Skip to comments.
Single Word Change in Book of Mormon Speaks Volumes
Salt Lake Tribune ^
| November 8, 2007
| Peggy Fletcher Stack
Posted on 11/08/2007 5:23:05 PM PST by Colofornian
The LDS Church has changed a single word in its introduction to the Book of Mormon, a change observers say has serious implications for commonly held LDS beliefs about the ancestry of American Indians.
Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe founder Joseph Smith unearthed a set of gold plates from a hill in upperstate New York in 1827 and translated the ancient text into English. The account, known as The Book of Mormon, tells the story of two Israelite civilizations living in the New World. One derived from a single family who fled from Jerusalem in 600 B.C. and eventually splintered into two groups, known as the Nephites and Lamanites.
The book's current introduction, added by the late LDS apostle, Bruce R. McConkie in 1981, includes this statement: "After thousands of years, all were destroyed except the Lamanites, and they are the principal ancestors of the American Indians."
The new version, seen first in Doubleday's revised edition, reads, "After thousands of years, all were destroyed except the Lamanites, and they are among the ancestors of the American Indians."
LDS leaders instructed Doubleday to make the change, said senior editor Andrew Corbin, so it "would be in accordance with future editions the church is printing."
The change "takes into account details of Book of Mormon demography which are not known," LDS spokesman Mark Tuttle said Wednesday.
It also steps into the middle of a raging debate about the book's historical claims.
Many Mormons, including several church presidents, have taught that the Americas were largely inhabited by Book of Mormon peoples. In 1971, Church President Spencer W. Kimball said that Lehi, the family patriarch, was "the ancestor of all of the Indian and Mestizo tribes in North and South and Central America and in the islands of the sea."
After testing the DNA of more than 12,000 Indians, though, most researchers have concluded that the continent's early inhabitants came from Asia across the Bering Strait.
With this change, the LDS Church is "conceding that mainstream scientific theories about the colonization of the Americas have significant elements of truth in them," said Simon Southerton, a former Mormon and author of Losing a Lost Tribe: Native Americans, DNA and the Mormon Church.
"DNA has revealed very clearly how closely related American Indians are to their Siberian ancestors, " Southerton said in an e-mail from his home in Canberra, Australia. "The Lamanites are invisible, not principal ancestors."
LDS scholars, however, dispute the notion that DNA evidence eliminates the possibility of Lamanites. They call it "oversimplification" of the research.
On the church's official Web site, lds.org, it says, "Nothing in the Book of Mormon precludes migration into the Americas by peoples of Asiatic origin. The scientific issues relating to DNA, however, are numerous and complex."
Mormon researcher John M. Butler and DNA expert further argues that "careful examination and demographic analysis of the Book of Mormon record in terms of population growth and the number of people described implies that other groups were likely present in the promised land when Lehi's family arrived, and these groups may have genetically mixed with the Nephites, Lamanites, and other groups. Events related in the Book of Mormon likely took place in a limited region, leaving plenty of room for other Native American peoples to have existed."
In recent years, many LDS scholars have come to share Butler's belief in what is known as the "limited geography" theory. By this view, the Nephites and Lamanites restricted their activities to portions of Central America, which would explain their absence from the general American Indian genetics.
Kevin Barney, a Mormon lawyer and independent researcher in Chicago, welcomes the introduction's word change.
"I have always felt free to disavow the language of the [Book of Mormon's] introduction, footnotes and dictionary, which are not part of the canonical scripture," said Barney, on the board of FAIR, a Mormon apologist group. "These things can change as the scholarship progresses and our understanding enlarges. This suggests to me that someone on the church's scripture committee is paying attention to the discussion."
TOPICS: History; Other Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: bookofmormon; godsgravesglyphs; lds; mormon; nativeamericans; romneyisanut; thelatestrevelation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 381-387 next last
To: Colofornian; metmom
Lot's righteousness wasn't in a laundry list of outward righteous deeds that would build up his own glory; rather, it was in inwardly reacting to unrighteousness--the same kind of righteous abhorrence that God has over man's unrighteous deeds.
The truth is, you just don't know for it is not listed in the scriptures, assumptions are a bad thing when your salvation may be on the line.
That said, believe as you wish, I am not trying to convert you, just defend my religion from what I see as scurrilous slander.
May God bless you both with the closeness you apparently crave, may his spirit distill upon you as the dews upon the grasses.
261
posted on
11/13/2007 2:04:19 AM PST
by
DelphiUser
("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
To: DelphiUser
Gonna go look for Pookie's Ping, then go to bed.
See Y'all tomorrow, (later today)
262
posted on
11/13/2007 2:10:04 AM PST
by
DelphiUser
("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
To: Grig
God didnt just sit around and wait till 1820 to start the restoration either, he was preparing the world for it all along. The Reformation and the weakening of the power of the Vatican was part of preparing for the Restoration, the formation of the USA with its freedom of religion was another major building block.It appears that the LDS organization is very similar to EVOLUTION:
There is NOTHING that can't be used to feed into expanding and explaining it's existance.
263
posted on
11/13/2007 4:37:35 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
A) Don't tell me what I believe, for you don't know.But we DO 'know' what your organization has published over the ytears.
264
posted on
11/13/2007 4:38:52 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Old Mountain man
Especially if you read the whole thing as opposed to whatever your preacher selects as a verse of the week.You must have VERY long services, hearing that read every week!
265
posted on
11/13/2007 4:39:42 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
Here are my two questions: 1) I understand that you do not believe my interpretation, but what does it mean to a non Mormon that the believers held all things in Common?Why do you keep insisting we 'explain' our postion; when you continue to ignore the Scripture??
ACTS 15:4
Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.
266
posted on
11/13/2007 4:43:01 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
2) Do Orthodox Christians believe the early Christians sold everything and pooled their resources for the common good, or not. Again; you miss the point.
WHY this is so will go undetermined.
The Scripture does NOT support your assertion that it was a COMMAND to share everything.
267
posted on
11/13/2007 4:44:42 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: metmom
Are
YOU a member of the ...
Church of SATAN???
Anton Szandor LaVey was the founder
Founders and Writers and Priests; oh my!!
268
posted on
11/13/2007 4:49:42 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Grig
You are being fed a distorted and hostile view of us by some posters here. You are being fed an accurate and loving view of us by some posters here.
269
posted on
11/13/2007 4:50:49 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Colofornian
2 Nephi 25:23 is clear enough. Don't you tell US what is clear or not!
WE are the ones with VOLUMES printed that try to explain what we believe!!!
--MormonDude(Still learning and growing - workin' on my TR!!)
270
posted on
11/13/2007 4:53:16 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: metmom
I'm drawing a blank on the record righteous deeds performed by Lot in Genesis How can you POSSIBLY miss...
Genesis 19:8-36
8. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof."
9. "Get out of our way," they replied. And they said, "This fellow came here as an alien, and now he wants to play the judge! We'll treat you worse than them." They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door.
10. But the men inside reached out and pulled Lot back into the house and shut the door.
11. Then they struck the men who were at the door of the house, young and old, with blindness so that they could not find the door.
12. The two men said to Lot, "Do you have anyone else here--sons-in-law, sons or daughters, or anyone else in the city who belongs to you? Get them out of here,
13. because we are going to destroy this place. The outcry to the LORD against its people is so great that he has sent us to destroy it."
14. So Lot went out and spoke to his sons-in-law, who were pledged to marry his daughters. He said, "Hurry and get out of this place, because the LORD is about to destroy the city!" But his sons-in-law thought he was joking.
15. With the coming of dawn, the angels urged Lot, saying, "Hurry! Take your wife and your two daughters who are here, or you will be swept away when the city is punished."
16. When he hesitated, the men grasped his hand and the hands of his wife and of his two daughters and led them safely out of the city, for the LORD was merciful to them.
17. As soon as they had brought them out, one of them said, "Flee for your lives! Don't look back, and don't stop anywhere in the plain! Flee to the mountains or you will be swept away!"
18. But Lot said to them, "No, my lords, please!
19. Your servant has found favor in your eyes, and you have shown great kindness to me in sparing my life. But I can't flee to the mountains; this disaster will overtake me, and I'll die.
20. Look, here is a town near enough to run to, and it is small. Let me flee to it--it is very small, isn't it? Then my life will be spared."
21. He said to him, "Very well, I will grant this request too; I will not overthrow the town you speak of.
22. But flee there quickly, because I cannot do anything until you reach it." (That is why the town was called Zoar. )
23. By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land.
24. Then the LORD rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah--from the LORD out of the heavens.
25. Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, including all those living in the cities--and also the vegetation in the land.
26. But Lot's wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.
27. Early the next morning Abraham got up and returned to the place where he had stood before the LORD.
28. He looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, toward all the land of the plain, and he saw dense smoke rising from the land, like smoke from a furnace.
29. So when God destroyed the cities of the plain, he remembered Abraham, and he brought Lot out of the catastrophe that overthrew the cities where Lot had lived.
30. Lot and his two daughters left Zoar and settled in the mountains, for he was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave.
31. One day the older daughter said to the younger, "Our father is old, and there is no man around here to lie with us, as is the custom all over the earth.
32. Let's get our father to drink wine and then lie with him and preserve our family line through our father."
33. That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and lay with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.
34. The next day the older daughter said to the younger, "Last night I lay with my father. Let's get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and lie with him so we can preserve our family line through our father."
35. So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went and lay with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.
36. So both of Lot's daughters became pregnant by their father.
37. The older daughter had a son, and she named him Moab; he is the father of the Moabites of today.
38. The younger daughter also had a son, and she named him Ben-Ammi; he is the father of the Ammonites of today.
271
posted on
11/13/2007 4:57:00 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Colofornian
Why no mention of this practice in that book if it's the FULNESS of the everlasting gospel?Do you KNOW that we get hardly ANYTHING from the BoM??
Most of our stuff is found in our OTHER scriptures: PGP and D&C's.
(HA Ha ha! you can't find ANY of our Temple Rites® in ANY of our scriptures; either!!!)
--MormonDude(glad our stuff is secret SACRED!)
272
posted on
11/13/2007 5:00:48 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
Why are things always Either or with you people?LOL!
273
posted on
11/13/2007 5:02:53 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
Many there are who will pay their tithes and not go to the highest degree, the first example I can think of is myself, for I know my own sins more intimately than anyone else I know...Then a smart person would save his money!!
274
posted on
11/13/2007 5:04:17 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
I am sorry, but I cannot get the picture of an incompetent lawyer multiplying his words needlessly so no one will know what he was saying, can you explain your understanding of how the Early saints of peter and Ananias' time were living financially?You're kidding; right??
275
posted on
11/13/2007 5:05:35 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
How many words did you use in THIS reply??
—MormonDude(Workin’ my way back to you, Babe.)
276
posted on
11/13/2007 5:10:26 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
24 And, notwithstanding we believe in Christ, we keep the law of Moses, and look forward with steadfastness unto Christ, until the law shall be fulfilled.It's too bad you don't 'believe' this:
"Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin,"
Rom. 3:20
277
posted on
11/13/2007 5:14:27 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DelphiUser
Getting a reward for good works is not the same as earning your salvation through them. Pretty basic difference.
278
posted on
11/13/2007 5:55:03 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Elsie
You don’t suppose that if Lot had done anything good or noteworthy God would have recorded as He did for so many others?
279
posted on
11/13/2007 5:59:29 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Elsie
280
posted on
11/13/2007 7:16:44 AM PST
by
colorcountry
("ever met a gang banger with a hunter safety card?" ~ Ted Nugent)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 381-387 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson