Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Once Upon a Universe
Catholic Exchange ^ | April 27, 2006 | Br. Shane Johnson, LC

Posted on 04/27/2006 9:20:31 AM PDT by NYer

Roman Catholic priest Fr. Georges Lemaître, working off Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, first proposed the “Big Bang” explanation of the universe’s origin in 1927. It took decades for the theory to win general acceptance. Einstein himself opposed it bitterly for years, in what he would later call “the biggest mistake of my life.”

The theory was finally proved experimentally only in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson. For their pains, they were awarded the Nobel Prize. Fr. Lemaître, on the other hand, never received the public recognition that was his due.

Nevertheless, in the 1970s several apparent problems with the Big Bang theory surfaced. The solution promised by Alan Guth’s 1981 hypothesis that the universe went through a period of extremely rapid expansion within the first second after the Big Bang, called “cosmic inflation,” had never been experimentally proven. It was one of the “great unsolved problems in physics.”

Until March 16th. Physicists working at Johns Hopkins University and Princeton University announced the results of 3 years of work using NASA’s WMAP satellite: inflation is for real, and Fr. Lemaître’s theory has survived another crucial test. At the press conference, according to AP wire reports, the scientists described the universe’s growth “from the size of a marble to a volume larger than all of observable space in less than a trillion-trillionth of a second.”

That begets a big question. Have we finally proven that God created the world with an dramatically instantaneous explosion of “Let there be light?"

Fr. Lemaître didn’t think so, and an anecdote has him taking Pius XII aside to dissuade any such premature judgment. Surprised? Ironically, unlike so many scientists of his time, Fr. Lemaître worked ceaselessly to keep religion and science separate.

Both explore the One Truth in different, complementary realms. Revelation tells us that God created the universe, and science is telling us what the beginning of the universe looked like. Neither has anything to say about the other’s contribution, even though points of contact like the Fiat lux of Genesis and the explosion of the Big Bang are certainly revealing. That was underlined by Pope John Paul II during his General Audience on January 29, 1986, when he said that the text of Genesis doesn’t purport to teach us anything significant from the point of view of the natural sciences; it tells us in fact something that goes beyond the sciences: that God is the cause of all creation.

Big Bucks

That March 16 announcement was big. This is bigger.

March 15 saw the official announcement of this year’s Templeton Prize winner, the widely-respected cosmologist John D. Barrow. The award, established by philanthropist Sir John Templeton, goes annually to a living person for advancement of knowledge in spiritual matters. Past winners have included Mother Teresa, Billy Graham, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Michael Novak, and Benedictine priest Fr. Stanley Jaki.

This is the PowerBall of scientific awards: currently at 795,000 pounds sterling ($1.4 million), the prize value is adjusted so that it always exceeds the value of the Nobel Prizes. For Templeton, it is a way to underscore that “research and advances in spiritual discoveries can be quantifiably more significant than disciplines recognized by the Nobels.”

Barrow has worked hard: to date, he is credited with more than 400 articles in scientific journals and 17 books translated into 27 languages. His most famous book was also his most controversial: 1986’s The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, co-authored with Frank Tipler. “Anthropic” and “cosmological” are big words, but the idea is simple: if we’re here, the universe must be tailor-made somehow to make life possible.

Now what does “tailor-made” mean here? Does it really have a Tailor, or did it just happen that way by chance? Since Barrow and Tipler’s groundbreaking work, scientists and philosophers juggle several versions of the principle that give all sorts of answers. One extreme version even ends by saying “Intelligent information-processing must come into existence in the universe, and once it comes into existence, it will never die out.” In other words, from the very moment of the Big Bang, humanity was destined to evolve.

That’s all very interesting, but how interesting?

Big Questions

Science has a knack for inspiring awe (most high-school chemistry classes excepted). We look up at a starry sky amazed by the immensity of it all, and then we’re told that we can only see a mere fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the stars in our galaxy, and that our galaxy is one of billions of billions. Wow.

Here’s a real wow: recent work keeps on showing that the values of fundamental “constants” in the universe — basic numbers that define the universe’s structure, that could conceivably be different than they are — seem to reflect some kind of “fine tuning.”

For example, the nuclear strong force and nuclear weak force govern the behavior of particles at a subatomic level. In other words, they’re unthinkably tiny.

Make the strong force 2% weaker, and atomic nuclei don’t hold together — you have a universe made only of hydrogen. Make the strong force 1% stronger, and you have a universe with hardly any hydrogen and therefore virtually no stars. Or try playing with the weak force: slightly smaller, and stars can’t develop for lack of helium; slightly larger, and too much helium means that stars over-produce heavy elements. In all of these cases, life can’t develop.

Or take the proton: it has a mass 1836 times greater than that of an electron. Big deal? Try varying that just slightly, and atoms and molecules, the basic building blocks of matter, most likely can’t exist.

Or again, try varying the ratio between photons and baryons: it stands at a billion to one. Just slightly larger or smaller, and no galaxies and no stars can form. No stars, no planets, no life. And that’s just for starters. It’s like Goldilocks and the Three Bears writ large: there are dozens more variables that seem “just right.”

So was there a Designer behind all of that? Or was it just random chance? Believe it or not, scientists and philosophers are still going round and round about all this. One counterproposal has the universe blowing itself up in Big Bangs so many times that once in a very long while a universe like ours was bound to turn up. Another idea has it that there is some kind of general law setting all these basic numbers that hasn’t been discovered yet, or that all these “coincidences” can somehow be explained if infinite parallel universes exist.

For a believer, however, John Barrow’s work simply reinforces our faith, making us stop and wonder all over again at the infinite providence of our Creator. We really have “hit the jackpot”: the universe seems just right for us because God has loved us so.

O come, let us sing to the Lord…
O come, let us worship and bow down,
let us kneel before the Lord, our Maker!
For He is our God,
and we are the people of His pasture
and the sheep of His hand. (Ps 95: 1,6-7)
As Barrow put it in his acceptance lecture, Sir John Templeton believes firmly that “religion and science can provide mutual illumination and appreciation of the wonders of our universe and inspire us to seek out and comprehend the truth in new ways — a truth that is unfailingly unexpected and so often not at all like it first appears.” Amen to that.


TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; History; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: bigbang; cosmos; einstein; templeton; universe
Br. Shane Johnson, of the Legionaries of Christ, studies for the priesthood at Rome’s Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University. He is simultaneously pursuing graduate-level degrees in religion and science and in philosophy of mind. He can be reached at authors@arcol.org.
1 posted on 04/27/2006 9:20:33 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...

Fascinating article. Enjoy!


2 posted on 04/27/2006 9:21:08 AM PDT by NYer (Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
As Barrow put it in his acceptance lecture, Sir John Templeton believes firmly that “religion and science can provide mutual illumination and appreciation of the wonders of our universe and inspire us to seek out and comprehend the truth in new ways — a truth that is unfailingly unexpected and so often not at all like it first appears.” Amen to that.

Thank you for that post. Jesus is Truth; where you have truth you have Jesus.

3 posted on 04/27/2006 10:23:43 AM PDT by Nihil Obstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Great article.


4 posted on 04/27/2006 10:27:52 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

bookmark


5 posted on 04/27/2006 2:22:56 PM PDT by Talking_Mouse (Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"The Roman Catholic Church gave more financial aid and social support to the study of astronomy for over six centuries, from the recovery of ancient learning during the late Middle Ages into the Enlightenment, than any other, and, probably, all other, institutions."

-- J.L. Heilbron University of California at Berkley.   

The Catholic Church: Impacting History
How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization

How the (Catholic) Church Built Western Civilization
How Catholicism Created Capitalism  

How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and the Success of the West

It is all very well to point out that important scientists, like Louis Pasteur, have been Catholic. More revealing is how many priests have distinguished themselves in the sciences. It turns out, for instance, that the first person to measure the rate of acceleration of a freely falling body was Fr. Giambattista Riccioli. The man who has been called the father of Egyptology was Fr. Athanasius Kircher (also called "master of a hundred arts" for the breadth of his knowledge). Fr. Roger Boscovich, who has been described as "the greatest genius that Yugoslavia ever produced," has often been called the father of modern atomic theory.

In the sciences it was the Jesuits in particular who distinguished themselves; some 35 craters on the moon, in fact, are named after Jesuit scientists and mathematicians.

By the eighteenth century, the Jesuits

had contributed to the development of pendulum clocks, pantographs, barometers, reflecting telescopes and microscopes, to scientific fields as various as magnetism, optics and electricity. They observed, in some cases before anyone else, the colored bands on Jupiter’s surface, the Andromeda nebula and Saturn’s rings. They theorized about the circulation of the blood (independently of Harvey), the theoretical possibility of flight, the way the moon effected the tides, and the wave-like nature of light. Star maps of the southern hemisphere, symbolic logic, flood-control measures on the Po and Adige rivers, introducing plus and minus signs into Italian mathematics — all were typical Jesuit achievements, and scientists as influential as Fermat, Huygens, Leibniz and Newton were not alone in counting Jesuits among their most prized correspondents [Jonathan Wright, The Jesuits, 2004, p. 189].

Seismology, the study of earthquakes, has been so dominated by Jesuits that it has become known as "the Jesuit science." It was a Jesuit, Fr. J.B. Macelwane, who wrote Introduction to Theoretical Seismology, the first seismology textbook in America, in 1936. To this day, the American Geophysical Union, which Fr. Macelwane once headed, gives an annual medal named after this brilliant priest to a promising young geophysicist. 
  

The Jesuits were also the first to introduce Western science into such far-off places as China and India. In seventeenth-century China in particular, Jesuits introduced a substantial body of scientific knowledge and a vast array of mental tools for understanding the physical universe, including the Euclidean geometry that made planetary motion comprehensible. Jesuits made important contributions to the scientific knowledge and infrastructure of other less developed nations not only in Asia but also in Africa and Central and South America.
 
Beginning in the nineteenth century, these continents saw the opening of Jesuit observatories that studied such fields as astronomy, geomagnetism, meteorology, seismology, and solar physics. Such observatories provided these places with accurate time keeping, weather forecasts (particularly important in the cases of hurricanes and typhoons), earthquake risk assessments, and cartography. In Central and South America the Jesuits worked primarily in meteorology and seismology, essentially laying the foundations of those disciplines there. The scientific development of these countries, ranging from Ecuador to Lebanon to the Philippines, is indebted to Jesuit efforts.

6 posted on 10/19/2009 6:05:23 PM PDT by Coleus (Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson