Posted on 09/19/2009 8:29:19 AM PDT by Freepmanchew
There are four polls here that look interesting. On the creation/evolution poll, it looks like the Darwinians are winning. If you believe in a 6 day creation then you are in second. Time to freep the poll Christian Freepers. Who do you believe?
Click on Darwin if you believe him.
They all go to the same page, so whatever link you click will take you to all four poll questions.
You might have guessed that I am really getting into this HTML stuff, and it really is fun.
Next up, a poll on whether the Earth is flat or round. /s
You don’t actually think facts are based on a show of hands, do you?
This is to find where people stand on the debate, but now that you bring it up. The Bible was right and the catholic church which brought in Greek philosophy and started believing what the Greek humanists thought were wrong,
But since the days of Job, men thought that the world was round, nor flat.
The true flat earthers are those who still believe in the outdated science of evolution. Like those who wanted to destroy the reputation of Galileo, we now have those who want to destroy the reputation of very qualified scientists who have debunked evolution using the very science they say proves evolution exists. It takes more faith to believe we accidentally by chance became than it does to believe in God and His ability to do all this in 6 days.
Reality is, evolution is a religious and political battle for the minds of all humans so they can control you and make you worship the government instead of God!
Why does it bother you that your religious beliefs are not winning an internet popularity poll?
The first poll is rigged. There are 3 choices for creation and only one for darwin, therefore darwin will come out the winner no matter what.
I don’t participate in rigged polls.
It’s been said by many over the years that darwin was a racist.
Is this rigged poll trying to prove false results to offer false proff that people really are racist like those dimwit libs accused?
As far away as I can from this useless, waste of time sort of thread.
LOL!! You scold me and claim that I need a little reading comprehension? Oh my, but you really should pull the moat from your own eye before you scold me about the tiny little microscopic splinter that you imagine you see in mine. LOL!
It seems, you may have been the one who needed a little reading comprehension to understand what I said. But I wont scold you for that. Anyway, what I said was: Its been said by many over the years that darwin was a racist." and then I asked the question: "Is this rigged poll trying to prove false results to offer false prof that people really are racist like those dimwit libs accused?" I asked the question because the lib dimwit's have been throwing around the racist charge all week long.
And Wow! Didn't you give me the big slap down for pointing out that the poll is rigged in favor of Darwinists, and for me saying that I do not participate in rigged polls.
And as for your other question: "So tell me, where is the discrepancy in the polling? If you read the sites descriptions, then why do you still think it is rigged?"
Any poll what splits one question and not the other is rigged to get a desired answer.
A poll that asked only one question per side of the argument is an honest poll. Evolution, or Creation, period. But asking three different answers for creation and only one for evolution, that is a rigged poll meant to give a very large slant in favor of evolution, by splitting the vote for creation three ways to Sunday.
The same would hold true if one were to slant a poll in the opposite direction. If one were to split evolution into three possible answers and ask only one for creation. Then such a poll would be rigged in the favor of creation.
My answer to an honest poll asking do you believe in evolution or creation would have gotten an honest answer: I believe in God with all of my heart and I don't sweat the small stuff, like when, where, what if, blah, blah, blah.
Have a good one! And God Bless!
Many of us who believe in a Creator believe in "micro-evolution," also. "Microevolution" is adaptations within species. So, I couldn't vote because there were two choices for me.
We have to realize that God can go from point a to point b by whichever route He chooses. I believe that He created the universe and all that’s in it in whtever period of “time” that it took Him. Six days....a day is the amount of time that it takes for the earth to revolve around the sun....what sun?..Time is always measured by the observers on hand....God was the only observer on hand at creation, thus “time” is only what His concept of time was and to God a million years are the same as 1 second....it really doesn’t matter to Him!
We have to realize that God can go from point a to point b by whichever route He chooses. I believe that He created the universe and all that’s in it in whtever period of “time” that it took Him. Six days....a day is the amount of time that it takes for the earth to revolve around the sun....what sun?..Time is always measured by the observers on hand....God was the only observer on hand at creation, thus “time” is only what His concept of time was and to God a million years are the same as 1 second....it really doesn’t matter to Him!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.