ping!
This is good news. God must have been very anxious about the ramifications of this. What if it had gone the other way?!
The theory may explain away some particular fairy tales, but why would one expect it to explain away God?
ABG.
It just goes to show how desperate the evoatheists are to get rid of God. They'll believe stuff that has no evidence to back it up, try to pass it off as science to give it SOME sort of credibility (which really gives science a good name, dontcha know), stretch the truth, ANYTHING but God.
“The multiverse hypothesis “
It is a hypothesis — have at it.
This isn't science, it's propaganda.
Or perhaps life adapted to existing conditions.
It’s a crude hologram. No split universes. God is laughing at our obtuse nature. :) Merry Christmas everyone.
it must be true because it is logically necessary”
More accurate would be to say that God exists, b/c that is logically necessary
This multivervse theory is more than 2 decades old right now.
This “multiverse” theory is one of the most ridiculous ideas that some people come up with — all for the purpose of *not invoking God* in the matter... LOL..
The multiverse theory, in order to remove the threat of the God hypothesis, would have to also exclude multiple universes that operate according to the same fundamental principles of physics. This would, in effect, completely destroy the very foundation of scientific reason. It would imply that “universal” principles of science would only be applicable in our universe, but not in any other, and therefore are merely relative.
So, to destroy the reasonable hypothesis of a Creator, the atheists are willing to dispense with the very foundation of the enterprise they wish to use to supplant God—scientific materialism. The irony is so rich, it is unbelievable. They are seriously backed into a philosophical corner with nowhere to turn but to a completely irrational and fanciful conjecture which, in principle, could never be empirically validated and even if it could be, it would negate the validity of the empirical validation. LOL!
P.S. No offense—the paper is not bad—but the paper is not as compelling as it should be. There needs to be more physics in the paper to explain how even the notion of mutliverses is absurd and contrary to the basic pressupositions of scientific reason — in ways that a infinitely more damaging to the prospects of science than the belief in God. In fact, science itself would not exist were it not for a monotheism that allows for belief in a universe that is founded on the notion of a rational universe that is orderly and predictable — a notion that never arose in any pagan culture even when they had the power and resources to take advantaage of it (e.g. Ancient Egypt, Classical Greece, Ancient Aztects, etc etc).
The purpose of science is not to “explain away God” any more than it is to blame God for our ignorance. Learning even a small corner of science can be a lifelong journey. Understanding the Universe is far and beyond more than many lifetimes. And it will all be revealed in God’s time, not in Man’s.
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [Him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. [Rom 1:20-25]
There is no evidence for the existence of alternate universes, and if a concept cannot be proved or disproved, it is not open to scientific investigation.
The concept of alternate universes has not been shown to be neither provable nor disprovable. The fact that there is currently no evidence for the existence of alternate universes does not rule out the discovery of such evidence in the future.
“If I knew God I’d be Him.”
There is no such thing as a multiverse period!!!!! Save me please, I really like cheese;)...
I had herd that one theologians centuries ago postulated that there were 10 dimensions in the universe because of the ten times that God spoke I AM or let there be. Does any one know how many known dimensions there are in the universe?