Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A word for nonbelievers (Billboard reaches out to atheists)
Philadelphia Enquirer ^ | Jun. 5, 2008 | David O'Reilly

Posted on 06/05/2008 7:57:03 AM PDT by Between the Lines

With its image of blue sky and fluffy clouds, the rectangle floating lately over I-95 near Allegheny Avenue suggests something dreamy, almost heavenly.

At least from a distance.

Drivers headed north toward the giant billboard might first discern the words God and Believe and suppose this to be the work of a fundamentalist church.

But this is the work of no church.

"Don't believe in God?" it asks. "You are not alone."

Think of it as a sign of the times.

Mounted by a consortium of local atheists, it is an invitation to the area's atheists, agnostics, skeptics, rationalists and religious freethinkers (no one label fits them all) to overcome their differences and form a coalition.

"Hundreds of thousands of your neighbors in the Delaware Valley feel the same as you do," according to the Web site www.phillyCOR.org, to which the billboard directs passing motorists.

"Our mission is not to convince fundamentalists to change their position," Steve Rade, a Huntingdon Valley businessman, said last week. He donated the $22,500 needed to mount the billboard, which appeared May 1 and is to remain until the end of August.

"What we want to do is give people questioning their beliefs a place to go for more information and to meet like-minded people."

No horns poke through Rade's wiry gray hair. He is tall and bony, quick to laugh, and dressed for the office - he is president of Wireless Accessories Inc. - in shorts and sneakers. He has the restless energy of a teenager. He is 70.

"I'd like everyone to believe what I do," he said, referring to his "absolute certainty" that there is no divine being running the universe and no life after death. "I think it would be a better world if they did."

The son of a West Oak Lane synagogue president who insisted that his children attend Shabbat services every Saturday, Rade was bar mitzvahed at 13 and confirmed at 16. But his youthful doubts about God and supernaturalism hardened while an undergraduate at Pennsylvania State University, where he was a finance major.

"It was just my own critical, rational thinking," he said Thursday with a shrug. "I accept that the universe began with the Big Bang, but I don't believe there were snakes talking in the Garden of Eden. . . . If God shows himself to me, I'll believe."

His grand plan - organizing the region's religious skeptics - began just three months ago, when he asked the American Humanist Association in Washington how to find its local chapter.

In March, he met for dinner with Joe Fox, president of the Humanist Association of Greater Philadelphia. Fox told him that there were many atheist groups in the region, but that few communicated with one another.

"Joe saw it as a lack of focus," Rade recalled. "I saw it as disarray."

Days later, he invited Fox and the heads of seven other like-minded organizations to dinner at a Chinese restaurant and asked if they wanted to expand and unify.

They agreed to create an umbrella group called the Greater Philadelphia Coalition of Reason (PhillyCOR), and Rade agreed to pay the salary of its half-time executive director.

After that, "the idea for a billboard was easy to come by."

The 20-by-60-foot sign has generated 7,000 hits for the Web site, which offers links to such member organizations as the Humanist Association of Greater Philadelphia, the Freethought Society of Greater Philadelphia, Philadelphia Atheists Meetup, and the Secular Society of Temple University.

The sign's original, geographically limited toll-free phone number generated only about 300 calls, however. The new number, 1-877-99HUMANIST, is reachable from any area code.

A recording describes PhillyCOR as a "local free thought group" for "those without supernatural beliefs."

"I'm so appreciative of Steve," Sally Cramer, president of the 300-member Freethought Society, said Friday. "I love the message. I'm really pleased we're able to be a part of this."

At age 24, she has no way to know if it is easier for today's atheists to be "out of the closet," but she said she had encountered hostility. The mother of a previous boyfriend "wouldn't talk to me when she found out I'm an atheist," she said.

No one knows how many American adults identify themselves as being in the atheist spectrum, but surveys suggest between 4 percent and 9 percent, the lowest of any industrialized nation.

Fred Edwords, spokesman for the roughly 10,000-member American Humanist Association, said he thought it was easier for atheists and agnostics to be public than in previous decades.

"In the 1980s, people were saying we're part of a great conspiracy, trying to take over the schools and courts."

The recent spate of best-sellers bearing such titles as The God Delusion, God Is Not Great and The End of Faith suggests a broader public interest in religious skepticism, Edwords said. "But we still feel we're the last minority group it's OK to say bad things about."


TOPICS: Current Events; Skeptics/Seekers
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Antoninus
More like God, the cleanser of sin.

Take what comfort you can in the fact that you are not alone in your view of the Godhead.

41 posted on 06/05/2008 10:55:30 AM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
Doing so means that you accept that nothing exists without scientific evidence for its existence.

Do you think that love exists? If so, what's the scientific evidence for it?

42 posted on 06/05/2008 11:03:55 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Mounted by a consortium of local atheists, it is an invitation to the area’s atheists, agnostics, skeptics, rationalists and religious freethinkers (no one label fits them all)...

Well, “atheist” and “agnostic” at least have the benefit of being honest descriptions of what their bearers actually do, or rather, don’t. I find “skeptic”, “rationalist”, and “freethinker” (oh, yeah, and “reality-based”) amusing in their irony. And “bright” is too silly to take seriously.

43 posted on 06/05/2008 11:10:29 AM PDT by RichInOC (God exists, He intervenes in His creation, and (I think this is obvious) He's a bit of a comedian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Absolutely, but you’ll never get an entire country on the same bandwagon.

I’m sure even under the most God-fearing circumstances, there were some idiot tribal Israelites who decided that some other random pagan god was better to worship.


44 posted on 06/05/2008 11:18:39 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Personal Methane Reclamation: Break wind for energy independence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Take what comfort you can in the fact that you are not alone in your view of the Godhead.

LOL. You lose via Godwin's Law.

Amusingly, you and I both know that Nazism was hardly a Christian ideology--or even a deist ideology. It was primarily atheistic with a healthy dash of weirdo mysticism thrown in for good measure.

The history of the 20th century is largely the history of bloodthirsty atheists figuring out new and novel ways of destroying their fellow man.
45 posted on 06/05/2008 11:38:27 AM PDT by Antoninus (John 6:54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The Fascists’ “religion” was installing the state as the “deity” of the people.

The atheists of the 20th century sought truth solely in “reason”. We see what that got us, as you mentioned, hundreds of millions dead, because “reason” dictates that a better society can be created by forcing it on the people from the top down.

And what’s a few hundred million dead if those entities are only going to exist for about 60-70 years anyway?


46 posted on 06/05/2008 11:42:09 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Nope, we don’t start from an assumption of a Creator,

What assumption do you start from then?

but, we don’t automatically exclude the possibility then try to make all theories fit it, like the “yo yo universe” theory proposed to exclude the evidence of a beginning of the universe.

Science freely admits that it doesn't know how the universe began. All we really know is that the Universe is expanding and that implies a beginning. A hundred years ago Scientists thought that the Universe was static.

Atheists limit their discovery to the material in order to avoid the consequences of the possibility of a Creator.

Actually they don't. QM is based on waves of nothing, it is the most accurate theory that we have and it may explain the origins of the Universe.

Science is based on testable theories. Religion is testable too, but it fails all the tests.

47 posted on 06/05/2008 12:02:50 PM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

How sad for so many to believe in nothing greater than themselves.


48 posted on 06/05/2008 12:12:07 PM PDT by OB1kNOb ("We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election." - Ahmed Yousef, Hamas PM advisor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"Gott" has some other meaning in German?

Anyhoo... "target a disliked religon"... check! "kill 'em if they don't get out of Dodge fast enough"... check! Yep, the correspondences track perfectly.

49 posted on 06/05/2008 12:34:45 PM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MrB; Soliton

Soliton is not trying to put anything over on anyone with his statement. He was, it seems to me, explaining his worldview.

Do you not start also with an assumption, and from that assumption claim that your worldview is true?


50 posted on 06/05/2008 12:58:27 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius
Do you think that love exists? If so, what's the scientific evidence for it?

Love is an emotion controlled by hormones. The right chemicals and you will love anyone or anything.

51 posted on 06/05/2008 4:57:58 PM PDT by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

That’s not my question. I said “how do you know that it exists?” Prove to me that it exists.


52 posted on 06/06/2008 5:25:04 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

I should also note that I think you’re describing something more akin to lust or attraction, not love.


53 posted on 06/06/2008 5:31:38 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Dang... would be funny if it were not so horribly sad.

jw


54 posted on 07/08/2008 1:57:23 PM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson