Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiverse theory fails to explain away God
Institute for Creation Research ^ | Dec. 3, 2008 | Brian Thomas

Posted on 12/25/2008 7:02:01 PM PST by tpanther

'Multiverse' Theory Fails to Explain Away God by Brian Thomas, M.S.

New discoveries continue to reveal the life-friendly properties of our universe, in which physical laws are seemingly fine-tuned to allow life to exist. To get around the appearance of design, secular scientists have to invent naturalistic explanations that exclude the possibility of supernatural origins. The latest of these inventions is “multiverses.”

The force of gravity, the specific masses of subatomic particles, the exact strengths of fundamental physical forces, and the distance of the earth from other galaxies and from the sun are all essential for the delicate balance needed to sustain life. Bernard Carr, cosmologist at Queen Mary University of London, told Discover, “If there is only one universe, you might have to have a fine-tuner. If you don’t want God, you’d better have a multiverse.”1

The multiverse hypothesis holds that our entire universe is only one of an infinite number of other universes. In this way, all conceivable fundamental construction parameters could exist in a vast array of alternate realities. Most of these imaginary universes would not have the right conditions for life to exist, but by a cosmic coincidence, all the life-friendly forces of our universe happened to line up correctly.

There is no evidence for the existence of alternate universes, and if a concept cannot be proved or disproved, it is not open to scientific investigation. Stanford University visionary physicist Andrei Linde seemed adamant, however, that though this theory is not scientific, it must be true because it is logically necessary. When asked whether physicists will ever be able to prove the multiverse in the absence of any hope for physical confirmation, he told Discover, “Nothing else fits the data.”

What data? ...

(Excerpt) Read more at icr.edu ...


TOPICS: Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 12/25/2008 7:02:01 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: metmom; valkyry1; GodGunsGuts; Ethan Clive Osgoode; Fichori; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; ...

ping!


2 posted on 12/25/2008 7:04:27 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Multiverse theory fails to explain away God

This is good news. God must have been very anxious about the ramifications of this. What if it had gone the other way?!

3 posted on 12/25/2008 7:04:32 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (appeasement is collaboration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

The theory may explain away some particular fairy tales, but why would one expect it to explain away God?


4 posted on 12/25/2008 7:09:39 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
There is no evidence for the existence of alternate universes, and if a concept cannot be proved or disproved, it is not open to scientific investigation. Stanford University visionary physicist Andrei Linde seemed adamant, however, that though this theory is not scientific, it must be true because it is logically necessary.

ABG.

It just goes to show how desperate the evoatheists are to get rid of God. They'll believe stuff that has no evidence to back it up, try to pass it off as science to give it SOME sort of credibility (which really gives science a good name, dontcha know), stretch the truth, ANYTHING but God.

5 posted on 12/25/2008 7:18:37 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

“The multiverse hypothesis “

It is a hypothesis — have at it.


6 posted on 12/25/2008 7:19:38 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Never understood how science can say there is no God because they can’t find any proof...yet they continue to look for life outside Earth, but they can’t find proof of that either!


7 posted on 12/25/2008 7:22:33 PM PST by NeoConfederate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
The force of gravity, the specific masses of subatomic particles, the exact strengths of fundamental physical forces, and the distance of the earth from other galaxies and from the sun are all essential for the delicate balance needed to sustain life. Bernard Carr, cosmologist at Queen Mary University of London, told Discover, “If there is only one universe, you might have to have a fine-tuner.

This proves God IMO.
8 posted on 12/25/2008 7:24:57 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Let me see if I've got this straight: some scientists honestly believe that science cannot be scientific, in the presence of intelligent design, and so they've embraced this odd attempt at end-running an inconvenient conclusion, thereby permitting the continuance of a priori beliefs. And, these scientists see no conflict in doing so, in the name of a science that forbids the exploration of certain possibilities?

This isn't science, it's propaganda.

9 posted on 12/25/2008 7:28:38 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
New discoveries continue to reveal the life-friendly properties of our universe, in which physical laws are seemingly fine-tuned to allow life to exist.

Or perhaps life adapted to existing conditions.

10 posted on 12/25/2008 7:28:51 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

It’s a crude hologram. No split universes. God is laughing at our obtuse nature. :) Merry Christmas everyone.


11 posted on 12/25/2008 7:37:11 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
From the article:

physical laws are seemingly fine-tuned to allow life to exist.

Also from the article:

Stanford University visionary physicist Andrei Linde seemed adamant, however, that though this theory is not scientific, it must be true because it is logically necessary. When asked whether physicists will ever be able to prove the multiverse in the absence of any hope for physical confirmation, he told Discover, “Nothing else fits the data.”

What data? ...

12 posted on 12/25/2008 7:37:16 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

The ‘data,... duh’ :)


13 posted on 12/25/2008 7:40:02 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

it must be true because it is logically necessary”

More accurate would be to say that God exists, b/c that is logically necessary


14 posted on 12/25/2008 7:40:31 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

It is.


15 posted on 12/25/2008 7:41:59 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

This multivervse theory is more than 2 decades old right now.


16 posted on 12/25/2008 7:46:04 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

This “multiverse” theory is one of the most ridiculous ideas that some people come up with — all for the purpose of *not invoking God* in the matter... LOL..


17 posted on 12/25/2008 7:48:20 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Do you think that the multi-universe theory is scientific?


18 posted on 12/25/2008 7:48:39 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

The multiverse theory, in order to remove the threat of the God hypothesis, would have to also exclude multiple universes that operate according to the same fundamental principles of physics. This would, in effect, completely destroy the very foundation of scientific reason. It would imply that “universal” principles of science would only be applicable in our universe, but not in any other, and therefore are merely relative.

So, to destroy the reasonable hypothesis of a Creator, the atheists are willing to dispense with the very foundation of the enterprise they wish to use to supplant God—scientific materialism. The irony is so rich, it is unbelievable. They are seriously backed into a philosophical corner with nowhere to turn but to a completely irrational and fanciful conjecture which, in principle, could never be empirically validated and even if it could be, it would negate the validity of the empirical validation. LOL!


19 posted on 12/25/2008 7:51:25 PM PST by bdeaner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

The Multiverse theory is based on Heisenberg. Every reality is random.


20 posted on 12/25/2008 7:56:46 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson