Perhaps the article was about mormon teachings, but my question to you is well withing the normal type of questions in forums. It is a rare thread on doctrininal issues that does not stray from what the original article is "about". Besides that, it is really "about" mormon teaching of the birth of your jesus christ vs what scripture says about the birth of Jesus Christ.
You are the one who raised the issue when you said that there was "abundant scripture". I just asked for you to cite just 5 of those passages. If you had said there was abundant teaching in mormonisim, I would not have asked you for those. So, do you prefer to retract your statement, or would you rather give what you perceive as the biblical proofs that Noah became Gabriel? Either one is satisfactory to me.
I was trying to point out that the “He” at the beginning of the next sentence was Adam, and that it was Adam who Brother Petersen was talking about when talking about how he was an angle before he became Adam.
Please forgive me. I need to go back and learn how to do that better.
Please also remember, when a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints talk about scriptures, we believe that they are still coming today, even though not all are canonized.