Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martin Luther: Hitler's Spiritual Ancestor
Catholic Apologetics ^ | Peter F. Wiener

Posted on 03/15/2008 10:17:55 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper

More than once during these talks I referred to Luther and what always occurred to me as his destructive influence. I pointed out that even in such an admirable book as Rohan Butler's “The Roots of National Socialism” the spiritual origins of Nazism and Luther's influence had not been given the necessary importance. Then I was asked if I would be prepared to elaborate to them—about a dozen of the very senior boys, that is—my own views on Luther and Lutheranism. I agreed—with the proviso that they would be my own views and nothing else. Admittedly, I had read more on Luther and about Luther than on most other subjects. But I wanted to make it quite clear that I would not speak to them with the voice of a great authority, but would merely give them my own interpretation. I told them, moreover, that I should try to prove how dangerous it is to accept legends; and that the picture I had of Luther and his influence was thoroughly contradictory of the customary Luther of the legend.

(Excerpt) Read more at catholicapologetics.info ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholicism; christians; hitler; holocaust; israel; jews; judaism; luther; lutheran; martinluther; nazi; nazism; protestantism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,001-1,006 next last
To: Campion; Gamecock; wmfights; xzins
What's it like to go through life blaming everything bad on the big, bad, ugly old Pope?

Lot's better than going through life believing some reprobate in Rome is infallible and "another Christ."

241 posted on 03/15/2008 3:17:07 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Campion
“Rome had made her position on the Nazis utterly clear by 1927.”

So, of course, nothing more had to be said. I think England and the US had made their statements, too, but guess what, we still sent people to kill Hitler and his minions.

Fortunately, the Pope didn't have to say much to show the world how serious Rome thought the matter was. Apparently, the Pope didn't even have to excommunicate Hitler, so as to further ensure Hitler didn't have animus against the Catholic church

242 posted on 03/15/2008 3:17:55 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

You wrote:

“It doesn’t matter a dang thing about how many Jewish lives he apparently saved, sitting quiet, when all we can know is that over 6 million Jews were killed and a world war was fought over the issue.”

1) WWII was NOT fought over the Jews. It started BEFORE the Holocaust began.

2) It does too matter how many he saved and it doesn’t really matter if he saved them loudly or quietly. A saved innocent life is a saved innocent life. Period.

“I DO NOT believe his supposed ‘pro-Jewish’ actions by being quiet were ever meant to help Jews.”

But that is exactly what they did so your opinion is meaningless.

“Where in the Bible does it say to stay silent about wrong? This solely shows the Pope found it expedient to stay silent.”

I always thought Matthew 10:16 taught such prudence.


243 posted on 03/15/2008 3:18:18 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

“It was I, Martin Luther, who slew all the peasants in the insurrection, for I commanded them to be slaughtered. All their blood is upon my shoulders. But I cast it on our Lord God who commanded me to speak in this way” (E59, 284).


244 posted on 03/15/2008 3:18:41 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hitler was a pagan and the state was his god.


245 posted on 03/15/2008 3:19:15 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Campion

They deny themselves the Holy Sacraments, and their malnourished souls wither and rot from within. Hate can be the only result.


246 posted on 03/15/2008 3:19:51 PM PDT by Petronski (Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Campion, sorry, I forgot to add your “nick to ping” on post #243


247 posted on 03/15/2008 3:19:52 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg
I know full well that the term "law-observing," coming from a Calvinist, is an accusation of Pelagianism or "works-righteousness"

That's an insult. That's a big insult.

Moreover, it wouldn't matter if she had said "chocolate-pie eating Catholic"; it's still evading the question with a personal slam, yet another ad hominem.

248 posted on 03/15/2008 3:20:19 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: sonic109
"Hitler was a pagan and the state was his god.

Many historians claim he was Catholic.

249 posted on 03/15/2008 3:20:32 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

See post 233.#


250 posted on 03/15/2008 3:20:41 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Martin Luther: Hitler's Spiritual Ancestor

I would think that this is not much of a stretch for those that also believe that Darwin gave rise to Hitler.

251 posted on 03/15/2008 3:21:15 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (Teach the Raelian Controversey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo; ConservativeMind; Campion
Oh, but let's give credit to the Pope where it is due. In his inaction, he surely saved a lot of people. Right?

Rabbi Dalin:

    His [Pope Pius XII] silence was an effective strategy directed to protecting the greatest possible number of Jews from deportation. An explicit and severe denunciation of the Nazis by the Pope would have been an invitation to reprisals, and would have worsened attitudes toward Jews throughout Europe.

    Of course one can ask: What could be worse than the extermination of 6 million Jews? The answer is simple and terribly honest: the killing of hundreds of thousands of other Jews. The revisionist critics of Pius XII know that both Jewish leaders as well as Catholic bishops, who came from occupied countries, advised Pacelli not to protest publicly against the atrocities committed by the Nazis.

    We have evidence that, when the bishop of Munster wished to pronounce himself against the persecution of the Jews in Germany, the leaders of the Jewish communities of his diocese begged him not to do so, as it would have caused a harsher repression against them.


252 posted on 03/15/2008 3:21:49 PM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Doc, that would make for an interesting argument on a thread about excommunication, and maybe we should have one, but I fail to see what that has to do with Martin Luther creating a culture in Germany that fostered Nazism.

It functions as a smoke screen.

253 posted on 03/15/2008 3:23:05 PM PDT by Petronski (Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Hitler proclaimed himself: I am the God of Hell and Fire

America almost did not stop the wehrmacht.

So, they blame the Holy Father? How sick is this?


254 posted on 03/15/2008 3:23:21 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
So, of course, nothing more had to be said. I think England and the US had made their statements, too, but guess what, we still sent people to kill Hitler and his minions.

That wasn't really an option for the Pope, was it? I think a fellow named Garibaldi had taken that option off the table about a century before.

Apparently, the Pope didn't even have to excommunicate Hitler

As we've explained in this thread, Hitler was excommunicated literally hundreds of times without the Pope having to say or do a thing. He was in all likelihood excommunicated long before he became chancellor.

255 posted on 03/15/2008 3:23:24 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

It functions as a smoke screen....or at least is intended to do so.


256 posted on 03/15/2008 3:23:24 PM PDT by Petronski (Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Lot's better than going through life believing some reprobate in Rome is infallible and "another Christ."

Evidently! We actually have to confront our own sins, mistakes, and foolishnesses, instead of passing them off on some guy in Rome!

However, I wouldn't bet on getting a "bad Pope did it" pass in the afterlife.

257 posted on 03/15/2008 3:25:45 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind; Campion

You wrote:

“So, of course, nothing more had to be said. I think England and the US had made their statements, too, but guess what, we still sent people to kill Hitler and his minions.”

So assassinating Elizabeth I would have been murder even though she was killing innocent people, but you imply the pope should have been trying to kill Hitler? By the way, did you know Pius XII actually gave his support to an attempt to assassinate Hitler? Would that have been a murder?


258 posted on 03/15/2008 3:26:15 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

You proved yourself wrong:

“...I saved 200 million people over 50 years ago, and I wasn’t even born.”

Logical impossibility. It, therefore, never happened.

Thinking. Try it.


259 posted on 03/15/2008 3:28:41 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

“The Jews are malignant snakes and imps”. “Whoever would like to cherish such adders and puny devils—who are the worst enemies of Christ and us all—to befriend them and to do them honour simply in order to be cheated, plundered, robbed, disgraced, and forced to howl and curse and suffer every kind of evil, to him I would commend the Jews. And if this be not enough, let him tell the Jews to use his mouth as a privy, or else crawl into the Jew’s hind parts, and there worship the holy thing, so as afterwards to be able to boast of having been merciful, and of having helped the Devil and his progeny to blaspheme our dear Lord.”


260 posted on 03/15/2008 3:30:42 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,001-1,006 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson