Posted on 04/27/2006 9:20:31 AM PDT by NYer
Roman Catholic priest Fr. Georges Lemaître, working off Albert Einsteins theory of relativity, first proposed the Big Bang explanation of the universes origin in 1927. It took decades for the theory to win general acceptance. Einstein himself opposed it bitterly for years, in what he would later call the biggest mistake of my life. Big Bucks Big Questions
The theory was finally proved experimentally only in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson. For their pains, they were awarded the Nobel Prize. Fr. Lemaître, on the other hand, never received the public recognition that was his due.
Nevertheless, in the 1970s several apparent problems with the Big Bang theory surfaced. The solution promised by Alan Guths 1981 hypothesis that the universe went through a period of extremely rapid expansion within the first second after the Big Bang, called cosmic inflation, had never been experimentally proven. It was one of the great unsolved problems in physics.
Until March 16th. Physicists working at Johns Hopkins University and Princeton University announced the results of 3 years of work using NASAs WMAP satellite: inflation is for real, and Fr. Lemaîtres theory has survived another crucial test. At the press conference, according to AP wire reports, the scientists described the universes growth from the size of a marble to a volume larger than all of observable space in less than a trillion-trillionth of a second.
That begets a big question. Have we finally proven that God created the world with an dramatically instantaneous explosion of Let there be light?"
Fr. Lemaître didnt think so, and an anecdote has him taking Pius XII aside to dissuade any such premature judgment. Surprised? Ironically, unlike so many scientists of his time, Fr. Lemaître worked ceaselessly to keep religion and science separate.
Both explore the One Truth in different, complementary realms. Revelation tells us that God created the universe, and science is telling us what the beginning of the universe looked like. Neither has anything to say about the others contribution, even though points of contact like the Fiat lux of Genesis and the explosion of the Big Bang are certainly revealing. That was underlined by Pope John Paul II during his General Audience on January 29, 1986, when he said that the text of Genesis doesnt purport to teach us anything significant from the point of view of the natural sciences; it tells us in fact something that goes beyond the sciences: that God is the cause of all creation.
That March 16 announcement was big. This is bigger.
March 15 saw the official announcement of this years Templeton Prize winner, the widely-respected cosmologist John D. Barrow. The award, established by philanthropist Sir John Templeton, goes annually to a living person for advancement of knowledge in spiritual matters. Past winners have included Mother Teresa, Billy Graham, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Michael Novak, and Benedictine priest Fr. Stanley Jaki.
This is the PowerBall of scientific awards: currently at 795,000 pounds sterling ($1.4 million), the prize value is adjusted so that it always exceeds the value of the Nobel Prizes. For Templeton, it is a way to underscore that research and advances in spiritual discoveries can be quantifiably more significant than disciplines recognized by the Nobels.
Barrow has worked hard: to date, he is credited with more than 400 articles in scientific journals and 17 books translated into 27 languages. His most famous book was also his most controversial: 1986s The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, co-authored with Frank Tipler. Anthropic and cosmological are big words, but the idea is simple: if were here, the universe must be tailor-made somehow to make life possible.
Now what does tailor-made mean here? Does it really have a Tailor, or did it just happen that way by chance? Since Barrow and Tiplers groundbreaking work, scientists and philosophers juggle several versions of the principle that give all sorts of answers. One extreme version even ends by saying Intelligent information-processing must come into existence in the universe, and once it comes into existence, it will never die out. In other words, from the very moment of the Big Bang, humanity was destined to evolve.
Thats all very interesting, but how interesting?
Science has a knack for inspiring awe (most high-school chemistry classes excepted). We look up at a starry sky amazed by the immensity of it all, and then were told that we can only see a mere fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the stars in our galaxy, and that our galaxy is one of billions of billions. Wow.
Heres a real wow: recent work keeps on showing that the values of fundamental constants in the universe basic numbers that define the universes structure, that could conceivably be different than they are seem to reflect some kind of fine tuning.
For example, the nuclear strong force and nuclear weak force govern the behavior of particles at a subatomic level. In other words, theyre unthinkably tiny.
Make the strong force 2% weaker, and atomic nuclei dont hold together you have a universe made only of hydrogen. Make the strong force 1% stronger, and you have a universe with hardly any hydrogen and therefore virtually no stars. Or try playing with the weak force: slightly smaller, and stars cant develop for lack of helium; slightly larger, and too much helium means that stars over-produce heavy elements. In all of these cases, life cant develop.
Or take the proton: it has a mass 1836 times greater than that of an electron. Big deal? Try varying that just slightly, and atoms and molecules, the basic building blocks of matter, most likely cant exist.
Or again, try varying the ratio between photons and baryons: it stands at a billion to one. Just slightly larger or smaller, and no galaxies and no stars can form. No stars, no planets, no life. And thats just for starters. Its like Goldilocks and the Three Bears writ large: there are dozens more variables that seem just right.
So was there a Designer behind all of that? Or was it just random chance? Believe it or not, scientists and philosophers are still going round and round about all this. One counterproposal has the universe blowing itself up in Big Bangs so many times that once in a very long while a universe like ours was bound to turn up. Another idea has it that there is some kind of general law setting all these basic numbers that hasnt been discovered yet, or that all these coincidences can somehow be explained if infinite parallel universes exist.
For a believer, however, John Barrows work simply reinforces our faith, making us stop and wonder all over again at the infinite providence of our Creator. We really have hit the jackpot: the universe seems just right for us because God has loved us so.O come, let us sing to the Lord
As Barrow put it in his acceptance lecture, Sir John Templeton believes firmly that religion and science can provide mutual illumination and appreciation of the wonders of our universe and inspire us to seek out and comprehend the truth in new ways a truth that is unfailingly unexpected and so often not at all like it first appears. Amen to that.
O come, let us worship and bow down,
let us kneel before the Lord, our Maker!
For He is our God,
and we are the people of His pasture
and the sheep of His hand. (Ps 95: 1,6-7)
Fascinating article. Enjoy!
Thank you for that post. Jesus is Truth; where you have truth you have Jesus.
Great article.
bookmark
The Catholic Church: Impacting History
How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization
It is all very well to point out that important scientists, like Louis Pasteur, have been Catholic. More revealing is how many priests have distinguished themselves in the sciences. It turns out, for instance, that the first person to measure the rate of acceleration of a freely falling body was Fr. Giambattista Riccioli. The man who has been called the father of Egyptology was Fr. Athanasius Kircher (also called "master of a hundred arts" for the breadth of his knowledge). Fr. Roger Boscovich, who has been described as "the greatest genius that Yugoslavia ever produced," has often been called the father of modern atomic theory.
In the sciences it was the Jesuits in particular who distinguished themselves; some 35 craters on the moon, in fact, are named after Jesuit scientists and mathematicians.
By the eighteenth century, the Jesuits
had contributed to the development of pendulum clocks, pantographs, barometers, reflecting telescopes and microscopes, to scientific fields as various as magnetism, optics and electricity. They observed, in some cases before anyone else, the colored bands on Jupiters surface, the Andromeda nebula and Saturns rings. They theorized about the circulation of the blood (independently of Harvey), the theoretical possibility of flight, the way the moon effected the tides, and the wave-like nature of light. Star maps of the southern hemisphere, symbolic logic, flood-control measures on the Po and Adige rivers, introducing plus and minus signs into Italian mathematics all were typical Jesuit achievements, and scientists as influential as Fermat, Huygens, Leibniz and Newton were not alone in counting Jesuits among their most prized correspondents [Jonathan Wright, The Jesuits, 2004, p. 189].
Seismology, the study of earthquakes, has been so dominated by Jesuits that it has become known as "the Jesuit science." It was a Jesuit, Fr. J.B. Macelwane, who wrote Introduction to Theoretical Seismology, the first seismology textbook in America, in 1936. To this day, the American Geophysical Union, which Fr. Macelwane once headed, gives an annual medal named after this brilliant priest to a promising young geophysicist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.