Posted on 11/19/2005 12:37:40 AM PST by Queen Beruthiel
July, 2005 was a turning point for the Orthodox Christian Church in North America. It was the time when two independent self governing Orthodox Christian Church bodies in North America, the Autocephalous Orthodox Church in America (OCA) and the Self-Ruled Antiochian Orthodox Christain Archdiocese of North America, met with the clergy and lay leaders of the parishes throughout the Americas. In a conciliar manner, hierarchy, clergy and laity reasoned together to make decisions for the good order of their respective bodies, so they could move forward to face the challenges of the 21st century. The OCA meeting took place in Toronto, Canada July 17-22, 2005 and the Antiochian meeting took place in Dearborn, Michigan July 24-31, 2005.
Both groups realize that they are at a crossroads and that bold thinking and actions are needed to meet the needs of the People of God. The theme of the OCA meeting was Our Church and the Future and the theme of the Antiochian meeting was Do not be conformed to this world but be transformed by the renewal of your mind. (Romans 12:2) These two themes interrelate as Father Thomas Hopko, Dean Emeritus of St. Vladimirs Theological Seminary, pointed out. We are transformed by trusting in God and through God all things are possible. If we are conformed to the world and seek prosperity, possessions, position, popularity and prestige for the Church we will have no future. All Orthodox jurisdictions must die in Christ so that they can be resurrected in Unity and the Church can witness to Christ and make disciples of the people who live in the Americas. This is the mission of the Church and it can be best accomplished in Unity.
Although both meetings were held separately there were common elements and themes that both assemblies must address in order to move ahead to meet the spiritual needs of the faithful. One priority was Orthodox Christian Unity in North America and another was Evangelization. His Beatitude Herman, Archbishop of New York and Washington and Metropolitan of All America and Canada, addressed the topic of Unity in an eloquent and direct address to all delegates, observers and visitors in his banquet remarks. Metropolitan Philip, Primate of the Antiochian Archdiocese, devoted his keynote address to the topic of unity. Both leaders see Unity as necessary and part of the good order of the Church in the Americas. OCL will post the text of both speeches on its web site www.ocl.org when they are made available.
The faithful clergy and laity of both assemblies are ready to work together in Unity to do the work of the Church which is to keep the faith as it has been handed to us at this time and place by the apostles and church fathers and to share the faith with all those who seek to become Orthodox Christians. The clergy and laity of both bodies share this commitment to Orthodox administrative Unity. They are willing to give up what needs to be given up to accomplish this task. The delegates to the Antiochian Archdiocese meeting voted a strong resolution directed at SCOBA to move ahead to make Unity a reality. The full text is printed for your consideration.
A highlight of the OCA meeting was the panel discussion on Orthodox Relations which featured a video presentation by His Grace Bishop Basil of Wichita of the Antiochian Archdiocese. He called for the re-establishment of a bilateral commission between the OCA and the Antiochian Archdiocese on topics of mutual concern. He received an extended standing ovation. People applauded this concrete proposal.
Other concrete options that the clergy and laity suggested in informal gatherings related to Unity included:
Asking the two primates Metropolitans Herman and Philip to appoint two bishops from their archdioceses to meet together to discuss how the two archdioceses can work together to address mutual concerns.
Setting up a meeting between Metropolitan Philip and Metropolitan Herman so that they can sit down together and talk directly about their mutual interest in jurisdictional Unity as part of the good order of the church. Father Leonid Kishkovsky stressed the importance of direct contact Metropolitan to Metropolitan in External Affairs and many saw the wisdom of these interactions and wondered why there is such little eye to eye contact between the hierarchies in the Americas. A meeting with Metropolitan Herman and Metropolitan Philip would be a very meaningful concrete first step to jump start the movement toward administrative Unity.
Establishing a new organization of all the canonical heads of jurisdictions to replace SCOBA. Those left out of the SCOBA meetings would be able to participate.
There is a consensus among the faithful People of God in both jurisdictions that the OCA and Antiochians share enough mutual interests that they should move ahead. They cannot wait for all jurisdictions to join together at the same time. Some jurisdictions are not ready. Move ahead with those who are ready and in time the others will follow because they will have no choice. Most of the faithful believe that the OCA must take the leadership role in moving ahead on Unity because they are the local Church in the Americas by the fact of their Autocephaly.
The second common element of both meetings is the commitment of both assemblies to Evangelization. For hundreds of years Orthodox Christians couldnt even talk about their faith for fear of having their tongues cut out or face other reprisals. The Church and its people were in captivity in Moslem or Communist lands. But today in America they are free to speak and write about the ancient apostolic Orthodox Christian faith. In America people are looking for the ancient faith and they are finding and choosing to become Orthodox Christians. They are flocking to both of these bodies through their well developed programs in Evangelization. So much more could be accomplished if they did this work of the Great Commission together! Here is the perfect bilateral program to further develop.
Two other highlights that I observed worth noting are that the Council Study Papers sent to the delegates and observers of the OCA meeting were excellent and applicable to all Orthodox jurisdictions not only the OCA. The lectures and panel discussions and the process involving all the participants to solicit their input on each priority were well organized and involved everyone. All the steps were designed to get input and create the vision for the OCA for the next ten years.
The outstanding Antiochian Camp and Youth and Young Adult Programs were presented by gifted and spirited young people. As faithful stewards we must guide our youth so that they can pass down Orthodoxy to the next generation. As a United Orthodox Christian Church in North America all our youth could have opportunities to participate in the excellent programs. There would be no jurisdictional barriers. The youth are ahead of us and inter-Orthodox programs such as OCMC, IOCC and OCF have broken down jurisdictional barriers. Both conventions were well attended by youth and they participated in all aspects of the meetings.
The holy services of daily Divine Liturgies and Vespers were holy occasions for the participants to reflect upon the work that they were doing each day. The Holy Spirit was truly guiding these two proceedings involving collectively over 3500 Church leaders. The people of God are ready to work toward building a United Orthodox Christian Church in North America. We call on the hierarchy to lead!
*** Observations submitted by George Matsoukas, Executive Director of Orthodox Christian Laity, an independent movement of Church Faithful dedicated to the formation of a United and Self Governed Orthodox Church in North America.
Ping for later reading.
When you go, perhaps you would take a small donation and some pics to the baby house number 1 for me?
Got an 11 year old daughter who was living there at age 3 before we brought her home.
Gamarjoba.
"This raises some interesting questions about church politics. "
Does the word "Byzantine" resonate any with you?
"But being Catholic, and having enough church politics of our own to deal with; I will let you all bicker about this rather silly point."
Nobody bickers about this anymore, haven't for years and years because, as you say, its silly. The "political question" facing Orthodoxy in America is the creation of an autocephallous American Church out of the various jurisdictions represented here. I think its a safe bet that a majority of the Orthodox who care about the issue are against it, at least right now.
Thanks Kosta for the insights. There is something a dichotomy, as I'm sure you're aware, between the practices of the eastern Catholic churches and the western. We still do fast in the eastern churches and for reasons that pretty much mirror the reasons why the Orthodox churches do so. My own church is in the Phillipian fast right now.
What you say is basically correct. I don't think there's much understanding in the western church as to why we fast. What people don't understand, they don't practice.
Thanks for the book link. I'm compiling my "wish list!"
So tell us how you came to this decision. Spill everything,
don't hold back. :-)
Catholics (and by that generalization I always mean Latin Catholics because the Eastern rite members of the RCC are but 2% of the Catholics world-wide) understand the concept (and the need) for self-denial. That is clearly proclaimed by Thomas Merton, as a shining example of a Catholic whose theology and spirituality expresses the same apophatic knowledge on which Orthodoxy is founded.
But where (Latin) Catholics differ from the Orthodox, and ultimately from their Eastern-rite brethren, is in the phronema or mindset where love is spoken of but often eclipsed by obedience and legalisms. Fasting, to most Catholics I spoke to, was a duty and an obligation.
Eastern-rite Catholics are Catholics, let's be honest if not blunt about it, because they recgonize the Pope not only as the Patriarch of the West, and a first among other Patriarchs in honor, but of the entire Church -- a visible head of the whole Church to whom all bishops and patriarchs are subjects. Take that monarchichal factor out of their equation and they cease to be Catholic. Once that was agreed upon, the theology gave way to Latin innovations, but the key element is the recognition of papal supremacy. Eastern-rite rites and phronema remained just what they used to be -- Orthodox, and that would include fasting as well.
From what I read online about ROCOR (they don't bother with an official overview on their web site) they re-baptise Catholics, but not other Orthodox in most cases.
The day I was baptised into the Orthodox church I saw a Catholic woman converting to the Orthodox church (OCA) and she was chrisimated but not baptised. Further she had to renounce the sins of the bishop of Rome.
Seems you could be Chrisimated in an Antiochian, OCA, or GOA church and then go to a ROCOR church. There is some inconsistency however with regard to practices at ROCOR parishes from what I've heard.
I'm against creating one American Orthodox church. (Even if they did manage it, it'd result in a slew of schismatic churches anyway).
Gamarjoba to you too!
Are we still going?
Interesting verbage from OrthodoxWiki (not real sure the authority of the content there): http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Fourth_Ecumenical_Council
"Regarding the second misunderstanding, the Orthodox do not accept the doctrine of Papal authority as established in 1870 by the Vatican Council and taught in the Roman Catholic Church today. But neither do they deny Rome its place of primacy, as she is first among honor as set up by the second Council. It was Rome, after all, who stayed most true to the faith during many of the heresies over the centuries. Where the Orthodox see Rome going wrong is when they turned this place of 'primacy' in love (as St. Ignatius called it) into a place of supremacy of external jurisdiction and power. And so the primacy assigned to Rome does not overthrow the essential quality of all bishops. The Pope may be the 'first Bishop in the Church,' but he is first among equals."
That is absolutely correct. The Orthodox Church recognizes that (Old) Rome carries the primacy of the elder brother, but no jurisdictional authority over the entire Church. It is, indeed the first-in-love concept.
The Undivided Church recognized the Bishop of [Old] Rome (aka the Pope of Rome) as the first in honor and privilege, followed by second in honor and equal priviledge the Bishop of Constantinople [New Rome]. This recognition is not optional -- it obligatory because it was proclaimed by an Ecumenical Council (as well as by an Imperial Decree at another time).
This privileged status among Patriarchs belong to these two because of Rome and Constantinople became impirial capitals respectively, and for no other reason. The Unidivided Church never proclaimed (through an Ecumenical Council) that the Bishop of Old Rome was in any way scripturally entitled to greater jurisdictional authority over other Patriarchs; he was jurisdictionally supreme only in the western Patriarchate.
The real schism between the East and the West occurred at Vatican I, when the Pope of Rome proclaimed himself inerrant (ex cathedra) as a dogma unknown to the Undivided Church. This Latin innovation did more to assure no reconcilliation was possible than any other issue. The Latin Church, of course, taught imperial papacy, and the "Viccar of Christ" model ever since the Great Schism, but it was never a matter of dogma unil 1870.
Quite a good summary.
Do you know if anything ever happened post-schism regarding the status of the Russian church? I've heard it reffered to as the third rome, but can't find much on it.
George
What the majority of Orthodox are against isn't necessarily a united Orthodoxy Church in America, it is autocephally. And you are absolutely right that the multiple hierarchs of different jurisdictions running around this country is uncanonical. I don't think anyone would argue that one!
The "smallest" Patriarch is at the same time the leading Patriarch. The Ecumenical Patriarch has a parish of s couple of thousand Greeks, but he is first among equals in Orthodoxy (only because we cannot commune with the Pope of Old Rome). Of course, he also has all of American Greek Orthodox under his wing, etc. but still, the Moscow Patriarchate has the vast majority of Orthodox Chirstians unde rits fold. A loving balance must exist, giving deferrence to the EP, while making sure the MP is heard, and heard well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.