Or perhaps life adapted to existing conditions.
physical laws are seemingly fine-tuned to allow life to exist.
Also from the article:
Stanford University visionary physicist Andrei Linde seemed adamant, however, that though this theory is not scientific, it must be true because it is logically necessary. When asked whether physicists will ever be able to prove the multiverse in the absence of any hope for physical confirmation, he told Discover, Nothing else fits the data.
What data? ...
Do you think that the multi-universe theory is scientific?
I don't think there's any perhaps about that subject. It really tickles me with the little we now know or maybe with the little we will ever really know, how many people have decided it can only be this way or that way concerning God and science. Some people think way too much of themselves in their knowledge about both God and science. Hubris approaching the infinite IMHO.
". . . imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in, an interesting hole I find myself in, fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, it's still frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to be on the watch out for." -- Douglas Adams