters?”

Pastor Bob goes on to say: “Jesus dealt with these Mary worshippers in His day. In Luke 11:27-28, the Bible says, ‘A woman in the crowd raised her voice and said to Him, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breasts that You sucked!” But He said, “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it!”’”

On a normal day you would probably just listen, take a few mental notes and drive on. But not this time. You’re feeling a little bit too saucy. You take the first exit you see and head for a phone. This is just one more reason why you need to buy that cell phone you’ve been talking about getting.

Step One:

(Excerpt) Read more at envoymagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History
KEYWORDS: bvm; catholic; mariolatry; moapb; ourlady
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 1,581-1,594 next last
To: wagglebee
Are you suggesting that by the early 4th Century the Gospels had been divided into chapters and verses?

*lolz*




[heads   e x p l o d i n g ]

1,081 posted on 02/19/2010 12:06:09 PM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

It wouldn’t be the dumbest thing I’ve heard on these threads, not even close.


1,082 posted on 02/19/2010 12:07:14 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1081 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Eusebius misquoted Matthew 28:19-20 the Shem Tov Matthew piggy-backs on this to try to destroy the Triune nature of God.

Despicable.

The Roman "church" father lied ?

It is the earliest citation of Matthew 28:19.

Where are all the older manuscripts ?

It seems like someone wanted to
re-write scriptures to back fill dogma.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
1,083 posted on 02/19/2010 12:09:34 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1077 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

LOL


1,084 posted on 02/19/2010 12:09:42 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1045 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
I never said Eusebius lied. Do you know the difference between "lied" and "misquoted?"

It is the earliest citation of Matthew 28:19.

It is a very early use of part of the language of what would later be numbered Matthew 28:19-20.

It is being exploited to deny Baptism and the Holy Trinity.

Satan is the father of all lies.

It seems like someone wanted to re-write scriptures to back fill dogma.

He was known as Shem Tov.

1,085 posted on 02/19/2010 12:13:50 PM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1083 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience; Belteshazzar
I’ll start the discussion on the Cana miracle. There’s much that could be said but I’ll only note:
The New Wine is better than the old wine.
Christ represents the new wine of the covenant.

I will add to that..the jars full of water that was changed to wine were the ritual washing jars... How symbolic that wine, the symbol of the cleansing blood of Christ, filled the ritual washing jars.. BTW Those jars were then ritually unclean after the wine was in them.

1,086 posted on 02/19/2010 12:14:57 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 882 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
As a former Catholic and self-proclaimed church teacher (what a mistake!), you ought to know about Immaculate Conception. Your question is an attempt to play a game. I decline.

I know what the immaculate conception is, do you? It has nothing to do with Mary being sinless, it has to do with her being a virgin.. did you know that ?

I am asking if "ann" wasalso sinless, because if one needs a sinless womb to carry a sinless child she ytoo must have been sinless

1,087 posted on 02/19/2010 12:22:16 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 891 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings; Ransomed
Boy, that's not gonna work. I have family members who are Catholicwho always want toknowmy reasons for not worshipping Mary. (35 years worth, must be slow learners)I'm also related to the Archbishop of Denver, let's ask him!

Amen Brother!

All you have to do is see the Pope kneeling down and praying to a statue of Mary to understand what's going on. Former RC's have said they were caught up in this heresy. We see it and know it for what it is, heresy.

1,088 posted on 02/19/2010 12:26:54 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 983 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Yes, we are well aware that you deny the Holy Trinity and the Divinity of Jesus Christ.

You are joining Pet in attempting to put words in my mouth.

You will most likely will get away with it as it would appear
that the RM provides cover for members of the Roman "church".

You know that I believe that Jesus the Christ is G-d
The ONE and only YHvH.

A NAME which appears over 7000 times in the Holy Word.

29 Jesus answered, "The foremost is, 'HEAR, O ISRAEL!
YHvH OUR Elohim IS ONE YHvH; Deut 6:4

John 14:9...Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, 'Show us the Father '?

He is not one of three gods.

Some members of the Roman "church" formally trained
in theology state that we can ignore the old god because
he is mean and nasty and not warm and cuddly.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
1,089 posted on 02/19/2010 12:28:59 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; Belteshazzar; 1000 silverlings
I will add to that..the jars full of water that was changed to wine were the ritual washing jars... How symbolic that wine, the symbol of the cleansing blood of Christ, filled the ritual washing jars..

Great point! I'll add that the marriage feast represents our communion with God and thus when Jesus told his mother that his time had not yet come he points to that time in which all of His will be united to Him.

1,090 posted on 02/19/2010 12:29:42 PM PST by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1086 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings; the_conscience; wmfights; Quix; RnMomof7; Religion Moderator; HarleyD
...but it looked like to me, that material from other threads was brought over here against the rules,...

Sure looked like it to me. Obviously, Dr.E. is a big target because she is so strong about supporting her positions. Maybe the open threads shouldn't have any constraints.

1,091 posted on 02/19/2010 12:30:57 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 990 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

I think I have said before that I am not playing your games, nor do I submit to questioning by you.

If I didn’t, consider it said.


1,092 posted on 02/19/2010 12:32:08 PM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1087 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I know what the immaculate conception is, do you? It has nothing to do with Mary being sinless...

*lolz*

1,093 posted on 02/19/2010 12:33:03 PM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1087 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
He is not one of three gods.

Congratulations! You agree with the Catholic Church.

1,094 posted on 02/19/2010 12:34:22 PM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1089 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

.


1,095 posted on 02/19/2010 12:36:15 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1094 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret
You wrote
The Bible does not say that He had a temptable nature, just that the devil tempted Him

I responded

Hebrews 4: 15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are--yet was without sin.

Hebrews just reiterates what we already know from the Gospel.

You basically implied that the only temptation Jesus had was the temptation by Satan on the mountain , even if that were true it would still count a HUMAN temptations because he had a HUMAN nature.. just as we all have. Again He got his Human nature from Mary. being human is more than just having a body..our dogs have bodies but they are not human. Would we call a child that was born with no arms or legs fully human ...of course , not based on his body, but on the nature he has within him .

If Mary was only to pass on a body, without the Human nature then she provides only a gene pool and nothing else. A sinless Mary would not have a human nature, but a divine one. Hebrews makes clear that Jesus was tempted just as we are, as he lived a life like ours..

1,096 posted on 02/19/2010 12:36:27 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings; John Leland 1789; Quix; RnMomof7
Thank you, very good summary.

Thank you for the ping to that post. I would have missed it.

JL thank you for posting that!

1,097 posted on 02/19/2010 12:36:57 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1003 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; Judith Anne; Petronski
I know what the immaculate conception is, do you? It has nothing to do with Mary being sinless, it has to do with her being a virgin.. did you know that ?

You are totally 100% WRONG.

The Immaculate Conception has NEVER referred to anything other than the conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary. (Though you will often hear it in movies incorrectly used to refer to the Incarnation and Virgin Birth.)

1,098 posted on 02/19/2010 12:38:10 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1087 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

“All you have to do is see the Pope kneeling down and praying to a statue of Mary to understand what’s going on.”

Things aren’t always like they seem.

“We see it and know it for what it is, heresy.”

Ask a bishop if worshipping Mary is heresy. What do you think he will say?

Freegards


1,099 posted on 02/19/2010 12:39:19 PM PST by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed Says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1088 | View Replies]

To: All

From Catholic Answers:

The Immaculate Conception

It’s important to understand what the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is and what it is not. Some people think the term refers to Christ’s conception in Mary’s womb without the intervention of a human father; but that is the Virgin Birth. Others think the Immaculate Conception means Mary was conceived “by the power of the Holy Spirit,” in the way Jesus was, but that, too, is incorrect. The Immaculate Conception means that Mary, whose conception was brought about the normal way, was conceived without original sin or its stain—that’s what “immaculate” means: without stain. The essence of original sin consists in the deprivation of sanctifying grace, and its stain is a corrupt nature. Mary was preserved from these defects by God’s grace; from the first instant of her existence she was in the state of sanctifying grace and was free from the corrupt nature original sin brings.

When discussing the Immaculate Conception, an implicit reference may be found in the angel’s greeting to Mary. The angel Gabriel said, “Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you” (Luke 1:28). The phrase “full of grace” is a translation of the Greek word kecharitomene. It therefore expresses a characteristic quality of Mary.

The traditional translation, “full of grace,” is better than the one found in many recent versions of the New Testament, which give something along the lines of “highly favored daughter.” Mary was indeed a highly favored daughter of God, but the Greek implies more than that (and it never mentions the word for “daughter”). The grace given to Mary is at once permanent and of a unique kind. Kecharitomene is a perfect passive participle of charitoo, meaning “to fill or endow with grace.” Since this term is in the perfect tense, it indicates that Mary was graced in the past but with continuing effects in the present. So, the grace Mary enjoyed was not a result of the angel’s visit. In fact, Catholics hold, it extended over the whole of her life, from conception onward. She was in a state of sanctifying grace from the first moment of her existence.


1,100 posted on 02/19/2010 12:41:17 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1098 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 1,581-1,594 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson