Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormon Stumpers [my subtitle "We don’t bash your church, why bash ours?"]
Catholic Answers ^ | 2004

Posted on 11/08/2009 7:04:08 AM PST by Gamecock

Mormon Stumpers

In your discussions with Mormons, they will most often wish to direct the topics presented into those areas where they feel most informed and comfortable. Whether they are the young missionaries at your door or friends or colleagues, they have all been taught several lines of approach and have been drilled in making their points.

We suggest that you take charge of such conversations. Besides acquainting yourself with the basics of Mormon teaching (in addition, of course, to the fundamentals of the Catholic faith), consider presenting the Mormon apologist with a few "stumpers."

"We don’t bash your church, why bash ours?"

Somehow, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints have been persuaded by their leaders that they have always been on the receiving end of uncharitable comments and unjust accusations. From the time Joseph Smith began his work in 1820, the Mormon church has gloried in the "fact" that it is a persecuted people. For them, this is a sure sign that it is the Lord’s true church; all opposition comes ultimately from Satan. So, if you do offer a question or a criticism, be prepared for this reaction.

Many Mormons, including their hierarchy, look upon any criticism—regardless of how honest and sincere—as perverseness inspired by the Evil One. But these same individuals ignore their own past (and present) attacks on Christian churches. You might like to point out a few of these to those Mormons who say their church "never attacks other churches."

1. "I was answered that I must join none of them (Christian churches), for they were all wrong…their creeds were an abomination in [God’s] sight; that those professors were all corrupt" (Joseph Smith—History 1:19).

2. "Orthodox Christian views of God are pagan rather than Christian" (Mormon Doctrine of Deity, B. H. Roberts [General Authority], 116).

3. "Are Christians ignorant? Yes, as ignorant of the things of God as the brute beast" (Journal of Discourses, John Taylor [3rd Mormon President], 13:225).

4. "The Roman Catholic, Greek, and Protestant church, is the great corrupt, ecclesiastical power, represented by great Babylon" (Orson Pratt, Writings of an Apostle, Orson Pratt, n. 6, 84).

5. "All the priests who adhere to the sectarian [Christian] religions of the day with all their followers, without one exception, receive their portion with the devil and his angels" (The Elders Journal, Joseph Smith, ed. Vol. 1, n. 4, 60).

6. [Under the heading, "Church of the Devil," Apostle Bruce R. McConkie lists:] "The Roman Catholic Church specifically—singled out, set apart, described, and designated as being ‘most abominable above all other churches’ (I Ne. 13:5)" (Mormon Doctrine, 1958, 129).

7. "Believers in the doctrines of modern Christendom will reap damnation to their souls (Morm. 8; Moro. 8)" (Mormon Doctrine, 1966, Bruce R. McConkie, 177).

Some contemporary Mormons, embarrassed—at least publicly—by McConkie’s ranting, will respond with, "That’s only his opinion." This is disingenuous at best. Keep in mind that McConkie, who died in 1985, was raised to the level of "apostle" in the Mormon church after he had written all these things. And still today, his Mormon Doctrine is published by a church-owned publishing company and remains one of the church’s bestsellers.

"We have no revelation on abortion"

Didn’t you assume Mormons were pro-life? That’s certainly the image their church attempts to broadcast, and most Mormons, in fact, mistakenly believe their church opposes abortion and regards it as an objective evil. But not so.

Indeed, the Mormon church accepts abortion for a number of reasons. The Church Handbook of Instructions, approved in September, 1998, states that abortion may be performed in the following circumstances: pregnancy resulting from rape or incest; a competent physician says the life or health of the mother is in serious jeopardy; or a competent physician says that the "fetus" has severe defects that will not allow the "baby" to survive beyond birth. In any case, the persons responsible must first consult with their church leader and receive God’s approval in prayer (156).

This same Handbook, the official policies of the Mormon church to be followed by all local church leaders throughout the world, also claims: "It is a fact that a child has life before birth. However, there is no direct revelation on when the spirit enters the body" (156). Previous teachings by former Mormon prophets referred to the unborn child as "a child," "a baby," a "human being," and decried abortion as "killing," "a grievous sin," "a damnable practice." Spencer W. Kimball, the prophet who died in 1985, taught, "We have repeatedly affirmed the position of the church in unalterably opposing all abortions" (Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, 189).

It appears that this "unalterable" position, constantly "affirmed," is just another in a series of doctrinal and moral teachings that Mormons have reworded, reworked, rescinded, or reneged—though never officially renounced. Such is the quality of the Mormon belief in "continuing revelation." Don’t expect dogmatic or ethical consistency. Rather, look for expediency and conformity with "the times."

A further statement in the Handbook says: "The church has not favored or opposed legislative proposals or public demonstrations concerning abortion (156)." While the Mormon prophet claims to speak the mind and will of God, he can neither figure out when the unborn child becomes human or if it is God’s desire that we protect the unborn unconditionally.

Your Mormon friend will offer the excuse that his church leaves many decisions to the free agency (free will) of its people, and that abortion is one such concern. You might point out the irony in the fact that the Mormon church has no hesitation or uncertainty in making the following declarations:

1. "The church opposes gambling in any form" (including lotteries). Members are also urged to oppose legislation and government sponsorship of any form of gambling (Handbook, 150).

2. The church also opposes [correctly, of course] pornography in any form (158).

3. Church members are to reject all efforts to legally authorize or support same-sex unions (158).

There is no need for a member to pray for divine guidance or seek church approval for such activities, for there will be no divine or ecclesiastical finessing of morality to permit even an occasional bingo game. A prayerful game of poker, unrepented, will bar the member from the temple and ultimate salvation; a prayerful, by-the-book abortion, unrepented, won’t.

Something’s wrong here

"Only Mormons teach the true nature of God."

Because they believe the Church established by Christ 2,000 years ago fell completely away from his teachings within a century or so of his death, Mormons argue that only a thorough "restoration" (and not a simple "reformation") of the true Church and its holy doctrines would lead man to salvation. Joseph Smith organized this "restored church" in 1830. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints preaches a belief central to most religions: one must know the true nature of God. "It is the first principle of the gospel to know for a certainty the character of God" (Teachings of Joseph Smith, 345ff).

No Christian disputes the absolute necessity of knowing the nature of God (to the extent our reason, aided by grace, can apprehend this great mystery). Indeed, the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations have been united in a constant belief in the supreme God as almighty, eternal, and unchanging. Mormons have not been favored by similar clarity from their self-described "prophets" who receive "direct revelation" from the gods.

You may wish to ask your Mormon acquaintance to consider the following authoritative statements by their earlier and present prophets.

1. In an early book of "Scripture" brought forth by Joseph Smith, the creation account consistently refers to the singular when speaking of God and creation: "I, God, caused . . . I, God, created . . . I, God, saw. . . . " The singular is used 50 times in the second and third chapters of the Book of Moses (1831).

2. In another of Smith’s earlier works, the Book of Mormon (1830), there are no references to a plurality of gods. At best, there is a confusion, at times, between the Father and the Son, leading at times to the extreme of modalism (one divine person who reveals himself sometimes as the Father, sometimes as the Son) or the other extreme of "binitarianism," belief in two persons in God. The Book of Mormon also makes a strong point for God’s spiritual and eternal unity (see Alma 11:44 and 22:10-11, which proclaims that God is the "Great Spirit").

3. Another early work of Smith is the Lectures on Faith (1834-35). There is continual evidence that the first Mormon leader taught a form of bitheism: the Father and the Son are separate gods. The Holy Spirit is merely the "mind" of the two.

4. At about the same time, we begin to see a doctrinal shift. Smith had acquired some mummies and Egyptian papyri. He proclaimed the writings to be those of the patriarch, Abraham, in his own hand, and set out to translate the text. His Book of Abraham records in chapters four and five that "the gods called . . . the gods ordered . . . the gods prepared" some 45 times. Smith thus introduces the notion of a plurality of gods.

5. The clearest exposition of this departure from traditional Christian doctrine is seen in Smith’s tale of a "vision" he had as a boy of 14. Both the Father and the Son appeared to him, he wrote; they were two separate "personages." This story of two gods was not authorized and distributed by the church until 1838, after his Book of Abraham had paved the way for polytheism.

6. Readers will notice that the Father is said to have appeared, along with his resurrected Son. In his final doctrinal message, Smith showed how this was possible.

In the King Follett Discourse (a funeral talk he gave in 1844), Joseph Smith left his church with the clearest statement to date on the nature of God:

"God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens[.] That is the great secret. If the veil were rent today, and the great God who holds this world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds and all things by his power, was to make himself visible—I say, if you were to see him today, you would see him like a man in form—like yourselves in all the person, image, and very form as a man. The scriptures inform us that Jesus said, ‘As the Father hath power to himself, even so hath the Son power’—to do what? Why, what the Father did. The answer is obvious—in a manner to lay down his body and take it up again. Jesus, what are you going to do? To lay down my life as my Father did, and take it up again. Do you believe it? If you do not believe it, you do not believe the Bible. The scriptures say it and I defy all the learning and wisdom and all the combined powers of earth and hell together to refute it."

As the Mormon church has taught since that time, God the Father was once a man who was created by his God, was born and lived on another earth, learned and lived the "Mormon gospel," died, and was eventually resurrected and made God over this universe. As such, he retains forever his flesh-and-bones body.

7. Aside from some temporary detours (Orson Pratt said the Holy Ghost was a spiritual fluid that filled the universe; Brigham Young taught that Adam is the god of this world), the Mormon church has constantly taught that God the Father is a perfected man with a physical body and parts. Right-living Mormon men may also progress, as did the Father, and eventually become gods themselves. In fact, fifth president, Lorenzo Snow, summed up the Mormon teaching thus: "As man now is, God once was; as God now is, man may be." Snow frequently claimed this summary of the Mormon doctrine on God and man was revealed to him by inspiration. (See Stephen E. Robinson, Are Mormons Christian?, 60, note 1.)

8. "Thou shalt not have strange gods before me." What is stranger than a God who starts off as a single Spirit, eternal and all-powerful; who then becomes, perhaps, two gods in one, and then three; who never changes, yet was once born a man, lived, sinned, repented, and died; who was made God the Father of this world by his own God; and who will make his own children gods someday of their own worlds?

That all believing Christians are shocked and disturbed by this b.asphemy may—just may—be nudging the Mormon leadership to soften their rhetoric (if not actually change their heresy). A case in point is an interview with current church prophet, Gordon B. Hinckley, published in the San Francisco Chronicle on April 13, 1997. When asked: "[D]on’t Mormons believe that God was once a man?" Hinckley demurred. "I wouldn’t say that. There’s a little couplet coined, ‘As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.’ Now, that’s more of a couplet than anything else. That gets into some pretty deep theology that we don’t know very much about" (3/Z1).

A surprising admission, as Hinckley seems to disparage the constant teaching of all his prophetic predecessors.

Choose, if you like, any one of these three attacks: on Christians; on the sanctity of life; on God. Ask your Mormon listener to explain the contradictions of his church. Don’t be satisfied with a personal, subjective, emotional "testimony." Demand clarification of confused and contradictory teachings.

When they aren’t forthcoming, be prepared to offer the truth.


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Orthodox Christian; Other Christian
KEYWORDS: antimormonthread; mormon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 561-574 next last
To: reaganaut

“Again, not whining. Correction. And you were the one that called us “unAmerican”, therefore you where the one whining.”

Bashing other religions is most certainly un-American.


461 posted on 11/10/2009 3:28:56 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

“Why do you keep bashing away at the posters here? “

I do not ever bash someones religion. I stand against those who do.

“(Is that done to the glory of Anglicanism?)” See, you can’t help yourself, can you?

“Well, you’re keeping things fairly negative. You’re not very bashful about bashing.”

The negative tone was set by you and your threadmates, I did my best to raise the tone, but you guys would have none of it.

But, you’ll note I have not and will not bash your religious views, while you, digging into my posts on other threads (which you are obviously free to do) simply could not resist finding out my religion so that you can......I can only guess you’ll be bashing it.

But again, you show no shame, at least so far, so I expect you to keep on doing your thing and pointing out who is or is not more Christian than you, and how God likes you best of all.

It’s amusingly childish, but at least I’ve broken up this little Talibanic enclave. My work has been successful!


462 posted on 11/10/2009 3:38:12 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

The Articles of Faith
of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost.

We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s transgression.

We believe that through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel.

We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the Gospel are: first, Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; second, Repentance; third, Baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; fourth, Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost.

We believe that a man must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands by those who are in authority, to preach the Gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof.

We believe in the same organization that existed in the Primitive Church, namely, apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, evangelists, and so forth.

We believe in the gift of tongues, prophecy, revelation, visions, healing, interpretation of tongues, and so forth.

We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly; we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God.

We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God.

We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes; that Zion (the New Jerusalem) will be built upon the American continent; that Christ will reign personally upon the earth; and, that the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory.

We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.

We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.

We believe in being honest, true, chaste, benevolent, virtuous, and in doing good to all men; indeed, we may say that we follow the admonition of Paul—We believe all things, we hope all things, we have endured many things, and hope to be able to endure all things. If there is anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.
Joseph Smith


463 posted on 11/10/2009 3:43:36 PM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: VC42
Your comment....tells me all I need to know.

You don't understand...

You are like millions of people that go around and quote scripture...but have no idea what that piece of scripture means.

Context is everything...friend.

Get some!

464 posted on 11/10/2009 3:46:40 PM PST by Osage Orange (Obama's a self-made man who worships his own creator...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: VC42

“Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.” - Jude 1:3

What is it that Jude has in mind when he admonishes us to “contend earnestly for the faith?” The verb he employs means to struggle for or to fight for. It was used to describe the strenuous, even grueling effort that Greek athletes exerted in their competitions. Jude uses it to call believers to stand firm on the truth of God’s Word—energetically, forcefully, going to great lengths and at great pains, if necessary—in order to insist that His revealed truth is not compromised. - Thomas Ascol


465 posted on 11/10/2009 4:12:44 PM PST by paulist ("For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain." - Philippians 1:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange; VC42

Context is everything...friend.

- - - - - - - -
You are so correct. Context IS everything. In Bible college, we had the 20/20 or 50/50 rule (depending upon length of book). The rule went: examine AT LEAST the 20 (or 50) verses BEFORE and AFTER the verse in question to determine context. That was the minimum. Ideally, context is best found in the book in it’s entirety or in the Bible as a whole.

“Cult” groups almost always use verses out of context and on people with little or no Biblical literacy. That is how I got roped in to the LDS, and discovering the context of their “proof texts” is how I was led out.

It is also why I went to Bible College after I got out.


466 posted on 11/10/2009 4:32:07 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

You said: “Debate over theological differences is healthy and good. I personally think that it too often crosses the line into something rhetorically indistinguishable from things in conflict with our constitutional rights, and something that is dehumanizing. It’s really disheartening to hear this sort of religious intolerance.”

So... debate over theological differences is ‘really’ crypto-anti-constitutional? How can this be unless you believe that the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of religion is actually a guarantee of freedom from religion? Retreating into obscurantism is not debate. This thread is in fact an exercise of religious tolerance, not intolerance: disagreement (however vulgarly full of exclamation points!!! and ALL CAPS) is not suppression, nor is it dehumanizing. Admittedly, ‘bashing’ other religions may be off-putting, but it is rhetorically indistinguishable from healthy debate over theological differences - ‘bashing’ being in the eye of the beholder.

This is precisely what the First Amendment was intended to protect: a full opportunity to speak, not one circumscribed by those in power, whether the limits are called blasphemy, censorship, political correctness, or “our constitutional rights.” You are an equal in this debate, not an arbiter. Whining that those with a religious conviction are having an unfettered expression of those views here, and this activity is “most certainly un-American,” is to claim that whatever you personally don’t like must be unconstitutional. To claim to be the constitution is arguably correct for Queen Elizabeth II of England, but to make such a claim here in the United States is sadly misguided and, well, un-American.


467 posted on 11/10/2009 4:37:40 PM PST by mrreaganaut (Sticks and stones may break my bones, but lawyer jokes are actionable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost.
_______________________________________________

Why thank you Saundra...

I dont know why you PINGed me with this...

Your mormon religious beliefs..

Your three separate mormon gods...

While in Christianity we have just one God, the Holy Three in One, the Trinity...

God the Father, God the Son, also called the Word, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost..

For there are three that bear record in Heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 1 John 5:7


468 posted on 11/10/2009 4:46:19 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly; we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God.
__________________________________________

What no pearl of great price ???

In Christianity we believe that The Bible is the ONLY Word of God...

Both the Old Testament and the New Testament...


469 posted on 11/10/2009 4:50:50 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

“We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly; “

Actually, the Bible is not necessarily translated. We have the original manuscripts. There is technically no correct translations. When in doubt, you have to go back to the original language. Check out http://www.e-sword.net for some good software.


470 posted on 11/10/2009 4:53:37 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.
__________________________________________

In Christianity we believe that Jesus came to save both men and women, equally...

regardless of color or nationality...

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. Galations 3:28

And they sang a new song: “You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased men for God from every tribe and language and people and nation. Revelation 5:9


471 posted on 11/10/2009 4:55:43 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.
__________________________________________

In Christianity we believe that Jesus came to save both men and women, equally...

regardless of color or nationality...

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. Galations 3:28

And they sang a new song: “You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation. Revelation 5:9


472 posted on 11/10/2009 4:56:13 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Those celestial marriages will be an interesting quandry since there will be neither male nor female ... ;^)
473 posted on 11/10/2009 4:58:44 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

We believe in the gift of tongues, prophecy, revelation, visions, healing, interpretation of tongues, and so forth.
_____________________________________________

Christianity doesnt seem to list a way to “so forth”

However, do the mormons practice the rest at every service ???

Or have they just D&C 132d them ???


474 posted on 11/10/2009 4:58:57 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.
_______________________________________________

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

The jury is still out on this one...

Remember mormons were to swear that they would forever be disruptive enemies of the United States government...

That would be “terrorists”...


475 posted on 11/10/2009 5:01:30 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
We have the original manuscripts.

Actually, there are no original manuscripts left. You are correct in that there are no correct translations. The Septuagint and the NT in koine Greek of the time are closer to what the Church kept during all those years before Gutenberg than anything else that we have, but we also have 3rd and 4th century copies that are not necessarily 100% in agreement. The earliest fragments that we have are just that; fragments.

476 posted on 11/10/2009 5:10:09 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
In Christianity we believe that Jesus came to save both men and women, equally...

You mean that I cannot have 72 virgins wives when I die and become a god and have my own universe that I create?

477 posted on 11/10/2009 5:13:44 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Your ignorance is showing, and you look pretty darn silly.

It IS?? I do???

Well then; post something contrary to PROVE me wrong!

478 posted on 11/10/2009 5:13:56 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
...more importantly America definitely doesn’t stand for that nonsense.

Oh?

Since when?

479 posted on 11/10/2009 5:15:31 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
I said you should know better than to bash another’s religion. You clearly should.

Ok then; went does pointing out error in theology end and 'bashing' start?

480 posted on 11/10/2009 5:16:45 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 561-574 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson