Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Pretribulation Rapture Biblical?
Reformedonline.com ^ | Unknown | Brian M. Schwertley

Posted on 04/02/2007 8:40:21 AM PDT by topcat54

Conclusion

Although the pretribulation rapture theory is very popular today, given arguments that are offered in support of this doctrine we must declare Pretribulationalism to be contrary to the clear teachings of Scripture. Simply put, there is not one shred of evidence that can be found in the Bible to support the pretribulation rapture. The typical Pretribulational arguments offered reveal a pattern: of imposing one’s presuppositions onto a text without any exegetical justification whatsoever; of finding subtle meaning between words and/or phrases that were never intended by the author; of spiritualizing or ignoring passages that contradict the Pretribulational paradigm; and, of imposing Pretribulationalism upon passages that actually teach the unity of the eschatological complex (i.e., the rapture, second coming, general resurrection, and general judgment all occur on the same day—the day of the Lord). It is our hope and prayer that professing Christians would cast off this escapist fantasy and return to the task of personal sanctification and godly dominion.

(Excerpt) Read more at reformedonline.com ...


TOPICS: Theology
KEYWORDS: eschatology; leftbehind; pretrib; rapture; tribulation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 581-594 next last
To: Zechariah11
Tell you what, you take an honest crack at #462 and then we can dialog.
481 posted on 04/08/2007 5:27:20 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Lee N. Field

I have withdrawn from this thread, Lee and shall have no further comments.


482 posted on 04/08/2007 5:28:39 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?
The John 6:66 refers to the Gospel of John read it from about 6:60 to 6:66. Is it not rather coincidental that the verse is 666 and the book was written prior to Revelations where the number of the man is 666.

I'm not even going to look it up. You do know, don't you, that the chapter and verse divisions were added later, and are not part of the original inspired text?

483 posted on 04/08/2007 5:30:20 PM PDT by Lee N. Field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
Going on your own today, topcat? Not using your ping list? Not waking the esteemed "Dr.?" (rofl) Dollars to donuts she/he will show up in moments whether we ping or not.

So Christ's feet are figuratively on the Mount of Olives? Does that include the other figurative rest of his body? Did his figurative elbows wake those "giggling oaks of Bashan" that Enosh mentioned?

484 posted on 04/08/2007 5:35:05 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11
You chiliasts are just a barrel of laughs.

The carnal-minded Jews of Jesus' day had much the same attitude -- looking for carnal throne in a carnal city and a carnal king -- and they missed the blessings of the kingdom.

485 posted on 04/08/2007 5:42:29 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?
The John 6:66 refers to the Gospel of John read it from about 6:60 to 6:66. Is it not rather coincidental that the verse is 666 and the book was written prior to Revelations where the number of the man is 666.

John, STAY in character!!!

Remember, you are not one of those "wacked-out" "dispys." You earned your way on to the ping list for being a sober TULIP guy. Now, you are tossing out this contrived gibberish that makes us think you've had a personality split.

486 posted on 04/08/2007 5:45:51 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11
So what was your point? Why would you suggest I be or anyone else be some thing they are not?

I know that the numbering of verses came later but here is John 6:60-66 any way.

John 6:60-66
60 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?
61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?
62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?
63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
66 From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

487 posted on 04/08/2007 5:53:12 PM PDT by John 6.66=Mark of the Beast? ("If God is your Father then I am your Brother" Larry Norman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
Topcat -- It's time to do some editing here from this ping list of yours. How can you justify John6.66 staying on after what he has posted today?

Reformed Eschatology Ping List (REPL): ItsOurTimeNow; HarleyD; suzyjaruki; nobdysfool; jkl1122; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Dr. Eckleburg; Lexinom; bluepistolero; TomSmedley; rwfromkansas; Colin MacTavish; civis; Jonathon Edwards; Lee N. Field; Gamecock; TomSmedley; ReformedBeckite; zeeba neighba; Frumanchu; Alex Murphy; Lord_Calvinus; sola gracia; Biblical Calvinist; John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?

488 posted on 04/08/2007 5:55:41 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?

Boy, that is really believable. And you are on topcat’s ping list. Imagine that. How many fakes are there?


489 posted on 04/08/2007 5:59:18 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11

I put anyone on the list who asks. There’s enough truth to go around. Wanna join?


490 posted on 04/08/2007 6:01:51 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: topcat54

Sounds like Bible babble to me.


491 posted on 04/08/2007 6:02:45 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Don't eat Spinich. The spinich growers are against the war and funding our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

“He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”


492 posted on 04/08/2007 6:05:02 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
I put anyone on the list who asks. There’s enough truth to go around. Wanna join?

Let me contrive a new alias.

Mnnnn . . . How about

. . . "Dr. Edinbirgh"? . . . or . . . ."LotsaEducatedFolks"? . . .or "Daniel9=JesusComesTomorrow?"

Whatever my new contrived personality is, I have to stay in character.

493 posted on 04/08/2007 6:09:46 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11; topcat54; Dr. Eckleburg

Zech,

I agree with you on Scriptural issues more than cat or the Doc, but you’re going overboard.

Take it easy.


494 posted on 04/08/2007 6:11:23 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Enosh

Thanks, Enosh. A word from the wise is always welcome. I’m outta here.


495 posted on 04/08/2007 6:14:19 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: topcat54

But topcat, you teach in #457 that the Rapture already occured and the great Tribulation has already taken place. How can we appeal to the Spirit when the Restrainer has been taken away by the end of the Great Tribulation?


496 posted on 04/08/2007 6:14:27 PM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11
Why do you call me a faker?

I asked to be on the endtimes ping list. I am on others list too. I'm on the Israel list does that make me of mid east decent?

I'm on the neener list too and that does make me a neener!!!!!!!!

This is freerepublic at one time it was a conservative site not to say that all here are conservatives.

What is your point? Discuss the topic and not the person. That is the rules I do believe.

Don't like the rules don't post.

497 posted on 04/08/2007 6:14:38 PM PDT by John 6.66=Mark of the Beast? ("If God is your Father then I am your Brother" Larry Norman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
But topcat, you teach in #457 that the Rapture already occured ...

No I don't. Read it again.

BTW, still waiting for a response on #445 and 446.

498 posted on 04/08/2007 6:20:30 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11

You know nothing about me do a search on what I have written and will see that I am anything but a Tulip guy


499 posted on 04/08/2007 6:23:29 PM PDT by John 6.66=Mark of the Beast? ("If God is your Father then I am your Brother" Larry Norman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
Blogger and now, it appears, Zechariah11 have left. Everyone else seems to be just rambling.

Is it over?

500 posted on 04/08/2007 6:24:05 PM PDT by Lee N. Field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 581-594 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson