Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A word for nonbelievers (Billboard reaches out to atheists)
Philadelphia Enquirer ^ | Jun. 5, 2008 | David O'Reilly

Posted on 06/05/2008 7:57:03 AM PDT by Between the Lines

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Antoninus
More like God, the cleanser of sin.

Take what comfort you can in the fact that you are not alone in your view of the Godhead.

41 posted on 06/05/2008 10:55:30 AM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
Doing so means that you accept that nothing exists without scientific evidence for its existence.

Do you think that love exists? If so, what's the scientific evidence for it?

42 posted on 06/05/2008 11:03:55 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Mounted by a consortium of local atheists, it is an invitation to the area’s atheists, agnostics, skeptics, rationalists and religious freethinkers (no one label fits them all)...

Well, “atheist” and “agnostic” at least have the benefit of being honest descriptions of what their bearers actually do, or rather, don’t. I find “skeptic”, “rationalist”, and “freethinker” (oh, yeah, and “reality-based”) amusing in their irony. And “bright” is too silly to take seriously.

43 posted on 06/05/2008 11:10:29 AM PDT by RichInOC (God exists, He intervenes in His creation, and (I think this is obvious) He's a bit of a comedian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Absolutely, but you’ll never get an entire country on the same bandwagon.

I’m sure even under the most God-fearing circumstances, there were some idiot tribal Israelites who decided that some other random pagan god was better to worship.


44 posted on 06/05/2008 11:18:39 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Personal Methane Reclamation: Break wind for energy independence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Take what comfort you can in the fact that you are not alone in your view of the Godhead.

LOL. You lose via Godwin's Law.

Amusingly, you and I both know that Nazism was hardly a Christian ideology--or even a deist ideology. It was primarily atheistic with a healthy dash of weirdo mysticism thrown in for good measure.

The history of the 20th century is largely the history of bloodthirsty atheists figuring out new and novel ways of destroying their fellow man.
45 posted on 06/05/2008 11:38:27 AM PDT by Antoninus (John 6:54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The Fascists’ “religion” was installing the state as the “deity” of the people.

The atheists of the 20th century sought truth solely in “reason”. We see what that got us, as you mentioned, hundreds of millions dead, because “reason” dictates that a better society can be created by forcing it on the people from the top down.

And what’s a few hundred million dead if those entities are only going to exist for about 60-70 years anyway?


46 posted on 06/05/2008 11:42:09 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Nope, we don’t start from an assumption of a Creator,

What assumption do you start from then?

but, we don’t automatically exclude the possibility then try to make all theories fit it, like the “yo yo universe” theory proposed to exclude the evidence of a beginning of the universe.

Science freely admits that it doesn't know how the universe began. All we really know is that the Universe is expanding and that implies a beginning. A hundred years ago Scientists thought that the Universe was static.

Atheists limit their discovery to the material in order to avoid the consequences of the possibility of a Creator.

Actually they don't. QM is based on waves of nothing, it is the most accurate theory that we have and it may explain the origins of the Universe.

Science is based on testable theories. Religion is testable too, but it fails all the tests.

47 posted on 06/05/2008 12:02:50 PM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

How sad for so many to believe in nothing greater than themselves.


48 posted on 06/05/2008 12:12:07 PM PDT by OB1kNOb ("We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election." - Ahmed Yousef, Hamas PM advisor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"Gott" has some other meaning in German?

Anyhoo... "target a disliked religon"... check! "kill 'em if they don't get out of Dodge fast enough"... check! Yep, the correspondences track perfectly.

49 posted on 06/05/2008 12:34:45 PM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MrB; Soliton

Soliton is not trying to put anything over on anyone with his statement. He was, it seems to me, explaining his worldview.

Do you not start also with an assumption, and from that assumption claim that your worldview is true?


50 posted on 06/05/2008 12:58:27 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius
Do you think that love exists? If so, what's the scientific evidence for it?

Love is an emotion controlled by hormones. The right chemicals and you will love anyone or anything.

51 posted on 06/05/2008 4:57:58 PM PDT by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

That’s not my question. I said “how do you know that it exists?” Prove to me that it exists.


52 posted on 06/06/2008 5:25:04 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

I should also note that I think you’re describing something more akin to lust or attraction, not love.


53 posted on 06/06/2008 5:31:38 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Dang... would be funny if it were not so horribly sad.

jw


54 posted on 07/08/2008 1:57:23 PM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson