Posted on 10/23/2008 11:18:36 AM PDT by Gamecock
For visitors to Monergism.com who are considering the purchase of the ESV Study Bible, the following may be of particular interest to you. Ever since the ESV Study Bibles have come out I have been reading through some of the notes on various texts and skimming the theological articles so I could report back to you what I found. As you might have guessed, one of the first things looked for was whether the ESV Study Bible would take a clear Christ-honoring stand on the vital doctrinal issue of regeneration. Expecting to find an amorphous commentary that neither monergist nor synergist would be offended by, I am very pleased to report to you that the notes from editors of the ESVSB unambiguously affirm divine monergism in regeneration. Because we believe this is a vital biblical doctrine to understand correctly, we wholeheartedly applaud those editors who decided not to be vague on this issue. We are also thankful for the effort and time it must have taken to put the incredible resources available in this Bible together in one place. May the Lord be pleased to use it to His glory
Here are a few samples of ESVSB comments on the doctrine of regeneration:
On page 2531 of the ESVSB in the article entitled "Biblical Doctrine: An Overview" under the subheading of "salvation" it reads as follows:
From God's vantage point salvation begins with his election of individuals, which is his determination beforehand that his saving purpose will be accomplished in them (John 6:3739, 44, 6466; 8:47; 10:26; 15:16; Acts 13:48; 16:14; Romans 9; 1 John 4:19; 5:1). God then in due course brings people to himself by calling them to faith in Christ (Rom. 8:30; 1 Cor. 1:9; 2 Tim. 1:9; 1 Pet. 2:9).
God's calling produces regeneration, which is the miraculous work of the Holy Spirit in which a spiritually dead person is made alive in Christ (Ezek. 11:1920; Matt. 19:28; John 3:3, 5, 7; Titus 3:5). The revived heart repents and trusts Christ in saving faith as the only source of justification.
Notice that the editors clearly affirm that a regenerated, revived heart precedes repentance and trust in Christ. It goes on to describe saving faith as follows:
To be a Christian means one has traded in his polluted garment of self-righteousness for the perfect righteousness of Christ (Phil. 3:89; cf. Isa. 64:6). He has ceased striving and now rests in the finished work of Christno longer depending on personal accomplishments, religious pedigree, or good works for God's approval, but only on what Christ has accomplished on his behalf (Phil. 2:89). A Christian understands with Paul that it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me (Gal. 2:20). As regards Jesus paying the penalty for our sins, the Christian believes that when Jesus said, it is finished (John 19:30), it really was. Because of this, there is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus (Rom. 8:1), and they have been saved to the uttermost (Heb. 7:25). A miraculous transformation has taken place in which the believer has passed from death to life (John 5:24). The Holy Spirit empowers the transformation from rebellious sinner to humble worshiper, leading to confidence for the day of judgment (1 John 4:17).
Now moving away from the theological essays, we would like to point to some related commentary the ESVSB makes on a few important texts of Scripture which speak of regeneration:
ESVSB commentary on Eph 2:5
"even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ by grace you have been saved" (Eph 2:5)
Eph. 2:5 when we were dead. Paul resumes his original thought, which began with you were dead in v. 1. made us alive. That is, God gave us regeneration (new spiritual life within). This and the two verbs in v. 6 (raised up and seated with) make up the main verbs of the long sentence in vv. 110. Since Christians were dead, they first had to be made alive before they could believe (and God did that together with Christ). This is why salvation is by grace alone (see notes on v. 8; vv. 910).
ESVSB commentary on 1 John 5:1
"Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the Father loves whoever has been born of him." (1 John 5:1)1 John 5:1 Everyone who believes that. The word that underscores that saving faith has a particular content. It is not a vague religious commitment but a wholehearted trust in the saving work of Christ. Everyone who believes has been born of God. Regeneration precedes faith (cf. 2:29; 3:9; 4:7; note on Eph. 2:5).
ESVSB commentary on John 6:63
"It is the Spirit who gives life; a the flesh is no help at all."
John 6:63 The flesh (i.e., human nature including emotions, will, and intellect) is completely incapable of producing genuine spiritual life (see Rom. 7:1425), for this can only be done by the Spirit. But the Holy Spirit works powerfully in and through the words that Jesus speaks, and those words are spirit and life in the sense that they work in the unseen spiritual realm and awaken genuine spiritual life.
I have also had people write to ask me what the esvsb has for notes on romans 9-11? and also, what is its attitude toward the dispensational covenanental conversation? And lastly what is its note on "the israel of God" in galations 6?
It may be of comfort to all of you that Thomas Schreiner was the author of the ESVSB notes for the Epistle to the Romans.
Here are some the notes:
Rom. 9:11 God did not choose Jacob on the basis of anything in Jacob or Esau's life but to achieve the fulfillment of God's purpose of election. Christians can be assured, therefore, that God's promise will be fulfilled because it depends solely upon his will. The contrast between works and calling shows that salvation is in view, not merely the historical destiny of Israel as a nation. For the OT background on "election," see Gen. 18:10; Ex. 33:19; Mal. 1:2. See also Eph. 1:36
Rom. 9:13 The citation of Mal. 1:23 also shows that God set his saving love on Jacob and rejected (hated) Esau. "Hated" is startling, but as a sinner Esau did not deserve to be chosen by God, who remains just in not choosing everyone. The salvation of anyone at all comes only from God's mercy.
Rom. 9:1415 Since God chose Jacob instead of Esau before they were born, without regard to how good or bad either of them would be, the question naturally arises: Is God just in choosing one over the other? God is just because no one deserves to be saved (cf. 3:23), and the salvation of anyone at all is due to God's mercy alone, as the citation of Ex. 33:19 affirms.
Rom. 9:16 Salvation, then, is not ultimately based on human free will or effort but depends entirely on God's merciful will.
Rom. 9:17 For this very purpose. Paul quotes Ex. 9:16 to show that God is sovereign over evil as well. Even the wrath of man praises God (Ps. 76:10), for God installed Pharaoh as ruler and hardened his heart so that his own saving power and glorious name would be spread throughout the whole world.
Rom. 9:19 who can resist his will? If salvation ultimately depends upon God, and he has mercy and hardens whomever he pleases, then how can he find anyone guilty? How can he charge anyone with guilt since his will is irresistible?
Rom. 9:2021 Some of Paul's readers might expect him to appeal to human free will to resolve the problem posed in v. 19. Instead, he insists that finite human beings may not rebelliously question God's ways, that God as a potter (cf. Jer. 18:16) has the right to do what he wishes with his creation. The honorable and dishonorable vessels in this context represent those who are saved and unsaved. Paul affirms that humans are guilty for their sin, and he offers no philosophical resolution as to how this fits with divine sovereignty. He does insist that God ordains all that happens (cf. Eph. 1:11), even though God himself does not sin and is not morally responsible for sin.
Romans 11
Rom. 11:11 Israel's hardening is not the final word. God planned salvation history so that Israel's trespass would open salvation for the Gentiles, and the Jews in turn would be provoked to jealousy when they see Gentiles being saved and enjoying a relationship with God. Rom. 11:12 The term world is another word for Gentiles here. Full inclusion looks forward to the fulfillment of God's saving promises to ethnic Israel. Paul argues from the lesser to the greater: if Israel's sin brought salvation to the Gentiles, then the blessing will be even greater when all Israel is saved (see v. 15).
Rom. 11:1314 As an apostle, Paul had a special calling and commission to preach the good news to the Gentiles. But he uses his ministry to the Gentiles also to benefit the Jews, for he hopes that the more Gentiles come to salvation, the more this will provoke the Jews to jealousy, so that many will be saved.
Rom. 11:15 If the rejection of the majority of Israel has meant that many Gentiles (the world) are now reconciled to God through Christ, then the acceptance of the Jews (their future coming to Christ in large numbers) will bring about the final resurrection (life from the dead) and the end of history, so that from that point on people will praise God forever and ever (see v. 12). Others think "life from the dead" is a figurative expression for great spiritual revival.
Galatians 6
Gal. 6:16 and upon. "And" (Gk. kai) can also mean "even," in which case Paul would be equating the church with "the Israel of God." Which sense is best here must be decided with reference to the larger context of Paul's thought both in Galatians and in his other epistles. Israel of God. That is, in contrast to the children of the "present Jerusalem" (4:25), the true people of God are the believing children of Abraham (3:7, 29), who belong to "Jerusalem above" (4:2627).
As for dispensational/covenantal -- Both editors J.I. Packer and Wayne Grudem are covenantal (with the exception of covenant baptism for Grudem). C. John Collins from Covenant seminary (a decidedly covenantal seminary) writes the essay in the ESVSB entitled How the New Testament Quotes and Interprets the Old Testament.
However, I noticed that in the notes for Revelation 20 - although the notes were written by a covenant theologian: Dennis Johnson from Westminster Seminary (who himself wrote a covenantal, amillennial commentary on Revelation), the notes for the chapter simply list the various positions on the millennium and does not push a particular position. I will do some deeper investigation on the overall view but it appears to me that it promotes much more continuity between Old and New Testaments than most dispensationalists would allow.
Both are responses, not causes. They are the manifestations of a change of will (heart).
**Furthermore, without the action of believing or faith on our part God can do nothing for us**
God saves us. We don’t save ourselves.
We can’t do anything without God acting first.
***Furthermore, without the action of believing or faith on our part God can do nothing for us, otherwise, why would our Savior state the following: ***
God is helpless before us. He can do nothing. WE CONTROL GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In all seriousness, nothing can happen until God allows it. Faith cannot happen before God interviens in your life.
Concider this: Romans 10:17 So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.
Faith cannot come UNTIL you hear the word. This ONLY happens when God puts someone there for you to hear from. So it all comes from God, and not of yourself.
Believes WHAT????
The word that was prepared for him FROM GOD. You can’t believe in what you haven’t heard about. You can’t believe in something you have no knowledge about. Belief comes from GOD.
Again, he came to them FIRST!
There is always a personal choice involved.
God is a fair and impartial, but loving, God.
He does not blithely give advantages to one soul over another.
We both as sinners and as born-again sinners will have a choice every day of our lives to either believe God or not to believe God. This is how God measures are obedience and rewards us. This comes straight from the mouth of Jesus as the scriptures I have posted on this thread show.
This is the one failing of Calvinism is that it removes the choice from the individual and removes the glory of the creator’s creation.
I’ve got to go now, but I’ll be back later tonight to continue the discussion.
Once you are regenerated, you can believe. No problem with that. In fact, I will state that, once you are regenerated, you WILL believe.
Supercharged?
"Westminster/Three Forms of Unity compliant, hear me roar."
:-).
Also is this a new translation apart from the NASV or the NIV?
A revision of the RSV, putting it in the family of revisions of the KJV, instead of an outright new translation.
That should have been:And yet the first words of Jesus's public ministry were "Repent and Believe"
Should have been "Jesus' public ministry".
***This is the one failing of Calvinism is that it removes the choice from the individual and removes the glory of the creators creation.***
No, it’s like this...
An unregenerated man can choose between sinning and not sinning in any particular circumstance.
A regenerated man can choose between sinning, not sinning, and glorifying God.
In other words:
Unregenrated man can choose to punch someone in the nose, or not punch someone in the nose. Sin or not sin.
Regenerated man can choose to punch someone in the nose, not punch someone in the nose, or tell them about Jesus. Sin, not sin, or glorify God.
That is the difference.
That’s what I said. Remember, an unregenerated man CAN choose to not sin, in a particular circumstance, but it doesn’t make him righteous.
Good to know, thanks for posting this one Gamecock. My husband was given this Bible last weekend and I recently purchased the Ligonier ESV Study Bible. I don’t care for it because the print is too small and too light for my aging eyes. I’ll have to check out hubby’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.