Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Romney By His Religion? I Do It, and So Should You.
Race 4 2012 ^ | November 30, 2009 | Alex Knepper

Posted on 11/30/2009 6:01:03 PM PST by delacoert

I’ll just leave this here…

Before a defense of any kind of religious discrimination, one ought to make all of the necessary disclaimers: of course I oppose government-sponsored discrimination, and I certainly would not support the kind of absurd treatment described by Steven Reinhart in his piece featured below. That being said, there is a legitimate case to be made for judging any candidate for office by his religious convictions.

In late 2007, Mitt Romney made his somewhat-famous speech on religion, where he spoke the following words:

“Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God. Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.”

Similarly, Romney has stated: “I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it…my faith is the faith of my fathers. I will be true to them and to my beliefs.”

If freedom requires religion, if his Mormon faith sustains his life and he will be true to those practices, then I’m at an utter loss as to why we should ignore Romney’s religious beliefs when evaluating his fitness for the White House.

We ask plenty of questions of any Evangelical Christian candidate: what do his beliefs about the nature of God, the nature of the cosmos, and the meaning of man’s life mean for his potential tenure in office? But for whatever reason, these questions are looked at as unnecessarily piercing and prejudiced when asked of a member of a minority faith.

When Sarah Palin gave her fumbling answer about Israel’s settlements, several commentators jumped on her faith, wondering whether she subscribed to the bizarre but potent sect of modern Christianity that believes in the imminence of the End Times. Will anyone ask Mitt Romney about the oddities of the dogma of the Mormon Church? There are plenty of Mormon doctrines that may strike people as a bit odd — and rightly so. It is established in the church that the devout can reach the upper echelons of heaven and eventually become gods themselves, able to create their own universes and govern them as they see fit (all while supervised by the One True God). Why is it that when I bring this up to Romney fans, I am dismissed as a bigot?

As an atheist, I both understand and accept that in a predominantly Christian society, my thoughts on religion are necessarily going to open me up to questions. If I were to ever run for office (don’t count on that, by the way), I would not expect my supporters would try to ward off any questions about my atheism with the victim-card of discrimination. One’s philosophy of religion contributes profoundly to his worldview and thus is a completely valid criterion by which to partially evaluate a candidate’s fitness for office.

I view all religions as equally bizarre and irrational. But mainstream Christianity is often adopted as a cultural guise, meant for purposes of assimilation with the majority. Probe most self-described Christians and you’ll find plenty of deviation from standard dogma. Devotion to Mormonism, which is completely outside of the American mainstream, requires a certain level of commitment. To what extent will Romney’s faith influence his decision-making? I ask that question of devoted Evangelicals and judge them accordingly, and I will do the same of a Mormon. And I am not going to apologize for that.


TOPICS: Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: braindeadbigots; excusesexcuses; hidebehindreligion; mitthides; mittwhit; mittwhits; mittwits; mormon; mormonism; rino; rinos; romney; romneyhiding; unusualtopic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 741-760 next last
To: restornu
TN wanted to share her medication...

Something YOU won't do!

I'll bet PRESBYTERIANs read these threads and have seen the fact that JS thought they believed UNTRUE things, and yet YOU will NOT tell them what they so DRASTICALLY need to know!!!

Shame on you; and you claim to be a loving MORMON?


I guess it's EASIER to be BAPTISED for them after they die; than to TALK to them while they still live.

481 posted on 12/02/2009 4:58:29 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
even Lds apostle Dallin Oaks conceded reality on this when he said:

But...

Was he SPEAKING as a PROPHET?

482 posted on 12/02/2009 4:59:54 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: fallingwater
Romney Palin 2012 or Palin Romney 2012? I can’t decide.

If the first; we'd see a very VOCAL Veep.

If the second; Sarah had best have a food taster.

483 posted on 12/02/2009 5:03:09 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: fallingwater
There are other places to get news.

And FR is a really GOOD place to get FACTS about MORMONism as well as ROMNEYism.

484 posted on 12/02/2009 5:04:37 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

LOOK!

Over there!


485 posted on 12/02/2009 5:05:19 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: restornu
First solve the finances than solidify the Principles of Liberty

Got it backwards again!

486 posted on 12/02/2009 5:06:17 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum
I can’t help but wonder how many of these zealous anti Mormons feel about Glenn Beck’s popularity.

When ya come to a fork in the road...

487 posted on 12/02/2009 5:07:45 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum
Would you not vote for Glenn Beck if he ran for office? Do you support his massive following? Are you glad he’s doing what he is doing?
Are you worried he is advocating Mormonism? Is this any different than a Mormon in high office?

Uh...

We've already HAD this conversation last month.

488 posted on 12/02/2009 5:09:06 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: Reno232

Dang!

Now I am doing it!


489 posted on 12/02/2009 5:11:12 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

it figures you have no clue of that message but what the heck does one expect of one suffering from OCD!

490 posted on 12/02/2009 6:17:01 AM PST by restornu (It had almost a 10 years run before putrescence set in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum

For one, I can tell you that I have no problem with Glenn Beck’s Mormonism since he doesn’t have a little platoon of whiners at FR. The mittiac is trying to play PC games to eliminate opposition using his mormonism as a tool. Disgusting aspect of the man actually ... and of course those playing this game for him are just as disgusting and duplicitous. BTW, have you met rameumpton?


491 posted on 12/02/2009 6:32:25 AM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
That's an honest approach at least, I appreciate it. Some here are saying they would never support a Mormon because it would spread the church, yet they have no problem supporting Glenn Beck and the important work he is doing. It smells of hypocrisy to me. Thanks for your take on it.

No, I've never met Rameumptum. Or Riplakish or Ramah for that matter either.

492 posted on 12/02/2009 6:47:13 AM PST by Ripliancum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum

Interesting ... you spelled Rame’s screen name the way he spelled it, rather than the way I wrote it. Committee?


493 posted on 12/02/2009 7:07:25 AM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

LOL...

Indeed...

I smell retread.


494 posted on 12/02/2009 7:10:14 AM PST by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

It’s the son, ONLY if the FIRST PERSONAGE was telling the truth.
__________________________________________________

Also Joey Smith claimed that his mormon gods were heavily into polygamy...

With the polyandry thingy, the son may not have been the son of that personage...

how would the personage know if the son was his child or the child of one of the other trillions of mormon gods ???

No DNA thingy back in 1805-1844..

Maybe thats why the kid didnt say anything...

Not even “OK Dad”


495 posted on 12/02/2009 7:14:12 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Sigh.

Am I required to misspell it like you did? It’s a word from the Book of Mormon, I suggest you look it up.


496 posted on 12/02/2009 7:17:10 AM PST by Ripliancum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum; MHGinTN
You are not required to spell it like MHGinTN but you may want to spell it like it is spelled in LDS doctrine...

Rameumptom

http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=7d2aa41f6cc20110VgnVCM100000176f620a____&vgnextoid=637e1b08f338c010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD

Please note that this is an LDS OWNED source...

497 posted on 12/02/2009 7:23:00 AM PST by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

You’ve just invalidated your game of accusations. I can find no Rameumptum with a U on Free Republic. If I am who you think I am, and spelling it like you say I am, why is there no record?


498 posted on 12/02/2009 7:27:29 AM PST by Ripliancum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Rumplestiltskins ???

Yeppers I’ve heard of him ...

Is that story in the bom ???

Spinning (a mormon thingy)

straw (lots of those guys in mormon logic)

into

gold (the desire for is a foundation of mormonism)

Yeah, he IS in the bom ...

:)


499 posted on 12/02/2009 7:30:21 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I answered your question, will you please answer mine. Do you think it a double standard to support Glenn Beck but not Mormon politicians?


500 posted on 12/02/2009 7:33:05 AM PST by Ripliancum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 741-760 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson