Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican Defrocks Seven Priests In Philadelphia Area
NBC 10 ^ | June 24, 2005

Posted on 06/24/2005 6:28:59 AM PDT by NYer

PHILADELPHIA -- Seven more priests removed from their duties by the Philadelphia Archdiocese in recent years for allegedly abusing minors have been defrocked by the Vatican, the archdiocese announced Thursday.

Among them, the priests had served in about 35 parishes and five Catholic high schools across the Philadelphia region over the past four decades.

The seven had been removed from their ministerial duties in the archdiocese years ago.

The Vatican's decision to laicize, or permanently remove them, is the most serious action the Roman Catholic Church can take against a priest. They are barred from ever administering sacraments or serving as priests in any capacity.

Donna M. Farrell, a spokeswoman for the archdiocese, declined to give a total number of area priests removed from their duties for sexually abusing minors, but the archdiocese covering the city and suburbs previously has said 47 priests, living or dead, had been removed as a result of such allegations in the last half-century.

Thursday's announcement brought to nine the number in the archdiocese who have been defrocked as a result of the scandal.

The announcement Thursday in the archdiocesan newspaper, the Catholic Standard and Times, provided no details of the alleged abuse, saying only that the priests were defrocked for "misconduct involving minors."

Justin Cardinal Rigali declined to comment, though Farrell said he "does offer deep apologies to the victims of sexual abuse."

The dismissals followed similar announcements recently in other cities. The Diocese of Rockville Centre, N.Y., said in January that eight of its priests had been defrocked, and the Archdiocese of Boston, where the child abuse scandal burst into public view in 2002, said June 9 that six of its priests had been defrocked.

Bill Ryan, a spokesman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said Thursday that a Vatican office, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, was handling a "backlog" of cases involving church requests to defrock American priests. He said he didn't know how many had been removed from the priesthood or how many cases were pending.


TOPICS: Activism; Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Moral Issues; Worship
KEYWORDS: abusivepriests; defrocked; dismissal; priests

1 posted on 06/24/2005 6:28:59 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 06/24/2005 6:30:06 AM PDT by NYer ("Each person is meant to exist. Each person is God's own idea." - Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Vatican is getting busy, no?


3 posted on 06/24/2005 6:30:30 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Yeah no joke. Good to see some action by the Vatican. I do like Pope Benedict XVI. Back when he was Ratzinger, he had my total support for pope. So far so good!


4 posted on 06/24/2005 6:32:47 AM PDT by Zeppelin (Keep on FReepin' on.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

All should be defrocked, and sooner rather than later. They cannot hide in the Church any more. Since 1962 these pedophiles have infiltrated the Catholic Church and other Houses of Worship. They are against the laws of God and MUST be removed.


5 posted on 06/24/2005 6:33:32 AM PDT by 26lemoncharlie ('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

New and improved with B16!


6 posted on 06/24/2005 6:35:33 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Not pedophiles. Gay, which is to say sexual libertines.


7 posted on 06/24/2005 6:50:38 AM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer
They are barred from ever administering sacraments or serving as priests in any capacity.

I think this is incorrect -- in an end-of-life emergency, they could still hear your confession.

8 posted on 06/24/2005 7:04:20 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
Since 1962 these pedophiles have infiltrated the Catholic Church and other Houses of Worship.

There were pedophiles in the Church long before 1962.

9 posted on 06/24/2005 7:05:18 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Regardless, we're getting a much-needed cleansing! God be praised!


10 posted on 06/24/2005 7:40:02 AM PDT by Romish_Papist (The times are out of step with the Catholic Church. God Bless Pope Benedict XVI.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Not pedophiles. Gay, which is to say sexual libertines.

If you read the article, you will see some of these guys were preying on children in the age range of 10-11. That is pedophilia. Also, some of them were preying only on girls.

11 posted on 06/24/2005 7:44:57 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"Seven more priests removed from their duties . . . for allegedly abusing minors have been defrocked by the Vatican"

Haulin' out the trash ping!

12 posted on 06/24/2005 8:06:28 AM PDT by Don Carlos (Me cache en los Moros. (Ancient Spanish curse))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker

I imagine there are lots of backlogs resulting from having had an ailing pope.


13 posted on 06/24/2005 8:07:14 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

That would be "homosexuals who like younger stuff."


14 posted on 06/24/2005 8:34:57 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Donna M. Farrell, a spokeswoman for the archdiocese, declined to give a total number of area priests removed from their duties for sexually abusing minors, but the archdiocese covering the city and suburbs previously has said 47 priests, living or dead, had been removed as a result of such allegations in the last half-century.

This number, 47 over 50 years, is peanuts when compared to some of the other archdiocese like Boston, NY, and LA. We can thank Cardinals Krol & Bevilacqua for keeping the homolesters out of the seminaries (for the most part) during the peak years of the abuse crisis.

God bless Cardinal Bevilacqua. Multi anni!

Cardinal Krol, pray for us.
15 posted on 06/24/2005 9:14:16 AM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; NYer
The Vatican is getting busy, no?

This situation was my only real gripe with JPII (and I think was the biggest "black mark" on his Pontificate in the eyes of non-Catholics). I am delighted that Benedict is moving quickly to deal with these monsters.

16 posted on 06/24/2005 10:48:43 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C2ShiningC

Ping


17 posted on 06/24/2005 12:31:28 PM PDT by GipperGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I believe Benedict XVI will make the Changes necessary to implement the original intentions of Vatican II. He is certainly moving his men like chess pieces to implement that policy.

I believe the reported incedents prior to 1962 were very few, as that behavior was not tolerated one iota in that society. If it existed within the priesthood at all.

Today, the permissiveness has run rampent and needs to be purged as is being done now.

Why would it be necessary for a Priest to wear an earing in his left ear? (Left is right and right is wrong).


18 posted on 06/24/2005 2:01:04 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie ('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
I believe the reported incedents prior to 1962 were very few, as that behavior was not tolerated one iota in that society.

*Such was the problem with homosexuality back in the day in Florence that Florenzer was German slang for a homosexual.

If it existed within the priesthood at all.

*Google Saint Peter Damien + Gomorrah

Nothing new under the sun

19 posted on 06/24/2005 3:46:09 PM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson