[fproy2222]

Where is your SOLID biblcal basis to say these things about Adam and Noah?

+++++++++++++=

Please remember this is about “mormon” teachings. That means that I can use the other teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to show that the author left out some of the important stuff, making the article less then true.

[MHGinTN]

Bwaahhahahaha ... thanks, I need a good laugh.

[lupie]

Gabriel became Noah, not the other way. Just a small example of some using miss-direction.

Perhaps the article was about mormon teachings, but my question to you is well withing the normal type of questions in forums. It is a rare thread on doctrininal issues that does not stray from what the original article is "about". Besides that, it is really "about" mormon teaching of the birth of your jesus christ vs what scripture says about the birth of Jesus Christ.

You are the one who raised the issue when you said that there was "abundant scripture". I just asked for you to cite just 5 of those passages. If you had said there was abundant teaching in mormonisim, I would not have asked you for those. So, do you prefer to retract your statement, or would you rather give what you perceive as the biblical proofs that Noah became Gabriel? Either one is satisfactory to me.

[Elsie]

That means that I can use the other teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to show that the author left out some of the important stuff, making the article less then true.

Uh... we REALLY can't 'show' any thing; we merely make assertions and then ask folks to PRAY about them.

Some small number will get a 'yes' while the most willl get a 'no'.

We win.

--MormonDude(one who got a definite yes! [ I think] )