Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Romney By His Religion? I Do It, and So Should You.
Race 4 2012 ^ | November 30, 2009 | Alex Knepper

Posted on 11/30/2009 6:01:03 PM PST by delacoert

I’ll just leave this here…

Before a defense of any kind of religious discrimination, one ought to make all of the necessary disclaimers: of course I oppose government-sponsored discrimination, and I certainly would not support the kind of absurd treatment described by Steven Reinhart in his piece featured below. That being said, there is a legitimate case to be made for judging any candidate for office by his religious convictions.

In late 2007, Mitt Romney made his somewhat-famous speech on religion, where he spoke the following words:

“Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God. Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.”

Similarly, Romney has stated: “I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it…my faith is the faith of my fathers. I will be true to them and to my beliefs.”

If freedom requires religion, if his Mormon faith sustains his life and he will be true to those practices, then I’m at an utter loss as to why we should ignore Romney’s religious beliefs when evaluating his fitness for the White House.

We ask plenty of questions of any Evangelical Christian candidate: what do his beliefs about the nature of God, the nature of the cosmos, and the meaning of man’s life mean for his potential tenure in office? But for whatever reason, these questions are looked at as unnecessarily piercing and prejudiced when asked of a member of a minority faith.

When Sarah Palin gave her fumbling answer about Israel’s settlements, several commentators jumped on her faith, wondering whether she subscribed to the bizarre but potent sect of modern Christianity that believes in the imminence of the End Times. Will anyone ask Mitt Romney about the oddities of the dogma of the Mormon Church? There are plenty of Mormon doctrines that may strike people as a bit odd — and rightly so. It is established in the church that the devout can reach the upper echelons of heaven and eventually become gods themselves, able to create their own universes and govern them as they see fit (all while supervised by the One True God). Why is it that when I bring this up to Romney fans, I am dismissed as a bigot?

As an atheist, I both understand and accept that in a predominantly Christian society, my thoughts on religion are necessarily going to open me up to questions. If I were to ever run for office (don’t count on that, by the way), I would not expect my supporters would try to ward off any questions about my atheism with the victim-card of discrimination. One’s philosophy of religion contributes profoundly to his worldview and thus is a completely valid criterion by which to partially evaluate a candidate’s fitness for office.

I view all religions as equally bizarre and irrational. But mainstream Christianity is often adopted as a cultural guise, meant for purposes of assimilation with the majority. Probe most self-described Christians and you’ll find plenty of deviation from standard dogma. Devotion to Mormonism, which is completely outside of the American mainstream, requires a certain level of commitment. To what extent will Romney’s faith influence his decision-making? I ask that question of devoted Evangelicals and judge them accordingly, and I will do the same of a Mormon. And I am not going to apologize for that.


TOPICS: Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: braindeadbigots; excusesexcuses; hidebehindreligion; mitthides; mittwhit; mittwhits; mittwits; mormon; mormonism; rino; rinos; romney; romneyhiding; unusualtopic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 741-760 next last
To: reaganaut
But what a happy circumstance of timing: the greatest advocate of the Savior known to this dispensation was born at Sharon, Vt., within 48 hours of that day in 1805 that Christendom observed the birth of Jesus Christ...

What?

Since the odds of being born on Christmas is 1 in 365, the odds are that 1 in 73 that you'd be born on the 5 days surrounding Christmas.

What a 'happy circumstance' indeed!

261 posted on 12/01/2009 2:05:13 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Kid catch up...

Mormonism has nothing to do with Christianity...

Joey Smith started mormonism as an antithesis of Christianity ...he rejected Jesus, anything good and Christian and added excuses for illict sex, lots of stolen moeny and control over people to his cultish doctrines..


262 posted on 12/01/2009 2:05:13 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Sect has a deferent connotation than denomination.

What point to you wish to argue.

263 posted on 12/01/2009 2:06:19 PM PST by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: restornu
For several years now I have witness how the Saul Alinsky “Rules For Radicals” method is being used here to attack Romney should it be surprising that this religion be also included!

For years now we've been watching you IGNORE the question: "Just what did Joseph Smith 'learn' to be UNTRUE about PRESBYTERIANism?"

And you even claim to have BEEN one!!

Surely you'd know!

264 posted on 12/01/2009 2:07:01 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

(snicker)


265 posted on 12/01/2009 2:08:36 PM PST by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Reno232
During the last cycle, I thought he was the best viable candidate. He certainly has his warts. I don't know that I will back him this next time around depending on what the choices are. I will support the best viable candidate.

Using what criteria?

266 posted on 12/01/2009 2:09:01 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I havent noticed anyone agreeing with your point...

Maybe you need to take your point to a thread on Islam...

This is Romney , his cult called mormonism and Christianity...

BTW Romney proslysized, preached about his cult and shoved his pagan religion down the throats of the people listening to that 1994 debate...

He denied Jesus and salvation and Christianity when he said “we will be judged only on what we do for others in this life”

Cult..


267 posted on 12/01/2009 2:10:24 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
(snicker)

Two in a row there Elsie....

268 posted on 12/01/2009 2:10:37 PM PST by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
If you think that it's been kumbaya after Nicea you better go talk to your priest; these sects can't even partake in the sacrament together. There is no one conception of Christianity, and there never has been. As for "the major faiths, the ones you are trying drive apart" nothing could be further from the truth, I am seeking to save them all from the force that seeks their collective destruction, Islam...and by the way I know plenty about the Mormon faith.
269 posted on 12/01/2009 2:10:47 PM PST by americanophile ("For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
“Has it ever worked?”

Nope. I don't believe I've ever received an answer. Wonder why?

BTW, speaking of deep in the old sack, isn't the whole MMM mantra about as deep & old as it gets. Hypocrisy? Hmmm

270 posted on 12/01/2009 2:11:20 PM PST by Reno232
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: americanophile; Tennessee Nana

I’m trying to help everyone who professes THEMSELVES to be a Christian to understand that the greatest threat to all of us is Islam

- - - - - - -
Perhaps physically, but then again if I am asked to choose between Islam and “the sword” (meaning death). I will GLADLY choose death, witnessing the love of Jesus the whole time.

I have no problem dying for my faith.


271 posted on 12/01/2009 2:12:09 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
My Hinckly? I’m not Mormon, and never have been. My beef is with Islam.

Ok, you position clarified - a little. You would do well to confirm your info before. Fortunately this is 2009 and not pre1990 or pre1927, else your take would have been a little differnt.

272 posted on 12/01/2009 2:12:09 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
 

Look at your posts just in the past couple of months, all of them to LDS threads.

 

Tada!!

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:reno232/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change


273 posted on 12/01/2009 2:13:31 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

May I ask what “sect” of Christianity you belong to?


274 posted on 12/01/2009 2:14:12 PM PST by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Well, that's the most ridiculous thing I've heard on a FR forum, perhaps ever. How one could be alive in this time and have any sense of history and make such a statement is quite beyond belief.

Are you saying that we should NOT vote for a person if they are a MUSLIM?

275 posted on 12/01/2009 2:15:45 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Maybe you need to take your point to a thread on Islam...

This became a thread on Islam when it was absurdly declared less of a threat to Christianity than Mormonism.

276 posted on 12/01/2009 2:15:54 PM PST by americanophile ("For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
and everyone knows

Sure they do...

277 posted on 12/01/2009 2:16:31 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

argue that they do not believe in Christ, you have a mountain of Mormon scripture to overcome
_____________________________________________

Yes lets look at what the mormons say about the mormon savior, Joey Smith...

Second President Brigham Young once remarked,
“I know that Joseph Smith is a Prophet of God, that this is the Gospel of salvation, and if you do not believe it you will be damned, every one of you”
(Journal of Discourses 4:298, March 29, 1857).

On October 9, 1859, Young said,
“From the day that the Priesthood was taken from the earth to the winding-up scene of all things, every man and woman must have the certificate of Joseph Smith, junior, as a passport to their entrance into the mansion where God and Christ are — I with you and you with me. I cannot go there without his consent” (Journal of Discourses 7:289).

“He (Joseph Smith) is the man through whom God has spoken... yet I would not like to call him a savior, though in a certain capacity he was a god to us, and is to the nations of the earth, and will continue to be.”
- Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 8:321

“You call us fools; but the day will be, gentlemen and ladies, whether you belong to this Church or not, when you will prize brother Joseph Smith as the Prophet of the Living God, and look upon him as a god...”
- Herber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses 5:88

“If we get our salvation, we shall have to pass by him [Joseph Smith]; if we enter our glory, it will be through the authority he has received. We cannot get around him [Joseph Smith]”
- (as quoted in 1988 Melchizedek Priesthood Study Guide, p. 142)

There is “no salvation without accepting Joseph Smith. If Joseph Smith was verily a prophet, and if he told the truth...no man can reject that testimony without incurring the most dreadful consequences, for he cannot enter the kingdom of God”
- Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 1, p.190


278 posted on 12/01/2009 2:16:45 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Reno232
You have received an answer, indeed from me in fact.

The machinations of man are not always led by Christ regardless of what the leaders of such activities may say.

(Sounds familiar)

If we were at war BECAUSE of our views, the Church interdenominational basketball league would be plagued by some pretty serious and gruesome injuries.

As it is it is simply followed by some really good food and brotherhood.

279 posted on 12/01/2009 2:16:59 PM PST by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

See you on the battlefield then ;)


280 posted on 12/01/2009 2:17:49 PM PST by americanophile ("For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 741-760 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson