Posted on 04/23/2009 12:54:19 PM PDT by chase19
It's a thriller, not an attack on the Howard's By Jeff Miller on April 23, 2009
I am producing a movie on Ron Howards family. In the movie based on my research I say his father was a drug pusher and his mother is a prostitute and that Ron Howard engages in S&M. All of the portrayal of Ron Howard and his family in my movie and the prequel I am doing later will be highly negative. I will present the Howard family as something totally based on lies and question whether his parents really were his parents in the first place. I will also attack his fans for being foolish enough to be a fan of him considering his background. My hero will follow clues that prove this evidence.
Now of course this is just a movie so people should not be upset about my portrayal of the Howard family at all. It is just entertainment people - only a fool would take my claims seriously.
Some jerk named Phil Donahue, president of the Howard League for Religious and Civil Rights has been making claims about me that are simply incorrect.
Let me be clear: neither I nor my film "Ron Howard's family are "Demons" is anti-Howard. And let me be a little controversial: I believe the Howards, including most in the hierarchy of their fan club, will enjoy the movie for what it is: an exciting mystery,
Mr. Phil Donohue's booklet accuses us of lying when our movie trailer says the Howard's ordered a brutal massacre of drug buyers and prostitutes. It would be a lie if we had ever suggested our movie is anything other than a work of fiction (if it were a documentary, our talk of massacres would have referenced the Mafia).
So come on people - get a life. The claims in the movie are simply fiction and so should not bother you at all. Next I will be doing a movie on the Dahla Lama and his work with the child porn industry another exciting fictional thriller.
Oh, the article itself is unremarkable. Only the usage of apostrophes is egregiously horrific.
Question mark key stuck?
Ok. I don’t know the author personally but perhaps he’ll follow the track-back and take your critiques into consideration.
Having a bad day?
No. It was deliberate.
No, I just think published writing should use punctuation correctly. My 3rd grader is being tested on this stuff. Since “you don’t know the author personally,” and presumably aren’t the author yourself, I can’t see why my comment would occasion any distress.
OK, getting boring. Adios and have a nice day. :)
See post 26.
Have a Guinness.
It's pretty clear Mayberry was a center of occult gnosticism.
Floyd was running the local Illuminati chapter out of the barber shop that
initiated Opie into this and Ozark ritual magic. He has all the signs of a
programmed multiple, including making contradictory and absurd statements
of cognitive dissonance and believing both accounts to be true.
It is well known that Aunt Bee was a theosophical Blavatsky adept who introduced Opie to the crackpot Priory of Sion Illuminati lore, instructing him in
Enochian incantations and occult yoga.
He's been around weirdness for a long time.
Well, we know that Barney always wanted to nip Opie in the bud.
Remember Clint Howard on Seinfeld? “Ann Landers sucks!”
You think he has a Dixie homintern membership card?
If Andy Griffith and Ron Howard wanted to support and campaign for B. Hussein Obama as private citizens and as themselves that’s their right and freedom to do so. But when they brought their Andy and Opie Taylor characters into it, 2 characters from the days when TV shows were relatively apolitical and more concerned about entertaining their audiences, that really annoys me. Why alienate half your potential audience like that?
Yes, this might help a bit:
http://www.arts.uottawa.ca/writcent/hypergrammar/apostrph.html
and perhaps this:
http://www.arts.uottawa.ca/writcent/hypergrammar/endpunct.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.