Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger

All true. Time to read “Trail of Blood” again.


18 posted on 06/27/2009 10:20:47 AM PDT by Scanian (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Scanian

Trail of Blood is a good book, but you have to be careful about some of his claims. Some of them can not be verified today. Some of them aren’t clarified enough and can lead to Baptists being linked with some heretical groups as well.


52 posted on 06/27/2009 10:50:21 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

“Trail of Blood” ???

What is that book about ???


172 posted on 06/27/2009 2:02:11 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian; Blogger; MarkBsnr; Tennessee Nana; Salvation
I thought you all might find these interesting.

Note the paragraphs, "It was McGoldrick, not Carroll", and "Depends On Which Anabaptists".

Note the question, "Q: A Baptist friend of mine told me that he is not a Protestant, since the Baptists didn’t break away from the Catholic Church—they had existed all along under various names, such as Anabaptists, Montanists, and Novations. How do I respond? "

The Trail of Blood: Baptist Successionism. (Warning!!! This last link is a PDF file)

430 posted on 06/28/2009 7:41:23 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson