Skip to comments.
Multiverse theory fails to explain away God
Institute for Creation Research ^
| Dec. 3, 2008
| Brian Thomas
Posted on 12/25/2008 7:02:01 PM PST by tpanther
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
1
posted on
12/25/2008 7:02:01 PM PST
by
tpanther
To: metmom; valkyry1; GodGunsGuts; Ethan Clive Osgoode; Fichori; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; ...
2
posted on
12/25/2008 7:04:27 PM PST
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: tpanther
Multiverse theory fails to explain away GodThis is good news. God must have been very anxious about the ramifications of this. What if it had gone the other way?!
To: tpanther
The theory may explain away some particular fairy tales, but why would one expect it to explain away God?
4
posted on
12/25/2008 7:09:39 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: tpanther
There is no evidence for the existence of alternate universes, and if a concept cannot be proved or disproved, it is not open to scientific investigation. Stanford University visionary physicist Andrei Linde seemed adamant, however, that though this theory is not scientific, it must be true because it is logically necessary. ABG.
It just goes to show how desperate the evoatheists are to get rid of God. They'll believe stuff that has no evidence to back it up, try to pass it off as science to give it SOME sort of credibility (which really gives science a good name, dontcha know), stretch the truth, ANYTHING but God.
5
posted on
12/25/2008 7:18:37 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: tpanther
“The multiverse hypothesis “
It is a hypothesis — have at it.
6
posted on
12/25/2008 7:19:38 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
Never understood how science can say there is no God because they can’t find any proof...yet they continue to look for life outside Earth, but they can’t find proof of that either!
To: tpanther
The force of gravity, the specific masses of subatomic particles, the exact strengths of fundamental physical forces, and the distance of the earth from other galaxies and from the sun are all essential for the delicate balance needed to sustain life. Bernard Carr, cosmologist at Queen Mary University of London, told Discover, If there is only one universe, you might have to have a fine-tuner.
This proves God IMO.
8
posted on
12/25/2008 7:24:57 PM PST
by
allmost
To: tpanther
Let me see if I've got this straight: some scientists honestly believe that science cannot be scientific, in the presence of intelligent design, and so they've embraced this odd attempt at end-running an inconvenient conclusion, thereby permitting the continuance of
a priori beliefs. And, these scientists see no conflict in doing so, in the name of a science that forbids the exploration of certain possibilities?
This isn't science, it's propaganda.
To: tpanther
New discoveries continue to reveal the life-friendly properties of our universe, in which physical laws are seemingly fine-tuned to allow life to exist. Or perhaps life adapted to existing conditions.
10
posted on
12/25/2008 7:28:51 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: tpanther
It’s a crude hologram. No split universes. God is laughing at our obtuse nature. :) Merry Christmas everyone.
11
posted on
12/25/2008 7:37:11 PM PST
by
allmost
To: Coyoteman
From the article:
physical laws are seemingly fine-tuned to allow life to exist.
Also from the article:
Stanford University visionary physicist Andrei Linde seemed adamant, however, that though this theory is not scientific, it must be true because it is logically necessary. When asked whether physicists will ever be able to prove the multiverse in the absence of any hope for physical confirmation, he told Discover, Nothing else fits the data.
What data? ...
To: RegulatorCountry
13
posted on
12/25/2008 7:40:02 PM PST
by
allmost
To: tpanther
it must be true because it is logically necessary”
More accurate would be to say that God exists, b/c that is logically necessary
To: ConservativeDude
15
posted on
12/25/2008 7:41:59 PM PST
by
allmost
To: tpanther
This multivervse theory is more than 2 decades old right now.
16
posted on
12/25/2008 7:46:04 PM PST
by
allmost
To: tpanther
This “multiverse” theory is one of the most ridiculous ideas that some people come up with — all for the purpose of *not invoking God* in the matter... LOL..
To: Coyoteman
Do you think that the multi-universe theory is scientific?
18
posted on
12/25/2008 7:48:39 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: tpanther
The multiverse theory, in order to remove the threat of the God hypothesis, would have to also exclude multiple universes that operate according to the same fundamental principles of physics. This would, in effect, completely destroy the very foundation of scientific reason. It would imply that “universal” principles of science would only be applicable in our universe, but not in any other, and therefore are merely relative.
So, to destroy the reasonable hypothesis of a Creator, the atheists are willing to dispense with the very foundation of the enterprise they wish to use to supplant God—scientific materialism. The irony is so rich, it is unbelievable. They are seriously backed into a philosophical corner with nowhere to turn but to a completely irrational and fanciful conjecture which, in principle, could never be empirically validated and even if it could be, it would negate the validity of the empirical validation. LOL!
19
posted on
12/25/2008 7:51:25 PM PST
by
bdeaner
To: bdeaner
The Multiverse theory is based on Heisenberg. Every reality is random.
20
posted on
12/25/2008 7:56:46 PM PST
by
allmost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson