Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEAST OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY, AUGUST 22ND
Roman Catholic Church | August 22, 1941 | Pope Pius XII

Posted on 08/21/2004 6:32:54 PM PDT by Viva Christo Rey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Pyro7480

I have no idea. I'm not into apparitions.


41 posted on 08/21/2004 8:33:51 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if you can't wear a tiara"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pascendi

We pray for you


42 posted on 08/21/2004 8:34:23 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Check out the conversion stories posted by the "reformed." You almost used their words verbatim.


43 posted on 08/21/2004 8:36:05 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Grey Ghost II
You were just claiming that the Pope had done the Consecration that Mary requested and now you're telling me to ignore her?

He did. Maybe it's time for Mary to uphold her end of the bargain.

Or, just pray and work for peace yourself.

Maybe we could both work on bringing a bit of harmony to FR.

I'll start by bowing out of this tit-for-tat.

44 posted on 08/21/2004 8:36:40 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if you can't wear a tiara"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
That is a low blow. Confession for you!

I will stroll right on down to the nearest Reconciliation Room. The only problem is that I need a sworn affidavit, signed by witnesses, stating that I actually sinned before the priest will absolve me.

45 posted on 08/21/2004 8:37:00 PM PDT by Grey Ghost II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pascendi
The average Russian woman has 4 abortions per lifetime, from what I hear.

That doesn't count; ask Cardinal McCarrick, John Kerry's personal defender.

It's at the discretion of the local apostate bishop whether or not infanticide is murder or a mortal sin.

46 posted on 08/21/2004 8:37:07 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I have no idea what you're talking about.


47 posted on 08/21/2004 8:37:20 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if you can't wear a tiara"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Maybe we could both work on bringing a bit of harmony to FR.

Peace brother!

48 posted on 08/21/2004 8:38:26 PM PDT by Grey Ghost II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Grey Ghost II

I thought he did, twice.


49 posted on 08/21/2004 8:38:58 PM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grey Ghost II

And we wonder where the non-Catholics get their ideas...........


50 posted on 08/21/2004 8:40:05 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Grey Ghost II
That is a low blow. Confession for you!

The Net Nanny strikes again. I'm surprised she didn't ping the Moderator.

51 posted on 08/21/2004 8:47:58 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480; sinkspur; Grey Ghost II
Check out the conversion stories posted by the "reformed." You almost used their words verbatim.

He's right, though. Consider these words of a Doctor of the Church:

Wherefore he that would now enquire of God, or seek any vision or revelation, would not only be acting foolishly, but would be committing an offence against God, by setting his eyes altogether upon Christ, and seeking no new thing or aught beside. And God might answer him after this manner, saying: If I have spoken all things to thee in My Word, Which is My Son, and I have no other word, what answer can I now make to thee, or what can I reveal to thee which is greater than this? Set thine eyes on Him alone, for in Him I have spoken and revealed to thee all things, and in Him thou shalt find yet more than that which thou askest and desirest. For thou askest locutions and revelations, which are the part; but if thou set thine eyes upon Him, thou shalt find the whole; for He is My complete locution and answer, and He is all My vision and all My revelation; so that I have spoken to thee, answered thee, declared to thee and revealed to thee, in giving Him to thee as thy brother, companion and master, as ransom and prize. For since that day when I descended upon Him with My Spirit on Mount Tabor, saying: Hic est filius meus dilectus, in quo mihi bene complacui, ipsum audite [St. Matthew xvii, 5.] (which is to say: This is My beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased; hear ye Him), I have left off all these manners of teaching and answering, and I have entrusted this to Him. Hear Him; for I have no more faith to reveal, neither have I any more things to declare. For, if I spake aforetime, it was to promise Christ; and, if they enquired of Me, their enquiries were directed to petitions for Christ and expectancy concerning Him, in Whom they should find every good thing (as is now set forth in all the teaching of the Evangelists and the Apostles); but now, any who would enquire of Me after that manner, and desire Me to speak to him or reveal aught to him, would in a sense be asking Me for Christ again, and asking Me for more faith, and be lacking in faith, which has already been given in Christ; and therefore he would be committing a great offence against My beloved Son, for not only would he be lacking in faith, but he would be obliging Him again first of all to become incarnate and pass through life and death. Thou shalt find naught to ask Me, or to desire of Me, whether revelations or visions; consider this well, for thou shalt find that all has been done for thee and all has been given to thee -- yea, and much more also -- in Him. (St. John of the Cross, Ascent of Mt. Carmel, II, 22)

52 posted on 08/21/2004 9:00:57 PM PDT by gbcdoj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
"We pray for you"

1. I can't be sure of that.

2. You're not supposed to tell everyone

3. Prayer intentions aren't meant to be used as comebacks

4. It's working. I'm getting more traditional.
53 posted on 08/21/2004 9:02:46 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gbcdoj; Hermann the Cherusker
You are a goldmine of substantiation.

You and Hermann could provide a rolling Church history, replete with documentation.

That's why I love this place.

54 posted on 08/21/2004 9:08:15 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if you can't wear a tiara"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gbcdoj; sinkspur
Doesn't work, gbcdoj. It's clearly speaking of desiring visions and so forth.

A past event approved by the Church does not equate to the desiring of visions and apparitions.

Nice try, though. Heck, why didn't you just use True Devotion to Mary by St. Louis DeMonfort? He says the same thing: don't desire apparitions and visions and the like.

Every traditional Catholic knows this. Your supposed expose is mere a platitude from their perspective.
55 posted on 08/21/2004 9:14:31 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Talking_Mouse; pascendi; ELS; Viva Christo Rey; Canticle_of_Deborah

How about a letter from Sr. Lucia saying it was done?

OK - so we refuse to ignore the evidence that the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary was never done according to our Lady's requests.

We refuse to acknowledge the words of JPII, which say it was not done by him.

And we want a statement from a 96 year old cloistered nun, who has been ordered to be silent by vatican officals regarding Fatima, since the 60s.

You realize of course that the words and writngs of the present Pope have been horribly twisted by everybody in his church from his Curial officials in the Vatican, to local Bishops & priests. And he is the Pope, with authority to speak freely.

Exactly what would lead you to believe that such a statement would not be concocted, or twisted, given the present climate?

Uh - huh.......and let's not go into that little bit of forgery and fraud purportrated on live tv on 5/13/2000.


56 posted on 08/21/2004 9:15:41 PM PDT by thor76 (Ave Maria Assumpta! Mediatrix of all graces & Co-Redemptrix of Mankind!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pascendi
A past event approved by the Church does not equate to the desiring of visions and apparitions.

Mary's appearances at Fatima were approved by the Church. That's all.

Her words and requests are not part of that official sanction.

57 posted on 08/21/2004 9:18:26 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if you can't wear a tiara"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: thor76
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that Pope John Paul II decided that he wanted get this consecration done tomorrow. What are the odds of getting the bishops to cooperate?

There's only one possible way: order them all to publicly uphold Catholic doctrine and proper liturgical practice, or face excommunication on a 30-day notice.

After 30 days, it would be a snap to get both remaining bishops in left in communion with him to pull it off. lol!
58 posted on 08/21/2004 9:22:14 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Mary's appearances at Fatima were approved by the Church. That's all. Her words and requests are not part of that official sanction."

If it were just Francisco that had them, you might actually have a point. haha!
59 posted on 08/21/2004 9:23:50 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: thor76
You realize of course that the words and writngs of the present Pope have been horribly twisted by everybody in his church from his Curial officials in the Vatican, to local Bishops & priests.

As in, "It is as it was." (regarding Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ)?

They then claim the Pope never said it, but if he did say it, it wasn't meant for public knowledge. Sounds like something Bill or Hillary would spew, e.g, "it depends on what the definition of "is" is."

In the meantime, the Pope remains silent.

60 posted on 08/21/2004 9:26:48 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson