Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: lonestar67

I agree, Jesus lays down firm marriage principles that necessarily exclude the possibility of homosex unions.

At the same time, the reason I did not address them in my article is because the revisionist argument tries to make hay out of the fact that "homosexuality" is not condemned by name.

The point of my article was that in the word "porneia" homosex is mentioned and condemned by name.


18 posted on 03/05/2006 3:38:13 AM PST by MMkennedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MMkennedy

We must know that Jesus came to fulfill the prophet and moses law. He did say "...never do it away..." Only Holy Person can throw the stone at sinner but nobody are holy anyway. So, when did Jesus say New Thing or New Law or New watsoever. This people are trying to fool person who never read bible. Poor soul. I am sure Jesus did ask us to fight against our weakness of flesh. GAY or Pro-Gay, Lesbian and other, don't try to be funny or else we will send you to Syariah Law and let them decide to cut which part of your body part!


19 posted on 03/05/2006 6:21:34 AM PST by plck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MMkennedy

Of course you are right. It is a matter of no small importance that Jesus was a Jew and that he did NOT preach to the Greeks.


22 posted on 03/05/2006 8:20:51 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson