Posted on 03/04/2006 7:16:48 PM PST by sionnsar
This is so important. James Carville came with this old canard that Jesus never said anything about homosexuality at a recent symposium at Boston College.
This is not only absurd, it borders on blasphemy.
HA Ping.
Mort Kondrake made a similar remark about a year ago on FOXNEWS "all stars" with Brit Hume. Fred Barnes, supposedly a conservative Episcopalian, made no attempt to counter the statement.
2 Timothy 3:15-17 (King James Version)
King James Version (KJV)
And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
I never understand why people do not also refer to Jesus' comments in Matthew 19.
God created them male and female and for this reason the two shall leave their parents and become one flesh.
This verse explains clearly that the difference in gender has a God ordained purpose upon which marriage is founded.
A selective sola scriptura is the new hermeneutic.
That's cuz their 'Jesus' is apparently the guy with the beanie cap, the Lord of the Social(ist) Gospel.
That famous Biblical scholar, Mr. Carville!
Many a bishop is a liberal Democrat before he is a bishop. They are still under the delusion that they do something to be invited back to the Democratic conventions. They still don't understand they they were dumpred back in 1968 when the party was taken over by McGoverites.
I could not agree more. I have long believed:
The conceit of the Catholic Church is the belief it can make disciples despite widespread ignorance of its own "Constitution."
The conceit of the Protestant Church is the belief it can maintain disciples with no functioning "Judiciary."
"He also didn't say anything about the federal budget reconciliation act..."
LOL!
Mark 10 says a lot more about it without using the word "homosexuality". I can't believe the writer of this article didn't reference Mark 10, unless he considers "wife" a man.
In the gospels of Luke, Jesus says the signs of the times will be like the days of Noah, and of Sodom and Gomorrah. Genesis pretty well documents what those places were like... homosexuality was rampant.
mark
I agree, Jesus lays down firm marriage principles that necessarily exclude the possibility of homosex unions.
At the same time, the reason I did not address them in my article is because the revisionist argument tries to make hay out of the fact that "homosexuality" is not condemned by name.
The point of my article was that in the word "porneia" homosex is mentioned and condemned by name.
We must know that Jesus came to fulfill the prophet and moses law. He did say "...never do it away..." Only Holy Person can throw the stone at sinner but nobody are holy anyway. So, when did Jesus say New Thing or New Law or New watsoever. This people are trying to fool person who never read bible. Poor soul. I am sure Jesus did ask us to fight against our weakness of flesh. GAY or Pro-Gay, Lesbian and other, don't try to be funny or else we will send you to Syariah Law and let them decide to cut which part of your body part!
Make mine the Old Testament.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.